Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Glass ionomer"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review Article
Comparative evaluation of the biological response of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cement on human cells: a systematic review
Shishir Singh, Gaurav Kulkarni, R S Mohan Kumar, Romi Jain, Ameya M Lokhande, Teena K Sitlaney, Musharraf H F Ansari, Navin S Agarwal
Restor Dent Endod 2024;49(4):e41.   Published online November 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e41
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This review aimed to evaluate and compare the biological response (biocompatibility and cytotoxicity) of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in contrast to conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) on human cells. Articles reporting parallel and split-mouth clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, and in vitro studies on human permanent teeth that assessed the biological response of GIC and RMGIC were included. The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the keywords: MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. For the risk of bias MINORS tool and the modified scale of Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials were used. Initial screening identified 552 studies, of which 9 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Different parameters such as odontoblastic changes, inflammatory response, tertiary dentin formation, presence of microorganisms, morphological changes, cell viability, number, and metabolism were used to evaluate the biological response of conventional GIC and RMGICs. Conventional GIC shows lower cytotoxicity compared to RMGIC in vital pulp therapy procedures. Further, in vivo studies and long-term clinical trials are needed to compare these observations for pulp therapy using the 2 test materials.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023426021

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The conventional glass ionomers – A forgotten paradigm
    Shishir Singh
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(12): 1201.     CrossRef
  • 683 View
  • 59 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Research Articles
Physical-mechanical, chemical and biological properties of graphene-reinforced glass ionomer cements
Tatiane Ramos dos Santos Jordão, Laura Soares Viana Fernandes, Karla Lorene de França Leite, Adílis Alexandria, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Lucianne Cople Maia, Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo
Restor Dent Endod 2024;49(4):e37.   Published online October 10, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e37
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the physical-mechanical, chemical, and biological properties of graphene-reinforced glass ionomer cements (GICs).

Materials and Methods

Different proportions of graphene powder were incorporated into 2 high-viscosity self-curing GIC, Ketac Molar (GKetac) and Fuji IX (GFuji), in 4 different concentrations: 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 5%. The control groups included the GICs without graphene. Experiments were performed to analyze linear (Ra) and volumetric roughness (Sa), antimicrobial activity, radiopacity, fluoride release, microhardness, solubility, and water sorption. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon, analysis of variance, and Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05).

Results

The GKetac 0% and GFuji0% groups presented higher Ra (4.05 and 2.72) and Sa (4.76 and 5.16), respectively. No inhibition zone was observed, and the incorporation of graphene reduced radiopacity. Moreover, there was no influence on the solubility and water sorption after 21 days. A greater fluoride release was observed in the period of 7 days for most of the groups. After 21 days, GKetac 5%, 2%, and 1% presented higher releasing than 0% and 0.5% (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

The graphene incorporation improved the microhardness of GICs in lower concentrations. Graphene incorporation to GICs modified some physical-mechanical, and chemical, but not affected biological properties.

  • 746 View
  • 82 Download
Close layer
The clinical success of ART restorations and Hall technique in primary molars: a randomized 18-month follow-up study
Esra Oz, Zuhal Kırzıoglu, Canan Kale
Restor Dent Endod 2023;48(2):e19.   Published online May 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e19
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of the Hall technique (HT) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement for the management of occlusal carious lesions in primary molars.

Materials and Methods

This randomized clinical study observed 40 children (aged 5–6 years). For each child, one tooth was treated with HT and one with ART. The primary outcome measures for HT restorations were successful, minor, and major failure rates. Clinical evaluations of ART restorations were performed according to the modified United States Public Health Service criteria during 18-month follow-up. McNemar test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Thirty of 40 (75%) participants returned for 18 months of follow-up. In the clinical evaluations of teeth that were treated with HT, the patients did not have complaints of pain or other symptoms, all crowns remained in the oral cavity, the gums were healthy, and the teeth were functional in all evaluations. At the end of the 18-month follow-up, the surface texture and marginal integrity criteria of ART restorations were recorded as 26.7% and 33.3%, respectively. In the radiographic evaluation of 30 patients treated with ART and HT, all restorations were considered successful.

Conclusions

The 18-month clinical and radiographic results after treatments applied to single-surface cavities in anxious children showed that both treatment methods were successful.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Success rate of Hall Technique for restoring carious primary molars - systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Nicola Patricia Innes, Claudia Lopez Gallegos, Gabriela Seabra Silva, Thais Gimenez, Mariana Minatel Braga, Mariana Pinheiro Araujo, Jayakumar Jayaraman, Waraf Al-yaseen, Daniela Prócida Raggio
    Evidence-Based Dentistry.2025; 26(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • 559 View
  • 19 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Porosity and pore size distribution in high-viscosity and conventional glass ionomer cements: a micro-computed tomography study
Aline Borburema Neves, Laísa Inara Gracindo Lopes, Tamiris Gomes Bergstrom, Aline Saddock Sá da Silva, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes, Aline de Almeida Neves
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(4):e57.   Published online October 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e57
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to compare and evaluate the porosity and pore size distribution of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (HVGICs) and conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Materials and Methods

Forty cylindrical specimens (n = 10) were produced in standardized molds using HVGICs and conventional GICs (Ketac Molar Easymix, Vitro Molar, MaxxionR, and Riva Self-Cure). The specimens were prepared according to ISO 9917-1 standards, scanned in a high-energy micro-CT device, and reconstructed using specific parameters. After reconstruction, segmentation procedures, and image analysis, total porosity and pore size distribution were obtained for specimens in each group. After checking the normality of the data distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to detect differences in porosity among the experimental groups with a 5% significance level.

Results

Ketac Molar Easymix showed statistically significantly lower total porosity (0.15%) than MaxxionR (0.62%), Riva (0.42%), and Vitro Molar (0.57%). The pore size in all experimental cements was within the small-size range (< 0.01 mm3), but Vitro Molar showed statistically significantly more pores/defects with a larger size (> 0.01 mm3).

Conclusions

Major differences in porosity and pore size were identified among the evaluated GICs. Among these, the Ketac Molar Easymix HVGIC showed the lowest porosity and void size.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of crown seating methods on the remnant cement in the subgingival region of a cement-retained implant crown
    Fanghui Ji, Ji Suk Shim, Jeongyol Lee, Hwiseong Oh, Jae Jun Ryu
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Wear Resistance in Glass Ionomer Cement through Green-mediated Chitosan-, Titanium-, Zirconium-, and Hydroxyapatite-based Nanocomposites: An Analysis before and after Chewing Simulator Endurance
    Jessy Paulraj, Rajeshkumar Shanmugam, Subhabrata Maiti, Srinavasa Surya Sitaram
    International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2024; 17(11): 1229.     CrossRef
  • The effect of mesoporous silica doped with silver nanoparticles on glass ionomer cements; physiochemical, mechanical and ion release analysis
    Syed Saad Bin Qasim, Ali Bmuajdad
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hyperbaric Pressure Effect on Dental Luting Cements
    Secil OZKAN ATA, Nazım ATA, Rıfat UGURLUTAN
    Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences.2023; 7(1): 464.     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Comparison of Differences in Setting Time of Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate According to Moisture Content of Gypsum
    Hyun-Jin Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Dong-Hoon Gwak, Yong-Seok Ko, Chun-Il Lim, Seung-Youl Lee
    Materials.2023; 17(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers
    Handan Yıldırım Işık, Aylin Çilingir
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2023; 14(7): 367.     CrossRef
  • An influence of finishing procedures and protective coating on the ultrastructure of conventional and hybrid glass ionomer cement restorations
    Antonije Stankovic, Jelena Popovic, Marija Nikolic, Aleksandar Mitic, Nenad Stosic, Radomir Barac, Aleksandra Milovanovic
    Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije.2023; 70(3): 138.     CrossRef
  • Effect of aging on mechanical and antibacterial properties of fluorinated graphene reinforced glass ionomer: In vitro study
    Suzan Khaled Arafa, Dalia Ibrahim Sherief, Mohamed Salah Nassif
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2023; 142: 105803.     CrossRef
  • 284 View
  • 6 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Bonding of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin using universal adhesives
Muhittin Ugurlu
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(3):e36.   Published online June 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e36
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aims to assess the effect of universal adhesives pretreatment on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin.

Materials and Methods

Fifty caries-free human third molars were employed. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 10) based on dentin surface pretreatments: Single Bond Universal (3M Oral Care), Gluma Bond Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), Prime&Bond Elect (Dentsply), Cavity Conditioner (GC) and control (no surface treatment). After Fuji II LC (GC) was bonded to the dentin surfaces, the specimens were stored for 7 days at 37°C. The specimens were segmented into microspecimens, and the microspecimens were subjugated to microtensile bond strength testing (1.0 mm/min). The modes of failure analyzed using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan tests (p = 0.05).

Results

The surface pretreatments with the universal adhesives and conditioner increased the bond strength of Fuji II LC to dentin (p < 0.05). Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal provided higher bond strength to Fuji II LC than Cavity Conditioner (p < 0.05). The bond strengths obtained from Prime&Bond Elect and Cavity Conditioner were not statistically different (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The universal adhesives and polyacrylic acid conditioner could increase the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin. The use of universal adhesives before the application of RMGIC may be more beneficial in improving bond strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial
    Reham Hendam, Rania Mosallam, Dina Kamal
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2025; 28(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Push-Out Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements Following Post Space Irrigation with 2% Chitosan: An In Vitro Study
    Shimaa Rifaat, Ahmed Rahoma, Hind Muneer Alharbi, Sawsan Jamal Kazim, Shrouq Ali Aljuaid, Basmah Omar Alakloby, Faraz A. Farooqi, Noha Taymour
    Prosthesis.2025; 7(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Nanosilver Fluoride Application on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Carious Dentin: An In Vitro Study
    Ila Srinivasan, Yuthi Milit, Anushka Das, Neeraja Ramamurthy
    International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2024; 17(5): 565.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear-bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Simulated Carious Dentin
    WT Koh, OT Yeoh, NA Yahya, AU Yap
    Operative Dentistry.2024; 49(6): 714.     CrossRef
  • Desensitizing agents’ post-bleaching effect on orthodontic bracket bond strength
    Gufa Bagus Pamungkas, Dyah Karunia, Sri Suparwitri
    Dental Journal.2024; 57(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Successful Rehabilitation of Traumatized Immature Teeth by Different Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Patients
    Mohammad Kamran Khan
    Journal of the Scientific Society.2023; 50(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Juliana Benace Fernandes, Sheila Mondragón Contreras, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Graziela Ribeiro Batista, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of tooth preparation on the microleakage of fissure sealant
    Gesti Kartiko Sari, Sri Kuswandari, Putri Kusuma Wardani Mahendra
    Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).2022; 55(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Rheological Properties, Surface Microhardness, and Dentin Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Methacrylate-Functionalized Polyacids and Spherical Pre-Reacted Glass Fillers
    Whithipa Thepveera, Wisitsin Potiprapanpong, Arnit Toneluck, Somruethai Channasanon, Chutikarn Khamsuk, Naruporn Monmaturapoj, Siriporn Tanodekaew, Piyaphong Panpisut
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials.2021; 12(3): 42.     CrossRef
  • 501 View
  • 11 Download
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Comparative assessment of antibacterial activity of different glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria
Rahul Gaybarao Naik, Arun Suresh Dodamani, Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar, Harish Chaitram Jadhav, Manjiri Abhay Deshmukh
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(4):278-282.   Published online September 20, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.278
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

Glass ionomer cements (GICs), which are biocompatible and adhesive to the tooth surface, are widely used nowadays for tooth restoration. They inhibit the demineralization and promote the remineralization of the tooth structure adjacent to the restoration, as well as interfere with bacterial growth. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess and compare the antimicrobial activity of three commercially available GICs against two cariogenic bacteria.

Materials and Methods

An agar plate diffusion test was used for evaluating the antimicrobial effect of three different GICs (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech) on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus). Thirty plates were prepared and divided into two groups. The first group was inoculated with S. mutans, and the second group was inoculated with L. acidophilus. These plates were then incubated at 37℃ for 24 hours. Zones of bacterial growth inhibition that formed around each well were recorded in millimeters (mm).

Results

The zones of inhibition for Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech on S. mutans were found to be 10.84 ± 0.22 mm, 10.23 ± 0.15 mm, and 15.65 ± 0.31 mm, respectively, whereas those for L. acidophilus were found to be 10.43 ± 0.12 mm, 10.16 ± 0.11 mm, and 15.57 ± 0.13 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

D-tech cement performed better in terms of the zone of bacterial inhibition against the two test bacteria, than the other two tested glass ionomers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Modifications of polyalkenoic acid and its effect on glass ionomer cement
    Sreejith Sasidharan Lathikumari, Manju Saraswathy
    Materials Advances.2024; 5(7): 2719.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Clinical Impact and In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Two Bioactive Restoratives against S. mutans ATCC 25175 in Class II Carious Restorations
    YA Maher, MT Rajeh, FA Hamooda, GO Zerain, RM Habis, RH Sulaimani, ST Albar, FMH Ali, NA Abdelaleem
    Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2023; 26(4): 404.     CrossRef
  • Effect of conditioning and 3-year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin
    Ahmed Zubaer, Rime Shamme Akter, Al Azad Salahuddin, Rahman Mir Ayubur, Sano Hidehiko, Hoshika Shuhei
    Journal of Dental Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison and Advanced Antimicrobial Strategies of Silver and Copper Nanodrug-Loaded Glass Ionomer Cement against Dental Caries Microbes
    Amal Adnan Ashour, Mohammed Fareed Felemban, Nayef H. Felemban, Enas T. Enan, Sakeenabi Basha, Mohamed M. Hassan, Sanaa M. F. Gad El-Rab
    Antibiotics.2022; 11(6): 756.     CrossRef
  • Antibacterial Activity and Biofilm Inhibition of New-Generation Hybrid/Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials
    Sevil Gurgan, Uzay Koc Vural, Cansu Atalay, Herve Tassery, Ivana Miletic, Suna Sibel Gurpinar
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(5): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
    RV Aparajitha, PSenthamil Selvan, AShafie Ahamed, S Bhavani, V Nagarajan
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(5): 485.     CrossRef
  • Dental Restorative Materials for Elderly Populations
    Yuyao Huang, Bingqing Song, Xuedong Zhou, Hui Chen, Haohao Wang, Lei Cheng
    Polymers.2021; 13(5): 828.     CrossRef
  • The Comparison of Biofilm Formation, Mechanical and Chemical Properties between Glass Ionomer Cement and Giomer
    Sylva Dinie Alinda, Anggraini Margono, Aditya Wisnu Putranto, Ike Dwi Maharti, Retno Amalina, Sherly Firsta Rahmi
    The Open Dentistry Journal.2021; 15(1): 274.     CrossRef
  • Effect of conditioning and 1 year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin
    Shuhei Hoshika, Shihchun Ting, Zubaer Ahmed, Fei Chen, Yu Toida, Norihito Sakaguchi, Bart Van Meerbeek, Hidehiko Sano, Sharanbir K. Sidhu
    Dental Materials.2021; 37(1): 106.     CrossRef
  • The synergistic effects of SrF2 nanoparticles, YSZ nanoparticles, and poly-ε-l-lysin on physicomechanical, ion release, and antibacterial-cellular behavior of the flowable dental composites
    Saeed Hesaraki, Mohammad Karimi, Nader Nezafati
    Materials Science and Engineering: C.2020; 109: 110592.     CrossRef
  • 219 View
  • 3 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Elemental analysis of caries-affected root dentin and artificially demineralized dentin
Young-Hye Sung, Ho-Hyun Son, Keewook Yi, Juhea Chang
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(4):255-261.   Published online August 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.255
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to analyze the mineral composition of naturally- and artificially-produced caries-affected root dentin and to determine the elemental incorporation of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) into the demineralized dentin.

Materials and Methods

Box-formed cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual root surfaces of sound human premolars (n = 15). One cavity was exposed to a microbial caries model using a strain of Streptococcus mutans. The other cavity was subjected to a chemical model under pH cycling. Premolars and molars with root surface caries were used as a natural caries model (n = 15). Outer caries lesion was removed using a carbide bur and a hand excavator under a dyeing technique and restored with RMGI (FujiII LC, GC Corp.). The weight percentages of calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and strontium (Sr) and the widths of demineralized dentin were determined by electron probe microanalysis and compared among the groups using ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Results

There was a pattern of demineralization in all models, as visualized with scanning electron microscopy. Artificial models induced greater losses of Ca and P and larger widths of demineralized dentin than did a natural caries model (p < 0.05). Sr was diffused into the demineralized dentin layer from RMGI.

Conclusions

Both microbial and chemical caries models produced similar patterns of mineral composition on the caries-affected dentin. However, the artificial lesions had a relatively larger extent of demineralization than did the natural lesions. RMGI was incorporated into the superficial layer of the caries-affected dentin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Frontiers of Global Research Trend on Root Caries: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Grace Yuchan Xu, Irene Shuping Zhao, Christie Ying Kei Lung, Iris Xiaoxue Yin, Edward Chin Man Lo, Chun Hung Chu
    International Dental Journal.2024; 74(6): 1197.     CrossRef
  • Effects of NaF versus SDF treatment on microhardness of artificial radiation caries at cervical and root areas
    Pipop SAIKAEW, Karis KATEKOVIT, Anocha BURANARACHADA, Nattapat SAIMALA, Anussara PRAYONGRAT, Pornpoj FUANGTHARNTHIP
    Dental Materials Journal.2024; 43(4): 591.     CrossRef
  • Degradable polycaprolactone/buffer composites as pH regulating carrier materials for drug delivery and 3D printed biomaterials
    Therese Schüler, Celine Guder, Franziska Alt, Katrin Lorenz, Torsten Sterzenbach, Christian Hannig, Hans-Peter Wiesmann, Benjamin Kruppke
    Materialia.2024; 34: 102087.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Oral Care Foams and a Spray on Salivary pH Changes after Exposure to Acidic Beverages in Young Adults
    Maria Polyakova, Anna Egiazaryan, Vladlena Doroshina, Alexandr Zaytsev, Alexey Malashin, Ksenia Babina, Nina Novozhilova
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(4): 93.     CrossRef
  • In Vitro Models Used in the Formation of Root Caries Lesions—A Review of the Literature
    Zaid Dohan, Lara T. Friedlander, Paul R. Cooper, Kai-Chun Li, Jithendra T. Ratnayake, May L. Mei
    Dentistry Journal.2023; 11(12): 269.     CrossRef
  • Yttrium Trifluoride as a Marker of Infiltration Rate of Decalcified Root Cementum: An In Vitro Study
    Anna Nowak-Wachol, Anna Korytkowska-Wałach, Bartosz Chmiela, Kacper Wachol, Maciej Łopaciński, Magdalena Wyszyńska, Yousuf Al-Dulaimi, Małgorzata Skucha-Nowak
    Polymers.2022; 14(4): 780.     CrossRef
  • Effect of fluoride, chlorhexidine or Nd:YAG on the progression of root dentin demineralization after removal of the demineralized organic matrix
    Andrea Maselli, Tânia Mara da Silva, Lucélia Lemes Gonçalves, Aline Silva Braga, Eduardo Bresciani, Ana Carolina Magalhães, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves
    Journal of Applied Oral Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of ionizing radiation and cariogenic biofilm challenge on root-dentin caries
    Camila de Carvalho Almança Lopes, Renata Borges Rodrigues, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci, Juliana Lays Stolfo Uehara, Tamires Timm Maske, Pedro Henrique Justino Oliveira Limirio, Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares, Veridiana Resende Novais
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2021; 25(6): 4059.     CrossRef
  • Silver diamine fluoride treatment of active root caries lesions in older adults: A case series
    Chelsea Mitchell, Andrew J Gross, Peter Milgrom, Lloyd Mancl, David B Prince
    Journal of Dentistry.2021; 105: 103561.     CrossRef
  • A Hydrogel Drink With High Fructose Content Generates Higher Exogenous Carbohydrate Oxidation and a Reduced Drop in Dental Biofilm pH Compared to Two Other, Commercially Available, Carbohydrate Sports Drinks
    Stefan Pettersson, Martin Ahnoff, Fredrik Edin, Peter Lingström, Charlotte Simark Mattsson, Ulrika Andersson-Hall
    Frontiers in Nutrition.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 204 View
  • 2 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements?
Maria Fernanda Costa Cabral, Roberto Luiz de Menezes Martinho, Manoel Valcácio Guedes-Neto, Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo, Danielson Guedes Pontes, Flávia Cohen-Carneiro
Restor Dent Endod 2015;40(3):209-215.   Published online May 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.209
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) and resin-modified GICs.

Materials and Methods

The cements were grouped as follows: G1 (Vidrion R, SS White), G2 (Vitro Fil, DFL), G3 (Vitro Molar, DFL), G4 (Bioglass R, Biodinâmica), and G5 (Ketac Fil, 3M ESPE), as conventional GICs, and G6 (Vitremer, 3M ESPE), G7 (Vitro Fil LC, DFL), and G8 (Resiglass, Biodinâmica) as resin-modified GICs. Six specimens (8.60 mm in diameter; 1.65 mm in thickness) of each material were prepared using a stainless steel mold. The specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution (pH 4.3) for 6 hr and a remineralizing solution (pH 7.0) for 18 hr a day. The fluoride ions were measured for 15 days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test with 5% significance were applied.

Results

The highest amounts of fluoride release were found during the first 24 hr for all cements, decreasing abruptly on day 2, and reaching gradually decreasing levels on day 7. Based on these results, the decreasing scale of fluoride release was as follows: G2 > G3 > G8 = G4 = G7 > G6 = G1 > G5 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

There were wide variations among the materials in terms of the cumulative amount of fluoride ion released, and the amount of fluoride release could not be attributed to the category of cement, that is, conventional GICs or resin-modified GICs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ion release of the glass ionomer restoration with silver diamine fluoride dentin pretreatment
    Kelsey Xingyun Ge, Ryan Quock, Feng Yan, Walter Yu-Hang Lam, Chun-Hung Chu, Ollie Yiru Yu
    Journal of Dentistry.2024; 148: 105247.     CrossRef
  • Dual function of anti-biofilm and modulating biofilm equilibrium of orthodontic cement containing quaternary ammonium salt
    Wenqi YU, Chaochao REN, Ning ZHANG, Li CAO, Michael D. WEIR, Kai YANG, Hockin H. K. XU, Yuxing BAI
    Dental Materials Journal.2023; 42(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Fluoride exchange by glass-ionomer dental cements and its clinical effects: a review
    John W. Nicholson, Sharanbir K. Sidhu, Beata Czarnecka
    Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Protective Surface Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
    Nantawan Krajangta, Chayanee Dulsamphan, Tongjai Chotitanmapong
    Dentistry Journal.2022; 10(12): 233.     CrossRef
  • Reinforcing an immature tooth model using three different restorative materials
    Pooja Misar, Hemalatha Hiremath, Chhaya Harinkhere, ShailendraS Sonawane, Vinay Sharma, KuldeepSingh Rana
    Dental Research Journal.2022; 19(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements—An in vitro study
    Yasemin Dziuk, Sachin Chhatwani, Stephan C. Möhlhenrich, Sabrina Tulka, Ella A. Naumova, Gholamreza Danesh, Richard Johannes Wierichs
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247716.     CrossRef
  • Phosphate Ion Release and Alkalizing Potential of Three Bioactive Dental Materials in Comparison with Composite Resin
    Shahin Kasraei, Sahebeh Haghi, Sara Valizadeh, Narges Panahandeh, Sogol Nejadkarimi, Shinn Jyh Ding
    International Journal of Dentistry.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • The effect of the polishing procedure and surface sealant application on the fluoride release of different restorative materials
    Muhittin Ugurlu, Hikmet Orhan
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical and antimicrobial property of different surface treated glass ionomer cements under desiccated condition
    Hemalatha Hiremath, Chhaya Harinkhere, Pooja Misar, Kshitij Sabley, Trupti Bajpai
    Dental Research Journal.2021; 18(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • Dental Restorative Materials for Elderly Populations
    Yuyao Huang, Bingqing Song, Xuedong Zhou, Hui Chen, Haohao Wang, Lei Cheng
    Polymers.2021; 13(5): 828.     CrossRef
  • Monomer conversion, dimensional stability, biaxial flexural strength, and fluoride release of resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers
    Piyaphong PANPISUT, Arnit TONELUCK
    Dental Materials Journal.2020; 39(4): 608.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing fluoride release in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) materials: A review
    P.Divya Kumari, Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Avidyuti Chowdhury, Edward Lynch, Chitta R. Chowdhury
    Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.2019; 9(4): 315.     CrossRef
  • Incorporation of chlorhexidine and nano-sized sodium trimetaphosphate into a glass-ionomer cement: Effect on mechanical and microbiological properties and inhibition of enamel demineralization
    Márjully Eduardo Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelle Danelon, José Antonio Santos Souza, Dinah Fressato Silva, Jesse Augusto Pereira, Denise Pedrini, Emerson Rodrigues de Camargo, Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem, Cristiane Duque
    Journal of Dentistry.2019; 84: 81.     CrossRef
  • 243 View
  • 3 Download
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Treatment of a lateral incisor anatomically complicated with palatogingival groove
Moon-Sun Choi, Se-Hee Park, Kyung-Mo Cho, Jin-Woo Kim
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36(3):238-242.   Published online May 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.238
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

Palatogingival groove is a developmental anomaly that starts near the cingulum of the tooth and runs down the cementoenamel junction in apical direction, terminating at various depths along the roots. While frequently associated with periodontal pockets and bone loss, pulpal necrosis of these teeth may precipitate a combined endodontic-periodontal lesion. This case presents a case of a lateral incisor anatomically complicated with palatogingival groove.

Methods

Two patients with lesion associated with the palatogingival groove were chosen for this report. Palatogingival grooves were treated with different restoration materials with endodontic treatment.

Conclusions

Maxillary lateral incisor with a palatogingival groove may occur the periodontal disease with pulpal involvement. Elimination of groove may facilitate the periodontal re-attachment and prevent the recurrence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endodontic treatment of maxillary lateral incisors with anatomical variations
    Moon-Hwan Lee, Jung-Hong Ha, Myoung-Uk Jin, Young-Kyung Kim, Sung-Kyo Kim
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2013; 38(4): 253.     CrossRef
  • 183 View
  • 1 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Micro-shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and resin-based adhesives to dentin
Hyun-Kyung Hong, Kyoung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Hyuk Park, Sang-Jin Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003;28(4):314-325.   Published online July 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.314
PDFPubReaderePub
  • 131 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP