Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
26 "Adhesives"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Articles
Bonding effects of cleaning protocols and time-point of acid etching on dentin impregnated with endodontic sealer
Tatiane Miranda Manzoli, Joissi Ferrari Zaniboni, João Felipe Besegato, Flávia Angélica Guiotti, Andréa Abi Rached Dantas, Milton Carlos Kuga
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(2):e21.   Published online April 6, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e21
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the bonding effects of cleaning protocols on dentin impregnated with endodontic sealer residues using ethanol (E) or xylol (X). The effects of dentin acid etching immediately (I) or 7 days (P) after cleaning were also evaluated. For bonding to dentin, universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal; 3M ESPE) was used. The persistence of sealer residues, hybrid layer formation and microshear bond strength were the performed analysis.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and twenty bovine dentin specimens were allocated into 4 groups (n = 10): G1 (E+I); G2 (X+I); G3 (E+P); and G4 (X+P). The persistence of sealer residues was evaluated by SEM. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images were taken to measure the formed hybrid layer using the Image J program. For microshear bond strength, 4 resin composite cylinders were placed over the dentin after the cleaning protocols. ANOVA followed by Tukey test and Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn test were used for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively (α = 5%).

Results

G2 and G4 groups showed a lower persistence of residues (p < 0.05) and thicker hybrid layer than the other groups (p < 0.05). No bond strength differences among all groups were observed (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Dentin cleaning using xylol, regardless of the time-point of acid etching, provided lower persistence of residues over the surface and thicker hybrid layer. However, the bond strength of the universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse strategy was not influenced by the cleaning protocols or time-point of acid etching.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of the Use of a Mixed Solution of Equal Amounts of Amyl Acetate, Acetone, and Ethanol on the Cleaning of Endodontic Sealer Residues on the Bond Strength of the Fiber Post Cementation System: A Laboratory Investigation
    Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Ana Paula Aparecida Raimundo Alves Freitas, Frederico Guilherme Otto Kokol, Elizangela Maria Pereira de Souza, Adirson Jorge Junior, Cristiane de Melo Alencar, Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade, Milton Carlos Kuga
    The Open Dentistry Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of the application protocol and bonding strategy of the universal adhesive on dentin previously impregnated with bioceramic sealer
    Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa, Jardel Camilo do Carmo Monteiro, Lucas David Galvani, Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade, José Roberto Cury Saad, Milton Carlos Kuga
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2024; 134: 103765.     CrossRef
  • Influência do protocolo de remoção de resíduos de cimentos à base de resina epóxi sobre a interface de adesão com o adesivo universal, utilizado na estratégia condiciona-e-lava
    Paulo Firmino Da Costa Neto, Mariana Bena Gelio, Elisângela Maria Pereira De Souza, Jardel Camilo do Carmo Monteiro, Adirson Jorge Júnior, Thais Piragine Leandrin, José Roberto Cury Saad, Milton Carlos Kuga
    Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo.2023; 15(5): 4802.     CrossRef
  • 297 View
  • 9 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Effects of dentin surface preparations on bonding of self-etching adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure
Chantima Siriporananon, Pisol Senawongse, Vanthana Sattabanasuk, Natchalee Srimaneekarn, Hidehiko Sano, Pipop Saikaew
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(1):e4.   Published online December 28, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e4
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure.

Materials and Methods

Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests.

Results

Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives.

Conclusions

Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The effect of different adhesive strategies and diamond burs on dentin bond strength of universal resin cements
    Chavakorn Atsavathavornset, Pipop Saikaew, Choltacha Harnirattisai, Hidehiko Sano
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Universal adhesive systems in dentistry: A narrative review
    Svetlana N. Razumova, Anzhela S. Brago, Oxana R. Ruda, Zoya A. Guryeva, Elvira V. Adzhieva
    Russian Journal of Dentistry.2024; 28(5): 512.     CrossRef
  • Delayed light activation of resin composite affects the bond strength of adhesives under dynamic simulated pulpal pressure
    Nattaporn Sukprasert, Choltacha Harnirattisai, Pisol Senawongse, Hidehiko Sano, Pipop Saikaew
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2022; 26(11): 6743.     CrossRef
  • 333 View
  • 10 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Adhesive systems applied to dentin substrate under electric current: systematic review
Carolina Menezes Maciel, Tatiane Cristina Vieira Souto, Bárbara de Almeida Pinto, Laís Regiane Silva-Concilio, Kusai Baroudi, Rafael Pino Vitti
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(4):e55.   Published online November 5, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e55
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this systematic review was to collect and discuss the technique of adhesive systems application on dentin substrate under electric current.

Materials and Methods

The first search strategy was based on data available at PubMed, LILACS, Scielo, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, using a combination of descriptors such as “dentin bond agents OR adhesive system AND electric current OR electrobond” or “dentin bonding agents OR dentin bonding agent application OR adhesive system AND electric current OR electrobond”, with no limit regarding the publication year. The second search strategy was based on the articles' references found previously. An additional search strategy was applied that concerned the proposed theme in the SBU-UNICAMP (Unicamp's Library System Institutional Repository).

Results

Twelve studies published between 2006 and 2020 were found. The analyses of the selected studies showed that the use of electric current during adhesive systems application on dentin, whether conventional or self-conditioning, increases resinous monomer infiltration in the dentin substrate, which improves the hybridization processes and the bond strength of the restorative material to dentin.

Conclusions

Despite the favorable results related to the use of this technique, there is still no specific protocol for the application of adhesive systems under electric current.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Iontophoresis effects of two-step self-etch and total-etch systems on dentin permeability and sealing of composite restoration under simulated pulpal pressure
    Orapin Ajcharanukul, Peeraya Santikulluk, Palat Sasingha, Sirithorn Sabpawat, Kanokporn Sukyanan
    BMC Oral Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 227 View
  • 7 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturation
Nelly Pradelle-Plasse, Caroline Mocquot, Katherine Semennikova, Pierre Colon, Brigitte Grosgogeat
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(1):e3.   Published online December 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e3
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the interface between a calcium silicate cement (CSC), Biodentine and dental adhesives in terms of sealing ability.

Materials and Methods

Microleakage test: 160 standardized class II cavities were prepared on 80 extracted human molars. The cavities were filled with Biodentine and then divided into 2 experimental groups according to the time of restoration: composite resin obturation 15 minutes after Biodentine handling (D0); restoration after 7 days (D7). Each group was then divided into 8 subgroups (n = 5) according to the adhesive system used: etch-and-rinse adhesive (Prime & Bond); self-etch adhesive 2 steps (Optibond XTR and Clearfil SE Bond); self-etch adhesive 1 step (Xeno III, G-aenial Bond, and Clearfil Tri-S Bond); and universal used as etch-and-rinse or self-etch (ScotchBond Universal ER or SE). After thermocycling, the teeth were immersed in a silver nitrate solution, stained, longitudinally sectioned, and the Biodentine/adhesive percolation was quantified. Scanning electron microscopic observations: Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were observed.

Results

A tendency towards less microleakage was observed when Biodentine was etched (2.47%) and when restorations were done without delay (D0: 4.31%, D7: 6.78%), but this was not significant. The adhesives containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate monomer showed the most stable results at both times studied. All Biodentine/adhesive interfaces were homogeneous and regular.

Conclusions

The good sealing of the CSC/adhesive interface is not a function of the system adhesive family used or the cement maturation before restoration. Biodentine can be used as a dentine substitute.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of Er Cr YSGG laser etching procedure on the bond strength of different calcium silicate cements
    Yesim Sesen Uslu, Hakan Yasin Gönder, Pinar Sesen, Gizem Gunduz Bektaş
    Lasers in Dental Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Managing Cracked Teeth with Root Extension: A Prospective Preliminary Study Using Biodentine™ Material
    Kênia Maria Soares de Toubes, Isabella Sousa Corrêa, Regina Célia Lopes Valadares, Stephanie Quadros Tonelli, Fábio Fernandes Borém Bruzinga, Frank Ferreira Silveira, Dr Karthikeyan Ramalingam
    International Journal of Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Resistance of Natural Molars vs. Additive-Manufactured Simulators Treated with Pulpotomy and Endocrown
    Marie-Laure Munoz-Sanchez, Alexis Gravier, Olivier Francois, Emmanuel Nicolas, Martine Hennequin, Nicolas Decerle
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2023; 14(9): 444.     CrossRef
  • Characterisation of the calcium silicate‐based cement–composite interface and the bonding strength with total‐etch or single/two‐stage self‐etch adhesive systems
    Abidin Talha Mutluay, Merve Mutluay
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2022; 48(3): 501.     CrossRef
  • Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
    Louis Hardan, Davide Mancino, Rim Bourgi, Alejandra Alvarado-Orozco, Laura Emma Rodríguez-Vilchis, Abigailt Flores-Ledesma, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez, Monika Lukomska-Szymanska, Ammar Eid, Maya-Line Danhache, Maryline Minoux, Youssef Haïkel, Naji Kharo
    Gels.2022; 8(5): 311.     CrossRef
  • 356 View
  • 14 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
The influence of nanofillers on the properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives
Leonardo Bairrada Tavares da Cruz, Marcelo Tavares Oliveira, Cintia Helena Coury Saraceni, Adriano Fonseca Lima
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(3):e28.   Published online July 24, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e28
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different concentrations of nanofillers on the chemical and physical properties of ethanol-solvated and non-solvated dental adhesives.

Materials and Methods

Eight experimental adhesives were prepared with different nanofiller concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 4 wt%) and 2 solvent concentrations (0% and 10% ethanol). Several properties of the experimental adhesives were evaluated, such as water sorption and solubility (n = 5, 20 seconds light activation), real-time degree of conversion (DC; n = 3, 20 and 40 seconds light activation), and stability of cohesive strength at 6 months (CS; n = 20, 20 seconds light activation) using the microtensile test. A light-emitting diode (Bluephase 20i, Ivoclar Vivadent) with an average light emittance of 1,200 mW/cm2 was used.

Results

The presence of solvent reduced the DC after 20 seconds of curing, but increased the final DC, water sorption, and solubility of the adhesives. Storage in water reduced the strength of the adhesives. The addition of 1 wt% and 2 wt% nanofillers increased the polymerization rate of the adhesives.

Conclusions

The presence of nanofillers and ethanol improved the final DC, although the DC of the solvated adhesives at 20 seconds was lower than that of the non-solvated adhesives. The presence of ethanol reduced the strength of the adhesives and increased their water sorption and solubility. However, nanofillers did not affect the water sorption and strength of the tested adhesives.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development of a Boron Nitride-Filled Dental Adhesive System
    Senthilguru Kulanthaivel, Jeremiah Poppen, Sandra Ribeiro Cunha, Benjamin Furman, Kyumin Whang, Erica C. Teixeira
    Polymers.2023; 15(17): 3512.     CrossRef
  • Analyses of Experimental Dental Adhesives Based on Zirconia/Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles
    Abdul Khan, Yasmin Alhamdan, Hala Alibrahim, Khalid Almulhim, Muhammad Nawaz, Syed Ahmed, Khalid Aljuaid, Ijlal Ateeq, Sultan Akhtar, Mohammad Ansari, Intisar Siddiqui
    Polymers.2023; 15(12): 2614.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical characterization and adhesive properties of a dental adhesive modified with a polymer antibiotic conjugate
    Camila Sabatini, Russell J. Aguilar, Ziwen Zhang, Steven Makowka, Abhishek Kumar, Megan M. Jones, Michelle B. Visser, Mark Swihart, Chong Cheng
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2022; 129: 105153.     CrossRef
  • 195 View
  • 3 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Influence of different universal adhesives on the repair performance of hybrid CAD-CAM materials
Gülbike Demirel, İsmail Hakkı Baltacıoğlu
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(3):e23.   Published online May 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e23
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of different universal adhesive systems applied to hybrid computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative materials repaired with a composite resin.

Materials and Methods

Four types of CAD-CAM hybrid block materials—Lava Ultimate (LA), Vita Enamic (VE), CeraSmart (CS), and Shofu Block HC (SH)—were used in this study, in combination with the following four adhesive protocols: 1) control: porcelain primer + total etch adhesive (CO), 2) Single Bond Universal (SB), 3) All Bond Universal (AB), and 4) Clearfil Universal Bond (CU). The μSBS of the composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

The CAD-CAM block type and block-adhesive combination had significant effects on the bond strength values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of groups: VE/CO and VE/AB, CS/CO and CS/AB, VE/CU and CS/CU, and VE/AB and CS/AB (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The μSBS values were affected by hybrid block type. All tested universal adhesive treatments can be used as an alternative to the control treatment for repair, except the AB system on VE blocks (the VE/AB group). The μSBS values showed variation across different adhesive treatments on different hybrid CAD-CAM block types.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of resin-repaired resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramic: A scoping review
    Ana Beatriz de Souza Albergardi, João Pedro Justino de Oliveira Limírio, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
    Journal of Dentistry.2025; 154: 105594.     CrossRef
  • Bond strength to aged CAD/CAM composites and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network using a universal adhesive with or without previous application of a universal primer
    Clemens Lechte, Lisa Sophia Faesser, Jana Biermann, Alexandra Schmidt, Philipp Kanzow, Annette Wiegand
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2025; 140: 104017.     CrossRef
  • Impact of in vitro findings on clinical protocols for the adhesion of CAD-CAM blocks: A systematic integrative review and meta-analysis
    Maria João Calheiros-Lobo, Ricardo Carbas, Lucas F.M. da Silva, Teresa Pinho
    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2024; 131(6): 1051.     CrossRef
  • Repair protocols for indirect monolithic restorations: a literature review
    Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco, Pablo Machado Soares, Marília Pivetta Rippe, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Luiz Felipe Valandro, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Albert J. Feilzer, João Paulo Mendes Tribst
    PeerJ.2024; 12: e16942.     CrossRef
  • Bonding performance of universal adhesives with concomitant use of silanes to CAD/CAM blocks
    Marina AMARAL, Jaqueline Maria Brandão RIZZATO, Victoria Caroline Souza de ALMEIDA, Priscila Christiane Suzy LIPORONI, Rayssa Ferreira ZANATTA
    RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Resistencia a la fractura de una nanocerámica CAD/CAM reparada con dos tratamientos de superficie: estudio in vitro
    Marcelo Geovanny Cascante-Calderón, Kevin Alejandro Reascos Flores, Inés María Villacís-Altamirano, Anggely Maite Bayas Salinas, Jessica Elizabeth Taraguay Galindo
    Universitas Odontologica.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of surface treatments and adhesive protocols on repair bond strength of glass‐matrix and resin‐matrix CAD/CAM ceramics
    Rana Turunç‐Oğuzman, Soner Şişmanoğlu
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(8): 1322.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Anti-COVID-19 Mouthwashes on Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramics Repaired with Resin Composite Using Universal Adhesive: An In Vitro Study
    Wichuda Limsiriwong, Awiruth Klaisiri, Nantawan Krajangta
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2023; 14(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • Effect of ceramic primers with different chemical contents on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics with resin cement after thermal ageing
    Mehmet Uğur, İdris Kavut, Özgür Ozan Tanrıkut, Önder Cengiz
    BMC Oral Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of microstructure of reinforced CAD/CAM hybrid composite resin block on shear bond strength of composite resin
    Sung-Ho Um, Minjeong Shin, Shin-hye Chung, Young-Seok Park, Bum-Soon Lim
    Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2023; 50(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Dentin contamination during repair procedures: A threat to universal adhesives?
    Anne‐Katrin Lührs, Cosima Brachmann, Silke Jacker‐Guhr
    Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2022; 8(3): 771.     CrossRef
  • Influence of mechanical and chemical pre-treatments on the repair of a hybrid ceramic
    Sascha Niklas Jung, Stefan Rüttermann
    Dental Materials.2022; 38(7): 1140.     CrossRef
  • Influence of different repair protocols and artificial aging on bond strength of composite to a CAD/CAM polymer-infiltrated ceramic
    Ece İrem OĞUZ, Gökhan ÇİÇEKCİ
    Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2021; 24(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • REZİN MATRİKS SERAMİKLER-DERLEME
    Elif Melike AKARCA, Dilara ŞAHİN, Ragibe Şenay CANAY
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; : 1.     CrossRef
  • REZİN MATRİKS SERAMİKLER-DERLEME
    Elif Melike AKARCA, Dilara ŞAHİN, Ragibe Şenay CANAY
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Microshear bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials: effect of surface treatment and aging
    Soner Şişmanoğlu, Rana Turunç-Oğuzman
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2020; 34(22): 2484.     CrossRef
  • Influence of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the repair of CAD-CAM composite resins: An in vitro study
    Soner Sismanoglu, Zuhal Yildirim-Bilmez, Aysegul Erten-Taysi, Pınar Ercal
    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2020; 124(2): 238.e1.     CrossRef
  • 237 View
  • 4 Download
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ali A. Elkaffas, Hamdi H. H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(3):e29.   Published online June 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the µTBS of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the µTBS of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the µTBS of Scotchbond Universal adhesive.

Results

Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Multi-mode ‘universal’ adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Proximal-Cervical Undermined Enamel Areas on Marginal Quality and Enamel Integrity of Laboratory and CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays and Partial Crowns
    Roland Frankenberger, Katharina Friedrich, Marie-Christine Dudek, Julia Winter, Norbert Krämer, Matthias J. Roggendorf
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2025; 16(3): 82.     CrossRef
  • Tooth-composite bond failure with a universal and an etch-and-rinse adhesive depending on mode and frequency of application
    Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Mathilde Tittel, Hartmut Schneider, Maximilian Bemmann, Marco Pellino, Tobias Meissner, Florian Fuchs, Christian Hannig, Florian Tetschke, Kyung-Jin Park, Michaela Strumpski, Rainer Haak
    Dental Materials.2024; 40(2): 359.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between Total-etch and Universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial
    Kiran Javed, Nouman Noor, Muhammad Zubair Nasir, Manzoor Ahmed Manzoor
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adhesion and sealing of different universal adhesive systems associated with bulk‐fill resins after using endodontic irrigation solutions: An in vitro study
    Érika Mayumi Omoto, Anderson Catelan, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, Fernanda de Souza e Silva Ramos, Caio César Pavani, André Luiz Fraga Briso, Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2024; 50(2): 309.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the effects of combined application of dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate and MDP on dentin bonding and antimicrobial properties
    Jiadi Shen, Ming Ma, Yun Huang, Haochen Miao, Xin Wei
    Journal of Materials Science.2023; 58(31): 12685.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow-up
    Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Li-Tzu Wang, Markus B. Blatz
    Journal of Prosthodontic Research.2023; 67(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Preceded Tumor Therapeutic Irradiation on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives Applied in Self-Etch Mode to Human Dentin In Vitro
    Sina Broscheit, Dirk Vordermark, Reinhard Gerlach, Christian Ralf Gernhardt
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(13): 7873.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Performance and Marginal Integrity of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in a Randomized 36-Month Study
    Rainer Haak, Gesa Stache, Hartmut Schneider, Matthias Häfer, Gerhard Schmalz, Ellen Schulz-Kornas
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(18): 5776.     CrossRef
  • Universal Adhesives in Clinical Dentistry
    Fusun Ozer, Shilpa Patnaikuni
    Science, Art and Religion.2023; 2(1--2): 6.     CrossRef
  • Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength
    Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Jelena Juloski, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluation
    Joana Vasconcelos e Cruz, António H. S. Delgado, Samuel Félix, José Brito, Luísa Gonçalves, Mário Polido
    Polymers.2022; 14(7): 1462.     CrossRef
  • Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?
    António H. S. Delgado, Hasan Jamal, Anne Young, Paul Ashley
    BMC Oral Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does acid etching prior to applying universal adhesives affect the bond strength of glass fiber post to root dentin?
    Helder Callegaro Velho, Eduardo Trindade Dalence, Pablo Soares Machado, Marília Pivetta Rippe, Jovito Adiel Skupien, Vinícius Felipe Wandscher
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2021; 105: 102795.     CrossRef
  • Does Adhesive Layer Thickness and Tag Length Influence Short/Long-Term Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems? An In-Vitro Study
    Naji Kharouf, Tarek Ashi, Ammar Eid, Levi Maguina, Jihed Zghal, Nairy Sekayan, Rim Bourgi, Louis Hardan, Salvatore Sauro, Youssef Haikel, Davide Mancino
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(6): 2635.     CrossRef
  • Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review
    Maicon Sebold, Carolina Bosso André, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Lorenzo Breschi, Marcelo Giannini
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(18): 1941.     CrossRef
  • Laboratory methods for measuring adhesive bond strength between restoration materials and hard tooth tissues
    I.Ya. Poyurovskaya, A.P. Polikarpova, F.S. Rusanov
    Stomatologiya.2021; 100(5): 88.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Curcumin Suspension and Vitamin C on Dentin Shear Bond Strength and Durability. A Pilot Study
    Dalia A. Abuelenain, Ensanya A. Abou Neel, Tariq S. Abuhaimed, Amal M. Alamri, Hanan S. Ammar, Sahar M. N. Bukhary
    The Open Dentistry Journal.2021; 15(1): 540.     CrossRef
  • Effect of 9.3 μm CO2 and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser vs. Bur Preparations on Marginal Adaptation in Enamel and Dentin of Mixed Class V Cavities Restored With Different Restorative Systems
    Clara Isabel Anton y Otero, Enrico Di Bella, Ivo Krejci, Tissiana Bortolotto
    Frontiers in Dental Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adhesion strategy and curing mode of a universal adhesive influence the bonding of dual-cured core build-up resin composite to dentin
    Ahmed Eid Elsayed, Mohamed Amr Kamel, Farid Sabry El-Askary
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Influence of etching mode and composite resin type on bond strength to dentin using universal adhesive system
    Stefan Dačić, Milan Miljković, Aleksandar Mitić, Goran Radenković, Marija Anđelković‐Apostolović, Milica Jovanović
    Microscopy Research and Technique.2021; 84(6): 1212.     CrossRef
  • Universal adhesives - a new direction in the development of adhesive systems
    A. Tichý, K. Hosaka, J. Tagami
    Česká stomatologie a praktické zubní lékařství.2020; 120(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Over-Etching and Prolonged Application Time of a Universal Adhesive on Dentin Bond Strength
    Phoebe Burrer, Hoang Dang, Matej Par, Thomas Attin, Tobias T. Tauböck
    Polymers.2020; 12(12): 2902.     CrossRef
  • Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance
    Marina Ciccone Giacomini, Polliana Mendes Candia Scaffa, Rafael Simões Gonçalves, Giovanna Speranza Zabeu, Cristina de Mattos Pimenta Vidal, Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho, Heitor Marques Honório, Linda Wang
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 110: 103925.     CrossRef
  • Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance
    Sanket Nagarkar, Nicole Theis‐Mahon, Jorge Perdigão
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.2019; 107(6): 2121.     CrossRef
  • Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations
    Wen Zhou, Shiyu Liu, Xuedong Zhou, Matthias Hannig, Stefan Rupf, Jin Feng, Xian Peng, Lei Cheng
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(3): 723.     CrossRef
  • 456 View
  • 11 Download
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of various bleaching treatments on shear bond strength of different universal adhesives and application modes
Fatma Dilsad Oz, Zeynep Bilge Kutuk
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(2):e20.   Published online April 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e20
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of 2 universal adhesives used in different application modes to bleached enamel.

