Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Emel Uzunoglu-Özyürek 3 Articles
Influence of reciprocating and rotary instrumentation on microbial reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
Selen Küçükkaya Eren, Emel Uzunoğlu-Özyürek, Sevilay Karahan
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(2):e19.   Published online March 10, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e19
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies regarding the effectiveness of reciprocating and rotary instrumentation on microbial reduction in root canals.

Materials and Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature were searched through December 2019. Studies comparing the influence of reciprocating and rotary instrumentation on the removal of microorganisms from root canals that quantified the antimicrobial effect were included. Data extraction was completed using a systematic form for data collection. The risk of bias of the studies was evaluated. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects meta-analysis.

Results

Seventeen in vitro studies were included in this systematic review, of which 7 provided adequate data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Both reciprocating and rotary systems were similarly effective in reducing the microbial load in infected root canals (SMD [95% CI], 0.0481 [−0.271, 0.367]). Three studies showed a low risk of bias, whereas most of the studies (82%) presented a medium risk.

Conclusions

Although both techniques decrease the microbial content (with reductions of 23.32%–88.47% and 23.33%–89.86% for reciprocating and rotary instrumentation, respectively), they are not able to provide complete disinfection of root canals.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Fifteen years of engine‐driven nickel–titanium reciprocating instruments, what do we know so far? An umbrella review
    Felipe Immich, Lucas Peixoto de Araújo, Rafaella Rodrigues da Gama, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa, Evandro Piva, Giampiero Rossi‐Fedele
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2024; 50(2): 409.     CrossRef
  • Does minimally invasive canal preparation provide higher fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review ofin vitrostudies
    Sıla Nur Usta, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Seda Falakaloğlu, Mustafa Gündoğar
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Combined Ultrasonic Tip and Mechanized Instrumentation on the Reduction of the Percentage of Non-Instrumented Surfaces in Oval/Flat Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Marcella Dewes Cassal, Pedro Cardoso Soares, Marcelo dos Santos
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Different Access Cavity Designs and Ni–Ti Files on the Elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the Root Canal System: An In Vitro Study
    Gizem Andac, Atakan Kalender, Buket Baddal, Fatma Basmaci
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(4): 2049.     CrossRef
  • Shaping Properties and Outcomes of Nickel-Titanium Reciprocation Systems in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
    SelvaKumar Haridoss, Bhavyaa R, Kavitha Swaminathan, Aruna P
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of Root Canal Sealers and Obturation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance. An In Vitro Experiment
    Mazen F. Alkahtany, Khalid H. Almadi, Fahad A. Alahmad, Abdullah M. Alshehri, Abdulrahman A. AlSwayyed, Omar M. AlZahran, Ali AlHadan, Abdulaziz S. Almustafa, Fahim Vohra, Tariq Abduljabbar
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(17): 8022.     CrossRef
  • 236 View
  • 12 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Critical evaluation of fracture strength testing for endodontically treated teeth: a finite element analysis study
Emel Uzunoglu-Özyürek, Selen Küçükkaya Eren, Oğuz Eraslan, Sema Belli
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(2):e15.   Published online April 18, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e15
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the diameter and direction of the plunger and simulation of the periodontal ligament (PDL) affected the stress distribution in endodontically treated premolars.

Methods

A fracture strength test was simulated via finite element analysis. A base model was set up, and the following parameters were modified: plunger diameter (3 mm vs. 6 mm), plunger direction (vertical vs. 135° angular to the central fossa), and PDL simulation. The analysis was conducted using the CosmosWorks structural analysis program, and the results are presented in terms of von Mises stresses.

Results

The smaller plunger increased the stresses at the contact area of the crown, but the plunger diameter had no effect on the stress distribution within the root. An angular plunger direction increased stresses within the root, as well as at the buccal cusp of the crown, compared with the vertical direction. Simulation of the PDL caused higher stress accumulation, especially in the cervical region of the root.

Conclusions

The plunger diameter had no effect on the stress distribution in the roots, whereas the plunger direction and PDL simulation did affect the stress distribution. More stringent standards can be established by taking such parameters into account when performing fracture testing in future studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Assessment of Stress Distribution with 3 Taper Design Preparation of Root Canal Using Finite Element Analysis
    Tejasree Rathod, G. Durgabhavani, Pudu Tirupathi, Nusrath Parveen, Yelloji Paramesh, Prabhakar Dharavattu
    Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.2024; 16(Suppl 1): S112.     CrossRef
  • The impact of the filling technique with two sealers in bulk or associated with gutta-percha on the fatigue behavior and failure patterns of endodontically treated teeth
    Isabella Marian Lena, Luiza Colpo Chiaratti, Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco, Renan Vaz Machry, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Renata Dornelles Morgental
    PeerJ.2024; 12: e18221.     CrossRef
  • Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
    Naji Kharouf, Eugenio Pedullà, Gianluca Plotino, Hamdi Jmal, Mohammed-El-Habib Alloui, Philippine Simonis, Patrice Laquerriere, Valentina Macaluso, Dina Abdellatif, Raphaël Richert, Youssef Haikel, Davide Mancino
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(8): 2975.     CrossRef
  • Neural network approach to evaluate the physical properties of dentin
    Mohammad Ali Saghiri, Ali Mohammad Saghiri, Elham Samadi, Devyani Nath, Julia Vakhnovetsky, Steven M. Morgano
    Odontology.2023; 111(1): 68.     CrossRef
  • Modelling and evaluating periodontal ligament mechanical behaviour and properties: A scoping review of current approaches and limitations
    Enaiyat Ghani Ovy, Dan L. Romanyk, Carlos Flores Mir, Lindsey Westover
    Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research.2022; 25(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • FEAr no more! Finite element analysis in orthodontics
    Shilpa Chawla, Shailesh Deshmukh
    Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization.2022; 14(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Methodological Variables on Fracture Strength Tests Results of Premolars with Different Number of Residual Walls. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Carlo Gaeta, Crystal Marruganti, Emanuele Mignosa, Giovanni Franciosi, Edoardo Ferrari, Simone Grandini
    Dentistry Journal.2021; 9(12): 146.     CrossRef
  • 312 View
  • 15 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Influence of size and insertion depth of irrigation needle on debris extrusion and sealer penetration
Emel Uzunoglu-Özyürek, Hakan Karaaslan, Sevinç Aktemur Türker, Bahar Özçelik
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(1):e2.   Published online December 22, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e2
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

To determine the effect of size and insertion depth of irrigation needle on the amount of apical extruded debris and the amount of penetration depth of sealer using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM).

Materials and Methods

Twenty maxillary premolars were assigned to 2 groups (n = 10), according to the size of needle tip, 28 G or 30 G. Buccal roots of samples were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 1 mm short of the working length (WL), while palatal roots were irrigated with respective needle type inserted 3 mm short of the WL. Prepared teeth were removed from the pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Canals were filled with F3 gutta-percha cone and rhodamine B dye-labeled AH 26 sealer. Teeth were transversally sectioned at 1 and 3 mm levels from the apex and observed under a CLSM. Eppendorf tubes were incubated to evaporate the irrigant and were weighed again. The difference between pre- and post-weights was calculated, and statistical evaluation was performed.

Results

Inserting needles closer to the apex and using needles with wider diameters were associated with significantly more debris extrusion (p < 0.05). The position of needles and level of sections had statistically significant effects on sealer penetration depth (p < 0.05 for both).

Conclusions

Following preparation, inserting narrower needles compatible with the final apical diameter of the prepared root canal at 3 mm short of WL during final irrigation might prevent debris extrusion and improve sealer penetration in the apical third.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preliminary insights: exploring irrigation practices during endodontic treatment among general dental practitioners in Malaysia
    Kai Qi Chiew, Xin Ni Lim, Shekhar Bhatia, Naveen Chhabra
    British Dental Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficiency of diode laser in control of post-endodontic pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Hend H. Ismail, Maram Obeid, Ehab Hassanien
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023; 27(6): 2797.     CrossRef
  • Endodontic management of an aberrant germinated composite odontome: A case report
    Ankit Arora, Kavina Desai, Sonali Kapoor, Seema Gajera
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2023; 49(3): 684.     CrossRef
  • Potentials of 3D-Modeling in the Preclinical Stage of Root Needle Research
    Aleksandr V. Kuligin, Larisa N. Kazakova, Oksana S. Tereshchuk, Vadim V. Bokov
    I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald.2022; 30(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • Effect of root canal geometry and needle type on apical extrusion of irrigant: an ex vivo study
    Büşra SERÇE FİKİRLİ, Bülent ALTUNKAYNAK, Güven KAYAOĞLU
    Acta Odontologica Turcica.2022; 39(3): 58.     CrossRef
  • An in vitro radiological evaluation of irrigant penetration in the root canals using three different irrigation systems: Waterpik WP-100 device, passive irrigation, and manual dynamic irrigation systems
    Suragani Hemalatha, Archana Srinivasan, A Srirekha, Lekha Santhosh, C Champa, Ashwija Shetty
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2022; 25(4): 403.     CrossRef
  • Preparation Ability of ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Instruments in Isthmus-containing Root Canal System
    Mustafa Sarıkahya, Tayfun Alaçam
    Conservative Dentistry and Endodontic Journal.2021; 5(2): 28.     CrossRef
  • Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation
    K. M. Galler, V. Grubmüller, R. Schlichting, M. Widbiller, A. Eidt, C. Schuller, M. Wölflick, K.‐A. Hiller, W. Buchalla
    International Endodontic Journal.2019; 52(8): 1210.     CrossRef
  • 199 View
  • 6 Download
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP