KACD
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Basic Research
- The evaluation of color and color difference according to the layering placement of Incisal shade composites on the body composites of the indirect resin restoration
- Su-Jung Park, Han-Young Lee, Myong-Yun Nah, Hoon-Sang Chang, Yun-Chan Hwang, Won-Mann Oh, In-Nam Hwang
- J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(1):37-49. Published online January 14, 2011
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.1.37
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface color of indirect resin restoration according to the layering placement of different shade of incisal composite.
Materials and Methods: In this study, CIE L*a*b* value of 16 Body composite of Tescera ATL (Bisco, Schaumburg IL, USA) was measured by spectrophotometer (NF999, Nippon Denshuku, Japan), and compared to CIE L*a*b* value of Vitapan shade guide. Nine shade Incisal composite of Tescera ATL were buildup to 1 mm thickness on Body composites inlay block, and CIE L*a*b* value was measured. Incisal composite was ground to 0.5 mm thickness and CIE L*a*b* value was re-measured. Color difference between Body composite and Incisal composites layered on Body composite was calculated as a function of thickness.
Results: Color difference between corresponding shade of Tescera Body composite and Vitapan shade guide was from 6.88 to 12.80.
L* and b*value was decreased as layering thickness of Incisal composite on Body composite was increased. But, a* value did not show specific change tendency.
Conclusions: Surface color difference between Body composites and Incisal composites layered on Body composite was increased as the layering thickness of Incisal composite increased (
p < 0.05).
- 29 View
- 0 Download
Original Article
- The effect of reinforcing methods on fracture strength of composite inlay bridge
- Chang-Won Byun, Sang-Hyuk Park, Sang-Jin Park, Kyoung-Kyu Choi
- J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32(2):111-120. Published online March 31, 2007
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.111
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of surface treatment and composition of reinforcement material on fracture strength of fiber reinforced composite inlay bridges.
The materials used for this study were I-beam, U-beam TESCERA ATL system and ONE STEP(Bisco, IL, USA). Two kinds of surface treatments were used; the silane and the sandblast. The specimens were divided into 11 groups through the composition of reinforcing materials and the surface treatments.
On the dentiform, supposing the missing of Maxillary second pre-molar and indirect composite inlay bridge cavities on adjacent first pre-molar disto-occlusal cavity, first molar mesio-occlusal cavity was prepared with conventional high-speed inlay bur.The reinforcing materials were placed on the proximal box space and build up the composite inlay bridge consequently. After the curing, specimen was set on the testing die with ZPC. Flexural force was applied with universal testing machine (EZ-tester; Shimadzu, Japan). at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until initial crack occurred. The data wasanalyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffes' post-hoc test at 95% significance level.
Groups using I-beam showed the highest fracture strengths (p < 0.05) and there were no significant differences between each surface treatment (p > 0.05). Most of the specimens in groups that used reinforcing material showed delamination.
The use of I-beam represented highest fracture strengths (p < 0.05).
In groups only using silane as a surface treatment showed highest fracture strength, but there were no significant differences between other surface treatments (p > 0.05).
The reinforcing materials affect the fracture strength and pattern of composites inlay bridge.
The holes at the U-beam did not increase the fracture strength of composites inlay bridge.
- 16 View
- 0 Download
First
Prev
