Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity

Sang-Bae Bae; Young-Gon Cho; Myeong-Seon Lee

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 34(6); 2009 > Article

Original Article Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity: Sang-Bae Bae¹, Young-Gon Cho¹, Myeong-Seon Lee²; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2009;34(6):477-483.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477
Published online: November 30, 2009

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

²Department of Dental Hygiene, Seokang University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosin University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@chosun.ac.kr

• Received: June 17, 2009 • Revised: September 11, 2009 • Accepted: October 18, 2009

18 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of low and high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities applied with 1-step adhesives.

Forty class V cavities were prepared on the cervices of buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted molar teeth and divided into four groups (n=8). Cavities were restored with AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo α, G-Bond/UniFil LoFlo Plus (Low flow groups), AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo and G-Bond/UniFil Flow (High flow group), respectively.

Specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed microleakages at the enamel and dentinal margins.

In conclusion, the low viscosity flowable resins showed lower marginal microleakage than do the high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities.
Keywords: Microleakage; Low and high viscosity flowable resin; Class V cavities; 1-step adhesives; Enamel margin; Dentinal margin

REFERENCES

1. Atash R, Vanden Abbeele A. Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6: 185-190.PubMed
2. Keyf F, Yalcin F. The weight change of various light-cured restorative materials stored in water. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6: 72-79.Article PubMed
3. Park JG, Lim BS, Lee IB. Cuspal deflection in class V cavities restored with domposite resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008;33: 83-89.
4. Ahn HR, Kim HC, Hur B, Park JK. The effectr of restorative materials on the stress distribution of class V composite resin restoration-a 3D finite elenment investigation. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31: 20-29.Article
5. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998;22: 221-229.PubMed
6. Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: Two-year results. Oper Dent. 2007;32: 313-321.Article PubMed PDF
7. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2001;14: 361-366.PubMed
8. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carbalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after poly-merization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17: 271-278.PubMed
9. Lee KW, Choung SJ, Han YC, Son HH, Um JM, Oh MH, Cho BH. Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restoration with or without mechanical retention. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31: 300-311.Article
10. Attar N, Korkmaz . Effect of two light-emitting diode(LED) and one halogen curing light on the marginal leakage of class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8: 80-88.PubMed
11. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MAC, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB, Meneghim MC. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J. 2006;17: 49-52.PubMed
12. Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift EJ Jr. Effect of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in class I restorations. Dent Mater. 2004;20: 839-845.PubMed
13. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29: 713-719.PubMed
14. Roberts HW, Charlton DG, Murchison DF. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects. Oper Dent. 2001;26: 273-276.PubMed
15. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental resto-rations. Oper Dent. 1997;22: 173-185.PubMed
16. Hwang SJ, Shin DH. Estimation of relation between technaiques of dye pentration for microleakage and SEM evaluation for marginal adaptation of the restoration. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31: 337-343.Article
17. Youngson CC, Glyn Jones JC, Magogue M, Smith IS. In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. Int Endod J. 1998;31: 90-99.Article PubMed
18. Stavridakis MM, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2005;30: 118-128.PubMed
19. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 128-137.PubMed
20. Takamizawa T, Yamamoto A, Inoue N, Tsujimoto A, Oto T, Irokawa K, Miyazaki M. Influence of light intensity on contraction stress of flowable resins. J Oral Sci. 2008;50: 37-43.Article PubMed
21. Irie M, Hatanaka K, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Immediate versus water-storage performance of class V flowable composite restoratives. Dent Mater. 2006;22: 875-883.Article PubMed

Table 1

Materials and group classification

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at enamel margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at dentinal margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009;34(6):477-483. Published online November 30, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477

XML Download

Related articles

Comparison of instrumental methods for color change assessment of Giomer resins

Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity

Table 1

Materials and group classification

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at enamel margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at dentinal margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Table 1 Materials and group classification

Table 2 Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at enamel margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Table 3 Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at dentinal margins

Different superscripts are statistically significant difference at p<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).