Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Push-Out Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements Following Post Space Irrigation with 2% Chitosan: An In Vitro Study
  Shimaa Rifaat, Ahmed Rahoma, Hind Muneer Alharbi, Sawsan Jamal Kazim, Shrouq Ali Aljuaid, Basmah Omar Alakloby, Faraz A. Farooqi, Noha Taymour
  Prosthesis.2025; 7(1): 18.     CrossRef
• Dentin bond strength of resin luting agents under a simulated intra-oral environment
  Takashi Washino, Hanemi Tsuruta, Masaomi Ikeda, Michael F. Burrow, Toru Nikaido
  Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry.2024; 24(2): 13.     CrossRef
• Effects of a relined fiberglass post with conventional and self-adhesive resin cement
  Wilton Lima dos Santos Junior, Marina Rodrigues Santi, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins
  Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Effect of dentin moisture on the adhesive properties of luting fiber posts using adhesive strategies
  Renata Terumi JITUMORI, Rafaela Caroline RODRIGUES, Alessandra REIS, João Carlos GOMES, Giovana Mongruel GOMES
  Brazilian Oral Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Influence of different intraradicular chemical pretreatments on the bond strength of adhesive interface between dentine and fiber post cements: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
  Ana Luiza Barbosa Jurema, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira Correia, Manuela da Silva Spinola, Eduardo Bresciani, Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele
  European Journal of Oral Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• SELF ADEZİV REZİN SİMANLAR / SELF ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS
  Kübra AMAÇ, Engin ESENTÜRK, Bilge TURHAN BAL
  Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2022; : 1.     CrossRef
• Postspace pretreatment with 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 1% phytic acid on bond strength of fiber posts luted with a self-adhesive resin cement
  PriyaC Yadav, Ramya Raghu, Ashish Shetty, Subhashini Rajasekhara
  Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(6): 558.     CrossRef
• Development and characterization of biological bovine dentin posts
  Alice Gonçalves Penelas, Eduardo Moreira da Silva, Laiza Tatiana Poskus, Amanda Cypriano Alves, Isis Ingrid Nogueira Simões, Viviane Hass, José Guilherme Antunes Guimarães
  Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2019; 92: 197.     CrossRef
• Evaluation of the influence of time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite on the bond strength of glass fibre post
  Beau Knight, Robert M. Love, Roy George
  Australian Endodontic Journal.2018; 44(3): 267.     CrossRef
• Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review
  F. C. Dos Santos, M. D. Banea, H. L. Carlo, S. De Barros
  The Journal of Adhesion.2017; 93(1-2): 159.     CrossRef
• Is the bonding of self-adhesive cement sensitive to root region and curing mode?
  Thaynara Faelly BOING, Giovana Mongruel GOMES, João Carlos GOMES, Alessandra REIS, Osnara Maria Mongruel GOMES
  Journal of Applied Oral Science.2017; 25(1): 2.     CrossRef
• A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
  Hanaa El Attar, Omnia Elhiny, Ghada Salem, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Mazen Attia
  Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2016; 4(4): 695.     CrossRef
• Shear bond strengths of various self-adhesive resin cements between bovine dentin and 4 types of adherends
  Ah-Jin Kim, Da-Ryeong Park, Seunghan Oh, Ji-Myung Bae
  Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2015; 42(4): 365.     CrossRef

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS), failure modes and bonding interfaces of self-etching and three self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and indirect composite resin.

Cylindrical composite blocks (Tescera, Bisco Inc.) were luted with resin cements (PA: Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray Medical Inc., RE: RelyX Unicem Clicker, 3M ESPE., MA: Maxem, Kerr Co., BI: BisCem, Bisco Inc.) on the prepared occlusal dentin surfaces of 20 extracted molars. After storage in distilled water for 24 h, 1.0 mm × 1.0 mm composite-dentin beams were prepared. µTBS was tested at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Dentin sides of all fractured specimens and interfaces of resin cements-dentin or resin cements-composite were examined at FE-SEM (Field Emission-Scanning Electron Microscope).

In conclusion, PA and RE showed higher bond strength and closer adaptation than MA and BI when indirect composite blocks were luted to dentin using a self-etching and three self-adhesive resin cements.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic and compare these result with that of conventional resin cement. For this study, four self-adhesive resin cements (Rely-X Unicem, Embrace Wetbond, Mexcem, BisCem), one conventional resin cement (Rely-X ARC) and one restorative resin composite (Z-350) were used. In order to evaluate the physical properties, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength were measured. To evaluate the shear bond strength on dentin, each cement was adhered to buccal dentinal surface of extracted human lower molars. Dentin bonding agent was applied after acid etching for groups of Rely-X ARC and Z-350. In order to evaluate the shear bond strength on ceramic, lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS Empress 2) disks were prepared. Only Rely-X ARC and Z-350 groups were pretreated with hydrofluoric acid and silane. And then each resin cement was adhered to ceramic surface in 2 mm diameter. Physical properties and shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine.

Results were as follows

1. BisCem showed the lowest compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and flexural strength. (P<0.05)

2. Self-adhesive resin cements showed significantly lower shear bond strength on the dentin and lithium disilicate ceramic than Rely-X ARC and Z-350 (P<0.05)

In conclusion, self-adhesive resin cements represent the lower physical properties and shear bond strength than a conventional resin cement.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Compressive Strength Evaluation in Brazed ZrO2/Ti6Al4V Joints Using Finite Element Analysis
  Ashutosh Sharma, Se Ho Kee, Flora Jung, Yongku Heo, Jae Pil Jung
  Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.2016; 25(5): 1722.     CrossRef
• Shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to resin-coated dentin
  Jee-Youn Hong, Cheol-Woo Park, Jeong-Uk Heo, Min-Ki Bang, Jae-Jun Ryu
  The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2013; 51(1): 27.     CrossRef
• Effect of curing modes on micro-hardness of dual-cure resin cements
  Ki-Deok Lee, Se-Hee Park, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Mo Cho
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(2): 132.     CrossRef
• The effect of the strength and wetting characteristics of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based adhesives on the bond strength to dentin
  Eun-Sook Park, Chang-Keun Kim, Ji-Hyun Bae, Byeong-Hoon Cho
  Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(2): 139.     CrossRef

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strength of several self-adhesive resin cements bonded to dentin surfaces with different wet conditions.

Three self-adhesive resin cements; Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent, Oakland, MA, USA), Maxcem (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) were used. Extracted sixty human molars were used. Each self-adhesive resin cement was adhered to the dentin specimens (two rectangular sticks from each molar) in different wet conditions.

Tensile bond strength were measured using universal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. After the testing, bonding failures of specimens were observed by Operative microscope (OPMI pro, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). T-test was used to evaluate the effect of dentin surface wetness. One-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate the tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements in the same condition. Scheffe's test was used for statistical analyzing at the 95% level of confidence.

The result showed that wetness of dentin surface didn't affect tensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements and Maxcem showed the lowest tensile bond strength.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Impact of Overdried Preparation and Thermocycling on the Fracture of CAD–CAM Hybrid Ceramic Occlusal Veneer Restorations
  Daranee Tantbirojn, Antheunis Versluis, Paul D Edgerley, David R Cagna
  International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry.2019; 9(2): 38.     CrossRef
• Effects of dentin moisture on the push-out bond strength of a fiber post luted with different self-adhesive resin cements
  Sevinç Aktemur Türker, Emel Uzunoğlu, Zeliha Yılmaz
  Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2013; 38(4): 234.     CrossRef
• 'Wet or Dry tooth surface?' - for self-adhesive resin cement
  Jeong-Won Park
  Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2012; 37(4): 249.     CrossRef

The purpose of this study was to compare the apical microleakage in root canal filled with Resilon by methacrylate-based root canal sealer or 2 different self-adhesive resin cements. Seventy single-rooted extracted human teeth were sectioned at the CEJ perpendicular to the long axis of the roots with diamond disk. Canal preparation was performed with crown-down technique using Profile NiTi rotary instruments and GG drill. Each canal was prepared to ISO size 40, .04 taper and 1 mm short from the apex. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups of 15 roots each and 5 roots each for positive and negative control group. The root canals were filled by lateral condensation as follows. Group 1: Guttapercha with AH-26, Group 2: Resilon with RealSeal primer & sealer, Group 3: Resilon with Rely-X Unicem, Group 4: Resilon with BisCem. After stored in 37℃, 100% humidity chamber for 7 days, the roots were coated with 2 layers of nail varnish except apical 3 mm. The roots were then immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 7 days. Apical microleakage was measured by a maximum length of linear dye penetration after roots were separated longitudinally. One way ANOVA and Scheffe's post-hoc test were performed for statistical analysis. Group 1 showed the least apical leakage and there was no statistical significance between Group 2, 3, 4. According to the results, the self adhesive resin cement is possible to use as sealer instead of primer & sealant when root canal filled by Resilon.