Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
The Effect of Surface Defects on the Cyclic Fatigue Fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a Dynamic Model: A Fractographic Analysis
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 32(2); 2007 > Article
Original Article The Effect of Surface Defects on the Cyclic Fatigue Fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a Dynamic Model: A Fractographic Analysis
Jung-Kyu Lee1, Eui-Sung Kim1, Myoung-Whai Kang2, Kee-Yeon Kum2
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2007;32(2):130-137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.130
Published online: March 31, 2007

1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University, Korea.

2Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Kee-Yeon Kum. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Yungun-Dong 28, Jongro-Gu Seoul, 110-749, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2072-2656, Fax: 82-2-2072-3859, kum6139@snu.ac.kr
• Received: December 20, 2006   • Revised: January 8, 2007   • Accepted: January 19, 2007

Copyright © 2007 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 15 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • This in vitro study examined the effect of surface defects on cutting blades on the extent of the cyclic fatigue fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files using fractographic analysis of the fractured surfaces. A total of 45 HEROShaper (MicroMega) Ni-Ti rotary files with a #30/.04 taper were divided into three groups of 15 each. Group 1 contained new HEROShapers without any surface defects. Group 2 contained HEROShapers with manufacturing defects such as metal rollover and machining marks. Group 3 contained HEROShapers that had been clinically used for the canal preparation of 4-6 molars. A fatigue-testing device was designed to allow cyclic tension and compressive stress on the tip of the instrument whilst maintaining similar conditions to those experienced in a clinic. The level of fatigue fracture time was measured using a computer connected the system. Statistical analysis was performed using a Tukey's test. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for fractographic analysis of the fractured surfaces. The fatigue fracture time between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 was significantly different (p < 0.05) but there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). A low magnification SEM views show brittle fracture as the main initial failure mode. At higher magnification, the brittle fracture region showed clusters of fatigue striations and a large number of secondary cracks. These fractures typically led to a central region of catastrophic ductile failure. Qualitatively, the ductile fracture region was characterized by the formation of microvoids and dimpling. The fractured surfaces of the HEROShapers in groups 2 and 3 were always associated with pre-existing surface defects. Typically, the fractured surface in the brittle fracture region showed evidence of cleavage (transgranular) facets across the grains, as well as intergranular facets along the grain boundaries. These results show that surface defects on cutting blades of Ni-Ti rotary files might be the preferred sites for the origin of fatigue fracture under experimental conditions. Furthermore, this work demonstrates the utility of fractography in evaluating the failure of Ni-Ti rotary files.
The introduction of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments has transformed root canal preparation. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments exhibit super-elasticity and can prepare root canals with less apical aberrations and with an excellent taper and flow compared with stainless steel hand files1-3). Despite the evident advantages, Ni-Ti rotary instruments can undergo unexpected fracture below the elastic limit of the alloy as a result of flexural fatigue or torsional stress in the curved root canal4-7). Many factors have been implicated in the fatigue fracture of Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Of these factors, the root canal geometry (including the radius and angle of curvature), rotation speed (rpm), instrumentation force, and instrument design (diameter, taper, and cross-sectional configuration) were found to be more significant4,8-14). The surface quality can also be an important factor in fatigue fracture. Recent studies using scanning electron microscopy have revealed the presence of micro-fissures, machining marks, metal strips, pits, and blunt cutting edges on the surface of both new and used Ni-Ti rotary instruments16-20). These surface defects may initiate microcracks and play a role in the fatigue failure of instruments21). However, there is little knowledge of the potential role of surface defects on the fatigue failure or the true mode of failure involved. Several studies on cyclic fatigue have been carried out using a dynamic model incorporating axial movement15,16,22). This provides a better simulation of the clinical environment. However, there are no reports in the dental literature showing an evaluation of the cyclic fatigue of HEROShaper. Fractography can be broadly defined as the science of observing, measuring and interpreting a fractured surface topography23). When material failure involves actual breakage, fractography can be used to identify the fracture origin, the direction of crack propagation, the failure mechanism, materials defects, and the nature of the stresses24).
The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the fractured surface of HEROShaper files that were fractured experimentally by cyclic fatigue stress in a dynamic model using scanning electron microscopy. An additional aim was to evaluate the effect of surface defects left on the instruments on the fatigue fracture using fractographic analysis.
Materials
A total of 45 HEROShaper (Micro-Mega, Becanson, France) rotary files were used in this study. All the files were 21 mm in length and had a #30/.04 taper. The files were divided into three groups containing 15 in each: Group 1, new HEROShaper rotary files without any surface defects; Group 2, HEROShaper rotary files with manufacturing defects such as metal rollover, microcracks and machining marks; and Group 3, HEROShaper rotary files that had been used for the root canal preparation of 4-6 molars. All the HEROShapers used in this study were supplied by MicroMega Company (Becanson, France).
Experimental Design
The fatigue-testing device (ENDO TESTER™, Denbotix, Bucheon, Korea) was designed to allow cyclic tension and compressive stress on the tip of the instrument whilst maintaining similar conditions to those encountered in clinical situations (Figure 1). In addition, the device could be programmed to automatically control the rotation speed (300 rpm), pecking distance (6 mm), and pecking speed (1 mm/sec). A sloped metal block was fixed to 15° and had a 2 mm notched V-form to guide the instruments. The angle of curvature, which was calculated using the Schneider's method25), was 50° at a 6 mm pecking distance. During the tests, friction was minimized using Glyde™ (FILE PREP, Maillefer, Dentsply, Ballaigues, Switzerland) as a lubricant. Fracture was detected early because the tip of the instrument was visible at the end of the curve of the radii. The time elapsed before fracture was measured using a computer program connected to the system. The files were cleaned ultrasonically in alcohol for approximately 60 seconds prior to the scanning electron microscopy (S-800 SEM Hitachi FE SEM, Tokyo, Japan) examination in order to remove any surface debris from the surface. The SEM observations were made after drying and ion-coating the sample with Eiko IB-C to a 20 - 30 mm thickness. Fractographic analysis was performed by initially surveying the entire fractured surface at low magnification (× 200 and 500). This usually showed one or more areas where the fracture appeared to have originated. These areas were then observed at higher magnifications (× 3000, 5000, and 10,000) to examine the surface features that are consistent with the different types of failure (i.e., brittle fracture, fatigue crack growth, or ductile fracture). To determine the statistical difference between the different groups, data obtained was subjected to a Tukey's test. The significance was determined at the 95% confidence level.
1. Resistance to cyclic fatigue
Table 1 shows the mean fracture time for each group. There was a significant difference in the fracture time between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05).
2. Fractographic analysis on the fracture surface
Microphotographs of the lateral surface of HEROShapers in group 2 showed metal rollover and/or significant machining marks along the faces of the flutes (Figure 2). In contrast, the lateral surfaces of the new HEROShaper files were rather clean and flawless. The low-magnification (× 200 and × 500) SEM images show small areas of brittle fracture located on the edge of the cross section of the fractured instruments, which typically leads to a large central fibrous area of catastrophic ductile fracture. The higher magnification view (× 3000 and × 10,000) revealed clusters of fatigue striations and a large number of secondary cracks in the brittle fracture area (Figure 3), which confirmed that the instruments failed as a result of fatigue. Transgranular fracture across the grains as well as intergranular fracture along the grain boundaries was also observed in the brittle fracture area. The ductile fracture area was characterized by the typical formation of microvoids and the dimpling (cup-and-cone fracture), particularly elongated dimples in some specimens in group 3 (Figure 4a). All the fractured surfaces of HEROShapers in groups 2 and 3 were always consistent with the slow crack propagation (in a brittle fracture mode) from pre-existing surface defects (Figure 4b). Voids or regions of separation between some grains are also evident.
This study examined the role of surface defects in the instrument fracture caused by cyclic fatigue in a dynamic model. The observed mean time to fatigue fracture was in the order of group 1 > 2 > 3. The reason for group 3 having the lowest time might be due to the formation of surface damage caused by clinical use (used file group) and/or the accumulation of internal stress as a result of cyclic fatigue in a dynamic model. These combined factors can interfere with the mobility of the martensite interfaces, which can result in early fracture in this study. Fife et al.26) clearly demonstrated that the prolonged reuse of Ni-Ti rotary files strongly affects the instrument's fatigue. Although there was no statistical difference in the fracture time between groups 2 and 3, group 2 had a larger standard deviation than group 3 (131.8 vs. 83.3 seconds), which suggests that a file containing manufacturing defects is prone to abrupt fracture below the elastic limit of Ni-Ti instruments.
The primary objective of material failure analysis is to determine the root cause of failure. During the machining process of Ni-Ti rotary instruments, small scratches and grooves are invariably introduced into the instrument surface as a result of the action of the cutting tools. These surface marks can reduce the fatigue life. Kuhn et al.18) reported a large degree of machining damage along with many irregularities and cracks on the new file surface. They suggested that the crack initiation stage is facilitated by a high density of these defects and the successive fatigue failure is largely due to a crack propagation process. Karn et al.27) suggested that the cracks at the base of the machining grooves might serve as the origin of failure of Ni-Ti rotary files. They tested this hypothesis by removing the machining damage by tumbling the files in an aluminum oxide media, and then measuring the cycles to failure. They reported that removal of machining damage from the file surface could significantly increase the fatigue life under experimental conditions. Cheung et al.21) also demonstrated that the machining grooves left on the surface of the instrument during the manufacturing process are likely initiators of microcracks. Once initiated, the fatigue-cracks propagate in each and every load cycle until the remaining intact material is unable to sustain the same load and thus can fail. In this study, microphotographs of the fractured surfaces of the instruments with manufacturing defects were always consistent with crack propagation (in a brittle fracture mode) from pre-existing surface defects. This suggests that the conditions associated with manufacturing defects may also play a role in the premature failure of Ni-Ti rotary instruments during clinical use, which is in accordance with the results from previous studies21,27).
Fractographic analysis provides valuable information on the features expected for instruments that fracture in separate, clinically or experimentally relevant stress states. A large number of HEROShaper files observed by SEM showed a variety of fracture processes during separation. The fractured surface generally showed dimpled rupture features, which were indicative of ductile fracture. In particular, the elongated dimples found on the fractured surfaces of a few samples in group 3 might reveal the role of shear stress from torsional loading during clinical use28). Another key objective of failure analysis is to identify the failure mechanism(s). Duerig et al.29) and Karn30) reported three characteristic stages of the failure of Ni-Ti rotary instruments (crack initiation, crack propagation, and ductile fracture) due to fatigue on a microscopic level. The crack initiation stage is associated with irregular surface defects and/or recognizable pre-existing surface damage, which act as stress concentrators. This stage was characterized by the smooth, almost featureless area at the periphery of the fracture face. In this study, the crack initiation sites of the HEROShapers in groups 2 and 3 were located at places on the periphery of the instrument cross-sections, where the defects created during manufacturing or from clinical use would provide a stress concentration. The crack propagation stage was characterized by clusters of striations. Each striation represented the progression of a crack caused by tension during a single rotation of the instrument. Fractures propagated from the periphery of the instrument toward the center. As a final stage, ductile fracture was observed in the central region of the fractured surface. A distinct zone of ductile dimpling is represented in this stage. Ductile dimpling was the result of microvoid coalescence and ultimate ductile failure due to a stress state that overwhelms the strength of the material. These fractographic results highlight the importance of the surface quality and limited clinical use in avoiding fatigue failure of the instruments. Clinically, it is impossible to identify the presence of microcracks on the cutting blade surface of new Ni-Ti rotary instruments where fatigue fracture appears to be initiated. Therefore, surface treatments such as electro-polishing were suggested to improve the resistance to cyclic fatigue11). Electro-polishing is the controlled electrochemical removal of surface metal, resulting in a passive surface that is free of contaminants, microcracks and work-induced residual stresses31). A recent study reported that electro-polishing procedures can reduce the number of surface defects and increase the fracture-related fatigue resistance21). The present results can be applied to more useful fractographic analyses of clinically fractured instruments to determine the stress states leading to fracture in clinical situations. Our results also emphasize the potential role of surface defects in Ni-Ti rotary instruments in fatigue fracture. This highlights the special role of wedged dentinal chips onto the surface microcracks, which may lead to their propagation from a localized tensile strength during clinical use, eventually resulting in early instrument fracture32). In conclusion, surface defects created during the machining process and/or by clinical use may act as initiators of microcracks that can lead to fatigue fracture. In addition, fractographic analysis can help identify the failure mechanism of Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
  • 1. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995;21: 173-176.PubMed
  • 2. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30: 559-567.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Kum KY, Spangberg LSW, Cha YB, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26: 719-723.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23: 77-85.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Bahia MGA, Buono VTL. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100: 249-255.PubMed
  • 6. Bahia MGA, Martins RC, Gonzalez BM, Buono VTL. Physical and mechanical characterization and the influence of cyclic loading on the behavior of Ni-Ti wires employed in manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2005;38: 795-801.PubMed
  • 7. Bahia MGA, Melo MCC, Buono VTL. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101: 675-680.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2005;31: 183-186.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod. 2005;31: 120-123.PubMed
  • 10. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Alleman C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999;25: 434-440.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Condorelli GG. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod. 2006;102: e106-e114.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Peters OA, Barbakow F. Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile 04 rotary instruments during preparation of curved canals. Int Endod J. 2002;35: 379-389.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Zelada G, Varela P, Martin B, Bahilo JG, Magan F, Ahn S. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2002;28: 540-542.PubMed
  • 14. Xu X, Zheng Y, Eng D. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod. 2006;32: 372-375.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: Static and dynamic tests. J Endod. 2002;28: 448-451.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Shin YM, Kim ES, Kim KM, Kum KY. Effect of surface defects and cross-sectional configurations on the fatigue fracture of Ni-Ti rotary files in a dynamic model. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29: 267-272.Article
  • 17. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Mitchell JC. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2003;29: 667-669.PubMed
  • 18. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of structure on Ni-Ti endodontic instrument failure. J Endod. 2001;27: 516-520.PubMed
  • 19. Eggert C, Peters O, Barbacow F. Wear of nickel-titanium Lightspeed instruments by scanning electron microscopy. J Endod. 1999;25: 494-497.PubMed
  • 20. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Tripi V, Condorelli GG, Rapisardo E. Defects in GT rotary instruments after use. An SEM study. J Endod. 2001;27: 782-785.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Cheung GSP, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darwell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J. 2005;38: 802-809.PubMed
  • 22. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod. 2006;32: 55-65.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Hull D. Fractography: Observing, measuring and interpreting fracture surface topography. 1999;Cambridge. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • 24. Parrington RJ. Fractography of metals and plastics. Pract Fail Anal. 2002;2: 16-46.Article
  • 25. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved canals. Oral Surg. 1971;32: 271-275.PubMed
  • 26. Fife D, Gambarini G, Britto LR. Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97: 251-256.PubMed
  • 27. Karn TA, Kelly FC, Eichmiller FC, Spnagberg LSW. Fracture behavior of Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments. J Dent Res. 2004;#2684.
  • 28. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. Int Endod J. 2006;39: 171-178.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Duerig T, Pelton A, Stockel D. An overview of nitinol medical applications. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater. 1999;273-275: 149-160.Article
  • 30. Karn T. Fractographic and microstructual analysis of separated Ni-Ti rotary files. 2003;University of Connecticut; MS thesis.
  • 31. Callister WD. Materials science and engineering. An introduction. 2000;New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 223-224.
  • 32. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GS. Proposed role of embedded dentin chips for the clinical failure of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2004;30: 339-341.PubMed
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the fatigue testing apparatus that automatically controls the rotation speed (rpm), pecking distance, and pecking speed.
jkacd-32-130-g001.jpg
Figure 2
Photomicrograph of a HEROShaper instrument in group 2 (before fatigue testing) showing the presence of manufacturing defects such as metal roll-over and machining marks (original magnification, × 500).
jkacd-32-130-g002.jpg
Figure 3
High magnification the SEM image of the brittle fracture region showing clusters of fatigue striations (arrows) as well as numerous secondary cracks (original magnification (× 3000).
jkacd-32-130-g003.jpg
Figure 4
SEM image of the fractured surface of a HEROShaper instrument in Group 2. The brittle fracture (BF) region is shown originating from a microcrack. The brittle fracture region transforms to catastrophic ductile failure (DF) (a, original magnification, × 200). A high magnification view of the fractured surface of the same file shows elongated dimples (cup-and-cone fracture) that are indicative of ductile fracture. This characteristic feature of ductile failure results from microvoid coalescence as the instrument is subjected to stress (b, original magnification, × 3000).
jkacd-32-130-g004.jpg
Table 1
Mean fatigue fracture time for the three experimental groups

*Groups with statistically significant differences are indicated by the different letters (Tukey's Test, p < 0.05).

jkacd-32-130-i001.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        The Effect of Surface Defects on the Cyclic Fatigue Fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a Dynamic Model: A Fractographic Analysis
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32(2):130-137.   Published online March 31, 2007
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      The Effect of Surface Defects on the Cyclic Fatigue Fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a Dynamic Model: A Fractographic Analysis
      Image Image Image Image
      Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the fatigue testing apparatus that automatically controls the rotation speed (rpm), pecking distance, and pecking speed.
      Figure 2 Photomicrograph of a HEROShaper instrument in group 2 (before fatigue testing) showing the presence of manufacturing defects such as metal roll-over and machining marks (original magnification, × 500).
      Figure 3 High magnification the SEM image of the brittle fracture region showing clusters of fatigue striations (arrows) as well as numerous secondary cracks (original magnification (× 3000).
      Figure 4 SEM image of the fractured surface of a HEROShaper instrument in Group 2. The brittle fracture (BF) region is shown originating from a microcrack. The brittle fracture region transforms to catastrophic ductile failure (DF) (a, original magnification, × 200). A high magnification view of the fractured surface of the same file shows elongated dimples (cup-and-cone fracture) that are indicative of ductile fracture. This characteristic feature of ductile failure results from microvoid coalescence as the instrument is subjected to stress (b, original magnification, × 3000).
      The Effect of Surface Defects on the Cyclic Fatigue Fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a Dynamic Model: A Fractographic Analysis

      Mean fatigue fracture time for the three experimental groups

      *Groups with statistically significant differences are indicated by the different letters (Tukey's Test, p < 0.05).

      Table 1 Mean fatigue fracture time for the three experimental groups

      *Groups with statistically significant differences are indicated by the different letters (Tukey's Test, p < 0.05).


      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      Close layer
      TOP