Materials and Methods

Extracted 160 sound human incisors were used for the study. Teeth were divided into 4 treatment groups: No treatment, 35% hydrogen peroxide, 16% carbamid peroxide, 7.5% carbamid peroxide. After bleaching treatments, groups were divided into subgroups according to the adhesive systems used and application modes (n = 10): 1) Single Bond Universal, etch and rinse mode; 2) Single Bond Universal, self-etch mode; 3) Gluma Universal, etch and rinse mode; 4) Gluma Universal, self-etch mode. After adhesive procedures nanohybrid composite resin cylinders were bonded to the enamel surfaces. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test after thermocycling. Data were analyzed using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc test.

Results

No significant difference were found among bleaching groups (35% hydrogen peroxide, 16% carbamid peroxide, 7.5% carbamid peroxide, and no treatment groups) in the mean SBS values. There was also no difference in SBS values between Single Bond Universal and Gluma Universal at same application modes, whereas self-etch mode showed significantly lower SBS values than etch and rinse mode (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The bonding performance of the universal adhesives was enhanced with the etch and rinse mode application to bleached enamel and non-bleached enamel.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of Time-Elapsed Bleaching on the Surface and Mechanical Properties of Dentin Substrate Using Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Nanohydroxyapatite Gel
    Aftab Khan, Abdulaziz AlKhureif, Manal Almutairi, Abrar Nooh, Saeed Hassan, Yasser Alqahtani
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2024; Volume 19: 10307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of sodium ascorbate on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bleached enamel using universal dental adhesive
    Saeid Sadeghian, Kamyar Fathpour, Mahshid Biglari
    Dental Research Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quantitative Measurements of the Depth of Enamel Demineralization before and after Bleach: An In Vitro Study
    Sara Naim, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Essam Osman, Syed Sarosh Mahdi, Gopi Battineni, Syed Saad B. Qasim, Mariangela Cernera, Hasna Rifai, Nada Jaafar, Elie Maalouf, Carina Mehanna Zogheib, Konstantinos Michalakis
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DİŞ BEYAZLATMA İŞLEMİNİN LİTYUM DİSİLİKAT SERAMİĞİN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ
    Merve YILDIRAK, Rıfat GÖZNELİ
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2020; : 1.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Different Bleaching Protocols, Used with and without Sodium Ascorbate, on Bond Strength between Composite and Enamel
    Maroun Ghaleb, Giovanna Orsini, Angelo Putignano, Sarah Dabbagh, Georges Haber, Louis Hardan
    Materials.2020; 13(12): 2710.     CrossRef
  • Influence of phototherapy on adhesive strength and microleakage of bleached enamel bonded to orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro study
    Erum Khan, Ibrahim Alshahrani, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Abdulaziz Samran, Ali Alqerban, Saad Abdul Rehman
    Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy.2019; 25: 344.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Er: YAG Laser on Microtensile Bond Strength of Bleached Dentin to Composite
    Mohsen Rezaei, Elham Aliasghar, Mohammad Bagher Rezvani, Nasim Chiniforush, Zohreh Moradi
    Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences.2019; 10(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • 224 View
  • 3 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Khaldoan H. Alshaikh, Hamdi H. H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(2):e14.   Published online March 6, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e14
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze previously published studies of the effects of dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents on the bonding of self-etch (SE) adhesives to dentin. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of the above-mentioned surface pretreatment methods on the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search was performed using the following databases: Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect. The online search was performed using the following keywords: ‘dentin’ or ‘hypochlorous acid’ or ‘sodium hypochlorite’ and ‘self-etch adhesive.’ The following categories were excluded during the assessment process: non-English articles, randomized clinical trials, case reports, animal studies, and review articles. The reviewed studies were subjected to meta-analysis to quantify the effect of the application time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) deproteinizing agents on bonding to dentin.

Results

Only 9 laboratory studies fit the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled average microtensile bond strength values to dentin pre-treated with deproteinizing agents (15.71 MPa) was significantly lower than those of the non-treated control group (20.94 MPa).

Conclusions

In light of the currently available scientific evidence, dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents does not enhance the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin. The HOCl deproteinizing agent exhibited minimal adverse effects on bonding to dentin in comparison with NaOCl solutions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluating the remnants of Al 2 O 3 particles on different dentine substrate after sandblasting and various cleaning protocols
    Faeze Hamze, Khotan Aflatoonian, Mahshid Mohammadibassir, Mohammad-Bagher Rezvani
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2025; 39(6): 869.     CrossRef
  • Preservation Strategies for Interfacial Integrity in Restorative Dentistry: A Non-Comprehensive Literature Review
    Carmem S. Pfeifer, Fernanda S. Lucena, Fernanda M. Tsuzuki
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2025; 16(2): 42.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of Er, Cr:YSGG laser and antioxidant pretreatments on bonding quality to caries-induced dentin
    Lamiaa M. Moharam, Haidy N. Salem, Ahmed Abdou, Rasha H. Afifi
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparison of different cleaning approaches for blood contamination after curing universal adhesives on the dentine surface
    Ting Liu, Haifeng Xie, Chen Chen
    Dental Materials.2024; 40(11): 1786.     CrossRef
  • Effect of fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with a conservative endodontic cavity design
    Merve Nezir, Beyza Arslandaş Dinçtürk, Ceyda Sarı, Cemile Kedici Alp, Hanife Altınışık
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of the use of bromelain associated with bioactive glass-ceramic on dentin/adhesive interface
    Rocio Geng Vivanco, Ana Beatriz Silva Sousa, Viviane de de Cássia Oliveira, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Experimental and Chitosan-Infused Adhesive with Dentin Pretreated with Femtosecond Laser, Methylene Blue-Activated Low-Level Laser, and Phosphoric Acid
    Fahad Alkhudhairy
    Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery.2024; 42(10): 634.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Effective Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Etched Dentin after Dentin Pretreatment: An In-vitro Study
    Muhammed Bilal, Shiraz Pasha, Arathi S. Nair
    Journal of the Scientific Society.2024; 51(4): 545.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Different Dentin Deproteinizing Agents on Bond Strength and Microleakage of Universal Adhesive to Dentin
    Fatih Bedir, Gül Yıldız Telatar
    Journal of Advanced Oral Research.2023; 14(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Addition of metal chlorides to a HOCl conditioner can enhance bond strength to smear layer deproteinized dentin
    Kittisak Sanon, Antonin Tichy, Takashi Hatayama, Ornnicha Thanatvarakorn, Taweesak Prasansuttiporn, Takahiro Wada, Yasushi Shimada, Keiichi Hosaka, Masatoshi Nakajima
    Dental Materials.2022; 38(8): 1235.     CrossRef
  • Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting Inlay Restorations: An In Vitro Micro-CT Study
    Linah M. Ashy, Hanadi Marghalani
    Materials.2022; 15(17): 6161.     CrossRef
  • Collagen-depletion strategies in dentin as alternatives to the hybrid layer concept and their effect on bond strength: a systematic review
    António H. S. Delgado, Madalena Belmar Da Costa, Mário Cruz Polido, Ana Mano Azul, Salvatore Sauro
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NaOCl Application after Acid Etching and Retention of Cervical Restorations: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
    M Favetti, T Schroeder, AF Montagner, RR Moraes, T Pereira-Cenci, MS Cenci
    Operative Dentistry.2022; 47(3): 268.     CrossRef
  • Resin infiltrant protects deproteinized dentin against erosive and abrasive wear
    Ana Theresa Queiroz de Albuquerque, Bruna Oliveira Bezerra, Isabelly de Carvalho Leal, Maria Denise Rodrigues de Moraes, Mary Anne S. Melo, Vanara Florêncio Passos
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bis[2-(Methacryloyloxy) Ethyl] Phosphate as a Primer for Enamel and Dentine
    R. Alkattan, G. Koller, S. Banerji, S. Deb
    Journal of Dental Research.2021; 100(10): 1081.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study
    Bruna Sinjari, Manlio Santilli, Gianmaria D’Addazio, Imena Rexhepi, Alessia Gigante, Sergio Caputi, Tonino Traini
    Materials.2020; 13(13): 3026.     CrossRef
  • A novel prime-&-rinse mode using MDP and MMPs inhibitors improves the dentin bond durability of self-etch adhesive
    Jingqiu Xu, Mingxing Li, Wenting Wang, Zhifang Wu, Chaoyang Wang, Xiaoting Jin, Ling Zhang, Wenxiang Jiang, Baiping Fu
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 104: 103698.     CrossRef
  • The effects of deproteinization and primer treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin
    In-Hye Bae, Sung-Ae Son, Jeong-Kil Park
    Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2019; 46(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Papain and Bromelain Enzymes on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial Dentin in Different Adhesive Systems
    Farahnaz Sharafeddin, Mina Safari
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2019; 20(9): 1077.     CrossRef
  • 327 View
  • 4 Download
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of additional etching and ethanol-wet bonding on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives
Joonghee Ahn, Kyoung-Hwa Jung, Sung-Ae Son, Bock Hur, Yong-Hoon Kwon, Jeong-Kil Park
Restor Dent Endod 2015;40(1):68-74.   Published online November 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.1.68
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study examined the effects of additional acid etching on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives with different compositions and pH. The effect of ethanol wetting on etched dentin bond strength of self-etch adhesives was also evaluated.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two human permanent molars were classified into 21 groups according to the adhesive types (Clearfil SE Bond [SE, control]; G-aenial Bond [GB]; Xeno V [XV]; Beauti Bond [BB]; Adper Easy Bond [AE]; Single Bond Universal [SU]; All Bond Universal [AU]), and the dentin conditioning methods. Composite resins were placed on the dentin surfaces, and the teeth were sectioned. The microtensile bond strength was measured, and the failure mode of the fractured specimens was examined. The data were analyzed statistically using two-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test.

Results

In GB, XV and SE (pH ≤ 2), the bond strength was decreased significantly when the dentin was etched (p < 0.05). In BB, AE and SU (pH 2.4 - 2.7), additional etching did not affect the bond strength (p > 0.05). In AU (pH = 3.2), additional etching increased the bond strength significantly (p < 0.05). When adhesives were applied to the acid etched dentin with ethanol-wet bonding, the bond strength was significantly higher than that of the no ethanol-wet bonding groups, and the incidence of cohesive failure was increased.

Conclusions

The effect of additional acid etching on the dentin bond strength was influenced by the pH of one-step self-etch adhesives. Ethanol wetting on etched dentin could create a stronger bonding performance of one-step self-etch adhesives for acid etched dentin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Different Application Modes of a Universal Adhesive System on the Bond Strength of Bulk‐Fill Composite Resin to Enamel and Dentin in Primary Teeth
    Ali Nozari, Maryam Pakniyat Jahromi, Farnaz Haji Abbas Oghli, Zahra Jowkar, Seyed Ahmadreza Hamidi
    Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of a novel pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives with dentin
    Yixiang Pan, Jiajia Xu, Xue Cai, Xiaodong Li, Xiaoyan Wang
    Journal of Dental Sciences.2023; 18(3): 1148.     CrossRef
  • Microfluidic Organ-on-A-chip: A Guide to Biomaterial Choice and Fabrication
    Uyen M. N. Cao, Yuli Zhang, Julie Chen, Darren Sayson, Sangeeth Pillai, Simon D. Tran
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3232.     CrossRef
  • Effect of phytic acid on bond strength and interfacial integrity of universal adhesive to deep dentin
    Ahmed Mostafa Attia, Ahmed Fawzy Abo-Elezz, Rehab Khalil Safy
    Brazilian Dental Journal.2022; 33(5): 116.     CrossRef
  • Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch and Self-Etch Universal Adhesives Containing 10-MDP: A Systematic Review
    I. Hisham Ismail, N.A. Abdul Razak, N.D. Mohd Ramzi, M.Y.P. Mohd Yusof
    The Journal of Dentists.2022; 10: 12.     CrossRef
  • Biomodification of dentin collagen by primers with crosslinking reagents using ethanol wet bonding technique
    Talita Arrais Daniel Mendes, Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal, Marcelo Victor Sidou Lemos, Sérgio Lima Santiago, Juliano Sartori Mendonça
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2022; 119: 103254.     CrossRef
  • Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies
    Julia Fehrenbach, Cristina Pereira Isolan, Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow
    Dental Materials.2021; 37(10): 1463.     CrossRef
  • The effect of additional chlorhexidine and/or ethanol on the bond strength of universal adhesives
    Zeynep Buket Kaynar, Magrur Kazak, Nazmiye Donmez, Evrim Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Effect of Cold Plasma Treatment on the Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin Restorations to Dentin using Different Adhesive Systems and the Effect of Thermocycling
    Sara Valizadeh, Elham Farhadi, Aida Moradi, Sedighe S. Hashemikamangar
    The Open Dentistry Journal.2021; 15(1): 734.     CrossRef
  • Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Louis Hardan, Rim Bourgi, Naji Kharouf, Davide Mancino, Maciej Zarow, Natalia Jakubowicz, Youssef Haikel, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez
    Polymers.2021; 13(5): 814.     CrossRef
  • Effects of simplified ethanol–wet bonding and hydrophobic coating on resin–dentin bonding properties
    Xia Wang, He Li, Liang Chen, Yue Wang, Jianfei Bai, Defei Wang, Hong Liu
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(9): 913.     CrossRef
  • Effect of dentin biomodification techniques on the stability of the bonded interface
    Nida Mehmood, Rajni Nagpal, UdaiPratap Singh, Meenal Agarwal
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(3): 265.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and nanoleakage of the adhesive interface using the ethanol-wet-bonding technique
    Mauricio Yugo Souza, Jéssica Lopes Andrade, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele, Eduardo Bresciani
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2020; 99: 102572.     CrossRef
  • The improvement of biocompatibility of adhesives
    Cigdem Atalayin, Huseyin Tezel, Zeynep Ergucu, Nimet Unlu, Guliz Armagan, Taner Dagci, Timur Kose
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2019; 23(8): 3213.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the micro-tensile bond strengths of four different universal adhesives to caries-affected dentin after ER:YAG laser irradiation
    Nazmiye DÖNMEZ, Ayça Sarıalioğlu GÜNGÖR, Barış KARABULUT, Şeyda Hergüner SİSO
    Dental Materials Journal.2019; 38(2): 218.     CrossRef
  • Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial
    Maurício Yugo de SOUZA, Ana Luiza Barbosa JUREMA, Taciana Marco Ferraz CANEPPELE, Eduardo BRESCIANI
    Brazilian Oral Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of ethanol-wet dentin, adhesive mode of application, and aging on bond strength of universal adhesive
    Mauricio Yugo de SOUZA, Rebeca DI NICOLÓ, Eduardo BRESCIANI
    Brazilian Oral Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of light curing modes and ethanol-wet bonding on dentin bonding properties
    Mu-zi Li, Jin-rui Wang, Hong Liu, Xia Wang, Kang Gan, Xiu-ju Liu, De-li Niu, Xiao-qing Song
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2016; 17(9): 703.     CrossRef
  • Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation on dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive
    A. Rüya Yazici, Emel Karaman, Duygu Tuncer, Gizem Berk, Atilla Ertan
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2016; 30(22): 2477.     CrossRef
  • The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing
    Jayang Kim, Sungok Hong, Yoorina Choi, Sujung Park
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2015; 40(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • 279 View
  • 2 Download
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer
Enamel pretreatment with Er:YAG laser: effects on the microleakage of fissure sealant in fluorosed teeth
Mahtab Memarpour, Nasrin Kianimanesh, Bahareh Shayeghi
Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(3):180-186.   Published online May 22, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.180
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage and penetration of fissure sealant in permanent molar teeth with fluorosis after pretreatment of the occlusal surface.

Materials and Methods

A total of 120 third molars with mild dental fluorosis were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 20). The tooth surfaces were sealed with an unfilled resin fissure sealant (FS) material. The experimental groups included: 1) phosphoric acid etching (AE) + FS (control); 2) AE + One-Step Plus (OS, Bisco) + FS; 3) bur + AE + FS; 4) bur + AE + OS + FS; 5) Er:YAG laser + AE + FS; and 6) Er:YAG laser + AE + OS + FS. After thermocycling, the teeth were immersed in 0.5% fuchsin and sectioned. Proportions of mircoleakage (PM) and unfilled area (PUA) were measured by digital microscope.

Results

Overall, there were significant differences among all groups in the PM (p = 0.00). Group 3 showed the greatest PM, and was significantly different from groups 2 to 6 (p < 0.05). Group 6 showed the lowest PM. Pretreatment with Er:YAG with or without adhesive led to less PM than bur pretreatment. There were no significant differences among groups in PUA.

Conclusions

Conventional acid etching provided a similar degree of occlusal seal in teeth with fluorosis compared to those pretreated with a bur or Er:YAG laser. Pretreatment of pits and fissures with Er:YAG in teeth with fluorosis may be an alternative method before fissure sealant application.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative Evaluation of Penetrative and Adaptive Properties of Unfilled and Filled Resin-Based Sealants When Placed using Conventional acid Etching, Lasing, and Fissurotomy Bur Technique of Enamel Preparation
    Poonam Ramrao Shingare, Vishwas Chaugule, Neha Pankey, Pallavi Kakade
    Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.2022; 13(4): 349.     CrossRef
  • Laser Tooth Preparation for Pit and Fissure Sealing
    Yair Schwimmer, Nurit Beyth, Diana Ram, Eitan Mijiritsky, Esti Davidovich
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(21): 7813.     CrossRef
  • The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yunhan Zhang, Yan Wang, Yandi Chen, Yang Chen, Qiong Zhang, Jing Zou
    BMC Oral Health.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self‐adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth
    Mahtab Memarpour, Fereshteh Shafiei, Faranak Razmjoei, Nasrin Kianimanesh
    Microscopy Research and Technique.2016; 79(4): 334.     CrossRef
  • 207 View
  • 4 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Basic Researchs
Effect of Er:YAG lasing on the dentin bonding strength of two-step adhesives
Byeong-Choon Song, Young-Gon Cho, Myung-Seon Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(5):409-418.   Published online September 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.409
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) and bonding interfaces of two-step total-etching and self-etching adhesive systems to three etch types of dentin either the acid etched, laser etched or laser and acid etched.

Materials and Methods

The occlusal dentinal surfaces of thirty human molars were used. They were divided into six groups: group 1, 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE); group 2, Er:YAG laser (KEY Laser 3, KaVo) + Single Bond 2; group 3, Er:YAG laser + 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2; group 4, Clearfil SE Primer + Bond (Kuraray); group 5, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Bond; group 6, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Primer + Bond. The samples were subjected to µSBS testing 24 hr after bonding. Also scanning microscopic evaluations were made on the resin-dentin interfaces of six specimens.

Results

The µSBS of group 2 was significantly lower than that of groups 1 and 3 in Single Bond 2 (p < 0.05). There were significant differences among the uSBS of groups 4, 5, and 6 in Clearfil SE Bond (p < 0.05). Very short and slender resin tags were observed in groups 2 and 5. Long and slender resin tags and lateral branches of tags were observed in groups 3 and 6.

Conclusions

Treatment of dentin surface using phosphoric acid or self-etching primer improved the adhesion of Er:YAG lased dentin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of Acid or Laser Treatment on Degradation of Dentin Matrix
    Aslihan Usumez, Tugrul Sari, Roda Seseogullari Dirihan, Mehmet Esad Guven, Serra Oguz Ahmet, Norbert Gutknecht, Arzu Tezvergil Mutluay
    Lasers in Dental Science.2022; 6(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • Ablation of carious dental tissue using an ultrashort pulsed laser (USPL) system
    Christoph Engelbach, Claudia Dehn, Christoph Bourauel, Jörg Meister, Matthias Frentzen
    Lasers in Medical Science.2015; 30(5): 1427.     CrossRef
  • 174 View
  • 1 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
The effects of total-etch, wet-bonding, and light-curing of adhesive on the apical seal of a resin-based root canal filling system
Won-Il Ryu, Won-Jun Shon, Seung-Ho Baek, In-Han Lee, Byeong-Hoon Cho
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(5):385-396.   Published online September 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.385
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the effects of adhesion variables such as the priming concepts of canal wall and the curing modes of adhesives on the sealing ability of a resin-based root canal filling system.

Materials and Methods

Apical microleakage of the Resilon-RealSeal systems filled with 3 different combinations of adhesion variables was compared with the conventional gutta-percha filling using a dye penetration method. Experimental groups were SEDC, Resilon (Resilon Research LLC) filling with self-etch RealSeal (SybronEndo) primer and dual-cure RealSeal sealer; NELC, Resilon filling with no etching, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE) primer application and light-curing adhesive; and TELC, Resilon filling with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose primer and adhesive used under total etch / wet bonding and light-cure protocols. GPCS, gutta-percha filling with conventional AH26 plus sealer, was the control group.

Results

The median longitudinal dye penetration length of TELC was significantly shorter than those of GPCS and SEDC (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). In the cross-sectional microleakage scores, TELC showed significant differences from other groups at 2 to 5 mm from the apical foramen (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

When a resin-based root canal filling material was used, compared to the self-etching primer and the dual-cure sealer, the total etch/wet-bonding with primer and light-curing of adhesive showed improved apical sealing and was highly recommended.

  • 159 View
  • 1 Download
Close layer
Influence of application methods of one-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength
Chul-Kyu Choi, Sung-Ae Son, Jin-Hee Ha, Bock Hur, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Yong-Hun Kwon, Jeong-Kil Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(3):203-210.   Published online May 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.203
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various application methods of one-step self-etch adhesives to microtensile resin-dentin bond strength.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-six extracted human molars were used. The teeth were assigned randomly to twelve groups (n = 15), according to the three different adhesive systems (Clearfil Tri-S Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop, G-Bond) and application methods. The adhesive systems were applied on the dentin as follows: 1) The single coating, 2) The double coating, 3) Manual agitation, 4) Ultrasonic agitation. Following the adhesive application, light-cure composite resin was constructed. The restored teeth were stored in distilled water at room temperature for 24 hours, and prepared 15 specimens per groups. Then microtensile bond strength was measured and the failure mode was examined.

Results

Manual agitation and ultrasonic agitation of adhesive significantly increased the microtensile bond strength than single coating and double coating did. Double coating of adhesive significantly increased the microtensile bond strength than single coating did and there was no significant difference between the manual agitation and ultrasonic agitation group. There was significant difference in microtensile bonding strength among all adhesives and Clearfil Tri-S Bond showed the highest bond strength.

Conclusions

In one-step self-etching adhesives, there was significant difference according to application methods and type of adhesives. No matter of the material, the manual or ultrasonic agitation of the adhesive showed significantly higher microtensile bond strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist
    Naji Ziad Arandi
    Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry.2023; Volume 15: 165.     CrossRef
  • 232 View
  • 5 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity
Sang-Bae Bae, Young-Gon Cho, Myeong-Seon Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009;34(6):477-483.   Published online November 30, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of low and high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities applied with 1-step adhesives.

Forty class V cavities were prepared on the cervices of buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted molar teeth and divided into four groups (n=8). Cavities were restored with AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo α, G-Bond/UniFil LoFlo Plus (Low flow groups), AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo and G-Bond/UniFil Flow (High flow group), respectively.

Specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed microleakages at the enamel and dentinal margins.

In conclusion, the low viscosity flowable resins showed lower marginal microleakage than do the high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities.

  • 147 View
  • 1 Download
Close layer
The effect of various bonding systems on the microtensile bond strength of immediate and delayed dentin sealing
Jin-hee Ha, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Bock Hur, Jeong-Kil Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008;33(6):526-536.   Published online November 30, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.526
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of various dentin bonding systems on microtensile bond strength of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) and delayed dentin sealing (DDS). Eighteen extracted permanent molars were used in this study. The teeth for DDS group were restored with a provisional restorations, and immersed in saline solution for 1 week, and divided into 3 subgroups according to various dentin bonding adhesives; SB subgroup (3 step total-etch adhesive), SE subgroup (2 step self-etch adhesive), XE subgroup (1 step self-etch adhesive). In IDS group, the teeth were divided into 3 subgroups, and applied with bonding adhesives as in DDS group. The teeth were restored with provisional restorations, and immersed in saline solution for 1 week. Indirect composite disc was cemented with resin cement, and all specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength. The data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Student t-test.

The results were as follows:

The IDS group showed significantly higher µTBS than DDS group in 3 step total-etch and 2 step self-etch adhesive (p < 0.05).

In IDS and DDS group, 3 step total-etch adhesive showed the highest µTBS value, followed by 2 step self-etch, and 1 step self-etch adhesive. In IDS group, the µTBS value for 1 step self-etch adhesive was significantly different from those of the other subgroups (p < 0.05), and in DDS group, there were statistical differences in all subgroup (p < 0.05).

Failure modes of tested dentin bonding adhesives were mostly mixed failure and only 1 step self-etch adhesive showed adhesive failure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation on microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration
    Jeong-Hye Son, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Bock Hur, Jeong-Kil Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(2): 134.     CrossRef
  • 184 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of the additional application of a resin layer on dentin bonding using single-step adhesives
Seung-Mo Choi, Sang-Hyuk Park, Kyung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Jin Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32(4):313-326.   Published online July 31, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.313
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to prove that an intermediate resin layer (IRL) can increase the bond strength to dentin by reducing the permeability of single-step adhesives.

Flat dentin surfaces were created on buccal and lingual side of freshly extracted third molar using a low-speed diamond saw under copious water flow. Approximately 2.0 mm thick axially sectioned dentin slice was abraded with wet #600 SiC paper. Three single-step self-etch adhesives; Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and Xeno III (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) were used in this study. Each adhesive groups were again subdivided into ten groups by; whether IRL was used or not; whether adhesives were cured with light before application of IRL or not; the mode of composite application.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. Bond strength of single-step adhesives increased by an additional coating of intermediate resin layer, and this increasement was statistically signigicant when self-cured composite was used (p < 0.001).

2. When using IRL, there were no difference on bond strengths regardless the curing procedure of single-step adhesives.

3. There were no significant difference on bond strengths between usage of AB2 or SM as an IRL.

4. The thickness of hybrid layer was correlated with the acidity of adhesive used, and the nanoleakage represented by silver deposits and grains was examined within hybrid and adhesive layer in most of single-step adhesives.

5. Neither thickness of hybrid layer nor nanoleakage were related to bond strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Quantitative comparison of permeability in the adhesive interface of four adhesive systems
    Juhea Chang, Keewook Yi, Hae-Young Kim, In Bog Lee, Byeong Hoon Cho, Ho-Hyun Son
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • 151 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives
Sae-Hee Han, Eun-Soung Kim, Young-Gon Cho
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32(3):169-179.   Published online May 31, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.3.169
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study was to compare the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of light- and chemically cured composites to enamel coupled with four 2-step self-etch adhesives and also to evaluate the incompatibility between 2-step self-etch adhesives and chemically cured composite resin.

Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally, and a 1 mm thickness of specimen was made. They were assigned to four groups by adhesives used: SE group (Clearfil SE Bond), AdheSE group (AdheSE), Tyrian group (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), and Contax group (Contax). Each adhesive was applied to a cut enamel surface as per the manufacturer's instruction. Light-cured (Filtek Z250) or chemically cured composite (Luxacore Smartmix Dual) was bonded to the enamel of each specimen using a Tygon tube. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to µSBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean µSBS (n=20 for each group) was statistically compared using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and t test at 95% level. Also the interface of enamel and composite was evaluated under FE-SEM.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. The µSBS of the SE Bond group to the enamel was significantly higher than that of the AdheSE group, the Tyrian group, and the Contax group in both the light-cured and the chemically cured composite resin (p < 0.05).

2. There was not a significant difference among the AdheSE group, the Tyrian group, and the Contax group in both the light-cured and the chemically cured composite resin.

3. The µSBS of the light-cured composite resin was significantly higher than that of the chemically cured composite resin when same adhesive was applied to the enamel (p < 0.05).

4. The interface of enamel and all 2-step self-etch adhesives showed close adaptation, and so the incompatibility of the chemically cured composite resin did not show.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of pre-heating on some physical properties of composite resin
    Myoung Uk Jin, Sung Kyo Kim
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2009; 34(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • 217 View
  • 2 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements
Do-Wan Kim, Sang-Jin Park, Kyoung-Kyu Choi
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005;30(6):493-504.   Published online November 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.493
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study was performed to investigate the compatibility between 4 dentin adhesives and 4 resin luting cements.

Dentin adhesives used in this study were All-Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), Prompt L-Pop (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Resin luting cements used in this study were Choice (Bisco Inc., Schaumbrug, IL, USA), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc, Osaka, Japan), RelyX ARC (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA), Bistite II DC (Tokuyama corp., Tokyo, Japan). Combination of each dentin adhesive and corresponding resin cement was made to 16 experimental groups.

Flat dentin surfaces was created on mid-coronal dentin of extracted mandibular third molars, then dentin surface was polished with 320-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers.

Indirect resin composite block (Tescera, Bisco) was fabricated. Its surface for bonding to tooth was polished with silicon carbide abrasive papers. Each dentin adhesive was treated on tooth surface and resin composite overlay were luted with each resin cement. Each bonded specimen was poured in epoxy resin and sectioned occluso-gingivally into 1.0 mm thick slab, then further sectioned into 1.0 × 1.0 mm2 composite-dentin beams. Microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

2-step self-etching dentin adhesive which has additional bonding resin is more compatible than 1-step self-etching dentin adhesive.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Microtensile bond strength of resin inlay bonded to dentin treated with various temporary filling materials
    Tae-Woo Kim, Bin-Na Lee, Young-Jung Choi, So-Young Yang, Hoon-Sang Chang, Yun-Chan Hwang, In-Nam Hwang, Won-Mann Oh
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(5): 419.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the additional etching procedure on push-out bond strength of one-step resin cement
    Soon-Il Kang, Jeong-Kil Park, Bock Hur, Hyeon-Cheol Kim
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(5): 443.     CrossRef
  • The study of shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin
    Hee-Sun In, Jong-Il Park, Jong-In Choi, Hye-Won Cho, Jin-Keun Dong
    The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2008; 46(5): 535.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements
    Hyun-A Lee, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(6): 499.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay
    Tae-Gun Kim, Kwang-Won Lee, Mi-Kyung Yu
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(6): 553.     CrossRef
  • The bonding durability of resin cements
    Min-Woo Cho, Sang-Hyuk Park, Jong-Ryul Kim, Kyoung-Kyu Choi
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(4): 343.     CrossRef
  • 199 View
  • 1 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Microshear bond strength of adhesives according to the direction of enamel rods
Young-Gon Cho, Jong-Jin Kim
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005;30(4):344-351.   Published online July 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.344
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study compared the microshear bond strength (µSBS) to end and side of enamel rod bonded by four adhesives including two total etch adhesives and two self-etch adhesives.

Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally. The outer buccal or lingual surface was used as specimens cutting the ends of enamel rods, and inner slabs used as specimens cutting the sides of enamel rods.

They were assigned to four groups by used adhesives: Group 1 (All-Bond 2), Group 2 (Single Bond), Group 3 (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), Group 4 (Adper Prompt L-Pop). After each adhesive was applied to enamel surface, three composite cylinders were adhered to it of each specimen using Tygon tube. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to µSBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows;

1. The µSBS of Group 2 (16.50 ± 2.31 MPa) and Group 4 (15.83 ± 2.33 MPa) to the end of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (11.93 ± 2.25 MPa) and Group 3 (11.97 ± 2.05 MPa) (p < 0.05).

2. The µSBS of Group 2 (13.43 ± 2.93 MPa) to the side of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 (8.64 ± 1.53 MPa), Group 3 (9.69 ± 1.80 MPa), and Group 4 (10.56 ± 1.75 MPa) (p < 0.05).

3. The mean µSBS to the end of enamel rod was significantly higher than that to the side of enamel rod in all group (p < 0.05).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives
    Sae-Hee Han, Eun-Soung Kim, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(3): 169.     CrossRef
  • 246 View
  • 1 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin
Young-Gon Cho, Young-Jae Kee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005;30(4):312-318.   Published online July 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.312
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study compared the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of three single step adhesives to dentin.

Occlusal superficial dentin was exposed in fifteen human molars. They were assigned to three groups by used adhesives: Xeno group (Xeno III), Prompt group (Adper Prompt L-Pop), AQ group (AQ Bond).

Each adhesive was applied to dentin surface, and composite of same manufacturer was constructed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks with an interface area approximately 1 mm2, and subjected to µTBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows;

The µTBS to dentin was 48.78 ± 9.83 MPa for Xeno III, 30.22 ± 4.52 MPa for Adper Prompt L-Pop, and 26.31 ± 7.07 MPa for AQ Bond.

The mean µTBS of Xeno group was significantly higher than that of Prompt group and AQ group (p < 0.05).

There was no significant difference between the µTBS of Prompt group and AQ group.

  • 128 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives
Young-Gon Cho, Jin-Ho Jeong, Young-Jae Ki, Hee-Young Choi, Cheul-Hee Jin, Sang-Hoon Yoo, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(2):162-169.   Published online March 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.162
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3), Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5).

The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).

Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).

Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups.

In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin
    Young-Gon Cho, Young-Jae Kee
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2005; 30(4): 312.     CrossRef
  • Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
    Young-Gon Cho, Cheol-Hee Jin, Jung-Bum Min
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2005; 30(4): 319.     CrossRef
  • 153 View
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Influence of microhardness and fluoride content of tooth structure by fluoride-containing restorative materials
Su-Jong Lee, Young-Gon Cho, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(1):36-43.   Published online January 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.036
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness and the fluoride content of enamel and dentin around fluoride- or non fluoride-containing restorations. Forty extracted human teeth were used and prepared cervical cavities on proximal surface. Experimental teeth were divided into five groups. Group 1 : Prime & Bond NT and Z100, Group 2 : Prime & Bond NT and F2000, Group 3 : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Z100, Group 4 : Scothcbond Multi-purpose and F2000, Group 5 : Fuji II LC. The cavities were filled with dentin adhesives and restorative materials. After each tooth was bisected, one half was tested microhardness and the other half was analyzed the fluoride at the enamel and dentin by an EPMA-WDX device. The results were as follows:

1. There was no statistical difference among the microhardness of enamel surface in all group.

2. The microhardness at dentin of 100 µm point in Group 2 and 20 µm point in Group 4 was lower than that of normal dentin (p>0.05).

3. There was no statistical difference among the fluoride content of enamel surface in all group.

4. The fluoride content at the dentin of 30 µm point in Group 2 and 5 were higher than those at 100 µm and 200 µm point in Group 2 and normal dentin (p<0.05).

5. At the dentin of 30 µm point, Group 2 showed higher fluoride content than Group 1 and 3, and Group 5 showed higher fluoride content than other groups.

  • 158 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Micro-shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and resin-based adhesives to dentin
Hyun-Kyung Hong, Kyoung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Hyuk Park, Sang-Jin Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003;28(4):314-325.   Published online July 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.314
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 136 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
The influence of IRM temporary restorations on marginal microleakage of dentin adhesives
Young-Gon Cho, Hyun-Kyung Kim, Young-Gon Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003;28(1):1-10.   Published online January 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.001
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study investigated the influence of IRM on marginal microleakage of 5th generation adhesives. Class V cavities with gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 60 extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1 and 4 received no temporary restoration with IRM. Group 2 and 5 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/1g). Group 3 and 6 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/2g). The temporary restorations were removed mechanically with an ultrasonic scaler after one-week storage in distilled water. The cavities were restored using one of two adhesives and composites; Single Bond/Filtek Z 250(Group 1, 2 and 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4, 5 and 6).

Following one day storage in distilled water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles(between 5℃ and 55℃) and immersed in 2% methylene blue for dye penetration testing. The results were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked test at a significance level of 0.05.

The results of this study were as follows:

1. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the enamel margins was Group 1<Group 3<Group 2<Group 4<Group 5<Group 6. The microleakage of Group 6 was significantly higher than that of Groups 1, 2 and 3(p<0.05).

2. At the enamel margins, without regard to pretreatment with IRM, the microleakage of Single Bond was lower than that of UniFil Bond.

3. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the dentin margins was Group 4<Group 1<Group 5<Group 6<Group 3<Group 2. But there were no significant difference among microleakages of each group(p>0.05).

4. At the dentin margins, the microleakage of the group not pretreated with IRM was lower than that of the group pretreated with IRM. And the microleakage of UniFil Bond was lower than that of Single Bond.

5. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentin margins of each groups, Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 at dentin margin were higher microleakage than those at enamel margin. There were significant difference between enamel and dentin microleakage of Group 2 and 3(p<0.05).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments
    Yong-Hee Kim, Jae-Gu Park, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(4): 327.     CrossRef
  • 175 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive
Young-Gon Cho, Kong-Chul Cho
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27(5):493-501.   Published online September 30, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.5.493
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the microleakage performance of four self-etcing primer adhesives(Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, UniFil Bond, and FL Bond) and one self-etching adhesive(Prompt L-Pop). Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 50 extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of five adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z 250(Group 1), Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil AP-X(Group 2), Clearfil Liner Bond 2/Clearfil AP-X(Group 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4), and FL Bond/Filtek Z 250(Group 5).

Following one day storage in room temperature water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5℃ and 55℃. Marginal microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye. After 24 hours, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. The microleakges at both enamel and dentinal margins were the lowest in group 4, increasing among groups in the following order: group 2, follwed by group 5, follwed by group 1, and the highest in group 3.

2. At the enamel margins, the microleakage of group 3 was significantly higher than those of groups 2, 4 and 5(p<0.05), and also the microleakage of group 1 was statistically higher than those of groups 2 and 5(p<0.05).

3. At the dentinal margins, microleakage of group 3 was significantly higher than microleakages of groups 1, 2, 4 and 5(p<0.05).

4. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentinal margins of each group, groups 1, 4 and 5 at enamel margin and group 2 and group 3 at dentinal margin were higher microleakage. But there was no significant difference between enamel and dentinal microleakages of each group(p>0.05).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of cutting instruments on the dentin bond strength of a self-etch adhesive
    Young-Gon Lee, So-Ra Moon, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements
    Hyun-A Lee, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(6): 499.     CrossRef
  • Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives
    Sae-Hee Han, Eun-Soung Kim, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(3): 169.     CrossRef
  • Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments
    Yong-Hee Kim, Jae-Gu Park, Young-Gon Cho
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(4): 327.     CrossRef
  • Influence of appication time of self-etching primers on dentinal microtensile bond strength
    Young-Gon Cho, Young-Gon Lee, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park, Jong-Jin Kim, Hee-Young Choi, Cheul-Hee Jin, Sang-Hoon Yoo
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2004; 29(5): 430.     CrossRef
  • Morphological patterns of self-etching primers and self-etching adhesive bonded to tooth structure
    Young-Gon Cho, Seok-Jong Lee, Jin-Ho Jeong, Young-Gon Lee, Soo-Mee Kim
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2003; 28(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin and sem analysis
    Young-Gon Cho, Kee-Sun Roh, Soo-Mee Kim, Young-Gon Lee, Jin-Ho Jeong, Young-Jae Ki
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2003; 28(3): 222.     CrossRef
  • The effect of additional enamel etching on microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system
    Jung-Jin Yoon, Kyung-San Min, Chan-Ui Hong
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2003; 28(5): 363.     CrossRef
  • 174 View
  • 2 Download
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP