Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Root canal filling materials"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review Article
Effect of endodontic sealer on postoperative pain: a network meta-analysis
Cynthia Maria Chaves Monteiro, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins, Alessandra Reis, Juliana Larocca de Geus
Restor Dent Endod 2023;48(1):e5.   Published online December 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e5
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to answer the following focused research question: “Does the type of endodontic sealer affect the postoperative pain in patients who received endodontic treatment?” Different databases and grey literature were surveyed. Only one randomized controlled trial were included. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated by using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compare the risk and intensity of postoperative pain. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Out of 11,601 studies, 15 remained for qualitative analyses and 12 for meta-analysis. Seven studies were classified at high risk of bias, and 8 studies raised some concerns. No significant differences between the endodontic materials were observed in the direct comparisons, both in risk and in intensity of postoperative pain (pairwise comparisons with 2 studies: I2 = 0%; p > 0.05 and 8 studies: I2 = 23%; p > 0.05, respectively). The certainty of the evidence was graded as low or moderate. There was no difference in the risk and intensity of postoperative pain after filling with different endodontic sealers. Further systematic reviews should be conducted.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020215314

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different endodontic sealers: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Ruchika Pandey, Nitin Kararia, Deepak Kumar Sharma, Vishal Rathod, Anand Vilas Bansod, Dhaval Desai
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(9): 962.     CrossRef
  • Effect of bioceramic-based and resin-based sealers on postoperative discomfort following root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mansi Supare, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Kashmira Sawant, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Suraj Arora, Firas Elmsmari, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Bhagyashree Thakur
    PeerJ.2024; 12: e18198.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Evaluation of Incidences of Post Operative Pain in Patient Treated in Single Visit Root Canal Treatment by Using Different Sealers: - An in-Vivo Study
    Sadashiv Daokar, Aishwarya Ranjalkar, Kalpana Pawar, Komal Potfode, Dhanashri Padwal, Sana Khan
    International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT).2024; : 2743.     CrossRef
  • 411 View
  • 23 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Research Article
The effect of individualization of fiberglass posts using bulk-fill resin-based composites on cementation: an in vitro study
Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Jairo Matozinho Cordeiro, Carolina Perez Rangel, Thiago Bessa Marconato Antunes, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(4):e37.   Published online October 18, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e37
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the bond strength of various fiberglass post cementation techniques using different resin-based composites.

Materials and Methods

The roots from a total of 100 bovine incisors were randomly assigned to 5 treatment groups: G1, post + Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) + RelyX ARC luting agent; G2, relined post (Filtek Z250) + SBMP + RelyX ARC; G3, individualized post (Filtek Z250) + SBMP; G4, individualized post (Filtek Bulk-Fill) + SBMP; G5, individualized post (Filtek Bulk-Fill Flow) + SBMP. The samples were subjected to the push-out (n = 10) and pull-out (n = 10) bond strength tests. Data from the push-out bond strength test were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni post hoc test, and data from the pull-out bond strength test were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA.

Results

The data for push-out bond strength presented higher values for G2 and G5, mainly in the cervical and middle thirds, and the data from the apical third showed a lower mean push-out bond strength in all groups. No significant difference was noted for pull-out bond strength among all groups. The most frequent failure modes observed were adhesive failure between dentine and resin and mixed failure.

Conclusions

Fiberglass post cementation using restorative and flowable bulk-fill composites with the individualization technique may be a promising alternative to existing methods of post cementation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of a relined fiberglass post with conventional and self-adhesive resin cement
    Wilton Lima dos Santos Junior, Marina Rodrigues Santi, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with relined or milled CAD-CAM glass fiber posts
    Belizane das Graças Oliveira MAIA, Thais da Silva Alves SANTOS, Cláudio Antonio Talge CARVALHO, Francielle Silvestre VERNER, Rafael Binato JUNQUEIRA
    Dental Materials Journal.2023; 42(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of pretreatments on intra‐radicular dentin bond strength of self‐adhesive resin cements
    Marina Rodrigues Santi, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins, Jorge Rodrigo Soto‐Montero
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2022; 34(7): 1051.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Push-out Bond Strength of Self-adhesive and Conventional Resin Cements on Fiber Post Cementation
    MR Santi, RBE Lins, BO Sahadi, JR Soto-Montero, LRM Martins
    Operative Dentistry.2022; 47(3): 346.     CrossRef
  • Glass fiber posts
    Renata Pereira, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Victória Castelan Rodrigues, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar
    Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences.2020; 19: e207508.     CrossRef
  • 200 View
  • 4 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Review Article
Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature
Sherin Jose Chockattu, Deepak Byathnal Suryakant, Sophia Thakur
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(4):e39.   Published online August 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e39
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an advanced diagnostic tool used in both medicine and dentistry. Since it functions based on a strong uniform static magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses, it is advantageous over imaging techniques that rely on ionizing radiation. Unfortunately, the magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses generated within the magnetic resonance imager interact unfavorably with dental materials that have magnetic properties. This leads to unwanted effects such as artifact formation, heat generation, and mechanical displacement. These are a potential source of damage to the oral tissue surrounding the affected dental materials. This review aims to compile, based on the current available evidence, recommendations for dentists and radiologists regarding the safety and appropriate management of dental materials during MRI in patients with orthodontic appliances, maxillofacial prostheses, dental implants, direct and indirect restorative materials, and endodontic materials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The influence of preformed metal crowns versus zirconia crowns on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images
    O. Dalzell, P. Haghighi, J. Ho, T. Rayner, L. Vidarsson, G. A. Garisto
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2025; 26(1): 109.     CrossRef
  • Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment
    Katrine M Johannsen, Jennifer Christensen, Louise Hauge Matzen, Brian Hansen, Rubens Spin-Neto
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2025; 54(2): 132.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of Ionizing‐Radiation‐Based and Non‐Ionizing Imaging Assessments for the Diagnosis of Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Nicola Discepoli, Isabella De Rubertis, Cecile Wasielewski, Giuseppe Troiano, Maria Clotilde Carra
    Journal of Clinical Periodontology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of MRI Exposure on the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Bracket Types
    Luka Šimunović, Jakov Stojanović, Katarina Tečić, Dijana Zadravec, Senka Meštrović
    Dentistry Journal.2025; 13(3): 108.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Artifacts Caused by Intraoral Dental Materials in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Divya Josephraj, Ravindranath Vineetha, Priya Pattath Sankaran, Prakashini Koteshwara, Mathangi Kumar, Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati
    Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Orthodontic appliances and their diagnostic impact to brain MRI
    Lisa Latzko, Anna Schmit, Bernhard Glodny, Astrid E. Grams, Christoph Birkl, Adriano G. Crismani
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nonionizing diagnostic imaging modalities for visualizing health and pathology of periodontal and peri‐implant tissues
    Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Abeer AlHadidi, Rutvi Vyas, Michael M. Bornstein, Hiroshi Watanabe, Ray Tanaka
    Periodontology 2000.2024; 95(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods
    David Romascano, Michael Rebsamen, Piotr Radojewski, Timo Blattner, Richard McKinley, Roland Wiest, Christian Rummel
    NeuroImage: Clinical.2024; 43: 103624.     CrossRef
  • Association between dental restorations and artefacts on head magnetic resonance images in paediatric patients
    Pitchaya Tunlayadechanont, Padcha Tunlayadechanont, Nantana Sriudomporn, Ploy Wisetsathon, Duangporn Duangthip, Varangkanar Jirarattanasopha
    International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry.2024; 34(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Commercially Pure Titanium Implants With Selenium and Hyaluronic Acid Coating for Dental Applications
    Soorya Ganesh, Gheena S, Kalaiyarasan Madhu
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multibraided Fixed Retainers with Different Diameters after Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): In Vitro Study Investigating Temperature Changes and Bonding Efficacy
    Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Paola Gandini, Lorenzo Preda, Domenico Sfondrini, Karin Bertino, Cinzia Rizzi, Andrea Scribante
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(8): 255.     CrossRef
  • Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis of the mandible – orthodontic considerations and management: A case report
    Saskia Andrea Schwabe, Sean Booth, Susi Caldwell
    Journal of Orthodontics.2024; 51(4): 415.     CrossRef
  • Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck: Unwanted effects caused by implant-supported restorations fabricated with different alloys
    Lauren Bohner, Dieter Dirksen, Marcel Hanisch, Newton Sesma, Johannes Kleinheinz, Norbert Meier
    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of periodontal and periapical disease
    Katrine Mølgaard Johannsen, João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig, Louise Hauge Matzen, Jennifer Christensen, Rubens Spin-Neto
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surveillance of head neck cancer: Case for personalized and standardized surveillance
    Shrikant B. Mali
    Oral Oncology.2023; 139: 106354.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T on Temperature and Bond Strength of Orthodontic Bands with Welded Tubes: An In Vitro Study
    Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Simone Gallo, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Cinzia Rizzi, Andrea Boldrini, Simone Santagostini, Luca Anemoni, Maria Sole Prevedoni Gorone, Lorenzo Preda, Paola Gandini, Andrea Scribante
    Materials.2023; 16(2): 651.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review
    Katrine Mølgaard Johannsen, João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig, Brian Hansen, Ann Wenzel, Rubens Spin-Neto
    Oral Radiology.2023; 39(2): 394.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging investigations in patients with metallic dental prosthesis: “The associated dilemma for medical fraternity and the dentist's role”
    Ritika Bhambhani, SantanuSen Roy, Shubha Joshi
    The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.2023; 23(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in the application and biological mechanism of silicon nitride osteogenic properties: a review
    Ziyi Liu, Ruijie Wang, Wenjing Liu, Yushan Liu, Xiaoli Feng, Fujian Zhao, Pei Chen, Longquan Shao, Mingdeng Rong
    Biomaterials Science.2023; 11(21): 7003.     CrossRef
  • Techniques, Tricks, and Stratagems of Oral Cavity Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Davide Maraghelli, Michele Pietragalla, Linda Calistri, Luigi Barbato, Luca Giovanni Locatello, Martina Orlandi, Nicholas Landini, Antonio Lo Casto, Cosimo Nardi
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(3): 1473.     CrossRef
  • GEÇICI VE DAIMI SIMANLARIN DENTINE OLAN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMI ÜZERINE MANYETIK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEME İŞLEMININ ETKISININ ARAŞTIRILMASI
    Melih ÜLGEY, Oğuzhan GÖRLER, İsmail ŞALK, Derya ÖZDEMİR DOĞAN
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2022; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Performance of PROPELLER FSE T2WI in reducing metal artifacts of material porcelain fused to metal crown: a clinical preliminary study
    Wenjin Li, Jing Shi, Wenjin Bian, Jianting Li, Xiaoqing Chen, Juan Feng, Jiali Yu, Jun Wang, Jinliang Niu
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tracking the Molecular Fingerprint of Head and Neck Cancer for Recurrence Detection in Liquid Biopsies
    Araceli Diez-Fraile, Joke De Ceulaer, Charlotte Derpoorter, Christophe Spaas, Tom De Backer, Philippe Lamoral, Johan Abeloos, Tim Lammens
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(5): 2403.     CrossRef
  • Review on Biocompatibility and Prospect Biomedical Applications of Novel Functional Metallic Glasses
    Michał Biały, Mariusz Hasiak, Amadeusz Łaszcz
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2022; 13(4): 245.     CrossRef
  • MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article
    Adrienn Dobai, Fanni Dembrovszky, Tamás Vízkelety, Péter Barsi, Fanni Juhász, Csaba Dobó-Nagy
    BMC Oral Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The interaction and interference of preformed metal crowns on magnetic resonance imaging: a scoping review with a systematic methodology
    O. Sumner, R. Goldsmith, N. Heath, G. D. Taylor
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2021; 22(6): 1023.     CrossRef
  • An Evidence-based Protocol for the Management of Orthodontic Patients Undergoing MRI Scans
    Rachael Shivam, Sheelagh Rogers, Nicholas Drage
    Orthodontic Update.2021; 14(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods
    Rolf G. Winnen, Kristian Kniha, Ali Modabber, Faruk Al-Sibai, Andreas Braun, Reinhold Kneer, Frank Hölzle
    Materials.2021; 14(24): 7829.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for periodontal disease: A prospective study with correlation to standard clinical findings—Is there added value?
    Monika Probst, Egon Burian, Teresa Robl, Dominik Weidlich, Dimitrios Karampinos, Teresa Brunner, Claus Zimmer, Florian Andreas Probst, Matthias Folwaczny
    Journal of Clinical Periodontology.2021; 48(7): 929.     CrossRef
  • An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review
    Rodolfo Reda, Alessio Zanza, Alessandro Mazzoni, Andrea Cicconetti, Luca Testarelli, Dario Di Nardo
    Journal of Imaging.2021; 7(5): 75.     CrossRef
  • Implant-supported overdentures: part 1
    David Gray, Jaymit Patel
    British Dental Journal.2021; 231(2): 94.     CrossRef
  • Oral and dental considerations in pediatric cancers
    Priyanshi Ritwik, Tammuella E. Chrisentery-Singleton
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2020; 39(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry
    Yin Fang, Lingyuan Meng, Aleksander Prominski, Erik N. Schaumann, Matthew Seebald, Bozhi Tian
    Chemical Society Reviews.2020; 49(22): 7978.     CrossRef
  • Imaging of root canal treatment using ultra high field 9.4T UTE-MRI – a preliminary study
    Maximilian Timme, Max Masthoff, Nina Nagelmann, Malte Masthoff, Cornelius Faber, Sebastian Bürklein
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2020; 49(1): 20190183.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging based computer‐guided dental implant surgery—A clinical pilot study
    Florian Andreas Probst, Josef Schweiger, Maria Juliane Stumbaum, Dimitrios Karampinos, Egon Burian, Monika Probst
    Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.2020; 22(5): 612.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries
    Lauren Bohner, Norbert Meier, Felix Gremse, Pedro Tortamano, Johannes Kleinheinz, Marcel Hanisch
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2020; 49(8): 20200121.     CrossRef
  • Implications and Considerations of Dental Materials in MRI: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Brenton J. Wilson, Phoebe E. O’hare, John Zacariah, Wen Lin Chai
    Case Reports in Dentistry.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • 692 View
  • 18 Download
  • 37 Crossref
Close layer
Research Articles
Push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement used as endodontic sealer
Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho, Felipe Coelho Lima, Vicente de Paula Aragão Saboia, Tauby de Souza Coutinho-Filho, Aline de Almeida Neves, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva
Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(4):282-287.   Published online August 20, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.282
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of the present study was to investigate the bond strength of RelyX Unicem (3M) to root canal dentin when used as an endodontic sealer.

Materials and Methods

Samples of 24 single-rooted teeth were prepared with Gates Glidden drills and K3 files. After that, the roots were randomly assigned to three experimental groups (n = 8) according to the filling material, (1) AH Plus (Dentsply De Trey GmbH)/Gutta-Percha cone; (2) Epiphany SE (Pentron)/Resilon cone; (3) RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha cone. All roots were filled using a single cone technique associated to vertical condensation. After the filling procedures, each tooth was prepared for a push-out bond strenght test by cutting 1 mm-thick root slices. Loading was performed on a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey test for multiple comparisons were used to compare the results among the experimental groups.

Results

Epiphany SE/Resilon showed significantly lower push-out bond strength than both AH Plus/Gutta-Percha and RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bond strength between AH Plus/Gutta-Percha and RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Under the present in vitro conditions, bond strength to root dentin promoted by RelyX Unicem was similar to AH Plus. Epiphany SE/Resilon resulted in lower bond strength values when compared to both materials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
    Radu Marcel Chisnoiu, Marioara Moldovan, Doina Prodan, Andrea Maria Chisnoiu, Dana Hrab, Ada Gabriela Delean, Alexandrina Muntean, Doina Iulia Rotaru, Ovidiu Pastrav, Mihaela Pastrav
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(10): 4454.     CrossRef
  • Push-out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Cemented Using New Universal Adhesives on Etched and Nonetched Intraradicular Dentin
    Hani F Ounsi, Simone Grandini, Marco Ferrari, Valentina Spicciarelli, Giacomo Corsentino, Crystal Marruganti
    The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice.2020; 21(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of push-out bond strength of three different obturating systems to intraradicular dentin: An In vitro study
    MohammedKhwaja Moinuddin, LKarthik Prasad, Nimeshika Ramachandruni, Shekar Kamishetty, RaviChandra Cherkupalli
    Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.2019; 10(4): 631.     CrossRef
  • The influence of methodological variables on the push‐out resistance to dislodgement of root filling materials: a meta‐regression analysis
    F. M. Collares, F. F. Portella, S. B. Rodrigues, R. K. Celeste, V. C. B. Leitune, S. M. W. Samuel
    International Endodontic Journal.2016; 49(9): 836.     CrossRef
  • Effect of photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) on bond strength to dentine of two root canal filling materials
    Ivana Miletić, Nicoletta Chieffi, Carlo Rengo, Marco Ferrari, Dan Nathanson, Anja Baraba
    Lasers in Surgery and Medicine.2016; 48(10): 951.     CrossRef
  • 266 View
  • 2 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials
Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati Dorileo, Fábio Luis Miranda Pedro, Matheus Coelho Bandeca, Orlando Aguirre Guedes, Ricardo Dalla Villa, Alvaro Henrique Borges
Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(3):201-209.   Published online June 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.201
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the solubility, dimensional alteration, pH, electrical conductivity, and radiopacity of root perforation sealer materials.

Materials and Methods

For the pH test, the samples were immersed in distilled water for different periods of time. Then, the samples were retained in plastic recipients, and the electrical conductivity of the solution was measured. The solubility, dimensional alteration, and radiopacity properties were evaluated according to Specification No. 57 of the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA). Statistical analyses were carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test at a significance level of 5%. When the sample distribution was not normal, a nonparametric ANOVA was performed with a Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05).

Results

The results showed that white structural Portland cement (PC) had the highest solubility, while mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based cements, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply-Tulsa Dental) and MTA BIO (Ângelus Ind. Prod.), had the lowest values. MTA BIO showed the lowest dimensional alteration values and white PC presented the highest values. No differences among the tested materials were observed in the the pH and electrical conductivity analyses. Only the MTA-based cements met the ANSI/ADA recommendations regarding radiopacity, overcoming the three steps of the aluminum step wedge.

Conclusions

On the basis of these results, we concluded that the values of solubility and dimensional alteration of the materials were in accordance with the ANSI/ADA specifications. PCs did not fulfill the ANSI/ADA requirements regarding radiopacity. No differences were observed among the materials with respect to the pH and electrical conductivity analyses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Chemical and in vivo analyses of calcium silicate‐based materials in bone and connective tissues
    Ana Cristina Padilha Janini, Lauter Eston Pelepenko, Brenda Fornazaro Moraes, Victor Augusto Benedicto dos Santos, Matheus Barros‐Costa, Isabela Alvarenga Maciel dos Santos, Fábio Roberto de Souza Batista, Juliana de Aguiar Silveira Meira, Mariza Akemi Ma
    International Endodontic Journal.2025; 58(3): 484.     CrossRef
  • Physicochemical and antibacterial properties of ZnO/chitosan-modified mineral trioxide aggregate composites
    Mariyam Mariyam, Siti Sunarintyas, Leny Yuliatun, Dyah Irnawati, Adhi Dwi Hatmanto, Nuryono Nuryono
    Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering.2024; 9: 100749.     CrossRef
  • Portland Cement: An Overview as a Root Repair Material
    Shahriar Shahi, Elaheh Fakhri, Hamidreza Yavari, Solmaz Maleki Dizaj, Sara Salatin, Khadijeh Khezri, Victor Feitosa
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials
    Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres, Jader Camilo Pinto, Gabriella Oliveira Figueira, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Mario Tanomaru-Filho
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • COMPARISON OF MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE, ENDOSEQUENCE ROOT REPAIR MATERIAL, AND BIODENTINE USED FOR REPAIRING ROOT PERFORATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Faisal ALGHAMDİ, Esraa ALJAHDALİ
    Cumhuriyet Dental Journal.2019; 22(4): 469.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the addition of nanoparticulate calcium carbonate on setting time, dimensional change, compressive strength, solubility and pH of MTA
    A. Bernardi, E. A. Bortoluzzi, W. T. Felippe, M. C. S. Felippe, W. S. Wan, C. S. Teixeira
    International Endodontic Journal.2017; 50(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • The use of a biocompatible cement in endodontic surgery. A randomized clinical trial 1
    Sérgio Ribeiro da Silva, José Dias da Silva Neto, Taylor Brandão Schnaider, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Neil Ferreira Novo, Marcos Mesquita Filho, Lydia Masako Ferreira
    Acta Cirurgica Brasileira.2016; 31(6): 422.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Sealing Effect and Working Time of Root Canal Filling MTA Materials
    Hyojin Kim, Youngjin Kim, Soonhyeun Nam, Kwon Taeyub, Hyunjung Kim
    THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2016; 43(2): 129.     CrossRef
  • Portland cement versus MTA as a root-end filling material. A pilot study
    Sérgio Ribeiro da Silva, José Dias da Silva Neto, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Taylor Brandão Schnaider, Lydia Masako Ferreira
    Acta Cirurgica Brasileira.2015; 30(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • 226 View
  • 3 Download
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP