Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Packable composite"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Amount of polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress in composites and compomers for posterior restoration
Sung-Ho Park, Soon-Young Lee, Yong-Sik Cho, Su-Sun Kim, Chang-Jae Lee, Young-Joo Kim, Bong-Hee Lee, Kouang-Sung Lee, Byung-Duk Noh
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003;28(4):348-353.   Published online July 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.348
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of present study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress and amount of linear shrinkage of composites and compomers for posterior restoration.

For this purpose, linear polymerization shrinkage and polymerization stress were measured.

For linear polymerization shrinklage and polymerization stress measurement, custom made Linometer (R&B, Daejon, Korea) and Stress measuring machine was used (R&B, Daejon, Korea). Compositers and compomers were evaluated; Dyract AP (Dentsply Detrey, Gumbh. German) Z100 (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, USA) Surefil (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, USA) Pyramid(Bisco, Schaumburg, USA) Synergy Compact (Coltene, Altstatten, Switzerland), Heliomolar (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Liechtenstein), and Compoglass (Vivadent Ivoclar/Liechtenstein) were used. 15 measurements were made for each material. Linear polymerization shrinkage or polymerization stress for each material was compared with one way ANOVA with Tukey at 95% levels of confidence.

For linear shrinkage; Heliomolar, Surefil<Synergy Compact, Z100<Dyract AP<Pyramid, Compoglass F (p<0.05)

For Shrinkage stress; Heliomolar<Z100, Pyramid<Synergy Compact, Compoglass F<Dyract AP<Heliomolar HB, Surefil (p<0.05)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A comparative study on color and dimensional stability of esthetic indirect dental materials
    Hye-Yun Heo, Hyo-Jin Son, Yu-Ri Heo, Mee-Kyoung Son
    Oral Biology Research.2019; 43(4): 306.     CrossRef
  • Measurement of the Internal Adaptation of Resin Composites Using Micro-CT and Its Correlation With Polymerization Shrinkage
    HJ Kim, SH Park
    Operative Dentistry.2014; 39(2): e57.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Premolar Cuspal Deflection in Bulk or in Incremental Composite Restoration Methods
    ME Kim, SH Park
    Operative Dentistry.2011; 36(3): 326.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intermittent polymerization on the rate of polymerization shrinkage and cuspal deflection in composite resin
    Min Kyung Kim, Sung Ho Park, Deog Gyu Seo, Yun Jung Song, Yoon Lee, Chan Young Lee
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(4): 341.     CrossRef
  • Correlation Between the Amount of Linear Polymerization Shrinkage and Cuspal Deflection
    S-Y. Lee, S-H. Park
    Operative Dentistry.2006; 31(3): 364.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between Linear polymerization shrinkage & tooth cuspal deflection
    Soon-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2005; 30(6): 442.     CrossRef
  • 180 View
  • 0 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Microleakage of posterior packable composite resin at the gingival margins of class II cavities
Su-Jin Choi, Mi-Ja Kim, Hyuk-Choon Kwon
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27(3):249-256.   Published online May 31, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.249
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The use of flowable composite resins as liners in class II packable composite restoration has been suggested by some manufacturers. However, the contributions of this technique are unproven. The purpose of this study was to compare the gingival microleakage in class II packable composite restorations with or without the use of flowable composite resins as liners.

Slot cavities were prepared on both proximals of 80 extracted human molars and randomly assigned to 8 groups of 20 each. The gingival margins were located at 1mm above CEJ in 80 cavities (group1-4) and 1mm below CEJ in 80 cavities (group5-8). The prepared teeth were mounted in the customized tray with adjacent teeth to simulate clinical conditions and metallic matrix band (Sectional matrix) and wooden wedges were applied. After acid etching and application of Single Bond, each group was restored with the following materials using incremental placement technique: Group 1,5 (Filtek P60), group 2, 3, 4 and group 6, 7, 8 (AeliteFlo, TetricFlow, Revolution/Filtek P60). All specimens were thermocycled 500 times between 5℃ and 55℃ with 1 mimute dwell time, immersed 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and then rinsed with tab water. The specimens were embedded in clear resin and sectioned longitudinally through the center of restoration with a low speed diamond saw. Dye penetration at gingival margin was viewed at 20 magnification and analyzed on a scale of 0 to 4. Kruscal-Wallis One way analysis and Mann-Whitney Rank sum test were used to analyze the results.

The results of this study were as follows.

1. The leakage values seen at the enamel margin were significantly lower than those seen at the dentin margin(P<0.05).

2. On the enamel margin, packable composite resins with flowable liners showed lower leakage than those without flowable liners, but there were no significant differences among the four groups(P>0.05).

3. On the dentin margin, four groups demonstrated moderate to severe leakage, and there were no significant differences in leakage values(P>0.05).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Self-adhesion of low-viscosity composites to dentin surface
    Tae-Hee Cho, Kyoung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Hyuk Park, Sang-Jin Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2003; 28(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • 166 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP