Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 30(4); 2005 > Article
Original Article Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
Young-Gon Cho, Cheol-Hee Jin, Jung-Bum Min
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2005;30(4):319-326.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.319
Published online: July 30, 2005

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea, 501-825. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, 3845, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr
• Received: January 6, 2005   • Revised: April 18, 2005   • Accepted: May 12, 2005

Copyright © 2005 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 21 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • This study compared the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of single step adhesives to different dentin depths.
    Superficial or deep dentin was exposed in 30 molar teeth by sectioning immediately under the DEJ or 1.5 mm area from central pit, respectively. After polishing with 600-grit SiC paper, the dentin surfaces were assigned to three groups: AQ group-AQ Bond, L-Pop group-Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno group-Xeno III.
    The bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks and subjected to µTBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows;
    The µTBS to superficial dentin was higher than that to deep dentin in all group.
    The µTBS of Xeno group was significantly higher than that of L-Pop group and AQ group in both superficial and deep dentin (p < 0.05).
  • 1. Cho YG, Jeong JH, Ki YJ, Choi HY, Jin CH, Yoo SH, Kim JU, Park BC. Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29: 162-169.Article
  • 2. Frey O. Creating a reliable bond. An all-in-one system. Am J Dent. 2000;13: 85D-87D.PubMed
  • 3. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent. 2000;13: 25D-30D.PubMed
  • 4. Haller B. Recent development in dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 2000;13: 44-50.PubMed
  • 5. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3: 133-138.PubMed
  • 6. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 1999;12: 277-282.PubMed
  • 7. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 414-420.PubMed
  • 8. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 296-308.PubMed
  • 9. Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Fernandes CAO, Tay FR, Carvalho RM. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 292-298.PubMed
  • 10. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2002;27: 88-94.PubMed
  • 11. Akagawa H, Nikaido T, Takada T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin. Am J Dent. 2002;15: 383-388.PubMed
  • 12. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 394-398.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciuccji B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994;10: 236-240.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Terada RSS, Carvalho RM, Fernades CAO, Pashley DH. Mapping bond strength of flat dentin surfaces. J Dent Res. 1998;77: 8205. (Abstr. No. 1226).
  • 15. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 212-221.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Toledano M, Perdigao J, Osorio E, Osorio E. Influence of NaOCl deproteinization on shear bond strength in function of dentin depth. Am J Dent. 2002;15: 252-255.PubMed
  • 17. Toba S, Veerapravati W, Shimada Y, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strengths of adhesive resins to coronal dentin versus the floor of the pulp chamber. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 51A-56A.PubMed
  • 18. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakjima M, Pereria PNR, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001;26: 27-35.PubMed
  • 19. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1992;8: 229-233.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 117-125.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 340-346.PubMed
  • 22. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakayabashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etchng primer: The effect of smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 122-126.PubMed
  • 23. Watanabe I, Saimi Y, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on binding to ground dentin-Relationship between grinding condition and tensile bond strength. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devices. 1994;13: 101-108.
  • 24. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 234-238.ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Erickson RL. Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1989;2: 117-123.PubMed
  • 26. Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998;14: 44-50.PubMed
  • 27. Fernandes CAO, Carvalho RM, Shono Y, Pashely DH. Bond strengths of adhesives to dentin as an array. J Dent Res. 1998;77: 205. (Abstr. No. 798).
  • 28. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001;26: 44-47.PubMed
  • 29. Sanares A, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Chemical-cured composite weakens bonding of adhesives by surface interaction. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 356. (Abstr. No. 1700).
  • 30. Suh BI, Tay FR, King NM, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured composites on all-in-one adhesives. J Dent Res. 2001;80: 50. (Abstr. No. 116).
  • 31. Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate. A review. Scanning Microsc. 1989;3: 161-174 discussion 174-6.PubMed
  • 32. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Corelation among dentin depth, permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 1990;6: 45-50.PubMed
  • 33. Gwinnett AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1993;6: 7-9.PubMed
  • 34. Fuentes V, Toledano M, Osorio R, Carvalho RM. Microhaddness of superficial and deep sound human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66: 850-853.PubMed
Table 1
Group classification, components of single step adhesives and composites

4-META: 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride, UDMA: urethane dimeth-acrylate, PTS: p-toluensulfinic acid sodium salt, Bis-GMA: Bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate, HEMA: 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BHT: 2,6-Di-tertbutyl-p hydroxyl toluene, Pyro-EMA: tetramethacryloxyethyl pyrophophate, PEMF: pentamethacryloxy ethyl cyclophophazen mono fluoride, EPD: p-dimethylamino ethyl benzoate.

jkacd-30-319-i001.jpg
Table 2
Mean microtensile bond strength to superficial and deep dentin in each group (Unit: MPa, Mean ± S.D.)

Superscripts of the other letter indicate values of statistical significant difference at p < 0.05 (by Tukey test, paired t-test).

jkacd-30-319-i002.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30(4):319-326.   Published online July 30, 2005
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
      Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths

      Group classification, components of single step adhesives and composites

      4-META: 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride, UDMA: urethane dimeth-acrylate, PTS: p-toluensulfinic acid sodium salt, Bis-GMA: Bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate, HEMA: 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BHT: 2,6-Di-tertbutyl-p hydroxyl toluene, Pyro-EMA: tetramethacryloxyethyl pyrophophate, PEMF: pentamethacryloxy ethyl cyclophophazen mono fluoride, EPD: p-dimethylamino ethyl benzoate.

      Mean microtensile bond strength to superficial and deep dentin in each group (Unit: MPa, Mean ± S.D.)

      Superscripts of the other letter indicate values of statistical significant difference at p < 0.05 (by Tukey test, paired t-test).

      Table 1 Group classification, components of single step adhesives and composites

      4-META: 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride, UDMA: urethane dimeth-acrylate, PTS: p-toluensulfinic acid sodium salt, Bis-GMA: Bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate, HEMA: 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, BHT: 2,6-Di-tertbutyl-p hydroxyl toluene, Pyro-EMA: tetramethacryloxyethyl pyrophophate, PEMF: pentamethacryloxy ethyl cyclophophazen mono fluoride, EPD: p-dimethylamino ethyl benzoate.

      Table 2 Mean microtensile bond strength to superficial and deep dentin in each group (Unit: MPa, Mean ± S.D.)

      Superscripts of the other letter indicate values of statistical significant difference at p < 0.05 (by Tukey test, paired t-test).


      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      Close layer
      TOP