KACD
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 41(3); 2016 > Article
- Case Report Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to determine the depth of demineralization of dental fluorosis in enamel microabrasion: a case report
-
Tae-Young Park, Han-Sol Choi, Hee-Won Ku, Hyun-Su Kim, Yoo-Jin Lee, Jeong-Bum Min
-
2016;41(3):-230.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.225
Published online: June 20, 2016
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea. JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
- Correspondence to Jeong-Bum Min, DDS, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, 309, Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61452, Korea. TEL, +82-62-220-3840; FAX, +82- 62-223-9064; minjb@chosun.ac.kr
• Received: June 22, 2015 • Accepted: March 23, 2016
©Copyrights 2016. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- 1,279 Views
- 5 Download
- 7 Crossref
Abstract
- Enamel microabrasion has become accepted as a conservative, nonrestorative method of removing intrinsic and superficial dysmineralization defects from dental fluorosis, restoring esthetics with minimal loss of enamel. However, it can be difficult to determine if restoration is necessary in dental fluorosis, because the lesion depth is often not easily recognized. This case report presents a method for analysis of enamel hypoplasia that uses quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) followed by a combination of enamel microabrasion with carbamide peroxide home bleaching. We describe the utility of QLF when selecting a conservative treatment plan and confirming treatment efficacy. In this case, the treatment plan was based on QLF analysis, and the selected combination treatment of microabrasion and bleaching had good results.
Introduction
Dental fluorosis is caused by excessive fluoride exposure during tooth development.1 It is characterized by the presence of diffuse, thin, horizontal white striations on numerous teeth. Management of dental fluorosis is important for esthetics, and several techniques have been proposed to improve its appearance. Conventional methods are bleaching and microabrasion, composite resin restoration, and prosthetic approaches. Recently, resin infiltration has become a popular technique for management of dental fluorosis.2 However, among groups with differing extent of demineralization there was no difference in the effect of resin infiltration on color or hardness.3 Lastly, the tooth jewelry technique can also be used to treat dental fluorosis.4
Enamel microabrasion has become accepted as a conservative, nonrestorative method of removing intrinsic and superficial dysmineralization defects from teeth, establishing esthetics with minimal loss of enamel. However, it is often difficult to determine if restoration is necessary in enamel hypoplasia, because the lesion depth is difficult to recognize. There are many in vitro methods for assessing lesion depth, such as microhardness indentation, sectioning, and scanning electron microscope examination. In vivo, there are no methods for assessing lesion depth, and only conventional methods for detecting enamel hypoplasia exist, such as ultrasound, transillumination, and visual inspection of changes.
A quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) device allows the quantification of mineral loss from enamel in the laboratory and in clinical situations for early detection of dental caries (Figure 1).5 When illuminated with blue light (405 nm), tooth enamel produces green auto-fluorescence. The absolute decrease in fluorescence as a result of enamel loss is determined by calculating the percentage loss between actual and reconstructed fluorescence and is expressed by ΔF.
QLF is a user-friendly, reproducible, and reliable method of quantifying mineral loss from enamel.6 However, case reports of QLF treatment of dental fluorosis are few. The following case report describes the utility of QLF when developing a conservative treatment plan and confirming treatment results.
Case Report
An 18 year old woman with a non-remarkable medical history presented to the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University Dental Hospital for removal of white spot lesions on the labial surface of the anterior incisors (Figure 2). The patient's dental history included reduction of the right temporomandibular joint due to anterior disc displacement. An intraoral examination showed diffuse white horizontal striations on all dentition except the lower anterior teeth. While the enamel opacity was diffuse, there was no clear boundary with the adjacent normal enamel. No specific features were found on diagnostic radiographs. After clinical and radiologic examination, the white spots were diagnosed as dental fluorosis.
In order to determine the depth of this lesion, the white spots on the anterior upper teeth were analyzed by QLF (Inspektor Research Systems BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Table 1 and Figure 3 present the results of the QLF analysis. Based on the QLF results, the treatment options, including microabrasion and home bleaching, were explained to the patient. After obtaining informed consent, a decision was made to perform microabrasion with Opalustre (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA) and home bleaching with Opalescence (Ultradent Products, Inc.) on six maxillary anterior teeth. The materials used are described further in Table 2.
After OpalDam (Ultradent Products, Inc.) and a rubber dam were applied, microabrasion was performed. In brief, the teeth were cleaned with pumice and water using a rubber cup in a slow speed contra-angle handpiece. The slurry was applied to the labial surface of each tooth with a small wooden toothpick. The rubber cup was used in 20 second applications, each applying no more than 10 g of force and repeated 10 times. The teeth looked yellowish and the white spots became less prominent than before abrasion (Figure 4). The assessment of tooth color using a commercial shade guide system was A3. Home bleaching was performed using individual trays for four weeks. The tooth shade became similar to the other teeth and the few remaining white spots were masked by the bleaching effect. After bleaching, the tooth shade was assessed as A1.
After treatment, the QLF analysis was repeated (Table 3). The results showed that the white spots had almost disappeared (Figure 5). Finally, a composite resin restoration with Charisma Diamond (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) was performed on the mesial enamel fracture of the left central incisor with OL (opaque light) and A1 shade (Figure 6). The patient was satisfied with the result. Therefore, treatment was considered complete.
Discussion
The QLF device used was the QLF-D Biluminator (Inspektor Research Systems BV), a new type of QLF device (Figure 1). Fluorescence images were captured with a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera (model 550D, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) with a shutter speed of 1/45 second, aperture value of 3.2, and ISO speed of 1600. Proprietary software (C3 v1.18, Inspektor Research Systems BV) was used to store all digital images on a personal computer. All fluorescence images were analyzed using a computer program (QA2 v1.18, Inspektor Research Systems BV) that measured the white spot patch.
Within the images, a reference is automatically generated or manually selected. A value is computed for each pixel in the area of interest. These pixel values are then compared to the average value of all pixels in the reference area. This permits the calculation of area size and average value over the area as a function of a threshold value. Delta F (ΔF) means percent loss of fluorescence with respect to the fluorescence of sound tooth tissue. This value is related to lesion depth. Kim et al. showed that ΔF was strongly correlated with histological lesion depth before and after fluoride treatment.7 Recently, Nakata et al. reported a good correlation between each ΔF value and the demineralization depth,8 such that when the demineralization depth increased, the ΔF value decreased. These authors suggested that at a ΔF value of 25%, the demineralization depth is around 200 µm. Wu et al. also reported a linear correlation between the percent loss of fluorescence and depth of the enamel demineralization.9 The greatest depth data on demineralization and the highest percentage loss of fluorescence were obtained; when the fluorescence loss value was 25%, the largest caries depth was 77 µm.
In the present case, the ΔF was less than 10% and the maximum ΔF was 19%, suggesting that the white spot lesion depth might be less than 200 µm according to the findings described above. Therefore, microabrasion and bleaching were selected for treatment. Microabrasion has been reported to reduce white spot lesions with 83% success,10 and can remove 200 µm of superficial enamel.11 The precise amount of enamel removed by microabrasion has been estimated using scanning electron microscopy,12 digital micrometry,13 and profilometry14 to be an amount not exceeding 250 µm. Bleaching of teeth is efficient in masking blemishes and providing a more uniform appearance.15,16
There are limited ways to recognize the depth of white spot lesions and then decide on conservative treatment methods. Microabrasion is a conservative method, but when the lesion is deeper than 250 µm, the enamel loss is too much and the microabrasion efficacy is decreased. QLF is a diagnostic device for detecting early caries, as it can analyze white spot lesions and help with evaluating the limitations of microabrasion. If the ΔF value is greater than 25%, an invasive treatment plan using composite resin restoration or prosthetic approaches is necessary. In this case, QLF was used successfully to determine the treatment planning. However, QLF also has several limitations. First, it has not yet been used in interproximal lesion. Secondly, analysis of lesions is possible with QLF, but the results depend entirely on the operator. Additional software development will allow the application of the method to interproximal lesions. Further studies are necessary to adjust the method to be suitable for evaluating baseline lesion depth and assisting in deciding whether to apply the resin infiltration technique or microabrasion.
Conclusions
In this case, the combination treatment plan of microabrasion and bleaching, based on QLF analysis, had a good result. Therefore, QLF analysis may help when deciding on conservative treatment plans and also confirm treatment results.
- 1. Castro KS, Ferreira AC, Duarte RM, Sampaio FC, Meireles SS. Acceptability, efficacy and safety of two treatment protocols for dental fluorosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2014;42:938-944.ArticlePubMed
- 2. Son JH, Hur B, Kim HC, Park JK. Management of white spots: resin infiltration technique and microabrasion. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:66-71.Article
- 3. Kim JH, Son HH, Chang J. Color and hardness changes in artificial white spot lesions after resin infiltration. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:90-95.Article
- 4. Kim HJ, Karanxha L, Park SJ. Non-destructive management of white spot lesions by using tooth jewelry. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:236-239.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 5. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The effect of ambient light on QLF analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:369-373.ArticlePubMed
- 6. Pretty IA, Hall AF, Smith PW, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analyses. Br Dent J 2002;193:105-109.ArticlePubMed
- 7. Kim HE, Kwon HK, Kim BI. Recovery percentage of remineralization according to severity of early caries. Am J Dent 2013;26:132-136.PubMed
- 8. Nakata K, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Relationship between fluorescence loss of QLF and depth of demineralization in an enamel erosion model. Dent Mater J 2009;28:523-529.ArticlePubMed
- 9. Wu J, Donly ZR, Donly KJ, Hackmyer S. Demineralization depth using QLF and a novel image processing software. Int J Dent 2010;2010:958264.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 10. Murphy TC, Willmot DR, Rodd HD. Management of postorthodontic demineralized white lesions with microabrasion: a quantitative assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:27-33.ArticlePubMed
- 11. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration-a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2009;40:713-718.PubMed
- 12. Kendell RL. Hydrochloric acid removal of brown fluorosis stains: clinical and scanning electron micrographic observations. Quintessence Int 1989;20:837-839.PubMed
- 13. Jacobsson-Hunt U, Harrison MR. The effect of hydrochloric acid pumice abrasion on fluorosed teeth. J Dent Res 1989;68(Supplement 2):982; Abstract #924.
- 14. Welbury RR, Shaw L. A simple technique for removal of mottling, opacities and pigmentation from enamel. Dent Update 1990;17:161-163.PubMed
- 15. Bussadori SK, do Rego MA, da Silva PE, Pinto MM, Pinto AC. Esthetic alternative for fluorosis blemishes with the usage of a dual bleaching system based on hydrogen peroxide at 35%. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28:143-146.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 16. Knösel M, Attin R, Becker K, Attin T. External bleaching effect on the color and luminosity of inactive whitespot lesions after fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 2007;77:646-652.ArticlePubMedPDF
REFERENCES
Figure 1
The QLF device is based on a DSLR camera equipped with an illumination tube with white and blue light-emitting diodes positioned in a ring around the lens opening. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; DSLR, digital single lens reflex.
Figure 3
Results of QLF analysis before treatment. (a) Right maxillary central incisor; (b) Left maxillary central incisor. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Figure 4
Photograph taken after treatment showing improved esthetics of the upper dentition. (a) Intraoral photograph after microabrasion; (b) Intraoral photograph after home bleaching.
Figure 5
Results of QLF analysis after treatment. (a) Right maxillary central incisor; (b) Left maxillary central incisor; (c) Right maxillary lateral incisor; (d) Left maxillary lateral incisor. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Figure 6
Photograph of maxillary lateral incisors after completion of the treatment with composite restoration of left central incisor.
Table 1
Results of QLF analysis before treatment
Table 2
Materials used in this case
Tables & Figures
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Resin Infiltration for Dental Fluorosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Esthetic Masking Efficacy
Hui Han, Tian Lan, Fenglan Li, Huishan Sun
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2025; 37(12): 2579. CrossRef - Management of Multifactorial Stained Enamel Defects on Anterior Dentition Using a Combination Treatment of Whitening, Microabrasion, Resin Infiltration and Resin-based Composite Restoration
A Alkhazaleh, A Tsujimoto
Operative Dentistry.2023; 48(3): 251. CrossRef - Resin Infiltration and Remineralization Interventions in Management of Moderate Dental Fluorosis
Shreepriya Singhania, B. Nandlal, Raghavendra Shanbhog, Ragavee Veeramani
Indian Journal of Dental Research.2021; 32(3): 362. CrossRef - Resolution of a fluorosis case through the association of minimally invasive techniques
Danielle Ferreira Sobral de Souza, Josué Junior Araújo Pierote, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar, Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences.2019; 18: e191663. CrossRef - La micro-abrasion amélaire associée à l’éclaircissement externe: intérêt dans la prise en charge de la fluorose
Laïla Azzahim, Sanaa Chala, Faïza Abdallaoui
Pan African Medical Journal.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Methodological considerations for designing a community water fluoridation cessation study
Sonica Singhal, Julie Farmer, Lindsay McLaren
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology.2017; 45(3): 193. CrossRef - Clinical validation and assessment of a modular fluorescent imaging system and algorithm for rapid detection and quantification of dental plaque
Keith Angelino, Pratik Shah, David A. Edlund, Mrinal Mohit, Gregory Yauney
BMC Oral Health.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadApplication of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to determine the depth of demineralization of dental fluorosis in enamel microabrasion: a case report
Figure 1 The QLF device is based on a DSLR camera equipped with an illumination tube with white and blue light-emitting diodes positioned in a ring around the lens opening. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; DSLR, digital single lens reflex.
Figure 2 Initial photograph from the first examination showing white spots on the upper dentition.
Figure 3 Results of QLF analysis before treatment. (a) Right maxillary central incisor; (b) Left maxillary central incisor. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Figure 4 Photograph taken after treatment showing improved esthetics of the upper dentition. (a) Intraoral photograph after microabrasion; (b) Intraoral photograph after home bleaching.
Figure 5 Results of QLF analysis after treatment. (a) Right maxillary central incisor; (b) Left maxillary central incisor; (c) Right maxillary lateral incisor; (d) Left maxillary lateral incisor. QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Figure 6 Photograph of maxillary lateral incisors after completion of the treatment with composite restoration of left central incisor.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to determine the depth of demineralization of dental fluorosis in enamel microabrasion: a case report
Results of QLF analysis before treatment
| Right maxillary lateral incisor | Right maxillary central incisor | Left maxillary central incisor | Left maxillary lateral incisor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔF | -7.5% | -5.1% | -10% | -6.2% |
| ΔFmax | -11% | -5% | -19% | -7% |
| Area | 36 px2 | 2 px2 | 296 px2 | 4 px2 |
QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; ΔF, average lesion depth; ΔFmax, maximum lesion depth; px, pixels.
Materials used in this case
| Material | Component | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| Opalustre | Opalustre syringe: 6.6% hydrochloric acid, 20 - 160 µm silicon carbide microparticles OpalCups bristle | Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA |
| Opalescence | 10% carbamide peroxide | Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA |
Results of QLF analysis after treatment
| Right maxillary lateral incisor | Right maxillary central incisor | Left maxillary central incisor | Left maxillary lateral incisor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔF | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| ΔFmax | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Area | 0 px2 | 0 px2 | 0 px2 | 0 px2 |
QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; ΔF, average lesion depth; ΔFmax, maximum lesion depth; px, pixels.
Table 1 Results of QLF analysis before treatment
QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; ΔF, average lesion depth; ΔFmax, maximum lesion depth; px, pixels.
Table 2 Materials used in this case
Table 3 Results of QLF analysis after treatment
QLF, quantitative light-induced fluorescence; ΔF, average lesion depth; ΔFmax, maximum lesion depth; px, pixels.
