Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Maxillary molar"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Articles
Proximity of maxillary molar apexes to the cortical bone surface and the maxillary sinus
Han Shin Lee, Dokyung Kim, Sung Kyo Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(3):e33.   Published online August 8, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e33
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to analyze the proximity of maxillary molar roots to their overlying cortical bone surfaces and the maxillary sinus.

Materials and Methods

Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 151 patients with completely erupted upper molars that had 3 separate roots were studied. The following distances were measured: from the root apex to the cortical plate and maxillary sinus floor, and from the apical 3-mm level of the root to the cortical plate. Differences between groups were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the Scheffé post hoc test, the significance of differences between cone-beam computed tomography views with the paired t-test, and the significance of differences among age groups with linear regression analysis. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The mesiobuccal and distobuccal root apexes of maxillary second molars were more distant from the buccal cortical plate than the maxillary first molars (p < 0.05). The apical 3-mm level of the mesiobuccal root of the first molar was closer to the buccal cortical bone than the second molar (p < 0.05). In the maxillary first molars, the thickness of the buccal cortical bone decreased in all roots with age (p < 0.05). In all root apexes of both molars, the difference in the vertical level between the maxillary sinus floor and the root apex increased with age (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Awareness of the anatomical profile of maxillary molar apices in relation to the cortical bones and maxillary sinus will be beneficial for apical surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Proximity of maxillary molar palatal roots to adjacent structures for endodontic microsurgery: a cone-beam computed tomography study
    Xiaoxiang Huang, Jun Xu, Benxiang Hou, Ying Wang
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 262 View
  • 8 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Morphotypes of the apical constriction of maxillary molars: a micro-computed tomographic evaluation
Jeffrey Wen-Wei Chang, Kuzhanchinathan Manigandan, Lakshman Samaranayake, Chellapandian NandhaKumar, Pazhamalai AdhityaVasun, Johny Diji, Angambakkam Rajasekharan PradeepKumar
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(2):e19.   Published online March 24, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e19
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the apical constriction (AC) and apical canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Materials and Methods

The anatomical features of 313 root canals from 41 maxillary first molars and 57 maxillary second molars of patients with known age and sex were evaluated using micro-CT, with a resolution of 26.7 µm. The factors evaluated were the presence or absence of AC, the morphotypes, bucco-lingual dimension, mesio-distal dimension, and the profile (shape) of AC and the apical root canal. The apical root canal dimensions, location of the apical foramen (AF), AC to AF distance, and presence of accessory canals in the apical 5 mm were also assessed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used for data evaluation.

Results

AC was present in all 313 root canals. Patients’ age and sex did not significantly impact either AC or the apical canal dimensions. The most common AC morphotype detected was the traditional (single) constriction (52%), followed by the parallel (29%) morphotype. The mean AC dimensions in maxillary first molars were not significantly different from those in maxillary second molars. Sixty percent of AF were located within 0.5 mm from the anatomic apex.

Conclusions

The most common morphotype of AC detected was the traditional constriction. Neither patients’ age nor sex had a significant impact on the dimensions of the AC or the apical root canal. The majority of AF (60%) were located within 0.5 mm from the anatomic apex.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of Coronal Flaring on Initial Apical File Size Estimation in Curved Canals Using Three Distinct Rotary Instruments: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Vinodhini Varatharajan, Muhammed Abdul Rahman Thazhathveedan, Mohammed Salman Kuttikkodan, Ismail Puzhangaraillath Mundanatayil, Amrutha Ravindran Thazhe Mangool, Ashraf Karumbil
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Evaluation of the Accuracy of Three Electronic Apex Locators Using Different Sodium Hypochlorite Concentrations
    Sanda Ileana Cîmpean, Radu Marcel Chisnoiu, Adela Loredana Colceriu Burtea, Rareș Rotaru, Marius Gheorghe Bud, Ada Gabriela Delean, Ioana-Sofia Pop-Ciutrilă
    Medicina.2023; 59(5): 918.     CrossRef
  • Cone beam computed tomography analysis of the root and canal morphology of the maxillary second molars in a Hail province of the Saudi population
    Ahmed A. Madfa, Moazzy I. Almansour, Saad M. Al-Zubaidi, Albandari H. Alghurayes, Safanah D. AlDAkhayel, Fatemah I. Alzoori, Taif F. Alshammari, Abrar M. Aldakhil
    Heliyon.2023; 9(9): e19477.     CrossRef
  • 411 View
  • 13 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Morphological characteristics of the mesiobuccal root in the presence of a second mesiobuccal canal: a micro-CT study
Lucas P. Lopes Rosado, Matheus Lima Oliveira, Karla Rovaris, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Frederico Sampaio Neves
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(1):e6.   Published online January 18, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e6
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study investigated the internal morphology of mesiobuccal (MB) roots of maxillary molars with a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal.

Materials and Methods

Forty-seven maxillary first or second molars from Brazilians were scanned using micro-computed tomography. The following measurements were obtained from the MB roots: root thickness, root width, and dentin thickness of the buccal aspect of the first mesiobuccal (MB1) canal, between the MB1 and MB2 canals, and the palatal aspect of the MB2 and MB1 canals at 3 mm from the root apex and in the furcation region. For statistical analysis, the Student’s t-test and analysis of variance with the post-hoc Tukey test were used (α = 0.05).

Results

In maxillary molars with an MB2 canal, MB roots were significantly thicker (p = 0.0014) and narrower (p = 0.0016) than in maxillary molars without an MB2 canal. The dentin thickness of the palatal aspect of the MB1 canal was also significantly greater than that of MB roots without an MB2 canal at 3 mm from the root apex (p = 0.0007) and in the furcation region (p < 0.0001). In the furcation region of maxillary molars with an MB2 canal, the dentin thickness between the MB1 and MB2 canals was significantly smaller than that in the buccal and palatal aspects (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The internal morphology of MB roots of maxillary molars with an MB2 canal revealed differences in dentin thickness, root diameter, and distance between the canals when compared with maxillary molars without an MB2 canal.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness and safety of three NiTi systems in endodontic retreatment of MB1 and MB2 root canals: a micro-CT and CBCT combined analysis
    Airton Oliveira Santos-Junior, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Karina Ines Medina Carita Tavares, Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres, Jáder Camilo Pinto, Pedro Luis Busto Rosim, Andréa Gonçalves, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can maxillary molar dimensions predict the presence of the second mesiobuccal canal?
    Lucas P. Lopes Rosado, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Karla Rovaris, Matheus L. Oliveira, Frederico Sampaio Neves
    Oral Radiology.2023; 39(3): 482.     CrossRef
  • Can the detection of second mesiobuccal canals be enhanced based on the volume of adjacent canals?
    Lucas P. Lopes Rosado, Deborah Q. Freitas, Karla Rovaris, Matheus L. Oliveira, Frederico S. Neves
    Archives of Oral Biology.2023; 146: 105604.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the coronal root canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars using digital 3D-reconstruction technology based on micro-computed tomography data
    Mudan Wang, Yuxuan Gao, Qi Deng, Yuan Gao, Dongzhe Song, Dingming Huang
    Journal of Dental Sciences.2023; 18(2): 586.     CrossRef
  • 281 View
  • 10 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
A cone-beam computed tomography study of the prevalence and location of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars
Seong-Ju Lee, Eun-Hye Lee, Se-Hee Park, Kyung-Mo Cho, Jin-Woo Kim
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(4):e46.   Published online September 3, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e46
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and location of the second mesiobuccal root (MB2) canal in maxillary molars with the aid of various measuring points and lines using cone-beam computed tomography (CT).

Materials and Methods

A total of 205 images of patients who underwent cone-beam CT examinations between 2011 and 2015 as part of their dental diagnosis and treatment were included. There were 76 images of the maxillary first molar and 135 images of the maxillary second molar. Canal orifices were detected at −1 mm from the top of the pulpal floor on cone-beam CT images. Image assessment was performed by 2 observers in reformatted image planes using software. Assessments included measurement of the distance between the MB1 and MB2 canals, and the angles between the lines connecting the MB1-MB2 and distobuccal (DB)-palatal (P) canals. The data were analyzed using the student's t-test.

Results

The prevalence of the MB2 canal was 86.8% in the first molar and 28.9% in the second molar. The angle between the lines connecting the MB1-MB2 and DB-P canals was 2.3° ± 5.7° in the first molar and −3.95° ± 7.73° in the second molar. The distance between the MB1 and MB2 canals was 2.1 ± 0.44 mm in the first molar and 1.98 ± 0.42 mm in the second molar.

Conclusions

The angles between the lines connecting the MB1-MB2 and DB-P canals was almost parallel. These findings may aid in the prediction of the location of the MB2 canal orifice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Position of Second Mesiobuccal Canal Relative to Distobuccal and Palatal Canals of Maxillary Molars in an Iranian Population
    Sina Mosadeghian, Azadeh Torkzadeh, Parisa Ranjbarian, Roya Asaadi
    Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences.2025; 10(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning Models in the Detection of MB2 Canal Orifice in CBCT Images
    Shishir Shetty, Meliz Yuvali, Ilker Ozsahin, Saad Al-Bayatti, Sangeetha Narasimhan, Mohammed Alsaegh, Hiba Al-Daghestani, Raghavendra Shetty, Renita Castelino, Leena R David, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin
    International Dental Journal.2025; 75(3): 1640.     CrossRef
  • The Correlation between Intraorifice Distance and the Anatomical Characteristics of the Second Mesiobuccal Canal of Maxillary Molars: A CBCT Study
    Isabella Perondi, Silvio Taschieri, Martino Baruffaldi, Roberto Fornara, Luca Francetti, Stefano Corbella, Deepa Gurunathan
    International Journal of Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endodontic management of type I maxillary first molar with two palatal roots using cone-beam computed tomography
    Nuha Alghamdi
    Dental Journal.2024; 57(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 3D geometric analysis of second mesiobuccal canal in permanent maxillary first molar tooth
    Indrani Khadilkar, Divya Nangia, Amrita Chawla, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Shalini Gupta, Ajay Logani
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2023; 49(1): 140.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of mesiobuccal-2 canals in maxillary first and second molars among the Bruneian population—CBCT analysis
    Hui Yi Onn, Malissa Siao Yun Abdullah Sikun, Hanif Abdul Rahman, Jagjit Singh Dhaliwal
    BDJ Open.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Location angle of second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molars of an Indian population: an in vivo retrospective CBCT evaluation and proposal of a new classification
    Kishor Vhorkate, Kulvinder Banga, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Shugufta Mir, Suraj Arora, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Anuj Bhardwaj, Alexander Maniangat Luke
    PeerJ.2022; 10: e14234.     CrossRef
  • Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of Neolithic and modern Chinese
    H.Y. Ren, K.Y. Kum, Y.S. Zhao, Y.J. Yoo, J.S. Jeong, Hiran Perinpanayagam, X.Y. Wang, G.J. Li, F. Wang, H. Fang, Y. Gu
    Archives of Oral Biology.2021; 131: 105272.     CrossRef
  • 350 View
  • 6 Download
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Fused roots of maxillary molars: characterization and prevalence in a Latin American sub-population: a cone beam computed tomography study
Maytté Marcano-Caldera, Jose Luis Mejia-Cardona, María del Pilar Blanco-Uribe, Elena Carolina Chaverra-Mesa, Didier Rodríguez-Lezama, Jose Hernán Parra-Sánchez
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(2):e16.   Published online April 22, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e16
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The upper molars generally have three roots; therefore, different combinations of fusion can occur, increasing the possibility of finding more complex root canal systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and characterization of fused roots in first and second maxillary molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a Colombian population.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1274 teeth were evaluated, of which 534 were maxillary first molars and 740 were maxillary second molars. Axial sections were made at the cervical, middle, and apical levels to determine the prevalence of root fusion and the types of fusion.

Results

Overall, 43% of the molars (n = 551) presented some type of fused root. Root fusion was present in 23.4% of the maxillary first molars. The most frequent type of fused root was type 3 (distobuccal-palatal; DB-P) (58.9%). Root fusion was observed in 57.6% of the maxillary second molars, and the most prevalent type of fused root was type 6 (cone-shaped) (45.2%). Of the maxillary molars, 12.5% were classified as C-shaped.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, there was a high prevalence of fused roots in maxillary molars in the Colombian population, mainly in the maxillary second molars. In first molars, the most common type of fused root was type 3 (DB-P) and in second molars, the most common type was type 6 (cone-shaped). Additionally, molars with root fusion presented variation at different levels of the radicular portion, with implications for treatment quality.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Exploring the sex-associated differences in molars fused roots
    Maria Eduarda Nunis Locks, Erika Calvano Küchler, Leonardo Santos Antunes, Alice Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos, Camila Paiva Perin, Paulo Henrique Condeixa França, Peter Proff, Christian Kirschneck, Flares Baratto-Filho
    Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger.2024; 254: 152245.     CrossRef
  • Cone beam computed tomography analysis of the root and canal morphology of the maxillary second molars in a Syrian subpopulation
    Safaa Allawi, Mouhammad Al-Tayyan, Hassan Achour, Eyad Al-Toutangy, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of root fusion in canine maxillary second molar teeth using cone-beam computed tomography
    Kristin Linder, Scott MacGee, Loren Schultz
    Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dentine thickness in maxillary fused molars depends on the fusion type: An ex vivo micro‐computed tomography study
    Cangül Keskin, Defne Toplu, Ali Keleş
    International Endodontic Journal.2023; 56(5): 637.     CrossRef
  • Root and canal-specific features of maxillary first molars with fused roots
    Katarina Beljic-Ivanovic, Branislav Karadzic
    Vojnosanitetski pregled.2022; 79(11): 1092.     CrossRef
  • Micro-CT Analysis of the Root Canal Configuration of Maxillary Second Molars with Fusion
    Cangül KESKİN, Özgür ÖZDEMİR, Ali KELEŞ
    European Annals of Dental Sciences.2022; 49(Suppl 1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of C-Shaped Canal Morphology in Mandibular and Maxillary Second Molars in an Iraqi Subpopulation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Kazhan Abdalrahman, Ranjdar Talabani, Sara Kazzaz, Dlsoz Babarasul, Berndt Koslowski
    Scanning.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Root and Canal Morphology of Fused and Separate Rooted Maxillary Molar Teeth in Turkish Population
    H Aydin
    Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2021; 24(3): 435.     CrossRef
  • Investigating prevalence of dental anomalies in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia through digital orthopantomogram
    Jehan ALHumaid, Maryam Buholayka, Arishiya Thapasum, Muhanad Alhareky, Maha Abdelsalam, Amr Bughsan
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(5): 2900.     CrossRef
  • Preferred Reporting Items for Epidemiologic Cross-sectional Studies on Root and Root Canal Anatomy Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Technology: A Systematized Assessment
    Jorge N.R. Martins, Anil Kishen, Duarte Marques, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, João Caramês, António Mata, Marco A. Versiani
    Journal of Endodontics.2020; 46(7): 915.     CrossRef
  • Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars—A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography
    Jorge N.R. Martins, Duarte Marques, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, João Caramês, António Mata, Marco A. Versiani
    Archives of Oral Biology.2020; 113: 104589.     CrossRef
  • 224 View
  • 5 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Maxillary first molar with 7 root canals diagnosed using cone-beam computed tomography
Evaldo Rodrigues, Antônio Henrique Braitt, Bruno Ferraz Galvão, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva
Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(1):60-64.   Published online August 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.60
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Root canal anatomy is complex, and the recognition of anatomic variations could be a challenge for clinicians. This case report describes the importance of cone beam computed tomographyic (CBCT) imaging during endodontic treatment. A 23 year old woman was referred by her general dental practitioner with the chief complaint of spontaneous pain in her right posterior maxilla. From the clinical and radiographic findings, a diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis was made and endodontic treatment was suggested to the patient. The patient underwent CBCT examination, and CBCT scan slices revealed seven canals: three mesiobuccal (MB1, MB2, and MB3), two distobuccal (DB1 and DB2), and two palatal (P1 and P2). Canals were successfully treated with reciprocating files and filled using single-cone filling technique. Precise knowledge of root canal morphology and its variation is important during root canal treatment. CBCT examination is an excellent tool for identifying and managing these complex root canal systems.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DOĞRULANMIŞ OLAĞANDIŞI ÜST BİRİNCİ BÜYÜK AZI DİŞİN ENDODONTİK TEDAVİSİ
    Didem Seda Gültekin, Funda Kont Çobankara
    Journal of International Dental Sciences.2025; 11(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • An Unusual Case of Maxillary First Molar: A Case Report
    Reetu Shrestha
    International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT).2024; : 1330.     CrossRef
  • Root canal therapy of maxillary first molar with seven canals diagnosed using cone beam computed tomography – a case report
    Saini Rashmi, Saini V. Kumar
    Tanta Dental Journal.2022; 19(3): 169.     CrossRef
  • Four-Rooted Maxillary First Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gabriel Magnucki, Sven V. K. Mietling, Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni
    International Journal of Dentistry.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic treatment of various palatal roots in maxillary molars
    Chengshi Wei, Keyi Li, Lili Shen, Guangliang Bai, Xiufen Tian
    The Journal of the American Dental Association.2021; 152(12): 1044.     CrossRef
  • Diversity of root canal morphology of maxillary first molars
    Juhász Kincső-Réka, Kovács Mónika, Pop Mihai, Pop Silvia, Kerekes-Máthé Bernadette
    Bulletin of Medical Sciences.2021; 94(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic Management of Maxillary First Molar with Seven Root Canals Diagnosed Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Case Report
    Ravindranath Megha, Venkatachalam Prakash
    World Journal of Dentistry.2021; 12(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic management of the maxillary first molar with special root canals: A case report and review of the literature
    Zhi-Hui Zhang, Hai-Lin Yao, Yan Zhang, Xiao Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(12): 2590.     CrossRef
  • Management of a permanent maxillary first molar with unusual crown and root anatomy: a case report
    Prateeksha Chowdhry, Pallavi Reddy, Mamta Kaushik
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography in perplexing endodontic cases
    Amandeep Kaur, Ajay Logani
    Endodontology.2018; 30(2): 187.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with seven root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning
    VijayReddy Venumuddala, Sridhar Moturi, SV Satish, BKalyan Chakravarthy, Sudhakar Malapati
    Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.2017; 7(5): 297.     CrossRef
  • 309 View
  • 2 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Research Article
Analysis of C-shaped root canal configuration in maxillary molars in a Korean population using cone-beam computed tomography
Hyoung-Hoon Jo, Jeong-Bum Min, Ho-Keel Hwang
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(1):55-62.   Published online January 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.55
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of root fusion and C-shaped root canals in maxillary molars, and to classify the types of C-shaped canal by analyzing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a Korean population.

Materials and Methods

Digitized CBCT images from 911 subjects were obtained in Chosun University Dental Hospital between February 2010 and July 2012 for orthodontic treatment. Among them, a total of selected 3,553 data of maxillary molars were analyzed retrospectively. Tomography sections in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes were displayed by PiViewstar and Rapidia MPR software (Infinitt Co.). The incidence and types of root fusion and C-shaped root canals were evaluated and the incidence between the first and the second molar was compared using Chi-square test.

Results

Root fusion was present in 3.2% of the first molars and 19.5% of the second molars, and fusion of mesiobuccal and palatal root was dominant. C-shaped root canals were present in 0.8% of the first molars and 2.7% of the second molars. The frequency of root fusion and C-shaped canal was significantly higher in the second molar than the first molar (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In a Korean population, maxillary molars showed total 11.3% of root fusion and 1.8% of C-shaped root canals. Furthermore, root fusion and C-shaped root canals were seen more frequently in the maxillary second molars.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of C‐Shaped Canal Configuration in Maxillary Molars Among an Iranian Population
    Nafiseh Nikkerdar, Mohammad Moslehi, Amin Golshah, Mario Dioguardi
    International Journal of Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endodontic treatment of a C‐shaped mandibular second molar with narrow dentinal thickness: A case report
    Mina Mehrjouei, Hamid Jafarzadeh, Pourya Esmaeelpour, Maryam Khorasanchi
    Clinical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of 2- and 3-dimensional anatomic parameters of C-shaped root canals with cone beam computed tomography, microcomputed tomography, and nanocomputed tomography
    Miguel Angel Ventura Molina, Giovane Oliveira Silva, Amanda Pelegrin Candemil, Rafael Verardino de Camargo, Ruben Pauwels, Reinhilde Jacobs, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves
    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology.2023; 136(6): 759.     CrossRef
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Analysis of an Unusual Configuration of the Upper First Molar With a C-shaped Canal With Apically Fused Roots: A Case Report
    Kapil D Wahane, Anand V Bansod, Sudha mattigatti, Rushikesh Mahaparale, Yuvraj B Rote, Mayur B Wanjari
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of C-Shaped Canal Morphology in Mandibular and Maxillary Second Molars in an Iraqi Subpopulation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Kazhan Abdalrahman, Ranjdar Talabani, Sara Kazzaz, Dlsoz Babarasul, Berndt Koslowski
    Scanning.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Root and canal-specific features of maxillary first molars with fused roots
    Katarina Beljic-Ivanovic, Branislav Karadzic
    Vojnosanitetski pregled.2022; 79(11): 1092.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of maxillary molar with abnormality
    Kkot-Byeol Bae, Bin-Na Lee, Hoon-Sang Chang, In-Nam Hwang, Won-Mann Oh, Yun-Chan Hwang
    Oral Biology Research.2022; 46(4): 195.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic treatment of the maxillary first molar with palatal canal variations: A case report and review of literature
    Kai Chen, Xing Ran, Yan Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(32): 12036.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of C-shaped canals in maxillary molars in a Chinese population using CBCT
    Yuyan Qian, Yamei Li, Jukun Song, Ping Zhang, Zhu Chen
    BMC Medical Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive evaluation of root and root canal morphology of mandibular second molars in a Saudi subpopulation evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography
    Moazzy I. Almansour, Saad M. Al‑Zubaidi, Abdulmjeed S. Enizy, Ahmed A. Madfa
    BMC Oral Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of C-shaped canal configuration in maxillary molars: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study
    Emre KÖSE, Rüya AK
    Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences.2021; 11(3): 444.     CrossRef
  • Maxillary First Molars with Two Palatal Root Canals
    Kun-Hwa Sung, Ho-Keel Hwang, Hyoung-Hoon Jo, Konstantinos Michalakis
    Case Reports in Dentistry.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Preferred Reporting Items for Epidemiologic Cross-sectional Studies on Root and Root Canal Anatomy Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Technology: A Systematized Assessment
    Jorge N.R. Martins, Anil Kishen, Duarte Marques, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, João Caramês, António Mata, Marco A. Versiani
    Journal of Endodontics.2020; 46(7): 915.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of root and root canal morphology of elderly Korean patients maxillary molars using cone-beam computed tomography
    Tae-Yong Lee, Mi-Yeon Kim, Sun-Ho Kim, Jeong-Hee Kim
    The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2020; 58(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars—A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography
    Jorge N.R. Martins, Duarte Marques, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, João Caramês, António Mata, Marco A. Versiani
    Archives of Oral Biology.2020; 113: 104589.     CrossRef
  • Prevalência estimada de canais “C- Shaped”: Uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise
    Natália Pereira da Silva Falcão, Sandro Junio de Oliveira Tavares, Ludmila Silva Guimarães, Katherine Azevedo Batistela Rodrigues Thuller, Leonardo dos Santos Antunes, Estefano Borgo Sarmento, Fellipe Navarro Azevedo de Azevedo, Cinthya Cristina Gomes, Ca
    Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento.2020; : 91.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the internal anatomy of paramolar tubercles using cone-beam computed tomography
    G. Colakoglu, I. Kaya Buyukbayram, M. A. Elcin, M. Kazak, H. Sezer
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.2020; 42(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Prevalence of Pyramidal Molars in Adolescent
    Woojin Kwon, Hyung-Jun Choi, Jaeho Lee, Je Seon Song
    THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2020; 47(4): 389.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence Studies on Root Canal Anatomy Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Imaging: A Systematic Review
    Jorge N.R. Martins, Duarte Marques, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, João Caramês, Marco A. Versiani
    Journal of Endodontics.2019; 45(4): 372.     CrossRef
  • Fused roots of maxillary molars: characterization and prevalence in a Latin American sub-population: a cone beam computed tomography study
    Maytté Marcano-Caldera, Jose Luis Mejia-Cardona, María del Pilar Blanco-Uribe, Elena Carolina Chaverra-Mesa, Didier Rodríguez-Lezama, Jose Hernán Parra-Sánchez
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An original micro‐CT study and meta‐analysis of the internal and external anatomy of maxillary molars—implications for endodontic treatment
    Iwona M. Tomaszewska, Anna Jarzębska, Bendik Skinningsrud, Przemysław A. Pękala, Sebastian Wroński, Joe Iwanaga
    Clinical Anatomy.2018; 31(6): 838.     CrossRef
  • A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study of Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Permanent Molars in a Thai Population
    Roserin Ratanajirasut, Anchana Panichuttra, Soontra Panmekiate
    Journal of Endodontics.2018; 44(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective Assessment of Healing Outcome of Endodontic Treatment for Mandibular Molars with C-shaped Root Canal
    Kishore Kumar Majety, Basanta Kumar Choudhury, Anika Bansal, Achla Sethi, Jaina Panjabi
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2017; 18(7): 591.     CrossRef
  • The morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a polish population
    Katarzyna Olczak, Halina Pawlicka
    BMC Medical Imaging.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 238 View
  • 3 Download
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP