Effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay

Sae-Hee Han; Young-Gon Cho

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.223

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 34(3); 2009 > Article

Original Article Effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay: Sae-Hee Han¹, Young-Gon Cho²; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2009;34(3):223-231.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.223
Published online: May 31, 2009

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Center, Chung Ang University Hospital, Korea.

²Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@chosun.ac.kr

• Received: March 23, 2009 • Revised: April 27, 2009 • Accepted: May 1, 2009

26 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay. Fifty four molar teeth were exposed the occlusal dentin. Class I inlay cavities were prepared and randomly divided into six groups. Control group ; no agent, Group 1 ; Isodan, Group 2 ; One-step, Group 3 ; All-Bond SE, Group 4 ; Isodan + One-step, Group 5 ; Isodan + All-Bond SE.

Desensitizing agent and dentin bonding agents were applied immediately after the completion of the preparations. Impressions were then made. The composite resin inlays (Tescera, Bisco) were fabricated according to the manufacturers' guidelines. Cementation procedures followed a standard protocol by using resin cement (Bis-Cem, Bisco). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37℃ for 24 hours.

All specimens were sectioned to obtained sticks with 1.0 × 1.0 mm² cross sectional area. The microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was tested at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data was analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey's test. Scanning electron microscopy analysis was made to examine the details of the bonding interface.

1. Group 1 showed significantly lower µTBS than other groups (p<0.05).

2. There was no significant difference between the µTBS of Group 3 and Group 5.

3. The µTBS of Group 4 showed significantly lower than that of Group 2 (p<0.05).

In conclusion, a desensitizer (Isodan) might have an adverse effect on the bond strength of composite resin inlay to dentin.
Keywords: Desensitizer; Cementation; Composite resin inlay; Microtensile bond strength; Scanning electron microscopy analysis

REFERENCES

1. Song MH, Park SJ, Jo HG, Hwang YC, Oh OM, Hwang IN. Influence of adhesive application on shear bond strength of the resin cement to indirect resin composite. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008;33(5):419-426.
2. Kim DS, Park SH, Choi KY, Choi KK, The Effect. The Effect of Bonding Resin on Bond Strength of Dual-Cure Resin Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32(5):426-436.Article
3. Jo MW, Park SH, Kim JR, Choi KK. The bonding durability of resin cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32(4):343-353.Article
4. Radovic I, Coniglio I, Magni E, Carvalho CA, Ferrari M. Luting fiber posts with self-adhesive cements: A push-out bond strength test. J Dent Res Appl. 2007;1(1):50-55.
5. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9: 161-167.PubMed
6. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperarive sensitivity. JADA. 2000;131: 1197-1199.PubMed
7. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent. 2001;29: 7-13.Article PubMed
8. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26: 555-562.Article PubMed
9. Jo YG, Ban IH, Yu MK. The chance of adaptability chance in adhesive systems to dentin substrte according to storage time. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30(3):204-214.
10. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lay SC, Yiu CK, Cheong C. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82(7):537-541.Article PubMed PDF
11. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89: 275-281.Article PubMed
12. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94: 511-519.Article PubMed
13. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3):166-174.PubMed
14. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(2):105-113.Article PubMed
15. Sengun A, Koyuturk AE, Sener Y, Ozer F. Effect of densensitizers on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to careis-affected dentin on the gingival wall. Oper Dent. 2005;30(4):430-435.PubMed
16. Omae M, Inoue M, Itota T, Finger WJ, Inoue M, Tanaka K, Yamamoto K, Yoshiyama M. Effect of a desensitizing agent containing glutaraldehyde and HEMA on bond strength to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. J Dent. 2007;35: 398-402.PubMed
17. Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayabgac B. The effects of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):451-456.PubMed
18. Brackett WW, Tay FR, Brackett MG, Dib A, Sword RJ, Pashley DH. The effects of chlorhexidine on dentin hybrid layers In Vivo. Oper Dent. 2007;32(2):107-111.PubMed
19. Craig RG. Overview of posterior composite resin for use in clinical practice in Vanherle G Smith DC(eds). Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. 1985;St.Paul: 3M Co; 199-211.
20. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7: 228-232.Article PubMed
21. Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent. 1989;17: 184-188.PubMed
22. Technical data sheet : Espertise Rely X Unicem. 2002;Seefeld Germany: 3M ESPE.
23. Suh BI. New strategies in Adhesive Dentistry : All-Bond 3 and All-Bond SE. J Dent Res Appl. 2007;1(1):2-6.
24. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations. JADA. 2002;133: 229-231.Article PubMed
25. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique : a modified to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17: 536-536.PubMed
26. Aranha ACC, Siqueira Junior CA, Cavalcante LMA, Pimenta LAF, Marchi GM. Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with densensitizer products. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8: 85-90.PubMed
27. Yiu CKY, King NM, Suh BI, Sharp LJ, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Incompatibility of oxalate densensitizers with acidic, fluoride-containing total-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):730-735.Article PubMed PDF
28. Fu B, Shen Y, Wang H, Hanning M. Sealing ability of dentin adhesives /densensitizer. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):496-503.PubMed

Figure 1

SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Control group (no agent).

Figure 2

2. SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 1 (Isodan).

Figure 3

SEM photograph showing the close adaptation at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 2 (One-step).

Figure 4

SEM photograph showing the close adaptation at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 3 (All-Bond SE).

Figure 5

SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 4 (Isodan + One-step).

Figure 6

SEM photograph showingthe close adaptation of the dentin-resincement interface by Group 5 (Isodan + All-Bond SE).

Table 1

Material, composition and manufacturer

All information provided by manufacturers.

BPDM: bisdimethacrylate, HEMA: Hydroxyethylmethacrylate, UDMA: urethane dimethacrylate,

Bis-GMA: Bisphenol-glycidyl methacrylate.

Table 2

Group classification

Table 3

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) for each group

Superscripts of the same letter mean statistically no significant difference (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test)

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009;34(3):223-231. Published online May 31, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.223

XML Download

Figure

Related articles

Effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay

Figure 1 SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Control group (no agent).

Figure 2 2. SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 1 (Isodan).

Figure 3 SEM photograph showing the close adaptation at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 2 (One-step).

Figure 4 SEM photograph showing the close adaptation at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 3 (All-Bond SE).

Figure 5 SEM photograph showing the gap at the dentin-resin cement interface produced by Group 4 (Isodan + One-step).

Figure 6 SEM photograph showingthe close adaptation of the dentin-resincement interface by Group 5 (Isodan + All-Bond SE).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay

Table 1

Material, composition and manufacturer

All information provided by manufacturers.

BPDM: bisdimethacrylate, HEMA: Hydroxyethylmethacrylate, UDMA: urethane dimethacrylate,

Bis-GMA: Bisphenol-glycidyl methacrylate.

Table 2

Group classification

Table 3

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) for each group

Superscripts of the same letter mean statistically no significant difference (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test)

Table 1 Material, composition and manufacturer

All information provided by manufacturers.

BPDM: bisdimethacrylate, HEMA: Hydroxyethylmethacrylate, UDMA: urethane dimethacrylate,

Bis-GMA: Bisphenol-glycidyl methacrylate.

Table 2 Group classification

Table 3 Microtensile bond strength (MPa) for each group

Superscripts of the same letter mean statistically no significant difference (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test)