Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Separated instruments"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Article
Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic tips versus the Terauchi file retrieval kit for the removal of separated endodontic instruments
Preeti Jain Pruthi, Ruchika Roongta Nawal, Sangeeta Talwar, Mahesh Verma
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(2):e14.   Published online February 6, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e14
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objective

The aim of this study was to perform a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic tips versus the Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) for the removal of broken endodontic instruments.

Materials and Methods

A total of 80 extracted human first mandibular molars with moderate root canal curvature were selected. Following access cavity preparation canal patency was established with a size 10/15 K-file in the mesiobuccal canals of all teeth. The teeth were divided into 2 groups of 40 teeth each: the P group (ProUltra tips) and the T group (TFRK). Each group was further subdivided into 2 smaller groups of 20 teeth each according to whether ProTaper F1 rotary instruments were fractured in either the coronal third (C constituting the PC and TC groups) or the middle third (M constituting the PM and TM groups). Instrument retrieval was performed using either ProUltra tips or the TFRK.

Results

The overall success rate at removing the separated instrument was 90% in group P and 95% in group T (p > 0.05) The mean time for instrument removal was higher with the ultrasonic tips than with the TFRK (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both systems are acceptable clinical tools for instrument retrieval but the loop device in the TFRK requires slightly more dexterity than is needed for the ProUltra tips.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of the pull-out force of different microtube-based methods in fractured endodontic instrument removal: An in-vitro study
    Nasim Hashemi, Mohsen Aminsobhani, Mohammad Javad Kharazifard, Fatemeh Hamidzadeh, Pegah Sarraf
    BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Broken Instrument Removal Methods with a Minireview of the Literature
    Mohsen Aminsobhani, Nasim Hashemi, Fatemeh Hamidzadeh, Pegah Sarraf, Giovanni Mergoni
    Case Reports in Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Assessment of Cyclic Fatigue Strength in Five Multiple-File Nickel–Titanium Endodontic Systems
    Jorge N. R. Martins, Emmanuel J. N. L. Silva, Duarte Marques, Francisco M. Braz Fernandes, Marco A. Versiani
    Materials.2024; 17(10): 2345.     CrossRef
  • Management of an Intracanal Separated Instrument in the Lower Right First Molar: A Case Report
    Pratik Rathod, Aditya Patel, Anuja Ikhar, Manoj Chandak, Joyeeta Mahapatra, Tejas Suryawanshi, Jay Patil, Priti Mahale
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors in the retrieval of endodontic instruments: the relationship between the fragment length and location
    Ricardo Portigliatti, Eugenia Pilar Consoli Lizzi, Pablo Alejandro Rodríguez
    Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of two instrument retrieval techniques in removing separated rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium files in mandibular molars – An in vitro study
    S. Jitesh, Smita Surendran, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(12): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Nickel-Titanium Instruments
    Eunmi Kim, Jung-Hong Ha, Samuel O. Dorn, Ya Shen, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Sang Won Kwak
    Journal of Endodontics.2024; 50(2): 213.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of instrument removal techniques in root canal treatment: a literature review
    Rómulo Guillermo López Torres, Jairo Romario Moreno Ochoa, Verónica Alejandra Salame Ortiz
    Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of the HBW Ultrasonic Ring for retrieval of fragmented manual or rotatory instruments
    Jennifer Galván-Pacheco, Verónica Méndez-González, Ana González-Amaro, Heriberto Bujanda-Wong, Amaury Pozos-Guillén, Arturo Garrocho-Rangel
    Journal of Oral Science.2023; 65(4): 278.     CrossRef
  • Retrieving Fragments
    Swayangprabha Sarangi, Manoj Ghanshyamdasji Chandak, Kajol Naresh Relan, Payal Sandeep Chaudhari, Pooja Chandak, Anuja Ikhar
    Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University.2022; 17(2): 429.     CrossRef
  • A novel approach for retrieval of separated endodontic instrument: Two case reports
    Tanvi Kohli, Syed Shahid Hilal
    IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics.2022; 7(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • A novel endodontic extractor needle for separated instrument retrieval
    Saaid Al Shehadat, Colin Alexander Murray, Sunaina Shetty Yadadi
    Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences.2022; 1(2): 116.     CrossRef
  • Present status and future directions: Removal of fractured instruments
    Yoshi Terauchi, Wagih Tarek Ali, Mohamed Mohsen Abielhassan
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(S3): 685.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasonic Use in Endodontic Management Approach, Review Article
    Bakheet Mohammed Al-Ghannam, Khalid Abdulmohsen Almuhrij, Rund Talal Basfar, Raghad Omar Alamoudi, Aseel Mohammed Alqahtani, Ahmed Atef Sait, Ahmed Loay Ghannam, Sultan Khalid Abdoun
    World Journal of Environmental Biosciences.2021; 10(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • The Time Taken for Retrieval of Separated Instrument and the Change in Root Canal Volume after Two Different Techniques Using Cbct
    Balu Santhosh Kumar, Sridevi Krishnamoorthy, Sandhya Shanmugam, Angambakkam Rajasekharan PradeepKumar
    Indian Journal of Dental Research.2021; 32(4): 489.     CrossRef
  • 480 View
  • 26 Download
  • 15 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP