Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Search
Advanced Search
OPEN ACCESS
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 37(1); 2012 > Article
Erratum Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery
Minju Song, Euiseong Kim
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2012;37(1):66-66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.66
Published online: February 4, 2012

Copyright © 2012 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 56 Views
  • 1 Download
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

Table 1.
Studies on the success rate of endodontic microsurgery
Study Sample size Follow up period Recall rate Magnification Root-end preparation Root-end filling material Root-end filling material Methodology
Rubinstein & Kim(1999)32 128 14 mon 94/128 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 96.8 Prospective
Rubinstein & Kim(2002)41 91 5 – 7 yr 59/91 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
Chong et al. (2003)16 122 1 – 2 yr 108/122 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
IRM		 92
87		 Prospective
Taschieri et al. (2006)18 80 1 yr 71/80 Endoscope Loupe Ultrasonic EBA 94.9
90.6		 RCT
Tsesis et al. (2006)20 110 > 6 mon 88/110 Microscope No aid Ultrasonic Bur IRM 91.1
44.2		 Retrospective
Taschieri et al. (2007)33 30 1 yr 28/30 Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 93 Prospective
Von Arx et al. (2007)34 194 1 yr 191/194 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Retroplast, Super EBA 83.8 Prospective
Von Arx et al. (2007)30 183 1 yr 177/183 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Super EBA 83 Prospective
Taschieri et al. (2008)35 113 > 2 yr 100/113 Microscope Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 92
90		 RCT
Saunder et al. (2008)14 321 4 – 72 mon 276/321 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA 88.8 Prospective
Kim et al. (2008)8 263 1 – 5 yr 192/263 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
Christiansen et al.(2009)13 52 1 yr 46/52 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
GP Smoothing		 96
52		 RCT
Von Arx et al. (2010)31 353 1 yr 339/353 Microscope Sonic MTA
Retroplast		 91.3
79.5		 Prospective
Song et al. (2011)10 54 1 – 7 yr 42/54 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 92.9 Prospective

MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate; GP, gutta-percha; RCT, randomized controlled trial study.

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery
        Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(1):66-66.   Published online February 4, 2012
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.66
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Related articles
      Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery
      Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery

      Studies on the success rate of endodontic microsurgery

      Study Sample size Follow up period Recall rate Magnification Root-end preparation Root-end filling material Root-end filling material Methodology
      Rubinstein & Kim(1999)32 128 14 mon 94/128 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 96.8 Prospective
      Rubinstein & Kim(2002)41 91 5 – 7 yr 59/91 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
      Chong et al. (2003)16 122 1 – 2 yr 108/122 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
      IRM      		 92
      87      		 Prospective
      Taschieri et al. (2006)18 80 1 yr 71/80 Endoscope Loupe Ultrasonic EBA 94.9
      90.6      		 RCT
      Tsesis et al. (2006)20 110 > 6 mon 88/110 Microscope No aid Ultrasonic Bur IRM 91.1
      44.2      		 Retrospective
      Taschieri et al. (2007)33 30 1 yr 28/30 Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 93 Prospective
      Von Arx et al. (2007)34 194 1 yr 191/194 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Retroplast, Super EBA 83.8 Prospective
      Von Arx et al. (2007)30 183 1 yr 177/183 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Super EBA 83 Prospective
      Taschieri et al. (2008)35 113 > 2 yr 100/113 Microscope Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 92
      90      		 RCT
      Saunder et al. (2008)14 321 4 – 72 mon 276/321 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA 88.8 Prospective
      Kim et al. (2008)8 263 1 – 5 yr 192/263 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
      Christiansen et al.(2009)13 52 1 yr 46/52 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
      GP Smoothing      		 96
      52      		 RCT
      Von Arx et al. (2010)31 353 1 yr 339/353 Microscope Sonic MTA
      Retroplast      		 91.3
      79.5      		 Prospective
      Song et al. (2011)10 54 1 – 7 yr 42/54 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 92.9 Prospective

      MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate; GP, gutta-percha; RCT, randomized controlled trial study.
      Table 1. Studies on the success rate of endodontic microsurgery

      MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate; GP, gutta-percha; RCT, randomized controlled trial study.

      Table 1.

      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      © The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.
      Close layer
      TOP