Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81
Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83
Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 The etching effects and microtensile bond strength of total etching and self-etching adhesive system on unground enamel
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Korea.
Corresponding author: Bock Hur. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentisty, Pusan National University, 1-10 Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Pusan, 602-739, Korea. Tel: 82-51-240-7454, bhur@pusan.ac.kr
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the etching effects and bond strength of total etching and self-etching adhesive system on unground enamel using scanning electron microscopy and microtensile bond strength test.
The buccal coronal unground enamel from human extracted molars were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (group SM), Clearfil SE Bond (group SE), or Adper Prompt L-Pop (group LP) were applied to the prepared teeth, and the blocks of resin composite (Filtek Z250) were built up incrementally. Resin tag formation was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, after removal of enamel surface by acid dissolution and dehydration. For microtensile bond strength test, resin-bonded teeth were sectioned to give a bonded surface area of 1mm2. Microtensile bond strength test was perfomed.
The results of this study were as follows.
1. A definite etching pattern was observed in Scotchbond Multi-Purpose group.
2. Self-etching groups were characterized as shallow and irregular etching patterns.
3. The results (mean) of microtensile bond strength were SM; 26.55 MPa, SE; 18.15 MPa, LP; 15.57 MPa. SM had significantly higher microtensile bond strength than SE and PL (p < 0.05), but there was no significant differance between SE and PL.
1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34: 849-853.ArticlePubMedPDF
2. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. Review. J Dent. 1998;26(1):1-20.PubMed
3. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin Ch, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001;29: 55-61.PubMed
4. Perdigão J, Lopes M. Dentin Bonding-Questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1: 191-209.PubMed
5. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(6):528-533.ArticlePubMed
6. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Intercrystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(6):464-470.ArticlePubMed
7. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 1998;14(2):99-105.PubMed
8. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent. 1999;24(3):172-180.PubMed
9. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent. 1997;10(3):141-146.PubMed
10. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41.ArticlePubMed
11. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999;27: 523-530.PubMed
12. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobbb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(2):115-124.PubMed
13. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent. 1995;20(1):34-38.PubMed
14. Mjor IA, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent. 1997;25(1):25-30.ArticlePubMed
15. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Smale I. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26(4):319-327.PubMed
16. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. Review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131: Suppl. 20S-25S.PubMed
17. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Related Articles, Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 1998;14(2):99-105.PubMed
19. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17(5):430-444.PubMed
20. Ripa LW, Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. The 'prismless' outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1966;11: 41-48.ArticlePubMed
21. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1982;27(5):383-392.ArticlePubMed
22. Nathanson D, Bodkin JL, Evans JR. SEM of etching patterns in surface and subsurface enamel. J Pedod. 1982;7(1):11-17.PubMed
23. Cehreli ZC, Altay N. Effects of a non-rinse conditioner and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the etch pattern of intact human permanent enamel. Angle Orthodont. 2000;70: 22-27.PubMed
24. Mcintyre J. In: Mount GJ, Hume WR, editors. The nature and progression of dental caries. Preservation and Restoration of Tooth Structure. 1998;London: Mosby Inernational Ltd; 9.
25. Itou K, Torii Y, Suzuki K, Inoue K. Adhesion of restorative resin to tooth-adhesion promotes by Liner Bond III. Adhesive Dent. 1994;12: 174.