KACD
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 43(1); 2018 > Article
- Research Article Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals
-
Hyun-Jin Park1
, Min-Seock Seo2, Young-Mi Moon2 -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e3
Published online: December 24, 2017
1Private Practice, Gyeongju, Korea.
2Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University, Daejeon, Korea.
- Correspondence to Young-Mi Moon, DDS, MSD, PhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University, 77 Dunsan-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 35233, Korea. mywizard12@naver.com
• Received: August 28, 2017 • Accepted: November 28, 2017
Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- 25 Views
- 0 Download
Abstract
-
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare root canal volume change and canal transportation by Vortex Blue (VB; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties), ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer), and ProTaper Universal (PTU; Dentsply Maillefer) nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals.
-
Materials and Methods Thirty canals with 20°–45° of curvature from extracted human molars were used. Root canal instrumentation was performed with VB, PTN, and PTU files up to #30.06, X3, and F3, respectively. Changes in root canal volume before and after the instrumentation, and the amount and direction of canal transportation at 1, 3, and 5 mm from the root apex were measured by using micro-computed tomography. Data of canal volume change were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test, while data of amount and direction of transportation were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test.
-
Results There were no significant differences among 3 groups in terms of canal volume change (p > 0.05). For the amount of transportation, PTN showed significantly less transportation than PTU at 3 mm level (p = 0.005). VB files showed no significant difference in canal transportation at all 3 levels with either PTN or PTU files. Also, VB files showed unique inward transportation tendency in the apical area.
-
Conclusions Other than PTN produced less amount of transportation than PTU at 3 mm level, all 3 file systems showed similar level of canal volume change and transportation, and VB file system could prepare the curved canals without significant shaping errors.
INTRODUCTION
Cleaning and shaping of root canal system while maintaining the original canal curvature have always been a challenge because shaping errors such as ledges, zipping, strip perforation, and apical transportation can occur, particularly in curved canals [1]. Thus, various approaches were made to improve the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary file, such as different instrumental designs and thermomechanical processing techniques [2,3,4,5].
In 2011, ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Vortex Blue (VB; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA) systems were introduced in the market. Those instruments were manufactured using M-wire alloy through thermomechanical process. Many researchers have reported improved cyclic fatigue resistance of those file systems [2,6,7,8,9].
PTN system is characterized by its unique rotary motion and design, as well as M-wire alloy. In the study of shaping ability, PTN showed greater centering ability than ProTaper Universal (PTU; Dentsply Maillefer) [10,11,12]. VB files are also made from M-wire alloy and have a unique blue color. VB files have been reported to have improved cyclic fatigue resistance and flexibility compared to ProFile Vortex (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties) files [8,13].
However, to our knowledge, research results on the shaping parameters of VB system were not yet available when this study was undertaken. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of different NiTi instruments (VB, PTN, and PTU) on root canal volume change and canal transportation in curved root canals by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital (W1502/003-001). Thirty-two extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars were collected. They were examined under a microscope (OPMI pico, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at ×8 magnification. The teeth without caries, crack, or previous dental treatments were selected. Preoperative periapical radiographs were taken to select the teeth that met with the conditions. Canals with severe calcification, resorption, or abnormal anatomy were excluded. Canal curvatures of mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals of maxillary molars, and mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of mandibular molars were assessed with the method of Schneider [14], and root canals with 20°–45° curvatures were chosen. After this process, 8 teeth were excluded, and 30 canals from 24 teeth were finally selected.
The teeth were stored in 0.01% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; sodium hypochlorite solution, Duksan pure chemicals, Ansan, Korea) at room temperature before use. After access cavity preparation, size 10 K-files were inserted beyond the 1 mm of apex to check the apical patency. Working length was determined as 1 mm shorter than the length to the apical foramen. The glide path was established with size 15 K-files.
The teeth were divided into 3 groups, according to the NiTi files used: VB, PTN, and PTU (n = 10). The distribution of the teeth was determined with Kruskal-Wallis test, concerning the parameters such as canal curvature and the initial canal volume.
