Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81
Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83
Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Management of separated file in the root canal
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Korea.
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Jin-Woo Kim. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Jibyun-Dong, Kangnung, Kangwon, Korea, 210-702. Tel: 82-33-640-3189, Fax: 82-33-640-3113, mendo7@kangnung.ac.kr
• Received: August 29, 2005 • Revised: March 3, 2006 • Accepted: March 4, 2006
During root canal preparation procedures, the potential for instrument separation is always present. Files, a lentulo, a Gates-Glidden (GG) bur or any manufactured obstruction can be left behind in the canal. Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files are in common usage in these days. Despite their undeniable advantages, there is a potential risk of separation within the canals. It is very rapid, unpredictable, and creates a great deal of stress for the practitioner.
When an endodontic instrument separates, the best option is to remove it. Ultrasonic instruments and microscopes have improved the success rate for removing separated instruments. But it is difficult and not always possible. Therefore prevention is the key.
In this case report, several management methods of separated file in the canal are presented.
1. Mounce R. The heartache of separation. Dent Today. 2003;22(4):83-85.PubMed
2. Ruddle C. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Pathways of the Pulp. 2002;8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 231-292.
3. Nagai O, Tani N, Kayaba Y, Kodama S, Osada T. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J. 1986;19(6):298-304.ArticlePubMed
4. Hulsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(6):252-258.PubMed
6. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(5):605-610.PubMed
7. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod. 2003;29(11):756-763.ArticlePubMed
8. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J Endod. 2003;29(11):764-767.PubMed
Figure 1
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). Separated file in the mesial root isthmus (b, c) and remove it using ultrasonic device under microscope (d).
Figure 2
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
Figure 3
File separation in the root canal (a, b) and remove using ultrasonic device under microscope (c).
Figure 1
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph (a). Separated file in the mesial root isthmus (b, c) and remove it using ultrasonic device under microscope (d).
Figure 2
Diagnostic intraoral radiograph.
Figure 3
File separation in the root canal (a, b) and remove using ultrasonic device under microscope (c).