Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Hee-Jung Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of newly developed calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers
Hee-Jung Kim, Seung-Ho Baek, Kwang-Shik Bae
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31(1):36-49.   Published online January 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.036
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity by MTT test and genotoxicity by Ames test of new calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers (CAPSEAL I, CAPSEAL II) with commercially available resin-based sealers (AH 26, AH Plus), zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers (Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT), calcium hydroxide-based sealer (Sealapex), and tricalcium phosphate based sealers (Sankin Apatite Root Canal Sealer I, II, III).

According to this study, the results were as follows:

The extracts of freshly mixed group showed higher toxicity than those of 24 h set group in MTT assay (p < 0.001).

CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II were less cytotoxic than AH 26, AH Plus, Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT, Sealapex and SARCS II in freshly mixed group (p < 0.01).

AH 26 in freshly mixed group showed mutagenicity to TA98 and TA100 with and without S9 mix and AH Plus extracts also were mutagenic to TA100 with and without S9 mix.

Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT and Sealapex in freshly mixed group were mutagenic to TA100 with S9 mix.

Among those of 24 h set groups, the extracts of SARCS II were mutagenic to TA98 with and without S9 mix and AH 26 showed mutagenic effects to TA98 with S9 mix.

No mutagenic effect of CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II was detected.

There is no statistically significant difference between CAPSEAL I and CAPSEAL II at MTT assay and Ames test in both freshly mixed group and 24 h set group.

  • 22 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Cytotoxicity of resin-based root canal sealer, adseal
Hee-Jung Kim, Seung-Ho Baek, Woo-Cheol Lee, Han-Soo Park, Kwang-Shik Bae
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(6):498-503.   Published online November 30, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.6.498
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The properties of ideal root canal sealers include the ability of sealing the total root canal system and no toxic effects to periradicular tissues. Cytotoxicity test using cell culture is a common screening method for evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic effect of newly developed resin-based sealer (Adseal 1, 2, and 3) comparing with those commercial resin-based sealers (AH26 and AH Plus), ZOE-based sealers (Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT) and calcium hydroxide based sealer (Sealapex). An indirect contact test of cytotoxicity by agar diffusion was performed according to the international standard ISO 10993-5. L929 fibroblast cells were incubated at 37℃ in humidified 5% CO2-containing air atmosphere. The freshly mixed test materials were inserted into glass rings of internal diameter 5 mm and height 5 mm placed on the agar. After the 24 hrs incubation period, the decolorization zones around the test materials were assessed using an inverted microscope with a calibrated screen. A Decolorization Index was determined for each specimen. Adseal 1, 2, and 3 did not exert any cytotoxic effects, whereas AH26, AH Plus, Tubliseal EWT, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT, and Sealapex produced mild cytotoxicity.

  • 21 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Sealing ability of root canals obturated with gutta-percha, epoxy resin-based sealer, and dentin adhesives
Hee-Jung Kim, Seung-Ho Baek, Kwang-Shik Bae
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(1):51-57.   Published online January 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.051
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 18 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP