KACD
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 46(1); 2021 > Article
- Research Article A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials
-
Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres
, Jader Camilo Pinto, Gabriella Oliveira Figueira, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Mario Tanomaru-Filho -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e2
Published online: December 8, 2020
Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
- Correspondence to Mario Tanomaru-Filho, DDS, PhD. Full Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Rua Humaitá, 1680 CEP Araraquara, SP 14801-903, Brazil. tanomaru@uol.com.br
• Received: March 13, 2020 • Revised: June 11, 2020 • Accepted: June 17, 2020
Copyright © 2021. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- 36 Views
- 2 Download
- 4 Web of Science
Abstract
-
Objectives New premixed bioceramic root repair materials require moisture for setting. Using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), this study evaluated the filling ability and volumetric changes of calcium silicate-based repair materials (mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity [MTA HP] and Bio-C Repair, Angelus), in comparison with a zinc oxide and eugenol-based material (intermediate restorative material [IRM]; Dentsply DeTrey).
-
Materials and Methods Gypsum models with cavities 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter were manufactured and scanned using micro-CT (SkyScan 1272. Bruker). The cavities were filled with the cements and scanned again to evaluate their filling capacity. Another scan was performed after immersing the samples in distilled water for 7 days to assess the volumetric changes of the cements. The statistical significance of differences in the data was evaluated using analysis of variance and the Tukey test with a 5% significance level.
-
Results Bio-C Repair had a greater filling ability than MTA HP (p < 0.05). IRM was similar to Bio-C and MTA HP (p > 0.05). MTA HP presented the largest volumetric change (p < 0.05), showing more volume loss than Bio-C and IRM, which were similar (p > 0.05).
-
Conclusions Bio-C Repair is a new endodontic material with excellent filling capacity and low volumetric change. The gypsum model proposed for evaluating filling ability and volumetric changes by micro-CT had appropriate and reproducible results. This model may enhance the physicochemical evaluation of premixed bioceramic materials, which need moisture for setting.
INTRODUCTION
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a material indicated for treatments of the vital pulp, regenerative endodontic therapies, apical barriers, perforation repairs, and root-end filling due to its biocompatibility, bioactivity, and proper sealing [1,2]. Therefore, MTA represents the gold standard for comparisons with new materials [3]. However, MTA presents some disadvantages, such as a long setting time, difficulties in handling, and a risk of tooth discoloration [1,3]. Since a number of bioactive endodontic cements based on calcium silicates have been introduced to the market aiming to overcome the drawbacks of MTA, further investigations using accurate methodologies should be performed in order to confirm their long-term effectiveness [1].
MTA repair high-plasticity (MTA HP; Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) has an organic plasticizer added to the distilled water in order to improve its physicochemical properties, such as plasticity [4]. Moreover, in MTA HP, bismuth oxide was replaced by calcium tungstate as a radiopacifier to prevent tooth staining [4]. Previous studies observed appropriate biological and physicochemical properties of this material [4,5,6,7]. Bio-C Repair (Angelus) is a new, premixed, ready-to-use bioceramic repair material [8]. Bio-C Repair showed proper biological properties, promoting high cell viability, cell adhesion, and cell migration, as well as inducing biomineralization [8,9]. However, no study has evaluated the physicochemical properties of Bio-C Repair.
From a clinical point of view, a proper filling is directly correlated to the prevention of bacterial leakage [10]. Thus, a mineral precipitate at the interface between the calcium silicate-based cement and dentin improve the sealing ability of this class of materials [11]. Aiming to assess the filling ability of endodontic materials, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) has been used as a tool that enables reproducible analysis, promoting accurate nondestructive volumetric measurements of filling materials [10,12]. Furthermore, micro-CT has been used to assess the dimensional stability and solubility of endodontic materials based on calcium silicate by calculating the volumetric change after immersion of these materials in a fluid environment [13,14]. However, no studies have yet evaluated the filling ability and volumetric changes of MTA HP and Bio-C Repair.
Calcium silicate-based materials need water to set through a hydration reaction [3]. Calcium sulfate, usually in the form of dehydrate (gypsum), can be used to control the rate of the setting process [15]. Therefore, plaster molds are recommended for the evaluation of these materials, which should be kept at 37°C and > 95% humidity for 24 hours before testing [16].
Since micro-CT can enhance the conventional evaluation of reparative materials [12], in light of the importance of assessing the physical properties of newly developed premixed bioceramic materials, a method that takes into account the fact that calcium silicate-based cements require moisture for setting should be applied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to use micro-CT to assess the filling capacity and volumetric changes of repair materials (MTA HP and Bio-C Repair), in comparison with a zinc oxide and eugenol-based material (intermediate restorative material [IRM]), using plaster models. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference among these materials for both properties evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The specification of the endodontic materials used in this study are described in Table 1.
Table 1
The manufacturers, composition, and proportions of the endodontic materials used in this study
According to ISO 6876/2012, gypsum molds should be used to assess materials that require moisture for setting [17]. Therefore, metal molds were used to fabricate standardized gypsum-based models (Durone IV Salmon, Dentsply, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil) with cavities measuring 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter (n = 6 per group). The sample size for this study was calculated based on a previous investigation with similar methodology [18]. G*Power 3.1.7 for Windows (Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany) was used for the sample calculation. One-way analysis of variance was used, with alpha type error of 0.05, beta power of .80 and effect size of 0.89. Six specimens per group were calculated as the necessary sample size.
Although IRM is a zinc oxide and eugenol-based cement, the setting of all materials was assessed before the micro-CT procedure. The gypsum-based models were scanned using micro-CT (SkyScan 1272, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). The scanning parameters were: 100 kV X-ray tube voltage and 100 µA anode current; Cu filter of 0.11 mm; isotropic voxel of 15 μm; and an evolution cycle of 180°. After the first scan, the cavities were immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The samples were then filled with each material by a single calibrated operator and stored in an oven at 37ºC and 95% humidity for 24 hours. New scans were performed after setting of the materials and after 7 days of immersion in distilled water. The images were reconstructed using NRecon software (V1.6.10.4, Bruker-MicroCT, Kontich, Belgium). The correction parameters when evaluating the empty models were: 2 for smoothing, 0 for beam hardening, and 7 for ring artifacts. After filling, the values were: 5 for smoothing, 10 for beam hardening and 10 for ring artifacts for IRM; 5 for smoothing, 0 for beam hardening, and 10 for ring artifacts for MTA HP; and 3 for smoothing, 0 for beam hardening, and 10 for ring artifacts for Bio-C Repair. The reconstructed images were superposed by Data Viewer software (v1.5.2.4, Bruker). The total volume (mm3) of the materials was calculated by CTAn software (v1.15.4.0, Bruker-MicroCT), using global thresholding. The volume of the empty cavities was used to determine the total volume of each cavity for calculating the percentage filled by each material. The difference between the volume of the filled cavities before and after immersion was considered the volumetric change of each cement. A schematic figure illustrating the methodology is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Schematic figure of the assessments of filling ability and volumetric changes. Gypsum–based models with cavities measuring 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter were manufactured and scanned using micro-computed tomography before and after filling. The samples were immersed in distilled water for 7 days, and another scan was performed.
The results obtained were analyzed using a normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov). The statistical analysis was performed with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey parametric test (α = 5%).
RESULTS
The results are presented in Table 2. Bio-C Repair had the highest values for filling ability, showing better results than MTA HP (p < 0.05). IRM was similar to Bio-C and MTA HP (p > 0.05). Regarding volumetric changes, all materials showed volume loss after immersion in distilled water. MTA HP showed the largest volumetric change (p < 0.05), while Bio-C and IRM were similar (p > 0.05). Three-dimensional models illustrating the cavities filled with each material are presented in Figure 2.
Table 2
Results for filling ability and volumetric changes of the endodontic materials
| Test/material | Bio-C Repair | MTA HP | IRM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filling ability (%) | 97.30 ± 2.01a | 89.80 ± 4.94b | 92.30 ± 5.37a,b |
| Volumetric change (%) | −2.36 ± 0.75b | −3.67 ± 0.86a | −2.10 ± 0.83b |
The values are mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters on the same line indicate statistically significant differences between the different cements (p < 0.05) (1-way analysis of variance and Tukey test).
MTA HP, mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity; IRM, intermediate restorative material.
Figure 2
Three-dimensional models illustrating microtomographic images of the filling ability of Bio-C Repair (A), mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity (B), and intermediate restorative material (C) in CTVox software.
DISCUSSION
In this study, 2 calcium silicate-based cements were compared with a zinc oxide and eugenol-based material regarding their filling ability and volumetric changes through micro-CT imaging of a new gypsum model. Since significantly different results were observed for the materials, our null hypothesis was rejected.
A long setting time has been discussed as a potential drawback of calcium silicate-based materials [19]. Therefore, new hydraulic premixed bioceramic root repair cements have been developed with the goal of improving this disadvantage [19]. This class of materials needs the presence of water to set and harden, and the ISO 6876/2012 standard recommends that a gypsum mold should be used to test materials that require moisture for setting [17]. As a result, new methodologies need to be developed to properly evaluate these new materials. Moreover, calcium silicate-based cements may be kept moist when used clinically to prevent shrinkage and cracking [20]. Based on this important information and considering that conventional tests are not appropriate to evaluate the physicochemical properties of hydraulic materials [21], our study developed a plaster model with standardized cavities to evaluate these cements using micro-CT. Cavities that were 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter were manufactured because in surgical endodontics, after apicectomy the apical canals are prepared with these dimensions with ultrasonic tips and subsequently are sealed with a root-end filling material, which is one of the indications of reparative cements [1,22].
In the present study, MTA HP was used since it presented adequate physicochemical and biological properties with improved flow ability when compared to WMTA [4]. IRM is a zinc oxide and eugenol-based cement that was added because it is commonly used as a control for comparisons with calcium silicate cements [20,23]. Our results showed that Bio-C Repair had the highest filling capacity, although its filling capacity was similar to that of IRM. The suitable filling capacity of zinc oxide and eugenol cement has been reported previously, and it showed better results than MTA [18]. This characteristic could be explained by the low porosity and satisfactory interfacial adaptability of IRM [20,23]. In contrast, a comparison between MTA and IRM to seal large furcation perforations using a dye-extraction leakage method showed that ProRoot MTA had better sealing capacity [24]. In addition, ProRoot MTA obtained better results than IRM in relation to bacterial microleakage [25].
Although this is the first study to evaluate the physical properties of Bio-C Repair, our findings can likely be explained as resulting from its suitable consistency and viscosity. Moreover, a previous study evaluating TotalFill BC RRM Putty (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), a ready-to-use repair material, showed an adequate sealing ability and marginal adaptation of apical plugs for this cement [26]. However, even though a plasticizer was added to the distilled water in MTA HP liquid, increasing the flow of this cement in comparison with MTA Angelus [4], this material showed lower percentage of filling than Bio-C. A possible explanation for this result is that flow and filling properties may not be correlated [12,27].
Reparative materials should have low solubility when in contact with the tissue fluid [28]. Although the ISO 6876 standard specifies a procedure for evaluating the solubility of endodontic materials [17], this methodology is not ideal for assessing calcium silicate-based cements [13], since during this test, the mass loss of hydraulic materials occurs not only due to their solubility, but also as a consequence of the evaporation of the liquid contained in these materials during drying of the specimens, which is required in this method [21]. A recent publication stated that another important drawback of the ISO standard for assessing the solubility of endodontic materials is that the materials have a large contact area with the environment [29]. Therefore, the ISO model is not representative of clinical conditions [29]. In contrast, the dimensions of the cavities made in our study could represent clinical situations more realistically, since the materials are kept humid and contact with the fluid only occurs at the material's surface. In this respect, the physical properties of materials should be assessed with more advanced methods [30]. Using micro-CT to assess volumetric changes enables the concomitant evaluation of the properties of solubility and dimensional stability [13]. The possibility of evaluating both of these properties is an advantage of micro-CT, as the absorption of fluids could compensate for solubility when assessing materials that present fluid uptake.
The volumetric change assessment showed that all the materials had a volume loss of around 3%. However, the values were higher for MTA HP than for the other cements, corroborating a publication that found high solubility values for this cement [31]. In contrast, a previous study evaluating the solubility of IRM showed that it had the lowest solubility among all filling materials evaluated up to 30 days, in agreement with our results [32]. No previous study has assessed the solubility of Bio-C Repair, meaning that there are no reference values for a comparison. Therefore, the data and results presented in the current study could serve as a reference for future investigations of new materials. Moreover, the methodology proposed in our study may complement the evaluation of biological properties of calcium silicate cements. Thus, the proper filling ability and low volumetric change of these new materials, in addition to their cytocompatibility and bioactive potential, may suggest that they are promising for clinical application.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, Bio-C Repair is a new endodontic material with an adequate filling capacity and low volumetric change. The gypsum model proposed for evaluating filling ability and volumetric changes using micro-CT had appropriate and reproducible results. This model may enhance the physicochemical analysis of calcium silicate-based materials, which need moisture to set.
-
Funding: This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001, PIBIC/CNPq, and was fully supported by FAPESP (2016/00321-0, 2017/19049-0 and 2018/19665-6).
-
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
-
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: Torres FFE, Tanomaru-Filho M, Pinto JC, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM.
Data curation: Torres FFE, Pinto JC.
Formal analysis: Torres FFE, Tanomaru-Filho M.
Funding acquisition: Torres FFE, Pinto JC, Tanomaru-Filho M.
Investigation: Torres FFE, Tanomaru-Filho M, Pinto JC, Figueira GO.
Methodology: Torres FFE, Pinto JC, Figueira GO.
Project administration: Tanomaru-Filho M.
Resources: Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM.
Software: Torres FFE, Pinto JC, Figueira GO.
Supervision: Tanomaru-Filho M.
Validation: Torres FFE, Tanomaru-Filho M, Pinto JC.
Visualization: Torres FFE, Tanomaru-Filho M, Pinto JC.
Writing - original draft: Torres FFE, Pinto JC, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM.
Writing - review & editing: Tanomaru-Filho M, Torres FFE.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
- 1. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PMH. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part II: other clinical applications and complications. Int Endod J 2018;51:284-317. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 2. Akbulut MB, Bozkurt DA, Terlemez A, Akman M. The push-out bond strength of BIOfactor mineral trioxide aggregate, a novel root repair material. Restor Dent Endod 2019;44:e5. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 3. Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Calcium silicate bioactive cements: biological perspectives and clinical applications. Dent Mater 2015;31:351-370. ArticlePubMed
- 4. Ferreira CMA, Sassone LM, Gonçalves AS, de Carvalho JJ, Tomás-Catalá CJ, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Silva EJ. Physicochemical, cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of a high-plasticity calcium-silicate based material. Sci Rep 2019;9:3933. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 5. Jiménez-Sánchez MDC, Segura-Egea JJ, Díaz-Cuenca A. MTA HP Repair stimulates in vitro an homogeneous calcium phosphate phase coating deposition. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e322-e326. PubMedPMC
- 6. Cintra LTA, Benetti F, de Azevedo Queiroz IO, de Araújo Lopes JM, Penha de Oliveira SH, Sivieri Araújo G, Gomes-Filho JE. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and biomineralization of the new high-plasticity MTA material. J Endod 2017;43:774-778. ArticlePubMed
- 7. Tomás-Catalá CJ, Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Forner L, Llena C, Lozano A, Castelo-Baz P, Moraleda JM, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Comparative analysis of the biological effects of the endodontic bioactive cements MTA-Angelus, MTA Repair HP and NeoMTA Plus on human dental pulp stem cells. Int Endod J 2017;50(Supplement 2):e63-e72. PubMed
- 8. Benetti F, Queiroz ÍOA, Cosme-Silva L, Conti LC, Oliveira SHP, Cintra LTA. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use Bioceramic Repair material. Braz Dent J 2019;30:325-332. ArticlePubMed
- 9. López-García S, Lozano A, García-Bernal D, Forner L, Llena C, Guerrero-Gironés J, Moraleda JM, Murcia L, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Biological effects of new hydraulic materials on human periodontal ligament stem cells. J Clin Med 2019;8:1216.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 10. Biočanin V, Antonijević Đ, Poštić S, Ilić D, Vuković Z, Milić M, Fan Y, Li Z, Brković B, Đurić M. Marginal gaps between 2 calcium silicate and glass ionomer cements and apical root dentin. J Endod 2018;44:816-821. ArticlePubMed
- 11. Chang SW. Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:188-193. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 12. Torres FFE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Chavez-Andrade GM, Pinto JC, Berbert FL, Tanomaru-Filho M. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the flow and filling ability of endodontic materials using different test models. Restor Dent Endod 2020;45:e11. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 13. Torres FFE, Zordan-Bronzel CL, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Chávez-Andrade GM, Pinto JC, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effect of immersion in distilled water or phosphate-buffered saline on the solubility, volumetric change and presence of voids within new calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2020;53:385-391. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 14. Zordan-Bronzel CL, Esteves Torres FF, Tanomaru-Filho M, Chávez-Andrade GM, Bosso-Martelo R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of a new calcium silicate-based sealer, Bio-C sealer. J Endod 2019;45:1248-1252. ArticlePubMed
- 15. Darvell BW, Wu RC. “MTA”-an hydraulic silicate cement: review update and setting reaction. Dent Mater 2011;27:407-422. ArticlePubMed
- 16. Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are premixed calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers comparable to conventional materials? a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod 2017;43:527-535. ArticlePubMed
- 17. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6876: dental root canal sealing materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2012.
- 18. Torres FFE, Bosso-Martelo R, Espir CG, Cirelli JA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of root-end filling materials using conventional and micro-CT tests. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:374-380. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 19. Guo YJ, Du TF, Li HB, Shen Y, Mobuchon C, Hieawy A, Wang ZJ, Yang Y, Ma J, Haapasalo M. Physical properties and hydration behavior of a fast-setting bioceramic endodontic material. BMC Oral Health 2016;16:23. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 20. Camilleri J, Grech L, Galea K, Keir D, Fenech M, Formosa L, Damidot D, Mallia B. Porosity and root dentine to material interface assessment of calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1437-1446.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 21. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Botero T, Bossù M, Riccitiello F, Prati C. Calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials for pulp capping: biointeractivity, porosity, solubility and bioactivity of current formulations. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015;13:43-60. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 22. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod 2006;32:601-623. ArticlePubMed
- 23. Torres FF, Jacobs R, EzEldeen M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Dos Santos BC, Lucas-Oliveira É, Bonagamba TJ, Tanomaru-Filho M. Micro-computed tomography high resolution evaluation of dimensional and morphological changes of 3 root-end filling materials in simulated physiological conditions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2020;31:14. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 24. Hashem AA, Hassanien EE. ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and IRM used to repair large furcation perforations: sealability study. J Endod 2008;34:59-61. PubMed
- 25. Övsay E, Kaptan RF, Şahin F. The repair of furcal perforations in different diameters with Biodentine, MTA, and IRM repair materials: a laboratory study using an E. Faecalis leakage model. BioMed Res Int 2018;2018:5478796. PubMedPMC
- 26. Lertmalapong P, Jantarat J, Srisatjaluk RL, Komoltri C. Bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of various bioceramics as apical plug in open apex model. J Investig Clin Dent 2019;10:e12371.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 27. Tanomaru-Filho M, Torres FFE, Bosso-Martelo R, Chávez-Andrade GM, Bonetti-Filho I, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. A novel model for evaluating the flow of endodontic materials using micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2017;43:796-800. ArticlePubMed
- 28. Dorileo MC, Pedro FL, Bandeca MC, Guedes OA, Villa RD, Borges AH. Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials. Restor Dent Endod 2014;39:201-209. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 29. Elyassi Y, Moinzadeh AT, Kleverlaan CJ. Characterization of leachates from 6 root canal sealers. J Endod 2019;45:623-627. ArticlePubMed
- 30. Song YS, Choi Y, Lim MJ, Yu MK, Hong CU, Lee KW, Min KS. In vitro evaluation of a newly produced resin-based endodontic sealer. Restor Dent Endod 2016;41:189-195. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 31. Guimarães BM, Prati C, Duarte MAH, Bramante CM, Gandolfi MG. Physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based formulations MTA Repair HP and MTA Vitalcem. J Appl Oral Sci 2018;26:e2017115. PubMedPMC
- 32. Singh S, Podar R, Dadu S, Kulkarni G, Purba R. Solubility of a new calcium silicate-based root-end filling material. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:149-153. PubMedPMC
REFERENCES
Tables & Figures
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadA micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials
Figure 1 Schematic figure of the assessments of filling ability and volumetric changes. Gypsum–based models with cavities measuring 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter were manufactured and scanned using micro-computed tomography before and after filling. The samples were immersed in distilled water for 7 days, and another scan was performed.
Figure 2 Three-dimensional models illustrating microtomographic images of the filling ability of Bio-C Repair (A), mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity (B), and intermediate restorative material (C) in CTVox software.
Figure 1
Figure 2
A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials
The manufacturers, composition, and proportions of the endodontic materials used in this study
| Material | Manufacturer | Composition | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio-C Repair | Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil | Calcium silicate, calcium aluminate, calcium oxide, zirconium oxide, iron oxide, silicon dioxide, dispersing agent | Ready to use |
| MTA HP | Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil | Powder: tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, calcium oxide, calcium tungstate | 1 g powder: 300 µL liquid |
| Liquid: water and plasticizer | |||
| IRM | Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany | Powder: zinc oxide, polymethyl methacrylate | 1 g powder: 200 µL liquid |
| Liquid: eugenol, acetic acid |
MTA HP, mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity; IRM, intermediate restorative material.
Results for filling ability and volumetric changes of the endodontic materials
| Test/material | Bio-C Repair | MTA HP | IRM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filling ability (%) | 97.30 ± 2.01a | 89.80 ± 4.94b | 92.30 ± 5.37a,b |
| Volumetric change (%) | −2.36 ± 0.75b | −3.67 ± 0.86a | −2.10 ± 0.83b |
The values are mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters on the same line indicate statistically significant differences between the different cements (p < 0.05) (1-way analysis of variance and Tukey test).
MTA HP, mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity; IRM, intermediate restorative material.
Table 1 The manufacturers, composition, and proportions of the endodontic materials used in this study
MTA HP, mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity; IRM, intermediate restorative material.
Table 2 Results for filling ability and volumetric changes of the endodontic materials
The values are mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters on the same line indicate statistically significant differences between the different cements (
MTA HP, mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity; IRM, intermediate restorative material.
