Effect of biscover on the marginal microleakage of composite resin restoration

Young-Gon Cho; Hee-Young Choi

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.355

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 30(5); 2005 > Article

Original Article Effect of biscover on the marginal microleakage of composite resin restoration: Young-Gon Cho, Hee-Young Choi; 2005;30(5):-362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.355
Published online: September 30, 2005

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea 501-825. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, 3845, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

• Received: January 3, 2005 • Revised: February 18, 2005 • Accepted: March 5, 2005

147 Views
0 Download
4 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on marginal leakage of a resin surface sealant (Biscover) applied before or after polymerization of composite resin to unsealed composite restorations. Thirty Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and cervical margin in dentin or cementum were prepared on the buccal surfaces of sound extracted molars and restored with a microfilled light-cured composite resin (Micronew). Restorations were randomly assigned into one of three equal groups (n = 10): a control group - no surface sealing, group 1 - applied Biscover after polymerization of the composite resin, and group 2 - applied Biscover before polymerization of the composite resin. Specimens were thermocycled, immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 4 hours, sectioned longitudinally, and analyzed for leakage at the occlusal and gingival margins. The results of this study were as follows;

1. In sealed group, group 2 showed higher microleakage than group 1 at both occlusal and gingival margins, but there was no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05).

2. Unsealed control group showed a little higher microleakage than sealed group at occlusal margins, and a little higher or similar microleakage than sealed group at gingival margins (p > 0.05).

3. Control group and group 2 showed significantly less microleakage at the occlusal margins, but group 1 showed no significantly difference between microleakage at the occlusal and gingival margins.
Keywords: Biscover; Resin surface sealant; Microleakage; Class V cavity; Occlusal margin or gingival margin

Table 1

Group classification by application methods of Biscover

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at occlusal margins

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at gingival margins

Table 4

Statistical analysis of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups by Mann-Whitney test

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

Table 5

Statistical analysis between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test

S: Microleakage of gingival margins was significant higher than that of occlusal margins (p < 0.05)

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

REFERENCES

1. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 203-208.PubMed
2. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lamberechts P, Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2001;14(3):170-176.PubMed
3. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(7):565-573.PubMed
4. Erhardt MCG, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent. 2002;27: 396-402.PubMed
5. May KN Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1996;9(3):133-136.PubMed
6. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resin in dentin cavities. J Dent Res. 1986;65: 1319-1321.Article PubMed PDF
7. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent. 1992;17: 7-12.PubMed
8. Santini A. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. Am J Dent. 1999;12: 194-200.PubMed
9. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coatingon" the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent. 2003;28: 28-35.PubMed
10. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 244-248.PubMed
11. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent. 1995;23: 183-189.Article PubMed
12. Crim GA. Influence of bonding agents and composites on microleakge. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(5):571-574.PubMed
13. Pameijer CH, Wendt SL. Microleakage of "surface-sealing" materials. Am J Dent. 1995;8(1):43-46.PubMed
14. Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):552-559.PubMed
15. Akyuz S, Mentes A, Oktay C. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations : an in vivo study. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1992;1(3):211-214.PubMed
16. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RGP. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 2002;33: 450-456.PubMed
17. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 1991;22: 295-298.PubMed
18. Bertrand MF, Leforestier E, Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Bolla M. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(6):658-663.Article PubMed
19. Doray PG, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15: 244-250.Article PubMed
20. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on resistance of luting agents. Quintessence Int. 1994;25: 767-771.PubMed
21. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124(7):68-72.Article PubMed
22. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent. 2000;48: 78-80.PubMed
23. Suh BI. A new resin technology: a glaze/composite sealant that cures without forming an oxygen-inhibited layer. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(8):27-29.PubMed
24. Barghi N, Alexander C. A new surface sealant for polishing composit resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(8):30-33.PubMed
25. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composit resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2000;25: 448-453.PubMed
26. Crim GA. Effect of composite resin on the microleakge of Scotchbond 2 Gluma. Am J Dent. 1988;1: 215-216.PubMed
27. Davidson CL, de Gee AL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 146-148.Article PubMed PDF
28. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64: 658-664.PubMed

Tables & Figures

Table 1

Group classification by application methods of Biscover

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at occlusal margins

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at gingival margins

Table 4

Statistical analysis of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups by Mann-Whitney test

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

Table 5

Statistical analysis between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test

S: Microleakage of gingival margins was significant higher than that of occlusal margins (p < 0.05)

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

REFERENCES

1. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1996;21: 203-208.PubMed
2. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lamberechts P, Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2001;14(3):170-176.PubMed
3. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(7):565-573.PubMed
4. Erhardt MCG, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent. 2002;27: 396-402.PubMed
5. May KN Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1996;9(3):133-136.PubMed
6. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resin in dentin cavities. J Dent Res. 1986;65: 1319-1321.Article PubMed PDF
7. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent. 1992;17: 7-12.PubMed
8. Santini A. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. Am J Dent. 1999;12: 194-200.PubMed
9. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coatingon" the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent. 2003;28: 28-35.PubMed
10. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent. 2003;16: 244-248.PubMed
11. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent. 1995;23: 183-189.Article PubMed
12. Crim GA. Influence of bonding agents and composites on microleakge. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(5):571-574.PubMed
13. Pameijer CH, Wendt SL. Microleakage of "surface-sealing" materials. Am J Dent. 1995;8(1):43-46.PubMed
14. Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):552-559.PubMed
15. Akyuz S, Mentes A, Oktay C. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations : an in vivo study. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1992;1(3):211-214.PubMed
16. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RGP. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 2002;33: 450-456.PubMed
17. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 1991;22: 295-298.PubMed
18. Bertrand MF, Leforestier E, Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Bolla M. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(6):658-663.Article PubMed
19. Doray PG, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15: 244-250.Article PubMed
20. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on resistance of luting agents. Quintessence Int. 1994;25: 767-771.PubMed
21. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124(7):68-72.Article PubMed
22. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent. 2000;48: 78-80.PubMed
23. Suh BI. A new resin technology: a glaze/composite sealant that cures without forming an oxygen-inhibited layer. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(8):27-29.PubMed
24. Barghi N, Alexander C. A new surface sealant for polishing composit resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(8):30-33.PubMed
25. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composit resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2000;25: 448-453.PubMed
26. Crim GA. Effect of composite resin on the microleakge of Scotchbond 2 Gluma. Am J Dent. 1988;1: 215-216.PubMed
27. Davidson CL, de Gee AL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 146-148.Article PubMed PDF
28. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64: 658-664.PubMed

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The role of surface-sealant application on bond effectiveness of all-in-one self-etch adhesives
Safa Tuncer, Neslihan Tekçe, Mustafa Demirci, Canan Baydemir
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.2017; 31(6): 677. CrossRef
Influence of rebonding procedures on microleakage of composite resin restorations
Mi-Ae Lee, Duck-Kyu Seo, Ho-Hyun Son, Byeong-Hoon Cho
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2010; 35(3): 164. CrossRef
The Effect of Three Surface Sealants on Microleakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations
Won Cheol Lee, Jae-Jun Ryu
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2009; 47(2): 182. CrossRef
Evaluation on the abrasion resistance of a surface sealant
Soo-Mee Kim, Sae-Hee Han, Young-Gon Cho
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2007; 32(3): 180. CrossRef

CanvasJS.com

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Effect of biscover on the marginal microleakage of composite resin restoration

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005;30(5):355-362. Published online September 30, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.355

XML Download

Related articles

Effects of different curing methods on the color stability of composite resins

Effect of biscover on the marginal microleakage of composite resin restoration

Table 1

Group classification by application methods of Biscover

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at occlusal margins

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at gingival margins

Table 4

Statistical analysis of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups by Mann-Whitney test

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

Table 5

Statistical analysis between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test

S: Microleakage of gingival margins was significant higher than that of occlusal margins (p < 0.05)

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

Table 1 Group classification by application methods of Biscover

Table 2 Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at occlusal margins

Table 3 Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at gingival margins

Table 4 Statistical analysis of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups by Mann-Whitney test

NS: No significant differences (p > 0.05)

Table 5 Statistical analysis between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test

S: Microleakage of gingival margins was significant higher than that of occlusal margins (p < 0.05)