Hyun Yang; In-Seok Yang; Yun-Chann Hwang; In-Nam Hwang; Suk-Ja Yoon; Won-Jae Kim; Won-Mann Oh

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.087

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 32(2); 2007 > Article

Original Article A study on transportation of apical foramen after overinstrumentation by ProFile®, ProTaper™ and K^3TM in simulated canals with different curvatures: Hyun Yang¹, In-Seok Yang¹, Yun-Chann Hwang¹, In-Nam Hwang¹, Suk-Ja Yoon², Won-Jae Kim³, Won-Mann Oh¹; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2007;32(2):87-94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.087
Published online: March 31, 2007

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Korea.

²Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Korea.

³Department of Oral Physiology, DSRI, 2nd stage of BK21, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Won-Mann Oh. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 8 Hak-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-4431, Fax: 82-62-225-8387, wmoh@chonnam.ac.kr

• Received: February 20, 2006 • Revised: March 30, 2006 • Accepted: April 25, 2007

20 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

This study was done to evaluate transportation of the apical foramen after 0.5 mm overinstrumentation by ProFile, ProTaper and K³ in simulated resin root canal.

Sixty simulated resin root canal with a curvature of J and S-shape were divided into two groups. Each group consisted of three subgroups with 10 blocks according to the instruments used: ProFile®, ProTaper™, and K^3TM. Simulated resin root canal was prepared by ProFile, ProTaper and K³ with 300 rpm by the crown-down preparation technique. Pre- and post-instrumentation apical foramen images were overlapped and recorded with Image-analyzing microscope 100X (Camcope, Sometech Inc, Korea). The amounts of difference in width and dimension on overlapped images were measured after reference points were determined by Image Analysis program (Image-Pro® Express, Media Cybernetic, USA). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test.

The results suggest that ProFile showed significantly less canal transportation and maintained original apical foramen shape better than K³ and ProTaper.
Keywords: ProFile; ProTaper; K3; Simulated J and S-shape canal

REFERENCES

1. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensionss. Dent Clin North Am. 1967;723-744.
2. Zmener O, Balbachan L. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium files for preparing curved root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11: 121-123.PubMed
3. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 1989;4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 277.
4. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14: 346-351.Article PubMed
5. Baumann MA. Nickel-titanium: options and challenges. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 55-67.Article PubMed
6. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995;21: 173-176.Article PubMed
7. Park HS, Lee MG, Kim JJ, Lee JY. In the formation of curved root canals using ProFile Study on root canal shape. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1999;24: 633-637.
8. Ko HJ, Baek SH. A study of histomorphological change of curved root canal preparation using GT rotary file, profile and stainless steel K-file. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002;27: 612-621.Article
9. Koch K, Brave D. The Ultimate Rotary File? Oral Health. 2002;59-64.
10. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975;1: 255-262.Article PubMed
11. Hsu YY, Kim SK. The ProFile system. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 69-85.PubMed
12. Clauder T, Baumann MA. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 87-111.Article PubMed
13. Mounce RE. The K3 rotary nickel-titanium file system. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 137-157.Article PubMed
14. Bishop K, Dummer PMH. A comparison of stainless steel flexofiles and Nickel-titanium Ni-Ti flex during the shaping of simulated canals. Int Endod J. 1997;30: 25-34.PubMed
15. Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod. 1997;23: 232-235.PubMed
16. Song YL, Bian Z, Fan B, Fan MW, Gutmann JL, Peng B. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2004;37: 265-271.Article PubMed
17. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation tecniques. J Endod. 1997;23: 503-507.PubMed
18. Hata GI, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod. 2002;28: 316-321.Article PubMed
19. Lim JJ, Kim DJ, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. The change of canal configuration after instrumentation by several nickel-titanium files in the simulated canal with abrupt curvature. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30: 303-311.
20. Yun HY, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95: 228-233.Article PubMed
21. Walsch H. The hybride concept of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 183-202.PubMed
22. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J. 2003;36: 86-92.Article PubMed PDF
23. Oh HJ, Hong CH, Jo YB. The effect of niti rotary instrumentation on the configuration of apical root canal. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 1997;22: 244-253.
24. Lee BK, Kim DJ, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. A comparative study on the canal configuration after shaping by profile, protaper^tm and k-flexofile in simulated canals with different angles of curvature. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30: 294-302.Article
25. Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J. 2004;37: 613-623.Article PubMed
26. Iqbal MK, Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B, Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2004;37: 359-364.Article PubMed

Figure 1

A and B diagrams indicate inner and outer side of canal curvature.

Figure 2

Procedure measuring the difference in width and dimensions of apical foramen. A. Measurement of difference in width of apical foramen after overlapping pre- and post-instrumentation images. (L1; Δ mesial width, L2; Δ outer width, L3; Δ distal width, L4; Δ inner width) B. Measurement of difference in dimensions of apical foramen after overlapping pre- and post-instrumentation images. (a; inner dimensions of apical foramen before instrumentation, b; outer dimensions of apical foramen before instrumentation, c; inner dimensions of apical foramen after instrumentation, d; outer dimensions of apical foramen after instrumentation)

Figure 3

ΔOuter width of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 4

ΔInner width of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 5

ΔOuter dimensions of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 6

ΔInner dimensions of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Table 1

Shaping sequence of ProFile, ProTaper and K3

WL (Working length) = CL (Canal length) + 0.5 mm

Table 2

Mean values of difference of outer, inner width and dimensions in apical foramen (Mean ± S.D)

Other letters mean significant difference (p < 0.05).

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

A study on transportation of apical foramen after overinstrumentation by ProFile®, ProTaper™ and K^3TM in simulated canals with different curvatures

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007;32(2):87-94. Published online March 31, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.087

XML Download

Figure

A study on transportation of apical foramen after overinstrumentation by ProFile®, ProTaper™ and K^3TM in simulated canals with different curvatures

Figure 1 A and B diagrams indicate inner and outer side of canal curvature.

Figure 2 Procedure measuring the difference in width and dimensions of apical foramen. A. Measurement of difference in width of apical foramen after overlapping pre- and post-instrumentation images. (L1; Δ mesial width, L2; Δ outer width, L3; Δ distal width, L4; Δ inner width) B. Measurement of difference in dimensions of apical foramen after overlapping pre- and post-instrumentation images. (a; inner dimensions of apical foramen before instrumentation, b; outer dimensions of apical foramen before instrumentation, c; inner dimensions of apical foramen after instrumentation, d; outer dimensions of apical foramen after instrumentation)

Figure 3 ΔOuter width of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 4 ΔInner width of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 5 ΔOuter dimensions of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 6 ΔInner dimensions of apical foramen between pre- and post-instrumentation according to the types of files and curvatures.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

A study on transportation of apical foramen after overinstrumentation by ProFile®, ProTaper™ and K^3TM in simulated canals with different curvatures

Table 1

Shaping sequence of ProFile, ProTaper and K3

WL (Working length) = CL (Canal length) + 0.5 mm

Table 2

Mean values of difference of outer, inner width and dimensions in apical foramen (Mean ± S.D)

Other letters mean significant difference (p < 0.05).

Table 1 Shaping sequence of ProFile, ProTaper and K3

WL (Working length) = CL (Canal length) + 0.5 mm

Table 2 Mean values of difference of outer, inner width and dimensions in apical foramen (Mean ± S.D)

Other letters mean significant difference (p < 0.05).