Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Cleaning"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review Article
Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
Hernán Coaguila-Llerena, Eduarda Gaeta, Gisele Faria
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(1):e11.   Published online February 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study aimed to describe the outcomes of the GentleWave system (GW) (Sonendo) on root canal treatment. Published articles were collected from scientific databases (MEDLINE/PubMed platform, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase). A total of 24 studies were collected from August/2014 to July/2021, 20 in vitro and 4 clinical. GW System was not associated with extrusion of the irrigant, promoted faster organic dissolution than conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and EndoVac, reduced more bacterial DNA and biofilm than PUI and CUI, promoted higher penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules than PUI and CUI in vitro, and removed more intracanal medication than CSI and PUI. GW was able to remove pulp tissue and calcifications. Moreover, its ability to remove hard-tissue debris and smear layer was better than that of CSI, and its ability to remove root canal obturation residues was lower or similar to that of PUI, and similar to that of CSI and EndoVac. Regarding root canal obturation of minimally instrumented molar canals, GW was associated with high-quality obturation. Clinically, the success rate of endodontic treatment using GW was 97.3%, and the short-term postoperative pain in the GW group was not different from CSI. Further research, mainly clinical, is needed to establish whether GW has any advantages over other available irrigation methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Use of the gentlewave system in endodonticsUse of the gentlewave system in endodontics
    Daiana Jacobi Lazzarotto, Mayara Colpo Prado, Lara Dotto, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre
    Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences.2025; 24: e254250.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison Between Multisonic and Ultrasonic Irrigant Activation Techniques for Multispecies Biofilm Removal During Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review
    Preethi Varadan, Sangavi Ra, Mathan R Rajendran
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of ultrasonic and multisonic irrigation on root canal microbial communities: An ex vivo study
    Ki Hong Park, Ronald Ordinola‐Zapata, W. Craig Noblett, Bruno P. Lima, Christopher Staley
    International Endodontic Journal.2024; 57(7): 895.     CrossRef
  • An Experimental Anatomic CBCT Study on the Correlations Between MB1 and MB2 of the Mesio-Vestibular Root of the Upper First Molars
    Luca Fiorillo, Cesare D’Amico, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Francesco Calanna, Alfio Pappalardo, Eugenio Pedullà
    Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2024; 35(2): 672.     CrossRef
  • Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives
    Xu Dong, Xin Xu
    Bioengineering.2023; 10(3): 354.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of modern irrigants activation techniques in the process of mechanical root canal system treatment (Literature review)
    Anatoliy Potapchuk, Vasyl Almashi, Arsenii Horzov, Victor Buleza
    InterConf.2023; (34(159)): 200.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of machine-assisted irrigation on removal of intracanal biofilm and extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using a three-dimensionally printed root canal model
    Ji-Yoon Shin, Mi-Ah Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Prasanna Neelakantan, Mi-Kyung Yu, Kyung-San Min
    Journal of Oral Science.2023; 65(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the efficiency of sound impact on the system of canals of the tooth root: A laboratory study
    Anatolii A. Adamchik, Valerii V. Tairov, Irina O. Kamyshnikova, Ekaterina S. Zaporozhskaya-Abramova, Zhanna V. Solovyeva, Viktoria A. Ivashchenko, Natalia V. Lapina, Armenak V. Arutyunov, Olga N. Risovannaya, Ksenia D. Kirsch, Valeria D. Golubina
    Russian Journal of Dentistry.2023; 27(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Multispecies biofilm removal by a multisonic irrigation system in mandibular molars
    Hernán Coaguila‐Llerena, Ronald Ordinola‐Zapata, Christopher Staley, Matthew Dietz, Ruoqiong Chen, Gisele Faria
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(11): 1252.     CrossRef
  • 552 View
  • 23 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Research Article
Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution
Ricardo Machado, Isadora da Silva, Daniel Comparin, Bianca Araujo Marques de Mattos, Luiz Rômulo Alberton, Ulisses Xavier da Silva Neto
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(1):e11.   Published online January 26, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal by conventional application (CA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EasyClean (EC), and XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after chemomechanical preparation, as evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Materials and Methods

Forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolars were selected for this study. After chemomechanical preparation, the teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the protocol for smear layer removal, as follows: G1 (control): CA of distilled water; G2 (CA): CA of 17% EDTA; G3 (PUI): 17% EDTA activated by PUI; G4 (EC): 17% EDTA activated by EC; and G5 (XPF): 17% EDTA activated by XPF. SEM images (×1,000) were obtained from each root third and scored by 3 examiners. Data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05).

Results

In the apical third, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). In the cervical and middle thirds, the experimental groups performed better than the control group (p < 0.05); however, G2 presented better results than G3, G4, and G5 (p < 0.05), which showed no differences among one another (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

No irrigation method was able to completely remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. Using CA for the chelating solution performed better than any form of activation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Smear layer removal comparing conventional irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator System, and a new sonic device (Perfect Clean System) by scanning electron microscopy: An ex vivo study
    Bruna Fernanda Alionço Gonçalves, Divya Reddy, Ricardo Machado, Paulo César Soares Júunior, Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio, Douglas Augusto Fernandes Couto, Karine Santos Frasquetti, Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen, Everdan Carneiro, Ulisses Xavier da Silva Net
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(12): e0314940.     CrossRef
  • Impact of different agitation methods on smear layer cleaning of mesial canals with accentuated curvature
    Abel Teves Cordova, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Michel Espinosa Klymus, Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in hybridized nanoarchitectures for improved oro-dental health
    Jun Guo, Pei Wang, Yuyao Li, Yifan Liu, Yingtong Ye, Yi Chen, Ranjith Kumar Kankala, Fei Tong
    Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system provided by four active supplementary irrigation methods
    Alessandra Timponi Goes Cruz, Adriane Antoniw Klemz, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro Rosa, Fabiana Soares Grecca, Bianca Mattos, Lucila Piasecki, Ricardo Machado, Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio, Ulisses Xavier da Silva Neto
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Scanning electron microscopic study of smear layer changes following ultrasonic endoactivator irrigation system during root canal treatment of primary teeth
    Mohamed Ghaly, Aya Alsherif, Arafa Khatab
    Tanta Dental Journal.2023; 20(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Influence of agitation methods of irrigants after methylene blue-mediated PDT on the bonding interface of a fiber post cementation system
    Lucas David Galvani, Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa, João Felipe Besegato, Joissi Ferrari Zaniboni, Wilfredo Gustavo Escalante-Otárola, Milton Carlos Kuga
    Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy.2022; 37: 102708.     CrossRef
  • 283 View
  • 10 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Time-dependent effects of EDTA application on removal of smear layer in the root canal system
Ja-Kyong Lee, Sang-Hyuk Park, Gi-Woon Choi
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31(3):169-178.   Published online May 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.3.169
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study was to verify that the combined application of NaOCl and EDTA was more effective in removal of smear layer than the application of NaOCl alone. Furthermore it was aimed to find out the optimal time for the application of EDTA.

Thirty five single rooted teeth were cleaned and shaped. NaOCl solution was used as an irrigant during instrumentation. After instrumentation, root canals of the control group were irrigated with 5 ml of NaOCl for 2 minutes. 30 sec, 1 min, and 2 min group were irrigated with 5 ml of 17% EDTA for 30 sec, 1 min, and 2 min respectively. Then the roots were examined with scanning electron microscopy for evaluating removal of smear layer and erosion of dentinal tubule.

The results were as follows;

The control group:

The smear layer was not removed at all.

The other groups:

1) Middle⅓: All groups showed almost no smear layer. And the erosion occurred more frequently as increasing irrigation time.

2) Apical⅓: The cleaning effect of 2 min group was better than the others.

The results suggest that 2 min application of 17% EDTA should be adequate to remove smear layer on both apical⅓ and middle⅓.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Enhancing the Antibacterial Effect of Erythrosine-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy with Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid
    MinKi Choi, Haeni Kim, Siyoung Lee, Juhyun Lee
    THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2024; 51(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Apical foramen morphology according to the length of merged canal at the apex
    Hee-Ho Kim, Jeong-Bum Min, Ho-Keel Hwang
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2013; 38(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Effect of moisture on sealing ability of root canal filling with different types of sealer through the glucose penetration model
    Jin-Ah Jang, Hee-Lyang Kim, Mi-Ja Her, Kwang-Won Lee, Mi-Kyung Yu
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(5): 335.     CrossRef
  • 175 View
  • 1 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP