INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

Young-Gon Cho; Young-Gon Lee; Jong-Uk Kim; Byung-Cheul Park; Jong-Jin Kim; Hee-Young Choi; Cheul-Hee Jin; Sang-Hoon Yoo

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.430

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(5); 2004 > Article

Original Article INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH: Young-Gon Cho^,*, Young-Gon Lee, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park, Jong-Jin Kim, Hee-Young Choi, Cheul-Hee Jin, Sang-Hoon Yoo; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2004;29(5):430-438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.430
Published online: January 14, 2004

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University

*Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho, Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea, 501-825, Tel : 82-62-220-3840 Fax : 82-62-232-9064, E-mail: ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

18 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of application time of self-etching primers on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin using three self-etching primer adhesive systems.

Dentin surfaces were exposed from forty-eight human molars. They were conditioned with three self-etching primers (Clearfil SE Bond [SE], Unifil Bond [UF], Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus [TY]) and different primining times (10s, 20s, 30s and 40s). Composite resins were bonded to dentin surfaces and specimens were made. μTBS was tested and statistically compared using by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Test.

The results of this study presented that priming time for 10s in SE and UF groups and for 30s and 40s in TY group was highly decreased μTBS to dentin.
Keywords: Application time; Self-etching primers; Microtensile bond strength; Self-etching primer adhesive systems; Condition; Dentin surface

Figure 1.

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2.

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3.

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to priming times of three self-etching primer adhesives to dentin

Table 1.

Self-etching primer adhesives, components, pH of primers and manufacturers

Adhesives	Component		pH	Manufacturers
Adhesives	Primer	Bonding agent	pH	Manufacturers
Clearfil SE Bond (SE)	MDP, HEMA, water, hydrophilic DMA, photoinitiator	MDP, HEMA, hydrophilic DMA, microfiller, photoinitiator	1.9	Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan

Unifil Bond (UF)	4-MET, HEMA, ethanol, water, initiator	UDMA, HEMA, TEGDMA	2.2	GC Co., Tokyo, Japan

Tyrian SPE + One-Step Plus (TY)	2-acrylamido-2-methyl propanesulfonic acid, Bis (2 methacryloyloxy) ethyl) phosphate, ethanol	BPDM, HEMA, acetone, glass frit, photoinitiator	0.4	Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.

MDP = 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phophate, DMA = dimethacrylate, HEMA = 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 4-MET = 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic acid, UDMA = urethane dimethacrylate, TEGDMA = triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, BPDM = biphenyl dimethacrylate

Table 2.

Microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis according to adhesives and priming times

Group	Priming time	Microtensile strength (mean ± S.D.)	Number of specimens
SE group	10 seconds	33.78 ± 7.20^a	20
	20 seconds	73.22 ± 15.10^b	20
	30 seconds	62.80 ± 15.01^b	20
	40 seconds	65.53 ± 18.44^b	20

UF group	10 seconds	22.87 ± 6.53^c	20
	20 seconds	40.04 ± 12.50^d	20
	30 seconds	46.28 ± 9.13^d	20
	40 seconds	41.19 ± 12.00^d,g	20

TY group	10 seconds	47.34 ± 8.19^d,f	20
	20 seconds	53.16 ± 17.95^f	20
	30 seconds	33.98 ± 20.17^a	20
	40 seconds	31.25 ± 13.09^a,g	20

S.D.: Standard Deviation. Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 3.

Statistical analysis of mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) at the same priming time

Priming time	Microtensile bond strength	No. of total specimens
10 seconds	34.66 ± 12.40^a	60
20 seconds	55.47 ± 20.42^b	60
30 seconds	47.71 ± 19.42^b,c	60
40 seconds	45.99 ± 20.54^c	60

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

REFERENCES

1. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29(1):55-61. 2001.Article PubMed
2. Inoue S, Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium. p131-148. 1999.
3. Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of dentin primer application methods on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 21:167-172. 1996.PubMed
4. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361-366. 2001.PubMed
5. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’vs ‘multi-bottle’dentin adhesive-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-380. 2001.PubMed
6. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H, Arki Y, Kubota M. Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding systems. J Dent 30:99-105. 2001.Article PubMed
7. Kazemi RB, Meiers JC, Peppers K. Effect of caries disclosing agents on bond strengths of total-etching and self-etching primer dentin bonding systems to resin composite. Oper Dent 27:238-242. 2002.PubMed
8. 조영 곤, 조 공철. 자가 산부식 프라이머와 자가 산부식 접착제의 변연 미세누출. 대한치과보존학회지 27(5):493-501. 2002.
9. 조영 곤, 이석 종, 정진 호, 이영 곤, 김수 미. 치질에 접착된 자가 산부식 프라이머와 자가 산부식 접착제의 형태학적인 양상. 대 한치과보존학회지 28(1):23-33. 2003.
10. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 14:163-169. 2001.PubMed
11. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa RT. New trends in dentin/enamal adhesion. Am J Dent 13:25-30. 2000.
12. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 18:359-369. 2002.Article PubMed
13. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215-235. 2003.PubMed
14. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 18(2):111-119. 2002.Article PubMed
15. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185-194. 1998.PubMed
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296-308. 2001.PubMed
17. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer P, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of resin human root dentin. J Dent Res 24:435-442. 1996.
18. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 26:609-616. 1998.Article PubMed
19. Shimada Y, Senawonge P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 27:403-409. 2002.PubMed
20. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros SG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 14:194-201. 1998.PubMed
21. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 70:889-893. 1991.Article PubMed PDF
22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin system. J Esth Dent 6:227-244. 1994.
23. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentine bonding-Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. Japan J Conserv Dent 37:882-887. 1994.
24. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer(polyalkenoate) cements to dentin using four conditioners. J Dent 28:361-366. 2000.PubMed
25. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F. The micro-tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1:299-309. 1999.PubMed
26. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212-222. 1998.Article PubMed
27. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 13:101-104. 2000.PubMed
28. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strengths to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surface. J Dent 27:523-530. 1999.PubMed
29. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of bonding systems. Oper Dent 26:375-382. 2001.PubMed
30. Toledano M, Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14(4):205-210. 2001.PubMed
31. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura M, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 78:906-911. 1999.PubMed
32. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primer teeth. Pediatric Dent 23:481-486. 2001.
33. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent 12:77-83. 1999.PubMed
34. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 31:353-358. 2000.PubMed
35. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 18:269-275. 2002.PubMed
36. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699-705. 1999.Article PubMed PDF
37. Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 14:394-398. 1998.PubMed
38. Nunes MF, Swift JR EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. Am J Dent 14:340-343. 2001.PubMed
39. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion of testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117-125. 1995.PubMed
40. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshiyama M, Inoue S, Vargas M, Fukuda R, Okazaki M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Bonding mechanism and micro-tensile bond strength of a 4-MET-based self-etching adhesive. J Dent Res 79((Special Issue) abstract #845):p249. 2000.
41. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biometerial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 79:709-714. 2000.Article PubMed PDF

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29(5):430-438. Published online January 14, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.430

XML Download

Figure

INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

Figure 1. Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus

Figure 2. EZ test for microtensile bond strength test

Figure 3. Microtensile bond strength (MPa) of each group according to priming times of three self-etching primer adhesives to dentin

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

INFLUENCE OF APPICATION TIME OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMERS ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

Adhesives	Component		pH	Manufacturers
Adhesives	Primer	Bonding agent	pH	Manufacturers
Clearfil SE Bond (SE)	MDP, HEMA, water, hydrophilic DMA, photoinitiator	MDP, HEMA, hydrophilic DMA, microfiller, photoinitiator	1.9	Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan

Unifil Bond (UF)	4-MET, HEMA, ethanol, water, initiator	UDMA, HEMA, TEGDMA	2.2	GC Co., Tokyo, Japan

Tyrian SPE + One-Step Plus (TY)	2-acrylamido-2-methyl propanesulfonic acid, Bis (2 methacryloyloxy) ethyl) phosphate, ethanol	BPDM, HEMA, acetone, glass frit, photoinitiator	0.4	Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.

Group	Priming time	Microtensile strength (mean ± S.D.)	Number of specimens
SE group	10 seconds	33.78 ± 7.20^a	20
	20 seconds	73.22 ± 15.10^b	20
	30 seconds	62.80 ± 15.01^b	20
	40 seconds	65.53 ± 18.44^b	20

UF group	10 seconds	22.87 ± 6.53^c	20
	20 seconds	40.04 ± 12.50^d	20
	30 seconds	46.28 ± 9.13^d	20
	40 seconds	41.19 ± 12.00^d,g	20

TY group	10 seconds	47.34 ± 8.19^d,f	20
	20 seconds	53.16 ± 17.95^f	20
	30 seconds	33.98 ± 20.17^a	20
	40 seconds	31.25 ± 13.09^a,g	20

Priming time	Microtensile bond strength	No. of total specimens
10 seconds	34.66 ± 12.40^a	60
20 seconds	55.47 ± 20.42^b	60
30 seconds	47.71 ± 19.42^b,c	60
40 seconds	45.99 ± 20.54^c	60

Table 1. Self-etching primer adhesives, components, pH of primers and manufacturers

Table 2. Microtensile bond strength (MPa) and statistical analysis according to adhesives and priming times

S.D.: Standard Deviation. Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 3. Statistical analysis of mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) at the same priming time

Superscripts of the same letter indicate values of no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05).