VB group: VB files were used in the sequence of sizes 15/0.06, 20/0.06, 25/0.06, and 30/0.06 at a rotational speed of 500 rpm and 3 Ncm torque.
PTN group: PTN files were used in the sequence of X1, X2, and X3 at a rotational speed of 300 rpm and 2 Ncm torque.
PTU group: PTU files were used in the sequence of S1, S2, F1, F2, and F3 at the rotational speed of 300 rpm and 2 Ncm torque.
Each canal was prepared with in-and-out motion using the Smart X plus engine (Dentsply Maillefer). Intentional brushing motion against the canal wall was avoided to exclude its possible influence on dentin removal. Files were discarded after single-usage. After the use of each file, canal irrigation was performed with 2 mL of 2%, 40°C NaOCl solution. Thirty-gauge irrigation needle (Steri Irrigation Tips, Diadent, Cheongju, Korea) was used. After canal preparation, each canal was irrigated with 5 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution for final rinse and then was dried with sterile paper points.
A custom-made mold for each tooth was made with a putty impression material to facilitate mounting of the tooth. All the teeth were scanned using a micro-CT system (SkyScan 1174, SkyScan bvba, Aartselaar, Belgium) with an isotropic resolution of 9.9 μm at 59 kV and 167 mA. The number of slices varied according to the length of each root, ranging from 700 to 900. The scanned images were reconstructed with the software NRecon (NRecon reconstruction 64bit, Bruker micro CT, Kontich, Belgium) and the reconstructed images were loaded on the software Dataviewer (Bruker micro CT), to take sectional images of axial view for assessment.
1. Measurement of canal volume change
Using image analysis software CTAn v 1.12 (Bruker micro CT), the canal volume was measured before and after the instrumentation. The region of interest was established from the canal orifice to the apical foramen. The changes in canal volume were calculated.
2. Evaluation of canal transportation
Cross-sectional images at the position of 1, 3, and 5 mm from the root apex were used to evaluate the amount and the direction of transportation. Preoperative and postoperative images were superimposed, and transportation value was calculated according to the following equation suggested by Gambill et al. [15] (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Superimposition of cross-sectional micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans before (red) and after (green) the instrumentation for calculating root canal transportation. X is the shortest distance from canal edge to the outside edge of the root, and Y is the shortest distance from canal edge to the inside edge of the root.
X1 and Y1 showed the distance from uninstrumented canal to the root. X1 was the shortest distance from canal edge to the outside (lateral) edge of the root, and Y1 was the shortest distance from canal edge to the inside (medial) edge of the root. X2 and Y2 showed the distance from instrumented canal to the root. X2 was the shortest distance from canal edge to the outside edge of the root, and Y2 was the shortest distance from canal edge to the inside edge of the root. The amount of transportation was assessed using the absolute value of the results from the formula, and the direction of transportation was assessed using the total value obtained [16]. A value of 0 from the formula represents there is no canal transportation. In terms of the direction of transportation, a positive value means outward transportation, and a negative value means inward transportation.
Data were first verified with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the normality of the distribution and the Levene test for homogeneity of variances. The data of the canal volume change were normally distributed and homogenous, so they were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. The transportation data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test for post hoc comparison (SPSS Statistics version 18.0, IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
In preoperative analysis, there was no significant difference in root canal curvature and canal volume among the 3 groups.
In micro-CT images, all the canals showed smooth and continuously tapered form after the instrumentation (Figure 2). No significant differences were found in volume changes among the 3 groups (Table 1).
Figure 2
Representative 3-dimensional reconstructed micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images of each group. Before (upper side) and after (lower side) the instrumentation. (A) Vortex Blue, (B) ProTaper Next, and (C) ProTaper Universal.
Table 1
Changes in root canal volume (mm3) by 3 file systems
| Stage | VB group | PTN group | PTU group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 2.69 ± 1.03 | 2.85 ± 1.22 | 3.18 ± 0.79 |
| Postoperative | 4.30 ± 1.05 | 4.64 ± 1.64 | 5.61 ± 1.48 |
| Changes* | 1.60 ± 0.44 | 1.80 ± 0.84 | 2.43 ± 1.10 |
The mean absolute values of canal transportation at 1, 3, and 5 mm levels from the apex of each group are presented in Table 2. Representative micro-CT images are shown in Figure 3.
Table 2
Average amount and direction of transportation (mm) of 3 file systems
Figure 3
Representative sectional images at the level of 1, 3, and 5 mm from the apex (from top to bottom) of each group. Before (red: left side), after (green: middle side) the instrumentation, and superimposition of the 2 images (right side). (A) Vortex Blue, (B) ProTaper Next, and (C) ProTaper Universal.
At 1 mm and 5 mm levels: no statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups.
At 3 mm level: PTN group showed significantly less transportation than PTU group (p = 0.005). However, there were no statistically significant differences between VB and PTN group, and between VB and PTU group.
The mean original values of canal transportation at 1, 3, and 5 mm levels from the apex showed no significant differences (Table 2).
At 1 mm level: inward transportation tendency was observed in VB and PTN group, and outward tendency was observed in PTU group.
At 3 mm level: VB group showed inward transportation tendency, whereas PTN and PTU group showed outward tendency.
At 5 mm level: all 3 groups showed inward transportation tendency.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, shaping ability of 3 different NiTi rotary file systems was evaluated using micro-CT technology. Micro-CT allows 3-dimensional approach and noninvasive evaluation of surface area, volume, and cross-sectional images quantitatively [6]. In the researches on endodontics, various resolutions from 8.9 to 41 μm have been used [17,18]. In the study of Huang et al. [19], micro-CT with high resolution allowed more effective inspection and provided more detailed information. In this study, relatively small voxels were obtained with 9.9 μm resolution, which allowed more accurate investigation.
In infected canals, infected dentin as well as bacteria, their byproducts, and necrotic tissue should be removed to the compatible levels for the optimal outcome [20]. However, excessive dentin removal could lead to weakening of teeth or even root fractures [21]. Therefore, appropriate removal of dentin is critical. In the current study, there was no significant difference in root canal volume change among 3 groups. This is in accordance with other studies that reported similar shaping abilities among different NiTi rotary systems [10,22]. The mean volume changes by VB, PTN, and PTU systems were 1.60 ± 0.14, 1.80 ± 0.27, and 2.43 ± 0.35 mm3, respectively, similar to previous studies [18,23].
Another important parameter of shaping ability is the root canal transportation. Transportation may lead to high risk of straightening the original canal curvature, excessive dentin removal and ledge formation and it could significantly affect long-term prognosis [22]. A previous study revealed that canal transportation was more pronounced in the narrow curved canals [24]. Therefore, teeth with root canal curvature more than 20° were included in the current study.
The transportation value was investigated by 2 ways; the amount of transportation as the absolute value, and the direction of transportation as the original value. In terms of the absolute value, statistically significant difference existed only between PTN and PTU at 3 mm level from the apex. PTN group exhibited significantly less transportation than PTU group. Majority of studies regarding these files revealed that PTN showed less transportation than PTU [11,12,25]. Possible explanation for this is that PTN files have smaller taper in the apical region than PTU files [26]. Comparing the apical taper of final files used, PTU F3 was 0.09 and PTN X3 was 0.07 [22]. Therefore, as the larger core mass of the F3 instrument has increased stiffness at the tip, more transportation could occur in PTU group [27]. Moreover, the improved flexibility of PTN file can be explained by its unique design features and movement (rectangular cross-section and off-centered mass of rotation) which reduced contact with the root canal wall [6]. In addition, the different composition of PTN with PTU could contribute this result. PTN files are manufactured using M-wire with a proprietary thermomechanical process [7]. Many researchers reported that the systems with M-wire showed improved cyclic fatigue resistance and flexibility [7,10,12,13,25]. This flexibility of M-wire might influence the reduced amount of canal transportation of PTN.
Regarding the file composition, VB files are also manufactured using M-wire, and they have unique blue color because of the titanium oxide layer [8]. Though the specific manufacturing process of this blue alloy has not been disclosed, recent researches suggested the possible explanation for the higher flexibility and the greater fatigue resistance compared to another M-wire alloy, ProFile Vortex. M-wire could have different proportions of austenite, martensite, and R-phase, depending on the processing conditions [28,29,30]. Because R-phase shows lower shear modulus than martensite or austenite, and the transformation strain for R-phase transformation is less than one tenth that of martensitic transformation, VB instruments are more flexible than ProFile Vortex instruments [29]. Blue treatment might make some differences on the proportion of R-phase in M-wire. However, in the present study, VB files did not show significantly less transportation than either PTN or PTU files. Unlike PTN, VB instrument has a triangular cross-section and shows uniform contact with having 3 contact points to the canal wall during rotation. These features of VB files are presumed to share more similarities with PTU than PTN files. It seems the advantage of VB files in having an enhanced metallurgical property does not fully outweigh its potential limitations of geometric and rotary features. In addition, one of the limitations of this study is the possible lack of anatomy standardization of extracted human teeth. Although efforts were made on even distribution to 3 groups, which is confirmed by Kruskal-Wallis test, human teeth have more variations in canal anatomy than simulated artificial canals of resin block [31]. This factor might have affected the result of the study. However, human teeth were chosen because of similar microhardness with natural dentin [32]. Also for resin block, heat generation might soften the resin, leading to binding of cutting blades [32,33]. Therefore, more researches are required to verify the effectiveness of this blue alloy.
In the evaluation of the direction of transportation, PTU showed the tendency of outward transportation at the apical level (at 1 and 3 mm levels from the apex) and inward transportation at mid-coronal level (at 5 mm level from the apex). Thicker and more rigid characteristics of PTU than PTN might have caused this straightening effect [34]. Also, VB showed unique inward transportation tendency at apical level (at 1 and 3 mm levels from the apex). All 3 files have different movements and morphological characteristics, such as cross-sectional shape, cutting angle, helix angle, taper, etc. Even a slight change of these factors might have affected the cutting efficacy or the tendency of forwarding in the canal. Further studies are required to specify the influencing factors.
At 5 mm level from the apex, all 3 file systems showed inward transportation tendency. It is worth pointing out that, with prescribed manufacturer's directions, coronal flaring is a prerequisite with proper endodontic instruments. Glide path and coronal enlargement are crucial to achieve more direct path to the apical third with removing coronal interferences and these also allow safe usage [22,35]. A previous study reported that the creation of a glide path and preliminary enlargement enhances the performance of PTN instrument, whereas PTN without a glide path results in a higher mean volume of removed dentin especially on the middle and coronal portion of the root [36]. In the current study, the procedure of coronal flaring was omitted to precisely evaluate the preparation systems only. Therefore, it might have influenced the result and thus the analyzed parameters should be interpreted with caution.
Previous reports already clarified that the canal transportation can be considered as a procedural error that results in inadequate root canal cleaning and the persistency of periapical lesions [37,38]. In this regard, Wu et al. [39] reported that apical transportation over 0.3 mm could negatively affect the sealing ability of filling material. In this study, the mean amount of transportation was within the range of 0.08–0.28 mm. This value is lower than the critical canal transportation value proposed by Wu et al. [39] Therefore, although there was a statistically significant difference in the amount of canal transportation at 3 mm level, all 3 files could be used in the clinical situations with acceptable performance.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitation of this study, VB system showed similar amount of canal volume change with both PTN and PTU files. For the amount of canal transportation, PTN files exhibited less transportation than PTU files at 3 mm level. VB files showed similar transportation with PTU or PTN files. Also, VB files showed unique inward transportation tendency in the apical area. Overall, VB file system could prepare the curved canals without significant shaping errors.
-
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
-
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Data curation: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Formal analysis: Park HJ, Seo MS, Moon YM.
Investigation: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Methodology: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Project administration: Park HJ, Seo MS, Moon YM.
Resources: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Software: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Supervision: Moon YM.
Validation: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Visualization: Park HJ, Moon YM.
Writing - original draft: Park HJ, Seo MS, Moon YM.
Writing - review & editing: Moon YM.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
- 1. Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review. Odontology 2012;100:130-136. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 2. Elnaghy AM. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files. Int Endod J 2014;47:1034-1039. PubMed
- 3. Kim HC, Sung SY, Ha JH, Solomonov M, Lee JM, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39:1572-1575. ArticlePubMed
- 4. Pirani C, Iacono F, Generali L, Sassatelli P, Nucci C, Lusvarghi L, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. HyFlex EDM: superficial features, metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of innovative electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49:483-493. PubMed
- 5. Bonessio N, Pereira ES, Lomiento G, Arias A, Bahia MG, Buono VT, Peters OA. Validated finite element analyses of WaveOne Endodontic Instruments: a comparison between M-Wire and NiTi alloys. Int Endod J 2015;48:441-450. ArticlePubMed
- 6. McRay B, Cox TC, Cohenca N, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files. Quintessence Int 2014;45:101-108. PubMed
- 7. Nguyen HH, Fong H, Paranjpe A, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Peters OA. Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and Vortex Blue rotary instruments. J Endod 2014;40:1190-1193. PubMed
- 8. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2014;40:1451-1453. ArticlePubMed
- 9. Shen Y, Zhou H, Coil JM, Aljazaeri B, Buttar R, Wang Z, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. ProFile Vortex and Vortex Blue nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2015;41:937-942. ArticlePubMed
- 10. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014;40:852-856. ArticlePubMed
- 11. Uygun AD, Kol E, Topcu MK, Seckin F, Ersoy I, Tanriver M. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. Int Endod J 2016;49:494-499. PubMed
- 12. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J Endod 2015;41:1718-1724. ArticlePubMed
- 13. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2012;38:398-401. ArticlePubMed
- 14. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275. ArticlePubMed
- 15. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 1996;22:369-375. PubMed
- 16. You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W. Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2011;37:1296-1300. ArticlePubMed
- 17. Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Misirli M, Demiralp KO, Orhan K. Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques. J Oral Sci 2015;57:361-366. ArticlePubMed
- 18. Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa-Neto MD, Fidel SR, Steier L, Robinson JP, Pécora JD, Versiani MA. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2015;48:1129-1136. PubMed
- 19. Huang CC, Chang YC, Chuang MC, Lin HJ, Tsai YL, Chang SH, Chen JC, Jeng JH. Analysis of the width of vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth by 2 micro-computed tomography systems. J Endod 2014;40:698-702. PubMed
- 20. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, Rôças IN. Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1860-1865. ArticlePubMed
- 21. Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2010;36:609-617. ArticlePubMed
- 22. Pasqualini D, Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino DS, Bianchi CC, Roggia A, Scotti N, Berutti E. Micro-Computed tomography evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRace shaping outcomes in maxillary first molar curved canals. J Endod 2015;41:1706-1710. ArticlePubMed
- 23. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2014;40:1860-1864. PubMed
- 24. Cruz A, Vera J, Gascón G, Palafox-Sánchez CA, Amezcua O, Mercado G. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study. J Endod 2014;40:1419-1423. ArticlePubMed
- 25. Bürklein S, Mathey D, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:774-781. PubMed
- 26. Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Kursun S, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Orhan K, Demiralp KO. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:32. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 27. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Porkodi I, Pradeep G. Canal-centering ability: an endodontic challenge. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:3-9. PubMedPMC
- 28. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, Clark WA, Kovarik L, Buie C, Liu J, Ben Johnson W. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009;35:1589-1593. ArticlePubMed
- 29. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013;39:163-172. ArticlePubMed
- 30. Duke F, Shen Y, Zhou H, Ruse ND, Wang ZJ, Hieawy A, Haapasalo M. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex and Vortex Blue nickel-titanium files in single and double curvatures. J Endod 2015;41:1686-1690. ArticlePubMed
- 31. Dummer PM, Alodeh MH, al-Omari MA. A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. Int Endod J 1991;24:63-66. PubMed
- 32. Lim YJ, Park SJ, Kim HC, Min KS. Comparison of the centering ability of Wave·One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38:21-25. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 33. Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:220-227. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 34. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003;36:86-92. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 35. Ha JH, Lee CJ, Kwak SW, El Abed R, Ha D, Kim HC. Geometric optimization for development of glide path preparation nickel-titanium rotary instrument. J Endod 2015;41:916-919. PubMed
- 36. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-104. ArticlePubMed
- 37. Pagliosa A, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA, Raucci-Neto W, Silva-Sousa YT, Alfredo E. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability. Braz Oral Res 2015;29:1-7.Article
- 38. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;1:255-262. ArticlePubMed
- 39. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26:210-216. PubMed
REFERENCES
Tables & Figures
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadRoot canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals
Figure 1 Superimposition of cross-sectional micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans before (red) and after (green) the instrumentation for calculating root canal transportation. X is the shortest distance from canal edge to the outside edge of the root, and Y is the shortest distance from canal edge to the inside edge of the root.
Figure 2 Representative 3-dimensional reconstructed micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images of each group. Before (upper side) and after (lower side) the instrumentation. (A) Vortex Blue, (B) ProTaper Next, and (C) ProTaper Universal.
Figure 3 Representative sectional images at the level of 1, 3, and 5 mm from the apex (from top to bottom) of each group. Before (red: left side), after (green: middle side) the instrumentation, and superimposition of the 2 images (right side). (A) Vortex Blue, (B) ProTaper Next, and (C) ProTaper Universal.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals
Changes in root canal volume (mm3) by 3 file systems
| Stage | VB group | PTN group | PTU group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 2.69 ± 1.03 | 2.85 ± 1.22 | 3.18 ± 0.79 |
| Postoperative | 4.30 ± 1.05 | 4.64 ± 1.64 | 5.61 ± 1.48 |
| Changes* | 1.60 ± 0.44 | 1.80 ± 0.84 | 2.43 ± 1.10 |
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
VB, Vortex Blue; PTN, ProTaper Next; PTU, ProTaper Universal.
*There was no statistically significant differences among 3 groups (p > 0.05).
Average amount and direction of transportation (mm) of 3 file systems
| Finding | Group | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 mm | 3 mm | 5 mm | ||
| Amount of transportation (absolute value) | VB | 0.12 ± 0.10 | 0.09 ± 0.10ab | 0.26 ± 0.19 |
| PTN | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 0.08 ± 0.10a | 0.13 ± 0.09 | |
| PTU | 0.24 ± 0.18 | 0.28 ± 0.21b | 0.23 ± 0.14 | |
| Direction of transportation (original value) | VB | −0.07 ± 0.15 | −0.04 ± 0.13 | −0.12 ± 0.31 |
| PTN | −0.03 ± 0.13 | 0.04 ± 0.12 | −0.11 ± 0.11 | |
| PTU | 0.02 ± 0.30 | 0.17 ± 0.31 | −0.13 ± 0.25 | |
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
VB, Vortex Blue; PTN, ProTaper Next; PTU, ProTaper Universal.
In the amount of transportation at 3 mm level, different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 1 Changes in root canal volume (mm3) by 3 file systems
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
VB, Vortex Blue; PTN, ProTaper Next; PTU, ProTaper Universal.
*There was no statistically significant differences among 3 groups (
Table 2 Average amount and direction of transportation (mm) of 3 file systems
Data shown are mean ± standard deviation.
VB, Vortex Blue; PTN, ProTaper Next; PTU, ProTaper Universal.
In the amount of transportation at 3 mm level, different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (
