KACD
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Research Articles
-
Retention of BioAggregate and MTA as coronal plugs after intracanal medication for regenerative endodontic procedures: an
ex vivo study - Suzan Abdul Wanees Amin, Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat
- Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(3):e18. Published online April 26, 2018
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e18
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader
ePub Objectives This study compared the retention of BioAggregate (BA; Innovative BioCeramix) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA; Angelus) as coronal plugs after applying different intracanal medications (ICMs) used in regenerative endodontics.
Materials and Methods One-hundred human maxillary central incisors were used. The canals were enlarged to a diameter of 1.7 mm. Specimens were divided into 5 groups (
n = 20) according to the ICM used: calcium hydroxide (CH), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), triple-antibiotic paste (TAP), double-antibiotic paste (DAP), and no ICM (control; CON). After 3 weeks of application, ICMs were removed and BA or MTA were placed as the plug material (n = 10). The push-out bond strength and the mode of failure were assessed. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance, the Tukey's test, and the χ2 test;p values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results The type of ICM and the type of plug material significantly affected bond strength (
p < 0.01). Regardless of the type of ICM, BA showed a lower bond strength than MTA (p < 0.05). For MTA, CH showed a higher bond strength than CON, TAP and DAP; CHX showed a higher bond strength than DAP (p < 0.01). For BA, CH showed a higher bond strength than DAP (p < 0.05). The mode of failure was predominantly cohesive for BA (p < 0.05).Conclusions MTA may show better retention than BA. The mode of bond failure with BA can be predominantly cohesive. BA retention may be less affected by ICM type than MTA retention.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three intracanal medicaments – chlorhexidine gel, triple antibiotic paste, and calcium hydroxide paste on the push-out bond strength of MTA Plus, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture
Gouthami Datta, Ramya Raghu, Ashish Shetty, Gautham P Manjunath, Dishant Patel, Subhashini Rajasekhara
Endodontology.2023; 35(1): 60. CrossRef - Effects of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament on push‐out bond strength of endodontic sealers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Mohammed Nasser Alhajj, Fadhilah Daud, Sadeq Ali Al‐Maweri, Yanti Johari, Zuryati Ab‐Ghani, Mariatti Jaafar, Yoshihito Naito, Widyasri Prananingrum, Zaihan Ariffin
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2022; 34(8): 1166. CrossRef - A Breakthrough in the Era of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Critical Review
Payal S Chaudhari, Manoj G Chandak, Akshay A Jaiswal, Nikhil P Mankar, Priyanka Paul
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Modern Medicaments for Endodontic Treatment in Children
Н.В. Шаковец, О.С. Романова
Стоматология. Эстетика. Инновации.2021; (4): 408. CrossRef - Do intracanal medications used in regenerative endodontics affect the bond strength of powder-to-liquid and ready-to-use cervical sealing materials?
MarinaCarvalho Prado, Kevillin Martiniano, AndreaCardoso Pereira, KarineL Cortellazzi, MarinaA Marciano, Gabriel Abuna, Adriana de-Jesus-Soares
Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(5): 464. CrossRef - In vivo Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Calcium Silicate-Based Bioceramics in Endodontics
Wencheng Song, Wei Sun, Lili Chen, Zhenglin Yuan
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of Hydrogel-Based Antibiotic Intracanal Medicaments on Push-Out Bond Strength
Rayan B. Yaghmoor, Jeffrey A. Platt, Kenneth J. Spolnik, Tien Min Gabriel Chu, Ghaeth H. Yassen
European Journal of Dentistry.2020; 14(04): 575. CrossRef - Regenerative Endodontic Procedures, Disinfectants and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Adam S. Kharchi, Nara Tagiyeva-Milne, Shalini Kanagasingam
Primary Dental Journal.2020; 9(4): 65. CrossRef
- An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three intracanal medicaments – chlorhexidine gel, triple antibiotic paste, and calcium hydroxide paste on the push-out bond strength of MTA Plus, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture
- 242 View
- 4 Download
- 8 Crossref
- Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics
- Dephne Jack Xin Leong, Frank C. Setzer, Martin Trope, Bekir Karabucak
- Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(2):98-105. Published online March 28, 2016
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.98
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives The biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for potential use in revascularization or pulp regeneration was evaluated.
Materials and Methods One resilient lyophilized collagen scaffold (COLL), releasing metronidazole and clindamycin, was compared to an experimental injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid scaffold (PLGA), releasing clindamycin. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) were seeded at densities of 1.0 × 104, 2.5 × 104, and 5.0 × 104. The cells were investigated by light microscopy (cell morphology), MTT assay (cell proliferation) and a cytokine (IL-8) ELISA test (biocompatibility).
Results Under microscope, the morphology of cells coincubated for 7 days with the scaffolds appeared healthy with COLL. Cells in contact with PLGA showed signs of degeneration and apoptosis. MTT assay showed that at 5.0 × 104 hDPSCs, COLL demonstrated significantly higher cell proliferation rates than cells in media only (control,
p < 0.01) or cells co-incubated with PLGA (p < 0.01). In ELISA test, no significant differences were observed between cells with media only and COLL at 1, 3, and 6 days. Cells incubated with PLGA expressed significantly higher IL-8 than the control at all time points (p < 0.01) and compared to COLL after 1 and 3 days (p < 0.01).Conclusions The COLL showed superior biocompatibility and thus may be suitable for endodontic regeneration purposes.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Advances in scaffolds used forpulp–dentinecomplex tissue engineering: A narrative review
Parisa Noohi, Mohammad J. Abdekhodaie, Mohammad H. Nekoofar, Kerstin M. Galler, Paul M. H. Dummer
International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(12): 1277. CrossRef - In vitro performance of a nanobiocomposite scaffold containing boron-modified bioactive glass nanoparticles for dentin regeneration
Reza Moonesi Rad, Engin Pazarçeviren, Elif Ece Akgün, Zafer Evis, Dilek Keskin, Sıla Şahin, Ayşen Tezcaner
Journal of Biomaterials Applications.2019; 33(6): 834. CrossRef - Biological effects of silk fibroin 3D scaffolds on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs)
M. Collado-González, M. P. Pecci-Lloret, D. García-Bernal, S. Aznar-Cervantes, R. E. Oñate-Sánchez, J. M. Moraleda, J. L. Cenis, F. J. Rodríguez-Lozano
Odontology.2018; 106(2): 125. CrossRef - Pulp Regeneration Concepts for Nonvital Teeth: From Tissue Engineering to Clinical Approaches
Valérie Orti, Pierre-Yves Collart-Dutilleul, Sofía Piglionico, Orsolya Pall, Frédéric Cuisinier, Ivan Panayotov
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews.2018; 24(6): 419. CrossRef - Investigation of Human Dental Pulp Cells on a Potential Injectable Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Microsphere Scaffold
Huiru Zou, Guanhua Wang, Fang Song, Xudong Shi
Journal of Endodontics.2017; 43(5): 745. CrossRef - Biocompatibility of hydrogel-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
Sheva Naahidi, Mousa Jafari, Megan Logan, Yujie Wang, Yongfang Yuan, Hojae Bae, Brian Dixon, P. Chen
Biotechnology Advances.2017; 35(5): 530. CrossRef
- Advances in scaffolds used forpulp–dentinecomplex tissue engineering: A narrative review
- 220 View
- 2 Download
- 6 Crossref
First
Prev
