Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Salah H. Mahmoud 5 Articles
Correlation between different methodologies used to evaluate the marginal adaptation of proximal dentin gingival margins elevated using a glass hybrid
Hoda S. Ismail, Brian R. Morrow, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(4):e36.   Published online September 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e36
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the marginal quality of glass hybrid (GH) material used to elevate dentin gingival margins, and to analyze the consistency of the results obtained by 3 in vitro methods.

Materials and Methods

Ten teeth received compound class II cavities with subgingival margins. The dentin gingival margins were elevated with GH, followed by resin composite. The GH/gingival dentin interfaces were examined through digital microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using resin replicas, and according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. After initial evaluations, all teeth were subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles, followed by repeating the same marginal evaluations and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis for the interfacial zone of 2 specimens. Marginal quality was expressed as the percentage of continuous margin at ×200 for microscopic techniques and as the frequency of each score for FDI ranking. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Pearson and Spearmen correlation coefficients.

Results

None of the testing techniques proved the significance of the aging factor. Moderate and strong significant correlations were found between the testing techniques. The EDS results suggested the presence of an ion-exchange layer along the GH/gingival dentin interface of aged specimens.

Conclusions

The marginal quality of the GH/dentin gingival interface defied aging by thermocycling. The replica SEM and FDI ranking results had stronger correlations with each other than either showed with the digital microscopy results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of the biomechanical effects of the post-core crown, endocrown and inlay crown after deep margin elevation and its clinical significance
    Feng Wu, Xiaomin Su, Yue Shi, Juan Bai, Jing Feng, Xilin Sun, Xuanqi Wang, Hongyan Wang, Jiayu Wen, Jie Kang
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of different restorative systems and aging on marginal adaptation of resin composites to deep proximal margins
    Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(2): 346.     CrossRef
  • Elevación de margen profundo, Revisión sistemática
    Doris Stefania Abad Cordero, Silvia Alexandra Reinoso Ortiz, Dolores Aracely Cedeño Zambrano, Manuel León Velastegui
    Anatomía Digital.2023; 6(4.3): 401.     CrossRef
  • 323 View
  • 21 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength
Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Jelena Juloski, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(2):e15.   Published online March 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e15
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This review aimed to characterize the effect of direct restorative material types and adhesive protocols on marginal adaptation and the bond strength of the interface between the material and the proximal dentin/cementum. An electronic search of 3 databases (the National Library of Medicine [MEDLINE/PubMed], Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Studies were included if they evaluated marginal adaptation or bond strength tests for proximal restorations under the cementoenamel junction. Only 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies presented a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of the materials used and the methodologies and evaluation criteria of each test; therefore, only a descriptive analysis could be conducted. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following predetermined criteria. To summarize the results of the included studies, the type of restorative material affected the test results, whereas the use of different adhesive protocols had an insignificant effect on the results. It could be concluded that various categories of resin-based composites could be a suitable choice for clinicians to elevate proximal dentin/cementum margins, rather than the open sandwich technique with resin-modified glass ionomers. Despite challenges in bonding to proximal dentin/cementum margins, different adhesive protocols provided comparable outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Bioactive Liner's Effect on Marginal Adaptation of Class II Composite Restorations: A Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
    Girija S Sajjan, Naveena Ponnada, Praveen Dalavai, Madhu Varma Kanumuri, Venkata Karteek Varma Penmatsa, B V Sindhuja
    World Journal of Dentistry.2025; 15(9): 749.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cervical Margin Relocation With Different Injectable Restorative Materials on Fracture Resistance of Molars Received MOD CAD/CAM Onlay Restorations
    Basema N. Roshdy, Radwa I. Eltoukhy, Ashraf I. Ali, Salah Hasab Mahmoud
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short dentin etching with universal adhesives: effect on bond strength and gingival margin adaptation
    Hoda Saleh Ismail, Hanan Ahmed Nabil Soliman
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Awareness and Practice of Deep Margin Elevation among Dental Practitioners in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Mythri Padaru, Preethesh Shetty, Namith Rai, Raksha Bhat
    Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of different restorative systems and aging on marginal adaptation of resin composites to deep proximal margins
    Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(2): 346.     CrossRef
  • Management of subgingival proximal defects
    Jagruti Mutalikdesai, K. C. Dhaniba, Supriya Choudhary, Promila Verma, Rhythm Bains
    Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences.2024; 14: 15.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on the Pulpal and Periodontal Health of Teeth: A Systematic Review
    S Srirama, S Jain, B Arul, K Prabakar, V Natanasabapathy
    Operative Dentistry.2024; 49(4): 388.     CrossRef
  • Alternative Direct Restorative Materials for Dental Amalgam: A Concise Review Based on an FDI Policy Statement
    Gottfried Schmalz, Falk Schwendicke, Reinhard Hickel, Jeffrey A. Platt
    International Dental Journal.2024; 74(4): 661.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the stress distribution in base materials and thicknesses in composite resin restorations
    Min-Kwan Jung, Mi-Jeong Jeon, Jae-Hoon Kim, Sung-Ae Son, Jeong-Kil Park, Deog-Gyu Seo
    Heliyon.2024; 10(3): e25040.     CrossRef
  • Influence of curing mode and aging on the bonding performance of universal adhesives in coronal and root dentin
    Hoda Saleh Ismail, Ashraf Ibrahim Ali, Mohamed Elshirbeny Elawsya
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ESTHETIC RESTORATION OF ANTERIOR TEETH
    Lyudmila Tatintsyan, Minas Poghosyan, Armen Shaginyan, Hovhannes Gevorgyan, Biayna Hoveyan, Tatevik Margaryan, Arsen Kupelyan
    BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY.2023; : 16.     CrossRef
  • Deep margin elevation—Present status and future directions
    Florin Eggmann, Jose M. Ayub, Julián Conejo, Markus B. Blatz
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • 518 View
  • 21 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
The effect of preheating resin composites on surface hardness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ali A. Elkaffas, Radwa I. Eltoukhy, Salwa A. Elnegoly, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(4):e41.   Published online October 29, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e41
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of preheating on the hardness of nanofilled, nanoceramic, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search of papers on MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost was performed. Only in vitro studies were included. Non-English studies, case reports, clinical trials, and review articles were excluded. A meta-analysis of the reviewed studies was conducted to quantify differences in the microhardness of the Z250 microhybrid resin composite using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.

Results

Only 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences between the non-preheated and preheated modes for both the top and bottom surfaces of the specimens (p < 0.05). The microhardness of the Z250 resin composite on the top surface in the preheated mode (78.1 ± 2.9) was higher than in the non-preheated mode (67.4 ± 4.0; p < 0.001). Moreover, the microhardness of the Z250 resin composite on the bottom surface in the preheated mode (71.8 ± 3.8) was higher than in the non-preheated mode (57.5 ± 5.7, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although the results reported in the reviewed studies showed great variability, sufficient scientific evidence was found to support the hypothesis that preheating can improve the hardness of resin composites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of pre-heating on physical–mechanical–chemical properties of contemporary resin composites
    Thamires Bueno, Nivien Masoud, Anna Akkus, Italo Silva, Karen McPherson, Adilson Yoshio Furuse, Fabio Rizzante
    Odontology.2025; 113(1): 135.     CrossRef
  • Clinical performance of different bulk‐fill composite resin systems in classIIcavities: A 2‐year randomized clinical trial
    Badria Goda, Kareem Hamdi, Radwa I. Eltoukhy, Ashraf I. Ali, Salah Hasab Mahmoud
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(8): 1122.     CrossRef
  • Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with snowplow technique using flowable or preheated packable bulk-fill composite resin as gingival increment by dye extraction method: An in vitro study
    M. A. Ranjini, V. Geetha, B. Vedavathi, H. K. Ashok, Akshata J. Airsang, S. Swathi
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(11): 1158.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Light‐Curing Time and Increment Thickness on the Properties of Bulk Fill Composite Resins With Distinct Application Systems
    Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres, Taiana Paola Prado, Daniele Mara da Silva Ávila, Cesar Rogério Pucci, Alessandra Bühler Borges, Heng Bo Jiang
    International Journal of Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Last Generation Bis-GMA Free Composite For Indirect Posterior Restorations: A Case Report
    M. Delgado
    Endodontics Today.2024; 21(4): 305.     CrossRef
  • Influence of preheating and water storage on the color, whiteness, and translucency of modern resin‐based composites
    Corina Mirela Prodan, Cristina Gasparik, Javier Ruiz‐López, Diana Dudea
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The clinical performance of dental resin composite repeatedly preheated: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mahmoud Elkady, Safaa Abdelhakim, Mona Riad
    Journal of Dentistry.2024; 144: 104940.     CrossRef
  • Preheating effect on microhardness and depth of cure of three bulk-fill composite resins: An in vitro study
    Aashna Sunil Sahetia, Divya Rupesh Jain, Padmaja Panditrao Sirsat, Meenal N. Gulve, Swapnil J. Kolhe, Surbhi P. Patel
    Endodontology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Veneers Using Pre-heated Resin Composite With Two Conventional Resin Cements: An In Vitro Study
    Ghalia Akyle, Hassan Achour
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Glass Fiber Reinforcement on Marginal Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations: An In Vitro Pilot Study
    Csaba Dudás, Emánuel Kardos, Melinda Székely, Lea Ádám, Zsuzsanna Bardocz-Veres, Evelyn Szőllősi, Kinga Mária Jánosi, Bernadette Kerekes-Máthé
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(12): 410.     CrossRef
  • Effect of preheating on the physicochemical properties and bond strength of composite resins utilized as dental cements: An in vitro study
    Carolina Carramilo Raposo, Luanna Marinho Sereno Nery, Edilausson Moreno Carvalho, Paulo Vitor Campos Ferreira, Diego Machado Ardenghi, José Bauer, Darlon Martins Lima
    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2023; 129(1): 229.e1.     CrossRef
  • Examining the Impact of Preheating on the Fracture Toughness and Microhardness of Composite Resin: A Systematic Review
    Jay Bhopatkar, Anuja Ikhar, Manoj Chandak, Aditya Patel, Paridhi Agrawal
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins
    Jhonn Luis Bernaldo-Faustino, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez, Carlos A. Munoz-Viveros
    International Journal of Dentistry.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Efecto del precalentamiento en la microdureza superficial de seis resinas compuestas
    Gloria Cristina Moreno Abello, Kavhas Castro, Paula Alejandra Ovalle Barrera, Paula Bernal, Laura Catalina Lara Hernández
    Universitas Odontologica.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Wear and Color Stability of Preheated Bulk-fill and Conventional Resin Composites
    AA Abdulmajeed, AA Suliman, BJ Selivany, A Altitinchi, TA Sulaiman
    Operative Dentistry.2022; 47(5): 585.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material
    Anastazja Skapska, Zenon Komorek, Mariusz Cierech, Elzbieta Mierzwinska-Nastalska
    Polymers.2022; 14(13): 2686.     CrossRef
  • Effects of ionizing radiation on surface properties of current restorative dental materials
    Débora Michelle Gonçalves de Amorim, Aretha Heitor Veríssimo, Anne Kaline Claudino Ribeiro, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e Souza, Isauremi Vieira de Assunção, Marilia Regalado Galvão Rabelo Caldas, Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: A systematic review
    Linh Tran, Dao Ngoc Hien Tam, Abdelrahman Elshafay, Thao Dang, Kenji Hirayama, Nguyen Tien Huy
    BMC Medical Research Methodology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preheated composite: Innovative approach for aesthetic restoration
    Reema N Asani, Vandana J Gade, Kalyani G Umale, Rachana Gawande, Rohit R Amburle, Raksha R Kusumbe, Purva P Kale, Priya R Kosare
    Archives of Dental Research.2021; 11(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • 237 View
  • 5 Download
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ali A. Elkaffas, Hamdi H. H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(3):e29.   Published online June 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the µTBS of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the µTBS of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the µTBS of Scotchbond Universal adhesive.

