Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Management of separated file in the root canal
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 31(3); 2006 > Article
Case Report Management of separated file in the root canal
Hye-Jeong Kim, Hoon-Sang Jang1, Se-Hee Park, Kyung-Mo Cho, Jin-Woo Kim
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2006;31(3):161-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.3.161
Published online: May 31, 2006

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Korea.

1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Jin-Woo Kim. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Jibyun-Dong, Kangnung, Kangwon, Korea, 210-702. Tel: 82-33-640-3189, Fax: 82-33-640-3113, mendo7@kangnung.ac.kr
• Received: August 29, 2005   • Revised: March 3, 2006   • Accepted: March 4, 2006

Copyright © 2006 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 23 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • During root canal preparation procedures, the potential for instrument separation is always present. Files, a lentulo, a Gates-Glidden (GG) bur or any manufactured obstruction can be left behind in the canal. Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files are in common usage in these days. Despite their undeniable advantages, there is a potential risk of separation within the canals. It is very rapid, unpredictable, and creates a great deal of stress for the practitioner.
    When an endodontic instrument separates, the best option is to remove it. Ultrasonic instruments and microscopes have improved the success rate for removing separated instruments. But it is difficult and not always possible. Therefore prevention is the key.
    In this case report, several management methods of separated file in the canal are presented.
  • 1. Mounce R. The heartache of separation. Dent Today. 2003;22(4):83-85.PubMed
  • 2. Ruddle C. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Pathways of the Pulp. 2002;8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 231-292.
  • 3. Nagai O, Tani N, Kayaba Y, Kodama S, Osada T. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J. 1986;19(6):298-304.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Hulsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(6):252-258.PubMed
  • 5. Ruddle CJ. Broken instrument removal. The endodontic challenge. Dent Today. 2002;21(7):70-81.
  • 6. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(5):605-610.PubMed
  • 7. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod. 2003;29(11):756-763.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J Endod. 2003;29(11):764-767.PubMed
Figure 1
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). Separated file in the mesial root isthmus (b, c) and remove it using ultrasonic device under microscope (d).
jkacd-31-161-g001.jpg
Figure 2
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
jkacd-31-161-g002.jpg
Figure 3
File separation in the root canal (a, b) and remove using ultrasonic device under microscope (c).
jkacd-31-161-g003.jpg
Figure 4
Master cone fitting and canal filling. Arrow indicates thinned dentinal wall.
jkacd-31-161-g004.jpg
Figure 5
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
jkacd-31-161-g005.jpg
Figure 6
File separation in the canal (a) and root perforation (b). Canal obturation after bypassing with hand file (c, d).
jkacd-31-161-g006.jpg
Figure 7
After tooth extraction, C-shaped root apex and root perforation were investigated.
jkacd-31-161-g007.jpg
Figure 8
Retrograde preparation and MTA filling.
jkacd-31-161-g008.jpg
Figure 9
Histological appearance of surgically removed tissue.
jkacd-31-161-g009.jpg
Figure 10
After intentional replantation (a), 3-month recall (b), 6-month recall (c) radiograph.
jkacd-31-161-g010.jpg
Figure 11
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). By-passing with hand file (b) and canal obturation (c, d). 30-month recall (e): tooth is symptomless.
jkacd-31-161-g011.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Management of separated file in the root canal
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31(3):161-168.   Published online May 31, 2006
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      • 4
      • 5
      • 6
      • 7
      • 8
      • 9
      • 10
      Management of separated file in the root canal
      Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
      Figure 1 Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). Separated file in the mesial root isthmus (b, c) and remove it using ultrasonic device under microscope (d).
      Figure 2 Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
      Figure 3 File separation in the root canal (a, b) and remove using ultrasonic device under microscope (c).
      Figure 4 Master cone fitting and canal filling. Arrow indicates thinned dentinal wall.
      Figure 5 Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
      Figure 6 File separation in the canal (a) and root perforation (b). Canal obturation after bypassing with hand file (c, d).
      Figure 7 After tooth extraction, C-shaped root apex and root perforation were investigated.
      Figure 8 Retrograde preparation and MTA filling.
      Figure 9 Histological appearance of surgically removed tissue.
      Figure 10 After intentional replantation (a), 3-month recall (b), 6-month recall (c) radiograph.
      Figure 11 Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). By-passing with hand file (b) and canal obturation (c, d). 30-month recall (e): tooth is symptomless.
      Management of separated file in the root canal

      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      Close layer
      TOP