The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Jung-Mi Kwon; Kyung-Kyu Choi; Sang-Jin Park

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 29(1); 2004 > Article

Original Article The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity: Jung-Mi Kwon, Kyung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Jin Park^,; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2004;29(1):1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1
Published online: January 14, 2004

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University

Corresponding author: Sang-Jin Park, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduated School of Kyung Hee University 1, Hoegi Dong, Dongdaemoon Gu, Seoul, 130-702, Korea, Tel : 02) 958-9335, E-mail : psangjin@khu.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

20 Views
0 Download

Full Article

Download PDF

REFERENCES

Fig. 1.

Specimen preparation for tensile bonding test: A) cavity preparation on buccal cervical area, B) adhesive systems bonding and restoration, additional composite build-up, C) vertical slice with 1mm thickness, D) trimmed specimen with hour glass shape.

Fig. 2.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Occlusal wall

Fig. 3.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Gingival wall

Fig. 4.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths of occlusal and gingival wall

Fig. 5A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 5B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 6A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 6B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 7A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 7B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 8A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 8B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 9A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 9B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the gingival wall.

Table 1.

Materials used in this study

Products		Main Components	Manufacturer
*Resin modified glass ionomer*
Fuji Ⅱ LC		fluoroaluminum silicate glass,	GC Co.
		polyacrylic acid, HEMA	(Tokyo, Japan)
Dentin Conditioner		20% polyacrylic acid with 3% AlCl3
*Compomer*
Dyract AP		resin, strontium-fluoro silicate glass
Prime & Bond NT	Etchant	36% Phosphoric acid	Dentsply Caulk
	Adhesive	UDMA, PENTA, nanofiller, acetone, trimethacrylate resin	(Milford, USA)
Non Rinse Conditioner		itaconic acid, maleic acid
*Self-etching system*
Clearfil SE Bond	Primer	MDP, HEMA, water	Kuraray Co.
	Adhesive	dimethacrylate, microfiller, MDP, HEMA	(Osaka, Japan)
*Self-priming system*
Single Bond	Etchant	37% Phosphoric acid	3M Co.
	Adhesive	HEMA, Bis-GMA, ethanol, water	(St. Paul, MN,
		Polyalkenoic acid copolymer	USA)
*Resin composite*
Clearfil AP-X		Barium glass, silicone dioxide,	Kuraray Co.
		3.0§(0.1~15§), 84.5wt％	(Osaka, Japan)

Bis-GMA=Bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate

HEMA=Hydroxyethylmethacrylate

MDP=methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2.

Five experimental groups

Group	Materials
GI	Fuji Ⅱ LC	Dentin Conditioner
DE	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with Etching)
DN	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with NRC)
SE	Clearfil AP-X	Clearfil SE Bond
SB	Clearfil AP-X	Single Bond

Table 3.

Micro-tensile bond strength of experimental groups (Unit : MPa±SD)

Group	Occlusal wall	Gingival wall
GI	23.27± 8.63^a	15.09± 5.10^a
DE	29.84±10.54^ab	16.52± 4.14^a
DN	29.63± 9.94^abA	22.53±11.90^abA
SE	36.34±11.11^b	27.51± 7.99^b
SB	36.47±13.39^bA	30.20±12.40^bA

Mean values with the same uppercase and lowercase superscript letters are not statistically different(p>0.05).

REFERENCES

1. Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stanabury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement. US patent application. 160856. 1988.
2. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 27:203-209. 1996.PubMed
3. Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a com-pomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class Ⅲ restoration. Am J Dent 9:195-198. 1996.PubMed
4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34:849-853. 1955.Article PubMed PDF
5. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic 1:78-81. 1982.
6. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 25:355-372. 1997.Article PubMed
7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão P, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1-20. 1998.Article PubMed
8. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured phenyl-P in TEGDMA to smear layer-retained dentin. Quintessence Int 24:335-342. 1993.PubMed
9. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706-1715. 1996.Article PubMed PDF
10. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185-194. 1998.PubMed
11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73:1212-1220. 1994.Article PubMed PDF
12. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404-1413. 1996.Article PubMed PDF
13. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435-442. 1996.PubMed
14. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-240. 1994.PubMed
15. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-effected dentin using adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679-1688. 1995.Article PubMed PDF
16. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Boschian L, Burrow M, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami T. Effect of water and regional difference on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 76:20 Abstract 56. 1997.
17. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Pashley DH. Effect of C-factor and depth on bonding strength to dentin. J Dent Res 76:39 Abstract 201. 1997.
18. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 13:236-240. 1994.Article PubMed
19. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J 3rd. Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent 5:315-317. 1992.PubMed
20. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage : leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18-25. 1995.PubMed
21. Wang T, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 2-(methacryloxy) ethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 70:59-66. 1991.Article PubMed PDF
22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure : A comparison of glass-ionomer and composite resin systems. J Esthet Dent 6:227-244. 1994.Article PubMed
23. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Tei R, Tagami J. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent 10:128-132. 1997.PubMed
24. Valeria VG, Daniel B, Karl-John S. Enamel and dentin shear bond strength of two resin-modified glass ionomers and two resin baced adhesives. J Dent 26:497-503. 1998.PubMed
25. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 77:1749-59. 1998.Article PubMed PDF
26. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glasss ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 31:261-266. 2000.PubMed
27. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 25:20-25. 2000.PubMed
28. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubular orientation on the bond strength between resin and dentin. J Dent 27:265-274. 1999.PubMed
29. Non-Rinse Conditioner(NRC). Dentsply Technical Manual. Konstanz, Germany: 1998.
30. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin Primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 24:81-88. 1994.
31. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26:27-35. 2001.PubMed
32. Perdigão J, May Jr KN, Wilder Jr AD, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid laayer. Oper Dent 25:186-194. 2000.PubMed
33. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180-187. 2000.Article PubMed
34. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-bonding. Quintessence Int 26:733-738. 1995.PubMed
35. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acidic conditioners on dentin demineralization and dimension of hybrid layers. J Dent 26:211-216. 1996.
36. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 73:1205-1211. 1994.Article PubMed PDF
37. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442. 1993.Article PubMed PDF
38. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117-125. 1995.Article PubMed

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29(1):1-12. Published online January 14, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1

XML Download

Figure

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Fig. 1. Specimen preparation for tensile bonding test: A) cavity preparation on buccal cervical area, B) adhesive systems bonding and restoration, additional composite build-up, C) vertical slice with 1mm thickness, D) trimmed specimen with hour glass shape.

Fig. 2. Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Occlusal wall

Fig. 3. Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Gingival wall

Fig. 4. Micro-tensile Bond Strengths of occlusal and gingival wall

Fig. 5A. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 5B. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 6A. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 6B. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 7A. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 7B. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 8A. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 8B. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 9A. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 9B. SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5A.

Fig. 5B.

Fig. 6A.

Fig. 6B.

Fig. 7A.

Fig. 7B.

Fig. 8A.

Fig. 8B.

Fig. 9A.

Fig. 9B.

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Products		Main Components	Manufacturer
*Resin modified glass ionomer*
Fuji Ⅱ LC		fluoroaluminum silicate glass,	GC Co.
		polyacrylic acid, HEMA	(Tokyo, Japan)
Dentin Conditioner		20% polyacrylic acid with 3% AlCl3
*Compomer*
Dyract AP		resin, strontium-fluoro silicate glass
Prime & Bond NT	Etchant	36% Phosphoric acid	Dentsply Caulk
	Adhesive	UDMA, PENTA, nanofiller, acetone, trimethacrylate resin	(Milford, USA)
Non Rinse Conditioner		itaconic acid, maleic acid
*Self-etching system*
Clearfil SE Bond	Primer	MDP, HEMA, water	Kuraray Co.
	Adhesive	dimethacrylate, microfiller, MDP, HEMA	(Osaka, Japan)
*Self-priming system*
Single Bond	Etchant	37% Phosphoric acid	3M Co.
	Adhesive	HEMA, Bis-GMA, ethanol, water	(St. Paul, MN,
		Polyalkenoic acid copolymer	USA)
*Resin composite*
Clearfil AP-X		Barium glass, silicone dioxide,	Kuraray Co.
		3.0§(0.1~15§), 84.5wt％	(Osaka, Japan)

Group	Materials
GI	Fuji Ⅱ LC	Dentin Conditioner
DE	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with Etching)
DN	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with NRC)
SE	Clearfil AP-X	Clearfil SE Bond
SB	Clearfil AP-X	Single Bond

Group	Occlusal wall	Gingival wall
GI	23.27± 8.63^a	15.09± 5.10^a
DE	29.84±10.54^ab	16.52± 4.14^a
DN	29.63± 9.94^abA	22.53±11.90^abA
SE	36.34±11.11^b	27.51± 7.99^b
SB	36.47±13.39^bA	30.20±12.40^bA

Table 1. Materials used in this study

Bis-GMA=Bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate

HEMA=Hydroxyethylmethacrylate

MDP=methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2. Five experimental groups

Table 3. Micro-tensile bond strength of experimental groups (Unit : MPa±SD)

Mean values with the same uppercase and lowercase superscript letters are not statistically different(p>0.05).