The effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength to human dentin

Hyoun-Jin Kim; Bock Hur; Hyun-Cheol Kim

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.281

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(3); 2004 > Article

Original Article The effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength to human dentin: Hyoun-Jin Kim, Bock Hur, Hyun-Cheol Kim; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2004;29(3):281-287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.281
Published online: May 31, 2004

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentisty, Pusan National University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Bock Hur. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentisty, Pusan National University, 1-10 Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Pusan, 602-739, Korea. Tel: 82-51-240-7454, bhur@pusan.ac.kr

17 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength and to determine the failure mode.

Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. The dentin was etched with 37% phosphoric acid. The following adhesives were applied to the etched dentin to manufacturer's directions; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose in group SM, Prime&Bond NT in group NT, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose followed by Tetric-flow in group TR. After adhesive application, a cylinder of resin-based composite was built up on the occlusal surface. Each tooth was sectioned vertically to obtain the 1 × 1mm² "sticks". Microtensile bond strength were determined. Each specimen was observed under stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to examine the failure mode. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA.

The results of this study were as follows;

1. The microtensile bond strength value were; group SM (18.98 ± 3.01MPa), group NT (16.01 ± 4.82MPa) and group TR (17.56 ± 3.22MPa). No significant statistical differences were observed among the groups (P>0.05).

2. Most of specimens showed mixed failure. In group TR, there was a higher number of specimens showing areas of cohesive failure in resin.
Keywords: Microtensile bond strength; Adhesive; Dentin; Stereomicroscope; Scaning eletron microscope; Failure mode

REFERENCES

1. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21(1):17-24.PubMed
2. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent. 1996;9(4):167-173.PubMed
3. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art,1995. Quintessence Int. 1995;26(2):95-110.PubMed
4. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63(12):1396-1399.PubMed
5. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Tensile bond strength of filled and unfilled adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent. 2000;13(2):73-76.PubMed
6. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res. 1988;67(5):841-845.Article PubMed PDF
7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66(11):1636-1639.Article PubMed PDF
8. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990;69(6):1240-1243.PubMed
9. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(4):249-257.PubMed
10. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent. 1996;9(3):100-104.PubMed
11. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993;72(10):1434-1442.Article PubMed PDF
12. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999;15(2):128-137.PubMed
13. Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. Effect of filler content on bonding efficacy of 4-META MMA/TBB bonding agent. Dent Mater J. 1994;13(2):131-137.Article PubMed
14. Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int. 1991 02;22(2):73-74.PubMed
15. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent. 1992;5(4):213-215.PubMed
16. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129(5):567-577.PubMed
17. Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composites. Dent Today. 1998 04;17(4):78-83.
18. Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent. 2001;29(6):435-441.Article PubMed
19. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int. 1986;17(2):103-111.PubMed
20. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001;26(1):44-47.PubMed
21. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater. 1995;11(4):234-238.Article PubMed
22. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1993;6(6):295-298.PubMed
23. Fortin D, Swift EJ Jr, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1994;10(4):253-258.Article PubMed
24. Frankenberger R, Lopes M, Perdigao J, Ambrose WW, Rosa BT. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):227-238.PubMed
25. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(4):315-324.PubMed
26. Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent. 1997;25(6):441-458.Article PubMed
27. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent. 1999;27(4):265-274.Article PubMed
28. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994;10(4):236-240.PubMed
29. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1998;14(3):212-221.Article PubMed
30. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater. 2001;17(3):268-276.Article PubMed
31. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):316-321.Article PubMed
32. Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to human dentin. Am J Dent. 2001;14(6):340-343.PubMed
33. Perdigao J, Swift EJ Jr, Gomes G, Lopes GC. Bond strengths of new simplified dentin-enamel adhesives. Am J Dent. 1999;12(6):286-290.PubMed
34. Kanca J 3rd. One step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1997;10(1):5-8.PubMed
35. Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent. 2003;31(1):59-66.Article PubMed

Figure 1

SEM photomicrograph of the resin/dentin interface produced by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (×1000)

Figure 2

SEM photomicrograph of the resin/dentin interface produced by Prime&Bond NT (×500)

Figure 3

SEM photomicrograph of the resin/dentin interface produced by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Tetric-flow (×300)

Figure 4

SEM photomicrographs of fractured dentin side of specimens. Adhesive failure can be observed (×500)

Figure 5

SEM photomicrographs of fractured dentin side of specimens. Mixed failure can be observed (×1000)

Figure 6

SEM photomicrographs of fractured dentin side of specimens. Cohesive failure in resin can be observed (×1000)

Table 1

Materials

Table 2

Bonding procedures

Table 3

Microtensile bond strength(MTBS; Unit: MPa, Mean ± SD)

Table 4

Failure mode

Type A : adhesive failure between bonding resin and dentin

Type B : mixed failure (above 50% adhesive failure)

Type C : mixed failure (below 50% adhesive failure)

Type D : cohesive failure in resin

Type E : cohesive failure in dentin

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format: