Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Enamel margin"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity
Sang-Bae Bae, Young-Gon Cho, Myeong-Seon Lee
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009;34(6):477-483.   Published online November 30, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.477
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of low and high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities applied with 1-step adhesives.

Forty class V cavities were prepared on the cervices of buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted molar teeth and divided into four groups (n=8). Cavities were restored with AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo α, G-Bond/UniFil LoFlo Plus (Low flow groups), AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo and G-Bond/UniFil Flow (High flow group), respectively.

Specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed microleakages at the enamel and dentinal margins.

In conclusion, the low viscosity flowable resins showed lower marginal microleakage than do the high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities.

  • 147 View
  • 1 Download
Close layer
Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives
Young-Gon Cho, Jin-Ho Jeong, Young-Jae Ki, Hee-Young Choi, Cheul-Hee Jin, Sang-Hoon Yoo, Jong-Uk Kim, Byung-Cheul Park
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(2):162-169.   Published online March 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.162
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3), Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5).

The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests.

The results of this study were as follows;

Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).

Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05).

Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups.

In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin
    Young-Gon Cho, Young-Jae Kee
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2005; 30(4): 312.     CrossRef
  • Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths
    Young-Gon Cho, Cheol-Hee Jin, Jung-Bum Min
    Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2005; 30(4): 319.     CrossRef
  • 153 View
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP