Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81
Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83
Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 In vitro evaluation of the consistency of two electronic apex locators
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Seung-Jong Lee. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Yonsei University, School of Dentistry, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Sudaemun-Ku, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-8700, Fax: 82-2-313-7575, sjlee@yuhs.ac
• Received: October 26, 2007 • Revised: December 1, 2007 • Accepted: December 26, 2007
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the consistency of two electronic apex locators in vitro model.
Materials consisted of fifty two extracted premolars and two electronic apex locators; Root ZX (J. Morita, Osaka, Japan) and E-Magic Finder Deluxe (S-Denti, Cheonan, Korea). After access preparation, the teeth were embedded in a saline-mixed alginate model. Canal lengths of each tooth were measured at "0.5" and "Apex" mark of the apex locators, respectively so that each tooth had two measurements from 0.5 and Apex points. The file was fixed at final measurement using a glass ionomer cement. The apical 4 mm from the apex was exposed to measure the distance from the file tip to the major apical foramen of each tooth. Average distances and standard deviations were used to evaluate the consistency.
Results showed that all measurements of both Root ZX and E-Magic Finder located the major foramen the range of ± 0.5 mm level. Both apex locators showed better consistency at Apex mark than at 0.5 mark. The average distance of file tip-major foramen was - 0.18 mm at 0.5 mark and - 0.07 mm at Apex mark in Root ZX, - 0.25 mm at 0.5 mark and - 0.02 mm at Apex mark in E-Magic Finder. Standard deviation was 0.21 at 0.5 mark and 0.12 at Apex mark in Root ZX, 0.12 at 0.5 mark and 0.09 at Apex mark in E-Magic Finder.
1. Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Sinai I, Goldenberg A, Bender IB. Biologic aspects of endodontics. Part III. Periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968;26: 534-546. 694-705.PubMed
2. Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1955;50: 544-552.ArticlePubMed
3. Lee SJ, Nam KC, Kim YJ, Kim DW. Clinical accuracy of a new apex locator with an automatic compensation circuit. J Endod. 2002;28: 706-709.ArticlePubMed
4. Sunada I. New method for the measuring the length of the root canal. J Dent Res. 1962;41: 375-387.ArticlePDF
5. Inoue N. An audiometric method for determining the length of root canals. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 1973;39: 630-636.PubMed
6. Frank AL, Torabinejad M. An in vivo evaluation of Endex electronic apex locator. J Endod. 1993;19: 177-179.ArticlePubMed
7. Kobayashi C, Okiji T, Kaqwashima N, Suda H, Sunada I. A basic study on the electronic root canal length measurement: Part 3. Newly designed electronic root canal length measuring device using division method. Jpn J Conservative Dent. 1991;34: 1442-1448.
8. Kobayashi C, Suda H. New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method. J Endod. 1994;20: 111-114.ArticlePubMed
9. Kobayashi C. Electronic canal length measurement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79: 226-231.PubMed
10. Kaufman AY, Keila S, Yoshpe M. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2002;35: 186-192.ArticlePubMed
11. Fouad AF, Rivera EM, Krell KV. Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size. J Endod. 1993;19: 63-67.PubMed
12. Riccuci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation. Int Endod J. 1998;31: 394-409.PubMed
13. Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. Theposition and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J. 1984;17: 192-198.PubMed
14. Green D. Stereomicroscopic study of 700 root apices of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1960;13: 728-733.ArticlePubMed
15. Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method. J Endod. 1998;24: 48-50.PubMed
16. Pagavino G, Pace R, Baccetti T. A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod. 1998;24: 438-441.ArticlePubMed
17. Tselnik M, Baumgartner CJ, Marshall GJ. An evaluation of Root ZX and Elements Diagnostic Apex Locators. J Endod. 2005;31: 507-509.PubMed
Figure 1
Root ZX.
Figure 2
E-Magic Finder.
Figure 3
Length measurements with digital caliper.
Figure 4
Distance from file tip to major foramen with EasyDent Viewer.
Figure 5
Box plots: Quartile of file tip-major foramen distance at 0.5 mark and Apex mark.
Table 1
Distance of file tip-major foramen at 0.5 mark and Apex mark (mm)
Table 2
Difference of the length at 0.5 mark and Apex mark