Results

Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Multi-mode ‘universal’ adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Proximal-Cervical Undermined Enamel Areas on Marginal Quality and Enamel Integrity of Laboratory and CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays and Partial Crowns
    Roland Frankenberger, Katharina Friedrich, Marie-Christine Dudek, Julia Winter, Norbert Krämer, Matthias J. Roggendorf
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2025; 16(3): 82.     CrossRef
  • Tooth-composite bond failure with a universal and an etch-and-rinse adhesive depending on mode and frequency of application
    Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Mathilde Tittel, Hartmut Schneider, Maximilian Bemmann, Marco Pellino, Tobias Meissner, Florian Fuchs, Christian Hannig, Florian Tetschke, Kyung-Jin Park, Michaela Strumpski, Rainer Haak
    Dental Materials.2024; 40(2): 359.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between Total-etch and Universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial
    Kiran Javed, Nouman Noor, Muhammad Zubair Nasir, Manzoor Ahmed Manzoor
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adhesion and sealing of different universal adhesive systems associated with bulk‐fill resins after using endodontic irrigation solutions: An in vitro study
    Érika Mayumi Omoto, Anderson Catelan, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, Fernanda de Souza e Silva Ramos, Caio César Pavani, André Luiz Fraga Briso, Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2024; 50(2): 309.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the effects of combined application of dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate and MDP on dentin bonding and antimicrobial properties
    Jiadi Shen, Ming Ma, Yun Huang, Haochen Miao, Xin Wei
    Journal of Materials Science.2023; 58(31): 12685.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow-up
    Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Li-Tzu Wang, Markus B. Blatz
    Journal of Prosthodontic Research.2023; 67(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Preceded Tumor Therapeutic Irradiation on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives Applied in Self-Etch Mode to Human Dentin In Vitro
    Sina Broscheit, Dirk Vordermark, Reinhard Gerlach, Christian Ralf Gernhardt
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(13): 7873.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Performance and Marginal Integrity of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in a Randomized 36-Month Study
    Rainer Haak, Gesa Stache, Hartmut Schneider, Matthias Häfer, Gerhard Schmalz, Ellen Schulz-Kornas
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(18): 5776.     CrossRef
  • Universal Adhesives in Clinical Dentistry
    Fusun Ozer, Shilpa Patnaikuni
    Science, Art and Religion.2023; 2(1--2): 6.     CrossRef
  • Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength
    Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Jelena Juloski, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluation
    Joana Vasconcelos e Cruz, António H. S. Delgado, Samuel Félix, José Brito, Luísa Gonçalves, Mário Polido
    Polymers.2022; 14(7): 1462.     CrossRef
  • Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?
    António H. S. Delgado, Hasan Jamal, Anne Young, Paul Ashley
    BMC Oral Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does acid etching prior to applying universal adhesives affect the bond strength of glass fiber post to root dentin?
    Helder Callegaro Velho, Eduardo Trindade Dalence, Pablo Soares Machado, Marília Pivetta Rippe, Jovito Adiel Skupien, Vinícius Felipe Wandscher
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2021; 105: 102795.     CrossRef
  • Does Adhesive Layer Thickness and Tag Length Influence Short/Long-Term Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems? An In-Vitro Study
    Naji Kharouf, Tarek Ashi, Ammar Eid, Levi Maguina, Jihed Zghal, Nairy Sekayan, Rim Bourgi, Louis Hardan, Salvatore Sauro, Youssef Haikel, Davide Mancino
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(6): 2635.     CrossRef
  • Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review
    Maicon Sebold, Carolina Bosso André, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Lorenzo Breschi, Marcelo Giannini
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(18): 1941.     CrossRef
  • Laboratory methods for measuring adhesive bond strength between restoration materials and hard tooth tissues
    I.Ya. Poyurovskaya, A.P. Polikarpova, F.S. Rusanov
    Stomatologiya.2021; 100(5): 88.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Curcumin Suspension and Vitamin C on Dentin Shear Bond Strength and Durability. A Pilot Study
    Dalia A. Abuelenain, Ensanya A. Abou Neel, Tariq S. Abuhaimed, Amal M. Alamri, Hanan S. Ammar, Sahar M. N. Bukhary
    The Open Dentistry Journal.2021; 15(1): 540.     CrossRef
  • Effect of 9.3 μm CO2 and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser vs. Bur Preparations on Marginal Adaptation in Enamel and Dentin of Mixed Class V Cavities Restored With Different Restorative Systems
    Clara Isabel Anton y Otero, Enrico Di Bella, Ivo Krejci, Tissiana Bortolotto
    Frontiers in Dental Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adhesion strategy and curing mode of a universal adhesive influence the bonding of dual-cured core build-up resin composite to dentin
    Ahmed Eid Elsayed, Mohamed Amr Kamel, Farid Sabry El-Askary
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Influence of etching mode and composite resin type on bond strength to dentin using universal adhesive system
    Stefan Dačić, Milan Miljković, Aleksandar Mitić, Goran Radenković, Marija Anđelković‐Apostolović, Milica Jovanović
    Microscopy Research and Technique.2021; 84(6): 1212.     CrossRef
  • Universal adhesives - a new direction in the development of adhesive systems
    A. Tichý, K. Hosaka, J. Tagami
    Česká stomatologie a praktické zubní lékařství.2020; 120(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Over-Etching and Prolonged Application Time of a Universal Adhesive on Dentin Bond Strength
    Phoebe Burrer, Hoang Dang, Matej Par, Thomas Attin, Tobias T. Tauböck
    Polymers.2020; 12(12): 2902.     CrossRef
  • Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance
    Marina Ciccone Giacomini, Polliana Mendes Candia Scaffa, Rafael Simões Gonçalves, Giovanna Speranza Zabeu, Cristina de Mattos Pimenta Vidal, Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho, Heitor Marques Honório, Linda Wang
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 110: 103925.     CrossRef
  • Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance
    Sanket Nagarkar, Nicole Theis‐Mahon, Jorge Perdigão
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.2019; 107(6): 2121.     CrossRef
  • Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations
    Wen Zhou, Shiyu Liu, Xuedong Zhou, Matthias Hannig, Stefan Rupf, Jin Feng, Xian Peng, Lei Cheng
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(3): 723.     CrossRef
  • 403 View
  • 11 Download
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Khaldoan H. Alshaikh, Hamdi H. H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(2):e14.   Published online March 6, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e14
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze previously published studies of the effects of dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents on the bonding of self-etch (SE) adhesives to dentin. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of the above-mentioned surface pretreatment methods on the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin.

Materials and Methods

An electronic search was performed using the following databases: Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect. The online search was performed using the following keywords: ‘dentin’ or ‘hypochlorous acid’ or ‘sodium hypochlorite’ and ‘self-etch adhesive.’ The following categories were excluded during the assessment process: non-English articles, randomized clinical trials, case reports, animal studies, and review articles. The reviewed studies were subjected to meta-analysis to quantify the effect of the application time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) deproteinizing agents on bonding to dentin.

Results

Only 9 laboratory studies fit the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled average microtensile bond strength values to dentin pre-treated with deproteinizing agents (15.71 MPa) was significantly lower than those of the non-treated control group (20.94 MPa).

Conclusions

In light of the currently available scientific evidence, dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents does not enhance the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin. The HOCl deproteinizing agent exhibited minimal adverse effects on bonding to dentin in comparison with NaOCl solutions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluating the remnants of Al 2 O 3 particles on different dentine substrate after sandblasting and various cleaning protocols
    Faeze Hamze, Khotan Aflatoonian, Mahshid Mohammadibassir, Mohammad-Bagher Rezvani
    Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2025; 39(6): 869.     CrossRef
  • Preservation Strategies for Interfacial Integrity in Restorative Dentistry: A Non-Comprehensive Literature Review
    Carmem S. Pfeifer, Fernanda S. Lucena, Fernanda M. Tsuzuki
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2025; 16(2): 42.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of Er, Cr:YSGG laser and antioxidant pretreatments on bonding quality to caries-induced dentin
    Lamiaa M. Moharam, Haidy N. Salem, Ahmed Abdou, Rasha H. Afifi
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparison of different cleaning approaches for blood contamination after curing universal adhesives on the dentine surface
    Ting Liu, Haifeng Xie, Chen Chen
    Dental Materials.2024; 40(11): 1786.     CrossRef
  • Effect of fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with a conservative endodontic cavity design
    Merve Nezir, Beyza Arslandaş Dinçtürk, Ceyda Sarı, Cemile Kedici Alp, Hanife Altınışık
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of the use of bromelain associated with bioactive glass-ceramic on dentin/adhesive interface
    Rocio Geng Vivanco, Ana Beatriz Silva Sousa, Viviane de de Cássia Oliveira, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Experimental and Chitosan-Infused Adhesive with Dentin Pretreated with Femtosecond Laser, Methylene Blue-Activated Low-Level Laser, and Phosphoric Acid
    Fahad Alkhudhairy
    Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery.2024; 42(10): 634.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Effective Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Etched Dentin after Dentin Pretreatment: An In-vitro Study
    Muhammed Bilal, Shiraz Pasha, Arathi S. Nair
    Journal of the Scientific Society.2024; 51(4): 545.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Different Dentin Deproteinizing Agents on Bond Strength and Microleakage of Universal Adhesive to Dentin
    Fatih Bedir, Gül Yıldız Telatar
    Journal of Advanced Oral Research.2023; 14(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Addition of metal chlorides to a HOCl conditioner can enhance bond strength to smear layer deproteinized dentin
    Kittisak Sanon, Antonin Tichy, Takashi Hatayama, Ornnicha Thanatvarakorn, Taweesak Prasansuttiporn, Takahiro Wada, Yasushi Shimada, Keiichi Hosaka, Masatoshi Nakajima
    Dental Materials.2022; 38(8): 1235.     CrossRef
  • Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting Inlay Restorations: An In Vitro Micro-CT Study
    Linah M. Ashy, Hanadi Marghalani
    Materials.2022; 15(17): 6161.     CrossRef
  • Collagen-depletion strategies in dentin as alternatives to the hybrid layer concept and their effect on bond strength: a systematic review
    António H. S. Delgado, Madalena Belmar Da Costa, Mário Cruz Polido, Ana Mano Azul, Salvatore Sauro
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NaOCl Application after Acid Etching and Retention of Cervical Restorations: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
    M Favetti, T Schroeder, AF Montagner, RR Moraes, T Pereira-Cenci, MS Cenci
    Operative Dentistry.2022; 47(3): 268.     CrossRef
  • Resin infiltrant protects deproteinized dentin against erosive and abrasive wear
    Ana Theresa Queiroz de Albuquerque, Bruna Oliveira Bezerra, Isabelly de Carvalho Leal, Maria Denise Rodrigues de Moraes, Mary Anne S. Melo, Vanara Florêncio Passos
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bis[2-(Methacryloyloxy) Ethyl] Phosphate as a Primer for Enamel and Dentine
    R. Alkattan, G. Koller, S. Banerji, S. Deb
    Journal of Dental Research.2021; 100(10): 1081.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study
    Bruna Sinjari, Manlio Santilli, Gianmaria D’Addazio, Imena Rexhepi, Alessia Gigante, Sergio Caputi, Tonino Traini
    Materials.2020; 13(13): 3026.     CrossRef
  • A novel prime-&-rinse mode using MDP and MMPs inhibitors improves the dentin bond durability of self-etch adhesive
    Jingqiu Xu, Mingxing Li, Wenting Wang, Zhifang Wu, Chaoyang Wang, Xiaoting Jin, Ling Zhang, Wenxiang Jiang, Baiping Fu
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 104: 103698.     CrossRef
  • The effects of deproteinization and primer treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin
    In-Hye Bae, Sung-Ae Son, Jeong-Kil Park
    Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2019; 46(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Papain and Bromelain Enzymes on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial Dentin in Different Adhesive Systems
    Farahnaz Sharafeddin, Mina Safari
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2019; 20(9): 1077.     CrossRef
  • 287 View
  • 4 Download
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP