Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling

Suk-Ho Kang; Oh-young Kim; Myung-Hwan Oh; Byeong-Hoon Cho; Chung-Moon Um; Hyuk-Choon Kwon; Ho-Hyun Son

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.142

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 27(2); 2002 > Article

Original Article Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling: Suk-Ho Kang, Oh-young Kim^*, Myung-Hwan Oh^**, Byeong-Hoon Cho, Chung-Moon Um, Hyuk-Choon Kwon, Ho-Hyun Son; 2002;27(2):-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.142
Published online: March 31, 2002

Department of Conservative Dentistiry, College of dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.

^*Department of Polymer Science & Engineering, Dankook University, Korea.

^**Vericom Co., Ltd., Korea.

167 Views
0 Download
1 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Results
1. There was significantly less microleage in enamel margins than dentinal margins of all groups. (p<0.05)

2. There was no significant difference between six composite resin in enamel margin of group 1.

3. In dentin margin of group 1, flowable composite had more microleakage than others but not of significant differences.

4. There was no significant difference between six composite resin in enamel margin of group 2.

5. In dentin margin of group 2, the microleakage were R>A=H=M>D>Z. But there was no significant differences.

6. In enamel margins, load cycling did not affect the marginal microleakage in significant degree.

7. In dentin margins, load cycling did affect the marginal microleakage only in Revolution. (p<0.05)
Keywords: Load cycling; Flowable composite; Microfill composite; Microleakage

Fig. 1

Chewing simulation

Fig. 2

Actual movement of MTS

Fig. 3

Mean microleakage values

Table 1

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 2

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 3

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

Table 4

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

REFERENCES

1. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 17-24.PubMed
2. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6: 167-171.Article PubMed
3. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64: 658-664.Article PubMed
4. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52: 374-380.Article PubMed
5. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66: 451-459.Article PubMed
6. Grippo JO. Abfractions. A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3: 14-19.Article PubMed
7. Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res. 1983;62(8):904-906.Article PubMed PDF
8. Labella R, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composite and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 128-137.PubMed
9. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowble composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129: 567-577.PubMed
10. Esafan AM, Estafan D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(9):705-712.PubMed
11. Leinfelder K. New developments in composite resins. Dent Today. 1997;16(4):44. 46-47.
12. Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composites. Dent Today. 1998;17(4):78-83.
13. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials- The continuum. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17(8):731-734.PubMed
14. Miller MB. Restoring class V lesions part 2: Abfraction lesions. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997;9(5):505-506.PubMed
15. Rundle T, Cobb D, Vargas M. Effect of elastic modulus on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Dent Res. 1997;76: (Abstract #1455).
16. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations : A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122: 41-47.Article PubMed
17. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium. 1994;15(11):1396-1400.PubMed
18. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972;84: 1349-1356.PubMed
19. Yap A, Stokes AN, Pearson GJ. An in vitro microleakage study of a new multi-purpose dental adhesive system. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23: 302-308.Article PubMed
20. Ahlgren J, Owall B. Muscular activity and chewing force: A polygraphic study of human mandibular movements. Arch Oral Biol. 1970;15: 271-280.Article PubMed
21. Rigsby DF. Effect of axial load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 155-159.PubMed
22. Mandras RS, et al. The effects of thermal and occlusal stresses on the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater. 1991;7: 63-67.Article PubMed
23. Sakaguchi RL, et al. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth : a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 235-240.Article PubMed
24. Lambrecht , et al. Quantitative evaluation of the wear of posterior dental restorations : four year results. J Dent Res. 1985 03;65(special issue):370. Abst. No. 1759.
25. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Hagen SV. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83: 194-203.Article PubMed
26. Hung CM, et al. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on the margins of provisional acrylic resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69: 573-577.Article PubMed
27. Dubois RJ, et al. Effects of occlusal loading and thermocycling on the marginal gaps of light-polymerized and autopolymerized resin provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82: 161-166.Article PubMed
28. DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 04;38(4):339-345.Article PubMed
29. Morin D, et al. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 1075-1078.Article PubMed PDF
30. Pilo R, et al. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent. 1998;26: 467-472.Article PubMed
31. Pilo R. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and tree multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82: 209-213.PubMed
32. Palamara D, Palamara JEA, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2000;16: 412-419.Article PubMed
33. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(2):146-148.Article PubMed PDF
34. Retief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1989 07;2: 133-144.PubMed
35. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim ACY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: Composite and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27: 205-210.Article PubMed

Tables & Figures

Fig. 1

Chewing simulation

Fig. 2

Actual movement of MTS

Fig. 3

Mean microleakage values

Table 1

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 2

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 3

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

Table 4

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

REFERENCES

1. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 17-24.PubMed
2. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6: 167-171.Article PubMed
3. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64: 658-664.Article PubMed
4. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52: 374-380.Article PubMed
5. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66: 451-459.Article PubMed
6. Grippo JO. Abfractions. A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3: 14-19.Article PubMed
7. Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res. 1983;62(8):904-906.Article PubMed PDF
8. Labella R, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composite and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 128-137.PubMed
9. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowble composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129: 567-577.PubMed
10. Esafan AM, Estafan D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(9):705-712.PubMed
11. Leinfelder K. New developments in composite resins. Dent Today. 1997;16(4):44. 46-47.
12. Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composites. Dent Today. 1998;17(4):78-83.
13. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials- The continuum. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17(8):731-734.PubMed
14. Miller MB. Restoring class V lesions part 2: Abfraction lesions. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997;9(5):505-506.PubMed
15. Rundle T, Cobb D, Vargas M. Effect of elastic modulus on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Dent Res. 1997;76: (Abstract #1455).
16. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations : A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122: 41-47.Article PubMed
17. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium. 1994;15(11):1396-1400.PubMed
18. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972;84: 1349-1356.PubMed
19. Yap A, Stokes AN, Pearson GJ. An in vitro microleakage study of a new multi-purpose dental adhesive system. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23: 302-308.Article PubMed
20. Ahlgren J, Owall B. Muscular activity and chewing force: A polygraphic study of human mandibular movements. Arch Oral Biol. 1970;15: 271-280.Article PubMed
21. Rigsby DF. Effect of axial load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations. Am J Dent. 1992;5: 155-159.PubMed
22. Mandras RS, et al. The effects of thermal and occlusal stresses on the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater. 1991;7: 63-67.Article PubMed
23. Sakaguchi RL, et al. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth : a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 235-240.Article PubMed
24. Lambrecht , et al. Quantitative evaluation of the wear of posterior dental restorations : four year results. J Dent Res. 1985 03;65(special issue):370. Abst. No. 1759.
25. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Hagen SV. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83: 194-203.Article PubMed
26. Hung CM, et al. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on the margins of provisional acrylic resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69: 573-577.Article PubMed
27. Dubois RJ, et al. Effects of occlusal loading and thermocycling on the marginal gaps of light-polymerized and autopolymerized resin provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82: 161-166.Article PubMed
28. DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 04;38(4):339-345.Article PubMed
29. Morin D, et al. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 1075-1078.Article PubMed PDF
30. Pilo R, et al. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent. 1998;26: 467-472.Article PubMed
31. Pilo R. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and tree multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82: 209-213.PubMed
32. Palamara D, Palamara JEA, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2000;16: 412-419.Article PubMed
33. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(2):146-148.Article PubMed PDF
34. Retief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1989 07;2: 133-144.PubMed
35. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim ACY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: Composite and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27: 205-210.Article PubMed

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Effect of a new resin monomer on the microleakage of composite resin restorations
JH Bae, YK Kim, PY Yoon, MA Lee, BH Cho
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(5): 469. CrossRef

CanvasJS.com

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27(2):142-149. Published online March 31, 2002

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.2.142

XML Download

Figure

Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling

Fig. 1 Chewing simulation

Fig. 2 Actual movement of MTS

Fig. 3 Mean microleakage values

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling

Table 1

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 2

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 3

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

Table 4

Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

Table 1 Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 2 Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(no load cycling, n=15)

Table 3 Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on enamel margin.(after load cycling, n=15)

Table 4 Number of specimen in each score and microleakage value on dentin margin.(after load cycling, n=15)