KACD
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 44(4); 2019 > Article
- Research Article Cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals
-
Damla Kırıcı
, Alper Kuştarcı -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e36
Published online: September 9, 2019
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
- Correspondence to Damla Kırıcı, DDS, PhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, P.K.10 Dumlupınar Bulvarı Kampüs, Antalya 07058, Turkey. d_ozsu@hotmail.com
• Received: June 8, 2019 • Revised: July 15, 2019 • Accepted: July 20, 2019
Copyright © 2019. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- 18 Views
- 0 Download
Abstract
-
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider and One G glide path instruments in artificial double-curvature canals.
-
Materials and Methods This study included 15 WaveOne Gold Glider (size 15/0.08), 15 ProGlider (size 16/0.08), and 15 One G (size 16/0.06) nickel titanium files. The files were used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions until they were broken in artificial double-curvature canals made of stainless steel. The time to fracture was recorded via a digital stopwatch and the number of rotations until fracture was also calculated. The data were statistically analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test.
-
Results The highest average number of rotations until fracture of the files was found for the WaveOne Gold Glider, followed by ProGlider and One G in order. Statistically significant differences were present between all groups of files (p < 0.05).
-
Conclusions In our study, the resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) file to cyclic fatigue in S-shaped curved canals was found to be higher than that of the ProGlider and One G Ni-Ti files.
INTRODUCTION
The main aims of root canal procedures, which are among the most significant phases of endodontic treatment, are eliminating bacteria from the root canal system, removing debris, and hermetically filling the root canal space in 3 dimensions [1]. The complications that can be encountered during root canal preparation include perforations, root canal transportation, ledge formation, and handpiece fracture [2,3,4,5].
New-generation nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary handpieces are used to minimize potential complications during the preparation procedure. Creating a glide path is recommended in order to use these handpieces safely. Several rotary files have been developed to create glide paths.
The ProGlider (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) file is a single-use file launched by Dentsply for creating a glide path in preparation for a root canal [6]. The file comes in 3 different lengths: 21, 25, and 31 mm. The tip diameter of the file is 0.16 mm, and the apical taper of the file is 0.2%. The One G (Micro-Mega, Besançon Cedex, France) file is also a single-file system for creating glide paths. Its tip diameter is 0.14 mm and the taper of the file is 3%. The file is produced in 3 different lengths: 21, 25, and 29 mm. Flexible pits on the edger increase the screwing effect of the file. The file has 3 asymmetric cross-section edgers, and having 3 edgers in 3 different sizes provides space for more effective debris elimination.
The WaveOne Gold Glider (Dentsply Sirona) is a single-use file that works via a reciprocating motion. Produced with gold-wire metallurgy, the tip of the file has a cone angle that begins at 2% and increases to 6%. The tip diameter of the file is 0.15 mm.
In our broad literature review, no studies were found that evaluated the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider in artificial double-curvature canals. The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of the ProGlider, One G, and WaveOne Gold Glider files in artificial double-curvature (S-shaped) canals under a static model. The null hypothesis was that there would be no statistically significant difference between the files' cyclic fatigue resistance under a static model in double-curvature canals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty five rotary-system Ni-Ti files were used in this study, including 15 ProGlider, 15 One G, and 15 WaveOne Gold Glider files. All of the files were evaluated by stereomicroscopy (Olympus BX43, Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan) under ×20 magnification to check for deformation and manufacturing defects before they were used in the test device.
A stainless steel mechanism with a stainless steel artificial canal in which files could freely rotate was installed for the cyclic fatigue tests (diameter 1.5 mm, length 18 mm). (Figure 1). The angle of the first curvature in the coronal area was 60°, and the diameter of the curvature was 5 mm in an artificial double-curvature canal. The distance between the center location of the coronal curvature and the tip of the canal was 8 mm. The apical curvature angle was 70°, and its diameter was 2 mm. The distance between the centers of curvature was 2 mm.
Synthetic lubricant (WD-40 Company, Milton Keynes, England) was used to minimize the friction and to enable the files to rotate freely in the canals. The OneG and ProGlider files were used with a VDW Silver Reciproc endodontic engine (VDW, Munich, Germany) at 300 rpm and 2 N of torque, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The WaveOne Gold Glider files were used with the same engine and the WaveOne All program. According to the manufacturer, the speed in the WaveOne All mode is 350 rpm [7]. All the files were used in artificial canals, and the time to fracture was recorded by a digital stopwatch. All of the procedures of the experiment were carried out by a single expert.
The following formula was used to calculate the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) of the files (N C F = rpm × duration 60 
, where NCF is NCF of the files, rpm is revolutions of the files per minute, and duration is measured in seconds). The length of each broken end was measured with a digital meter (WT 20130 Digital Power Meter, Yokogawa Electric Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Broken surface images of 2 files from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Quanta 450, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) in order to confirm that the fracture was due to cyclic fatigue.
, where NCF is NCF of the files, rpm is revolutions of the files per minute, and duration is measured in seconds). The length of each broken end was measured with a digital meter (WT 20130 Digital Power Meter, Yokogawa Electric Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Broken surface images of 2 files from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Quanta 450, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) in order to confirm that the fracture was due to cyclic fatigue.Differences between groups in the average NCF and the length of the broken pieces were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and 1-way analysis of variance using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS
The average values and standard deviations of the NCF of the ProGlider, One G, and WaveOne Gold Glider Ni-Ti files are shown in Table 1. The WaveOne Gold Glider showed the most resistance to cyclic fatigue, to a statistically significant extent (p < 0.05). The ProGlider file showed significantly greater resistance to fatigue than the One G file. All files initially broke in the apical area and then in the coronal area of the artificial double-curvature canals.
Table 1
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF; mean ± standard deviation) and fragment length (FL; mm) of 3 instruments
Photos of the broken surfaces of the files were taken by SEM and were evaluated. Fatigue lines, which are typically seen in fractures due to fatigue, were observed in all groups (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Scanning electron microscopic appearances of (A) the WaveOne Gold Glider; (B) the ProGlider; and (C) the One G after cyclic fatigue testing.
EHT, electron high tension.
DISCUSSION
Several studies have shown the importance of creating a glide path in order to efficiently and safely flare curved root canals. In addition to curved canals with a single curvature, there are canals with S-shaped curvatures. S-shaped curvatures in root canals cause more stress to accumulate on the file than in single-curvature canals [8]. Additionally, forming a glide path in S-shaped canals can be more difficult. Recently, file systems have been produced with different technologies in order to create glide paths. The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of the ProGlider, One G, and WaveOne Gold Glider single-file systems, which were produced in order to create glide paths.
Studies have revealed that the kinematic and alloy features of the files are efficient with regard to cyclic fatigue resistance [9]. In 2008, Yared [10] stated that Ni-Ti instruments that are used with a reciprocating motion are more resistant to cyclic fatigue than instruments with a rotating motion. Varela-Patiño et al. [11] found that angular movement of the files in a reciprocating motion caused less stress on the files than a rotating motion, which increased their resistance to cyclic fatigue. Evaluating the cyclic fatigue of R-Pilot, HyFlex EDM, and PathFile files in artificial double-curvature canals, Uslu et al. [12] concluded that the R-pilot reciprocating glide path file was more resistant to fatigue than other files. In studies that were carried out in artificial single-curvature canals with 45°, 60°, and 90° curves, the WaveOne Gold Glider glide path file, which uses a reciprocating motion, was more resistant to cyclic fatigue than files that work with a rotating motion [13,14,15]. Moreover, the WaveOne Gold Glider file is produced with gold-wire technology, and recent studies have shown that alloy properties are very important for cyclic fatigue resistance in Ni-Ti instruments [14,16]. The NCF values in the results of our study also demonstrate that the WaveOne Gold Glider file is more resistant to fracture due to cyclic fatigue in both the apical and the coronal curvatures than the ProGlider and One G files. For this reason, the null hypothesis was rejected.
The present study also found that the ProGlider file was more resistant to cyclic fatigue than the One G file. Other studies that evaluated the cyclic fatigue resistance of the ProGlider and One G files found that the ProGlider file was significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue in curved and S-shaped canals [16,17]. As noted above, alloy properties can influence cyclic fatigue resistance. The fact that the Ni-Ti ProGlider file is produced with M-wire technology, while the One G file is made of a traditional Ni-Ti alloy, could explain the results of our study [18,19].
According the results of our study, fractures on the files initially formed in the apical area and then in the coronal area. The results of similar studies are consistent with the outcomes of our study [8,20]. A smaller radius in the apical curvature means a sharper curve, which causes files to fracture in this area first [21,22]. The average lengths of the pieces that were broken in the apical and coronal areas were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that the WaveOne Gold Glider, which uses a reciprocating motion and is produced with gold-wire technology, is the most resistant glide path file in S-shaped artificial canals in terms of cyclic fatigue. Further studies are warranted to test the torsional fatigue resistance of reciprocating glide path instruments.
-
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
-
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: Kırıcı D.
Data curation: Kırıcı D.
Formal analysis: Kırıcı D.
Funding acquisition: Kırıcı D.
Investigation: Kırıcı D.
Methodology: Kuştarcı A, Kırıcı D.
Project administration: Kuştarcı A, Kırıcı D.
Resources: Kırıcı D.
Software: Kuştarcı A, Kırıcı D.
Validation: Kuştarcı A, Kırıcı D.
Visualization: Kırıcı D.
Writing - original draft: Kırıcı D.
Writing - review & editing: Kırıcı D.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
- 1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296. ArticlePubMed
- 2. Tsesis I, Rosenberg E, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Katz M, Rosen E. Prevalence and associated periodontal status of teeth with root perforation: a retrospective study of 2,002 patients' medical records. J Endod 2010;36:797-800. ArticlePubMed
- 3. Aydin B, Köse T, Calişkan MK. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2009;42:1050-1056. PubMed
- 4. Cujé J, Bargholz C, Hülsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J 2010;43:545-554. ArticlePubMed
- 5. Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23:533-534. ArticlePubMed
- 6. Dentsply Maillefer. Dentsply Maillefer Home [Internet]. Ballaigues: Dentsply Maillefer; c2014. cited 2014 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.dentsplymaillefer.com/#/218x624/line_218x7950/product_218x9225.
- 7. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015;41:913-915. ArticlePubMed
- 8. Al-Sudani D, Grande NM, Plotino G, Pompa G, Di Carlo S, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J Endod 2012;38:987-989. PubMed
- 9. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-1409. ArticlePubMed
- 10. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008;41:339-344. ArticlePubMed
- 11. Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36:157-159. ArticlePubMed
- 12. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, HyFlex EDM and PathFile nickel-titanium glide path files in artificial canals with double (S-shaped) curvature. Int Endod J 2018;51:584-589. PubMed
- 13. Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Kafdağ Ö, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating glide path files in 45- and 60-degree curved canals. Int Endod J 2018;51:1053-1058. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 14. Serefoglu B, Kaval ME, Micoogullari Kurt S, Çalişkan MK. Cyclic fatigue resistance of novel glide path instruments with different alloy properties and kinematics. J Endod 2018;44:1422-1424. ArticlePubMed
- 15. Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:3007-3012.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 16. Yılmaz K, Uslu G, Özyürek T. In vitro comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM, One G, and ProGlider nickel titanium glide path instruments in single and double curvature canals. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42:282-289. PubMedPMC
- 17. Uslu G, Özyürek T, İnan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider and One G glide path files. J Endod 2016;42:1555-1558. ArticlePubMed
- 18. Al-Hadlaq SM. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue resistance of 25/0.04 and 25/0.06 twisted file rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J 2013;39:62-65. ArticlePubMed
- 19. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2009;35:401-403. ArticlePubMed
- 20. Neelakantan P, Reddy P, Gutmann JL. Cyclic fatigue of two different single files with varying kinematics in a simulated double-curved canal. J Investig Clin Dent 2016;7:272-277.PubMed
- 21. Duke F, Shen Y, Zhou H, Ruse ND, Wang ZJ, Hieawy A, Haapasalo M. Cyclic fatigue of profile vortex and vortex blue nickel-titanium files in single and double curvatures. J Endod 2015;41:1686-1690. ArticlePubMed
- 22. Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017;50:713-717. ArticlePubMedPDF
REFERENCES
Tables & Figures
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadCyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals
Figure 1 A stainless steel artificial canal with a double curvature.
Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopic appearances of (A) the WaveOne Gold Glider; (B) the ProGlider; and (C) the One G after cyclic fatigue testing.EHT, electron high tension.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF; mean ± standard deviation) and fragment length (FL; mm) of 3 instruments
| Groups | Coronal curvature | Apical curvature | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCF | FL | NCF | FL | |
| One G | 778.3 ± 124.62a | 6.99 ± 0.19 | 487.92 ± 76.11a | 2.16 ± 0.7 |
| ProGlider | 1,331.75 ± 65.41b | 6.98 ± 0.13 | 666.25 ± 34.97b | 2.14 ± 0.1 |
| WaveOne Gold Glider | 1,868.08 ± 55.16c | 7.02 ± 0.09 | 1,482 ± 57.54c | 2.15 ± 0.11 |
a,b,cDifferent superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 1 Number of cycles to fracture (NCF; mean ± standard deviation) and fragment length (FL; mm) of 3 instruments
a,b,cDifferent superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (
