KACD
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Research Articles
- Effect of adhesive application method on repair bond strength of composite
- Hee Kyeong Oh, Dong Hoon Shin
- Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(3):e32. Published online June 4, 2021
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e32
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the application method of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired composites, applied with different thicknesses.
Materials and Methods The 84 specimens (Filtek Z350 XT) were prepared, stored in distilled water for a week and thermocycled (5,000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C). They were roughened using 400-grit sandpapers and etched with phosphoric acid. Then, specimens were equally divided into 2 groups; Single Bond Universal (SU) and Prime&Bond Universal (PB). Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups according to application methods (
n = 14); UC: 1 coat + uncuring, 1C: 1 coat + curing, 3C: 3 coats + curing. After storage of the repaired composite for 24 hours, specimens were subjected to the SBS test and the data were statistically analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and independentt -tests. Specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to analyze fracture mode and a scanning electron microscope to observe the interface.Results Adhesive material was a significant factor (
p = 0.001). Bond strengths with SU were higher than PB. The highest strength was obtained from the 1C group with SU. Bonding in multiple layers increased adhesive thicknesses, but there was no significant difference in SBS values (p = 0.255). Failure mode was predominantly cohesive in old composites.Conclusions The application of an adequate bonding system plays an important role in repairing composite resin. SU showed higher SBS than PB and the additional layers increased the adhesive thickness without affecting SBS.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The effect of different surface treatments and adhesive systems on shear bond strength in universal nanohybrid composite resin repair
Merve Kütük Ömeroğlu, Melek Çam, Işıl Doğruer, Zeynep Buket Kaynar
BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
- The effect of different surface treatments and adhesive systems on shear bond strength in universal nanohybrid composite resin repair
- 277 View
- 8 Download
- 1 Crossref
- Bonding of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin using universal adhesives
- Muhittin Ugurlu
- Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(3):e36. Published online June 15, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e36
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives This study aims to assess the effect of universal adhesives pretreatment on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin.
Materials and Methods Fifty caries-free human third molars were employed. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (
n = 10) based on dentin surface pretreatments: Single Bond Universal (3M Oral Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), Prime&Bond Elect (Dentsply), Cavity Conditioner (GC) and control (no surface treatment). After Fuji II LC (GC) was bonded to the dentin surfaces, the specimens were stored for 7 days at 37°C. The specimens were segmented into microspecimens, and the microspecimens were subjugated to microtensile bond strength testing (1.0 mm/min). The modes of failure analyzed using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan tests (p = 0.05).Results The surface pretreatments with the universal adhesives and conditioner increased the bond strength of Fuji II LC to dentin (
p < 0.05). Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal provided higher bond strength to Fuji II LC than Cavity Conditioner (p < 0.05). The bond strengths obtained from Prime&Bond Elect and Cavity Conditioner were not statistically different (p > 0.05).Conclusions The universal adhesives and polyacrylic acid conditioner could increase the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. The use of universal adhesives before the application of RMGIC may be more beneficial in improving bond strength.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial
Reham Hendam, Rania Mosallam, Dina Kamal
Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2025; 28(1): 50. CrossRef - Push-Out Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements Following Post Space Irrigation with 2% Chitosan: An In Vitro Study
Shimaa Rifaat, Ahmed Rahoma, Hind Muneer Alharbi, Sawsan Jamal Kazim, Shrouq Ali Aljuaid, Basmah Omar Alakloby, Faraz A. Farooqi, Noha Taymour
Prosthesis.2025; 7(1): 18. CrossRef - Assessment of Nanosilver Fluoride Application on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Carious Dentin: An In Vitro Study
Ila Srinivasan, Yuthi Milit, Anushka Das, Neeraja Ramamurthy
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2024; 17(5): 565. CrossRef - Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear-bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Simulated Carious Dentin
WT Koh, OT Yeoh, NA Yahya, AU Yap
Operative Dentistry.2024; 49(6): 714. CrossRef - Desensitizing agents’ post-bleaching effect on orthodontic bracket bond strength
Gufa Bagus Pamungkas, Dyah Karunia, Sri Suparwitri
Dental Journal.2024; 57(1): 45. CrossRef - Successful Rehabilitation of Traumatized Immature Teeth by Different Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Patients
Mohammad Kamran Khan
Journal of the Scientific Society.2023; 50(1): 111. CrossRef - Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Juliana Benace Fernandes, Sheila Mondragón Contreras, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Graziela Ribeiro Batista, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
Clinical Oral Investigations.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Effects of tooth preparation on the microleakage of fissure sealant
Gesti Kartiko Sari, Sri Kuswandari, Putri Kusuma Wardani Mahendra
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).2022; 55(2): 67. CrossRef - Rheological Properties, Surface Microhardness, and Dentin Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Methacrylate-Functionalized Polyacids and Spherical Pre-Reacted Glass Fillers
Whithipa Thepveera, Wisitsin Potiprapanpong, Arnit Toneluck, Somruethai Channasanon, Chutikarn Khamsuk, Naruporn Monmaturapoj, Siriporn Tanodekaew, Piyaphong Panpisut
Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2021; 12(3): 42. CrossRef
- Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial
- 475 View
- 9 Download
- 9 Crossref
- Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Ali A. Elkaffas, Hamdi H. H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
- Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(3):e29. Published online June 18, 2018
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the µTBS of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used.
Materials and Methods An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the µTBS of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the µTBS of Scotchbond Universal adhesive.
Results Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (
p > 0.05).Conclusions Multi-mode ‘universal’ adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Influence of Proximal-Cervical Undermined Enamel Areas on Marginal Quality and Enamel Integrity of Laboratory and CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays and Partial Crowns
Roland Frankenberger, Katharina Friedrich, Marie-Christine Dudek, Julia Winter, Norbert Krämer, Matthias J. Roggendorf
Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2025; 16(3): 82. CrossRef - Tooth-composite bond failure with a universal and an etch-and-rinse adhesive depending on mode and frequency of application
Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Mathilde Tittel, Hartmut Schneider, Maximilian Bemmann, Marco Pellino, Tobias Meissner, Florian Fuchs, Christian Hannig, Florian Tetschke, Kyung-Jin Park, Michaela Strumpski, Rainer Haak
Dental Materials.2024; 40(2): 359. CrossRef - Comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between Total-etch and Universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial
Kiran Javed, Nouman Noor, Muhammad Zubair Nasir, Manzoor Ahmed Manzoor
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Adhesion and sealing of different universal adhesive systems associated with bulk‐fill resins after using endodontic irrigation solutions: An in vitro study
Érika Mayumi Omoto, Anderson Catelan, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra, Fernanda de Souza e Silva Ramos, Caio César Pavani, André Luiz Fraga Briso, Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Australian Endodontic Journal.2024; 50(2): 309. CrossRef - Evaluation of the effects of combined application of dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate and MDP on dentin bonding and antimicrobial properties
Jiadi Shen, Ming Ma, Yun Huang, Haochen Miao, Xin Wei
Journal of Materials Science.2023; 58(31): 12685. CrossRef - Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow-up
Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Li-Tzu Wang, Markus B. Blatz
Journal of Prosthodontic Research.2023; 67(1): 35. CrossRef - Impact of Preceded Tumor Therapeutic Irradiation on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives Applied in Self-Etch Mode to Human Dentin In Vitro
Sina Broscheit, Dirk Vordermark, Reinhard Gerlach, Christian Ralf Gernhardt
Applied Sciences.2023; 13(13): 7873. CrossRef - Effect of the Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Performance and Marginal Integrity of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in a Randomized 36-Month Study
Rainer Haak, Gesa Stache, Hartmut Schneider, Matthias Häfer, Gerhard Schmalz, Ellen Schulz-Kornas
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(18): 5776. CrossRef - Universal Adhesives in Clinical Dentistry
Fusun Ozer, Shilpa Patnaikuni
Science, Art and Religion.2023; 2(1--2): 6. CrossRef - Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength
Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Jelena Juloski, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluation
Joana Vasconcelos e Cruz, António H. S. Delgado, Samuel Félix, José Brito, Luísa Gonçalves, Mário Polido
Polymers.2022; 14(7): 1462. CrossRef - Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?
António H. S. Delgado, Hasan Jamal, Anne Young, Paul Ashley
BMC Oral Health.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Does acid etching prior to applying universal adhesives affect the bond strength of glass fiber post to root dentin?
Helder Callegaro Velho, Eduardo Trindade Dalence, Pablo Soares Machado, Marília Pivetta Rippe, Jovito Adiel Skupien, Vinícius Felipe Wandscher
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.2021; 105: 102795. CrossRef - Does Adhesive Layer Thickness and Tag Length Influence Short/Long-Term Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems? An In-Vitro Study
Naji Kharouf, Tarek Ashi, Ammar Eid, Levi Maguina, Jihed Zghal, Nairy Sekayan, Rim Bourgi, Louis Hardan, Salvatore Sauro, Youssef Haikel, Davide Mancino
Applied Sciences.2021; 11(6): 2635. CrossRef - Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review
Maicon Sebold, Carolina Bosso André, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Lorenzo Breschi, Marcelo Giannini
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(18): 1941. CrossRef - Laboratory methods for measuring adhesive bond strength between restoration materials and hard tooth tissues
I.Ya. Poyurovskaya, A.P. Polikarpova, F.S. Rusanov
Stomatologiya.2021; 100(5): 88. CrossRef - Effect of Curcumin Suspension and Vitamin C on Dentin Shear Bond Strength and Durability. A Pilot Study
Dalia A. Abuelenain, Ensanya A. Abou Neel, Tariq S. Abuhaimed, Amal M. Alamri, Hanan S. Ammar, Sahar M. N. Bukhary
The Open Dentistry Journal.2021; 15(1): 540. CrossRef - Effect of 9.3 μm CO2 and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser vs. Bur Preparations on Marginal Adaptation in Enamel and Dentin of Mixed Class V Cavities Restored With Different Restorative Systems
Clara Isabel Anton y Otero, Enrico Di Bella, Ivo Krejci, Tissiana Bortolotto
Frontiers in Dental Medicine.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Adhesion strategy and curing mode of a universal adhesive influence the bonding of dual-cured core build-up resin composite to dentin
Ahmed Eid Elsayed, Mohamed Amr Kamel, Farid Sabry El-Askary
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2021; 35(1): 52. CrossRef - Influence of etching mode and composite resin type on bond strength to dentin using universal adhesive system
Stefan Dačić, Milan Miljković, Aleksandar Mitić, Goran Radenković, Marija Anđelković‐Apostolović, Milica Jovanović
Microscopy Research and Technique.2021; 84(6): 1212. CrossRef - Universal adhesives - a new direction in the development of adhesive systems
A. Tichý, K. Hosaka, J. Tagami
Česká stomatologie a praktické zubní lékařství.2020; 120(1): 4. CrossRef - Effect of Over-Etching and Prolonged Application Time of a Universal Adhesive on Dentin Bond Strength
Phoebe Burrer, Hoang Dang, Matej Par, Thomas Attin, Tobias T. Tauböck
Polymers.2020; 12(12): 2902. CrossRef - Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance
Marina Ciccone Giacomini, Polliana Mendes Candia Scaffa, Rafael Simões Gonçalves, Giovanna Speranza Zabeu, Cristina de Mattos Pimenta Vidal, Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho, Heitor Marques Honório, Linda Wang
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 110: 103925. CrossRef - Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance
Sanket Nagarkar, Nicole Theis‐Mahon, Jorge Perdigão
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.2019; 107(6): 2121. CrossRef - Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations
Wen Zhou, Shiyu Liu, Xuedong Zhou, Matthias Hannig, Stefan Rupf, Jin Feng, Xian Peng, Lei Cheng
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(3): 723. CrossRef
- Influence of Proximal-Cervical Undermined Enamel Areas on Marginal Quality and Enamel Integrity of Laboratory and CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays and Partial Crowns
- 411 View
- 11 Download
- 25 Crossref
- Comparison of bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and a universal adhesive
- Ji-Yeon Lee, Jaechan Ahn, Sang In An, Jeong-won Park
- Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(1):e7. Published online January 22, 2018
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e7
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and universal adhesive.
Materials and Methods Fifty zirconia blocks (15 × 15 × 10 mm, Zpex, Tosoh Corporation) were polished with 1,000 grit sand paper and air-abraded with 50 µm Al2O3 for 10 seconds (40 psi). They were divided into 5 groups: control (CO), Metal/Zirconia primer (MZ, Ivoclar Vivadent), Z-PRIME Plus (ZP, Bisco), Zirconia Liner (ZL, Sun Medical), and Scotchbond Universal adhesive (SU, 3M ESPE). Transbond XT Primer (used for CO, MZ, ZP, and ZL) and Transbond XT Paste was used for bracket bonding (Gemini clear ceramic brackets, 3M Unitek). After 24 hours at 37°C storage, specimens underwent 2,000 thermocycles, and then, shear bond strengths were measured (1 mm/min). An adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was calculated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test (
p = 0.05).Results Surface treatment with primers resulted in increased shear bond strength. The SU group showed the highest shear bond strength followed by the ZP, ZL, MZ, and CO groups, in that order. The median ARI scores were as follows: CO = 0, MZ = 0, ZP = 0, ZL = 0, and SU = 3 (
p < 0.05).Conclusions Within this experiment, zirconia primer can increase the shear bond strength of bracket bonding. The highest shear bond strength is observed in SU group, even when no primer is used.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols
Claire Pédemay, Philippe François, Vincent Fouquet, Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Jean-Pierre Attal, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan
BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets using CAD/CAM transfer trays to monolithic zirconia
Rebecca Jungbauer, Christian M. Hammer, Daniel Edelhoff, Peter Proff, Bogna Stawarczyk
Dental Materials.2023; 39(2): 170. CrossRef - Mechanical and chemical surface treatment enhances bond strength between zirconia and orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study
Nareudee Limpuangthip, Atikom Surintanasarn, Ploylada Vitavaspan
BDJ Open.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Orthodontic Bracket Type on Shear Bond Strength of High-Translucent Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
Yasamin Babaee Hemmati, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Mehran Falahchai, Sina Safary, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
International Journal of Dentistry.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef - Does Surface Treatment With Different Primers Increase The Shear Bond Strength Between Metallic Bracket and Monolithic Zirconia?
Emine Begüm BÜYÜKERKMEN, Ayşe Selenge AKBULUT, Murat KEÇECİ
Selcuk Dental Journal.2022; 9(2): 451. CrossRef - Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Surface Roughness and Orthodontic Bond Strength of Partially-stabilized Zirconia
Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Betül Ballı Demirel, Münir Demirel, Yasemin Gündoğdu, Hamdi Şükür Kılıç
Meandros Medical and Dental Journal.2022; 23(3): 335. CrossRef - Shear Bond Strength of Polypropylene Fiber in Orthodontic Adhesive on Glazed Monolithic Zirconia
Dhanabhol Riowruangsanggoon, Apiwat Riddhabhaya, Nattisa Niyomtham, Irin Sirisoontorn
Polymers.2022; 14(21): 4627. CrossRef - Effects of Three Novel Bracket Luting Agents Containing Zirconia Primer on Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Attached to Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Preliminary In Vitro Study
Milad Shamohammadi Heidari, Mehrnaz Moradinejad, Hamed Tabatabaei, Vahid Rakhshan, Dinesh Rokaya
International Journal of Dentistry.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef - Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
Rebecca Jungbauer, Peter Proff, Daniel Edelhoff, Bogna Stawarczyk
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives
Cecilia Goracci, Giuseppe Di Bello, Lorenzo Franchi, Chris Louca, Jelena Juloski, Jovana Juloski, Alessandro Vichi
Materials.2022; 15(3): 1245. CrossRef - Effect of enamel-surface modifications on shear bond strength using different adhesive materials
Bo-wen Zheng, Shan Cao, Majedh Abdo Ali Al-Somairi, Jia He, Yi Liu
BMC Oral Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - The effect of various mechanical and chemical surface conditioning on the bonding of orthodontic brackets to all ceramic materials
Dalia A. Abuelenain, Amal I. Linjawi, Ahmed S. Alghamdi, Fahad M. Alsadi
Journal of Dental Sciences.2021; 16(1): 370. CrossRef - The Performance of Universal Adhesives on Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
Muhittin Ugurlu, Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus
European Journal of General Dentistry.2021; 10(01): 019. CrossRef - A comparison of shear bond strength of brackets bonded to zirconia
Hannah Knott, Xiaoming Xu, Edwin Kee, Qingzhao Yu, Paul Armbruster, Richard Ballard
Australasian Orthodontic Journal.2021; 37(1): 62. CrossRef - Influence of Surface Treatment and Resin Cements on the Bond Strength between the Y-TZP Zirconia and Composite Resin Interface
Lucas Campagnaro Maciel, Amanda Pádua Proeza, Hélyda Coelho Guimarães Balbino, Marcela Moráo Corteletti, Ricardo Huver De Jesus, Laís Regiane da Silva Concílio
Journal of Health Sciences.2019; 21(5): 477. CrossRef - Effect of Simplified Bonding on Shear Bond Strength between Ceramic Brackets and Dental Zirconia
Ga-Youn Ju, Soram Oh, Bum-Soon Lim, Hyun-Seung Lee, Shin Hye Chung
Materials.2019; 12(10): 1640. CrossRef
- Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols
- 249 View
- 8 Download
- 16 Crossref
- Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics
- Hyun-Young Lee, Geum-Jun Han, Juhea Chang, Ho-Hyun Son
- Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(2):95-104. Published online January 25, 2017
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.95
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives This study evaluated the influence of a multi-mode universal adhesive (MUA) containing silane (Single Bond Universal, 3M EPSE) on the bonding of resin cement to lithium disilicate.
Materials and Methods Thirty IPS e.max CAD specimens (Ivoclar Vivadent) were fabricated. The surfaces were treated as follows: Group A, adhesive that did not contain silane (ANS, Porcelain Bonding Resin, Bisco); Group B, silane (S) and ANS; Group C, hydrofluoric acid (HF), S, and ANS; Group D, MUA; Group E, HF and MUA. Dual-cure resin cement (NX3, Kerr) was applied and composite resin cylinders of 0.8 mm in diameter were placed on it before light polymerization. Bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 hours or underwent a 10,000 thermocycling process prior to microshear bond strength testing. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (
p < 0.05).Results Bond strength varied significantly among the groups (
p < 0.05), except for Groups A and D. Group C showed the highest initial bond strength (27.1 ± 6.9 MPa), followed by Group E, Group B, Group D, and Group A. Thermocycling significantly reduced bond strength in Groups B, C, and E (p < 0.05). Bond strength in Group C was the highest regardless of the storage conditions (p < 0.05).Conclusions Surface treatment of lithium disilicate using HF and silane increased the bond strength of resin cement. However, after thermocycling, the silane in MUA did not help achieve durable bond strength between lithium disilicate and resin cement, even when HF was applied.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass–ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis
Jiawen Liu, Suqing Tu, Mingjuan Wang, Du Chen, Chen Chen, Haifeng Xie
BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass-ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Isis de Araújo Ferreira Muniz, Débora e Silva Campos, Fabián Murillo-Gómez, Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade, Rosângela Marques Duarte, Grace Mendonça de Souza
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2024; 131(3): 392. CrossRef - Effect of the difference water amounts and hydrolysis times of silane coupling agent on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and composite resin
Pimchanok OSOTPRASIT, Sasipin LAUVAHUTANON, Yosnarong SIRIMETHAWONG, Patcharanun CHAIAMORNSUP, Pornpot JIANGKONGKHO
Dental Materials Journal.2024; 43(3): 375. CrossRef - Is additional silane application necessary for a new silane‐containing universal adhesive to bond to glass ceramics?
Priscila Luciane da Silva, Hélio Radke Bittencourt, Luiz Henrique Burnett, Ana Maria Spohr
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024; 36(10): 1452. CrossRef - The Effect of Various Lasers on the Bond Strength Between Orthodontic Brackets and Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Jaafar Abduo, Mehrnaz Zakizade, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Ahmed Hussain
Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery.2024; 42(1): 20. CrossRef - Long-Term Bonding Performance of One-Bottle vs. Two-Bottle Bonding Agents to Lithium Disilicate Ceramics
Masao Irie, Masahiro Okada, Yukinori Maruo, Goro Nishigawa, Takuya Matsumoto
Polymers.2024; 16(16): 2266. CrossRef - Bond strength to different CAD/CAM lithium disilicate reinforced ceramics
Mona Alhomuod, Jin‐Ho Phark, Sillas Duarte
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(1): 129. CrossRef - Surface Treatment Effect on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement
Siripan Simasetha, Awiruth Klaisiri, Tool Sriamporn, Kraisorn Sappayatosok, Niyom Thamrongananskul
European Journal of Dentistry.2022; 16(02): 373. CrossRef - Bonding of Clear Aligner Composite Attachments to Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study
Bashair A. Alsaud, Maher S. Hajjaj, Ahmad I. Masoud, Ensanya A. Abou Neel, Dalia A. Abuelenain, Amal I. Linjawi
Materials.2022; 15(12): 4145. CrossRef - Bonding of different resin luting materials to composite, polymer-infiltrated and feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM blocks
Burcu Dikici, Esra Can Say
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2022; 36(14): 1572. CrossRef - Influence of mechanical and chemical pre-treatments on the repair of a hybrid ceramic
Sascha Niklas Jung, Stefan Rüttermann
Dental Materials.2022; 38(7): 1140. CrossRef - Effect of Silane-Containing Universal Adhesives on the Bonding Strength of Lithium Disilicate
Yu-Ri Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Sung-Ae Son, Jeong-Kil Park
Materials.2021; 14(14): 3976. CrossRef - Ceramics in dentistry: which material is appropriate for the anterior or posterior Dentition? Part 1: materials science
Loo Chien Win, Peter Sands, Stephen J Bonsor, FJ Trevor Burke
Dental Update.2021; 48(8): 680. CrossRef - The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic
Nanako UEDA, Tomohiro TAKAGAKI, Toru NIKAIDO, Rena TAKAHASHI, Masaomi IKEDA, Junji TAGAMI
Dental Materials Journal.2021; 40(5): 1073. CrossRef - Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies
Carlos Enrique Cuevas‐Suárez, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa, Rafael Pino Vitti, Adriana Fernandes da Silva, Evandro Piva
Journal of Prosthodontics.2020; 29(4): 298. CrossRef - Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic
Karina Barbosa Souza, Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura, Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva, Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli Pinto, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite, Mutlu Özcan, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e Souza
Journal of Applied Oral Science.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Effects of the ratio of silane to 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogenphosphate (MDP) in primer on bonding performance of silica-based and zirconia ceramics
Minkhant Koko, Tomohiro Takagaki, Ahmed Abdou, Masanao Inokoshi, Masaomi Ikeda, Takahiro Wada, Motohiro Uo, Toru Nikaido, Junji Tagami
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2020; 112: 104026. CrossRef - Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations
Ki-Won Jeong, Sung-Hun Kim
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics.2019; 11(2): 95. CrossRef - Microtensile bond strengths of adhesively bonded polymer-based CAD/CAM materials to dentin
Nuray CAPA, Esra CAN SAY, Cansin CELEBI, Ayca CASUR
Dental Materials Journal.2019; 38(1): 75. CrossRef - Simplified Surface Treatments for Ceramic Cementation: Use of Universal Adhesive and Self-Etching Ceramic Primer
Heloísa A. B. Guimarães, Paula C. Cardoso, Rafael A. Decurcio, Lúcio J. E. Monteiro, Letícia N. de Almeida, Wellington F. Martins, Ana Paula R. Magalhães
International Journal of Biomaterials.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef - Effects of surface treatments on repair bond strength of a new CAD/CAM ZLS glass ceramic and two different types of CAD/CAM ceramics
Ayse Seda Ataol, Gulfem Ergun
Journal of Oral Science.2018; 60(2): 201. CrossRef - An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant‐supported zirconia‐based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials
Hiroki Takata, Futoshi Komine, Junichi Honda, Markus B. Blatz, Hideo Matsumura
Clinical Oral Implants Research.2018; 29(4): 396. CrossRef - Effects of multiple firings on mechanical properties and resin bonding of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic
Hongliang Meng, Haifeng Xie, Lu Yang, Bingzhuo Chen, Ying Chen, Huaiqin Zhang, Chen Chen
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2018; 88: 362. CrossRef
- The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass–ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis
- 300 View
- 1 Download
- 23 Crossref
- The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing
- Jayang Kim, Sungok Hong, Yoorina Choi, Sujung Park
- Restor Dent Endod 2015;40(4):299-305. Published online October 2, 2015
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.299
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of multiple decontamination procedures for salivary contamination after curing of a universal adhesive on dentin bond strength according to its etch modes.
Materials and Methods Forty-two extracted bovine incisors were trimmed by exposing the labial dentin surfaces and embedded in cylindrical molds. A universal adhesive (All-Bond Universal, Bisco) was used. The teeth were randomly divided into groups according to etch mode and decontamination procedure. The adhesive was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a given etch mode. With the exception of the control groups, the cured adhesive was contaminated with saliva for 20 sec. In the self-etch group, the teeth were divided into three groups: control, decontamination with rinsing and drying, and decontamination with rinsing, drying, and adhesive. In the etch-and-rinse group, the teeth were divided into four groups: control, decontamination with rinsing and drying, decontamination with rinsing, drying, and adhesive, and decontamination with rinsing, drying, re-etching, and reapplication of adhesive. A composite resin (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) was used for filling and was cured on the treated surfaces. Shear bond strength was measured, and failure modes were evaluated. The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variation and Tukey's HSD test.
Results The etch-and-rinse subgroup that was decontaminated by rinse, drying, re-etching, and reapplication of adhesive showed a significantly higher bond strength.
Conclusions When salivary contamination occurs after curing of the universal adhesive, additional etching improves the bond strength to dentin.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Effect of contamination and decontamination methods on the bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin: A systematic review
Rim Bourgi, Carlos Enrique Cuevas‐Suarez, Walter Devoto, Ana Josefina Monjarás‐Ávila, Paulo Monteiro, Khalil Kharma, Monika Lukomska‐Szymanska, Louis Hardan
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2023; 35(8): 1218. CrossRef - Universal adhesive application to contaminated/non-contaminated dentin with three different protocols: An in vitro shear bond strength and SEM analysis
Tuğçe BALOGLU GONCU, Nasibe Aycan YILMAZ
Dental Materials Journal.2022; 41(4): 633. CrossRef - Tükürük kontaminasyon/dekontaminasyonunun üniversal adezivlerin dentine bağlanma dayanımına etkisi
Cansu ATALAY, Aybüke USLU, Ece MERAL, Ayşe YAZICI, A. Atila ERTAN
Selcuk Dental Journal.2021; 8(3): 611. CrossRef - Bioactive glass ceramic can improve the bond strength of sealant/enamel?
R. E. Silveira, R. G. Vivanco, R. C. de Morais, G. Da Col dos Santos Pinto, F. de C. P. Pires-de-Souza
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2019; 20(4): 325. CrossRef - Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance
Sanket Nagarkar, Nicole Theis‐Mahon, Jorge Perdigão
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.2019; 107(6): 2121. CrossRef - Effect of Saliva Decontamination on Bond Strength of 1-step Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin of Primary Posterior Teeth
Junhee Lee, Shin Kim, Taesung Jeong, Jonghyun Shin, Eungyung Lee, Jiyeon Kim
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2019; 46(3): 274. CrossRef - Polymeric materials and films in dentistry: An overview
Dinesh Rokaya, Viritpon Srimaneepong, Janak Sapkota, Jiaqian Qin, Krisana Siraleartmukul, Vilailuck Siriwongrungson
Journal of Advanced Research.2018; 14: 25. CrossRef - Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods
Myung-Jin Lee, Mi-Joo Kim, Jae-Sung Kwon, Sang-Bae Lee, Kwang-Mahn Kim
Materials.2017; 10(3): 288. CrossRef
- Effect of contamination and decontamination methods on the bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin: A systematic review
- 208 View
- 2 Download
- 8 Crossref
First
Prev
