Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Clinical trial"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Article
Single-session associative protocol for dentin hypersensitivity management: a 1-year randomized, blinded clinical study
Thayna Carolina Zeni, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso, Rafael da Silva Vanolli, Márcio José Mendonça, Julio Katuhide Ueda, Veridiana Camilotti
Restor Dent Endod 2024;49(2):e15.   Published online March 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e15
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to establish a single-session associative protocol for non-restorative management of dentin hypersensitivity (DH).

Materials and Methods

Twenty-four individuals with DH and a minimum sensitivity level of 4 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were selected. The study was conducted in a split-mouth design, with each participant (n = 20) having at least 1 affected tooth in all quadrants. The management protocols consisted of control group: universal adhesive, Neural Desensitizing Protocol group: 5% potassium nitrate, Mixed Desensitizing Protocol (PAM) group: 5% sodium fluoride and 5% potassium nitrate, Remineralizing Desensitizing Protocol (PDR) group: surface-partially reacted glass technology photopolymerizable varnish. Evaluations were performed immediately after application, at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 12 months using the VAS sensitivity test.

Results

The scores were subjected to statistical analysis using the Friedman test (p < 0.05), Durbin-Conover test (p < 0.05), and Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). At the 12-month evaluation, all groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the initial assessment. For the evaluation after 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the PAM group, the control group, and the PDR group.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that all groups were effective in controlling DH, but there were significant results in the control group and PDR group. The clinical relevance of this study is to demonstrate that the application of single-session desensitizing protocols can be effective in controlling DH for up to 12 months.

Trial Registration

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: RBR-4r63d7s

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Desensitizing efficacy of a universal dentin adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth model
    Hyun-Jung Kim, Soram Oh, Jiyoung Kwon, Kyoung-Kyu Choi, Ji-Hyun Jang, Duck-Su Kim
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 132 View
  • 11 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Research
The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations
Kyou-Li Kim, Cheol Namgung, Byeong-Hoon Cho
Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(1):11-20.   Published online February 26, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

In most retrospective studies, the clinical performance of restorations had not been considered in survival analysis. This study investigated the effect of including the clinically unacceptable cases according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria into the failed data on the survival analysis of direct restorations as to the longevity and prognostic variables.

Materials and Methods

Nine hundred and sixty-seven direct restorations were evaluated. The data of 204 retreated restorations were collected from the records, and clinical performance of 763 restorations in function was evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria by two observers. The longevity and prognostic variables of the restorations were compared with a factor of involving clinically unacceptable cases into the failures using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The median survival times of amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer were 11.8, 11.0 and 6.8 years, respectively. Glass ionomer showed significantly lower longevity than composite resin and amalgam. When clinically unacceptable restorations were included into the failure, the median survival times of them decreased to 8.9, 9.7 and 6.4 years, respectively.

Conclusions

After considering the clinical performance, composite resin was the only material that showed a difference in the longevity (p < 0.05) and the significantly higher relative risk of student group than professor group disappeared in operator groups. Even in the design of retrospective study, clinical evaluation needs to be included.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Decision‐Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational Cross‐Sectional Study With Meta‐Analysis
    Ömer Hatipoğlu, João Filipe Brochado Martins, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Nessrin Taha, Thiyezen Abdullah Aldhelai, Daoud M. Ayyad, Ahmed A. Madfa, Benjamin Martin‐Biedma, Rafael Fernández‐Grisales, Bakhyt A. Omarova, Wen Yi Lim, Suha Alfirjani, Kacper Nijak
    Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Navigating the practical-knowledge gap in deep margin elevation: A step towards a structured case selection – a review
    Eman H. Ismail, Saba S. Ghazal, Rahaf D. Alshehri, Hajar N. Albisher, Rana S. Albishri, Abdulrahman A. Balhaddad
    The Saudi Dental Journal.2024; 36(5): 674.     CrossRef
  • Er:YAG laser in selective caries removal and dentin treatment with chitosan: a randomized clinical trial in primary molars
    Rai Matheus Carvalho Santos, Renata Siqueira Scatolin, Sérgio Luiz de Souza Salvador, Aline Evangelista Souza-Gabriel, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona
    Lasers in Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials
    Flávio Fernando Demarco, Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Anelise Fernandes Montagner, Verônica Pereira de Lima, Marcos Britto Correa, Rafael R. Moraes, Niek J.M. Opdam
    Dental Materials.2023; 39(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keda Fang, Kenan Chen, Mengqi Shi, Liang Wang
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2023; 27(6): 2495.     CrossRef
  • Survival of direct resin composite onlays and indirect tooth-coloured adhesive onlays in posterior teeth: a systematic review
    Colin E. McGrath, Stephen J. Bonsor
    British Dental Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A 2-year clinical evaluation of direct and semi-direct resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomized clinical study
    Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele, Laura Célia Fernandes Meirelles, Rafael Santos Rocha, Lucélia Lemes Gonçalves, Daniele Mara Silva Ávila, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves, Eduardo Bresciani
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2020; 24(3): 1321.     CrossRef
  • Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Bruna M. Vetromilla, Niek J. Opdam, Ferdinan L. Leida, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, Flavio F. Demarco, Mark P.J. van der Loo, Maximiliano S. Cenci, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
    The Journal of the American Dental Association.2020; 151(8): 614.     CrossRef
  • Effect of a novel prime‐and‐rinse approach on short‐ and long‐term dentin bond strength of self‐etch adhesives
    Mingxing Li, Jingqiu Xu, Ling Zhang, Chaoyang Wang, Xiaoting Jin, Yan Hong, Baiping Fu, Matthias Hannig
    European Journal of Oral Sciences.2019; 127(6): 547.     CrossRef
  • Longevity of resin-bonded fixed partial dental prostheses made with metal alloys
    Naomi Tanoue
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2016; 20(6): 1329.     CrossRef
  • Amalgam vs Composite Restoration, Survival, and Secondary Caries
    Muhanad Alhareky, Mary Tavares
    Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice.2016; 16(2): 107.     CrossRef
  • Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial
    G. Moncada, E. Fernández, K. Mena, J. Martin, P. Vildósola, O.B. De Oliveira, J. Estay, I.A. Mjör, V.V. Gordan
    Journal of Dentistry.2015; 43(11): 1371.     CrossRef
  • Longitudinal Results of a 10-year Clinical Trial of Repair of Amalgam Restorations
    G Moncada, P Vildósola, E Fernández, J Estay, OB de Oliveira Júnior, MF de Andrade, J Martin, IA Mjör, VV Gordan
    Operative Dentistry.2015; 40(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vittorio Moraschini, Cheung Ka Fai, Raphael Monte Alto, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos
    Journal of Dentistry.2015; 43(9): 1043.     CrossRef
  • Aumento de longevidad de restauraciones de resinas compuestas y de su unión adhesiva. Revisión de tema
    Gustavo Moncada, Patricio Vildósola, Eduardo Fernandez, Juan Estay, Osmir B de Oliveira Junior, Javier Martin
    Revista Facultad de Odontología.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparison of resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite polymerisation shrinkage stress in a wet environment
    Joshua J. Cheetham, Joseph E.A. Palamara, Martin J. Tyas, Michael F. Burrow
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2014; 29: 33.     CrossRef
  • 45 View
  • 1 Download
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP