Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Clinical study"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Basic Researchs
A clinical evaluation of safety of an office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide
Sin-Young Kim, Je-Uk Park, Chang-Hyen Kim, Sung-Eun Yang
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35(3):198-210.   Published online May 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.3.198
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the safety of an office bleaching gel (RemeWhite, Remedent Inc., Deurle, Belgium) containing 30% hydrogen peroxide. 37 volunteers were recieved office bleaching with the RemeWhite for 3 times at one visit, total 2 visits. As control group, the same gel in which hydrogen peroxide was not included was applied to 34 volunteers with the same protocol.

There was no difference between experimental group and control group using electric pulp test. In the result of gingival inflammation index and tooth sensitivity test, there was mild pain response in experimental group but it disappeared as time went by. Therefore, safety of the office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide was confirmed.

  • 19 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
A clinical evaluation of efficacy of an office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide
Sin-Young Kim, Je-Uk Park, Chang-Hyen Kim, Sung-Eun Yang
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35(1):40-50.   Published online January 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.1.040
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the efficacy of an office bleaching gel (RemeWhite, Remedent Inc., Deurle, Belgium) containing 30% hydrogen peroxide. 31 volunteers were recieved office bleaching with the RemeWhite for 3 times at one visit, total 2 visits. As control group, the same gel in which hydrogen peroxide was not included was applied to 31 volunteers with the same protocol. The shade change (ΔE*, color difference) of 12 anterior teeth was measured using Colorimerter and Vitapan classical shade guide. The shade change of overall teeth in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group which was measured using Colorimeter. There was also a significant difference between baseline and 14 weeks or 26 weeks though color rebounding phenomenon occurred as time went by. Small shade change difference can be measured accurately using Colorimeter than using Vitapan classical shade guide.

  • 29 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
Clinical study of shade improvement and safety of polymer-based pen type BlancTic Forte whitening agent containing 8.3% Carbamide peroxide
Jin-Kyung Lee, Sun-Hong Min, Sung-Tae Hong, So-Ram Oh, Shin-Hye Chung, Young-Hye Hwang, Sung-Yeop You, Kwang-Shik Bae, Seung-Ho Baek, Woo-Cheol Lee, Won-Jun Son, Kee-Yeon Kum
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009;34(2):154-161.   Published online March 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.154
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This clinical study evaluated the whitening effect and safety of polymer based-pen type BlancTis Forte (NIBEC) containing 8.3% carbamide peroxide. Twenty volunteers used the BlancTis Forte whitening agent for 2 hours twice a day for 4 weeks. As a control, Whitening Effect Pen (LG) containing 3% hydrogen peroxide was used by 20 volunteers using the same protocol. The change in shade (ΔE*, color difference) was measured using Shadepilot™ (DeguDent) before, during, and after bleaching (2 weeks, 4 weeks, and post-bleaching 4 weeks). A clinical examination for any side effects (tooth hypersensitivity or soft tissue complications) was also performed at each check-up. The following results were obtained.

1. Both the experimental and control groups displayed a noticeable change in shade (ΔE) of over 2. No significant differences were found between the two groups (p > 0.05), implying that the two agents have a similar whitening effect.

2. The whitening effect was mainly due to changes in a and b values rather than in L value (brightness). The experimental group showed a significantly higher change in b value, thus yellow shade, than the control (p < 0.05).

3. None of the participants complained of tooth hypersensitivity or soft tissue complications, confirming the safety of both whitening agents.

  • 20 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restorations with or without mechanical retention
Kyung-Wook Lee, Sae-Joon Choung, Young-Chul Han, Ho-Hyun Son, Chung-Moon Um, Myoung-Hwan Oh, Byeong-Hoon Cho
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31(4):300-311.   Published online July 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.300
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The purpose of this study is to evaluate prospectively the effect of different bonding systems and retention grooves on the clinical performance of resin restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Thirty-nine healthy adults who had at least 2 NCCLs in their premolar areas were included in this study. One hundred and fifty teeth were equally assigned to six groups: (A) Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, 4th generation bonding system) without retention grooves; (B) SBMP with retention grooves; (C) BC Plus (Vericom Co., Anyang, Gyeonggido, Korea, 5th generation bonding system) without retention grooves; (D) BC Plus with retention grooves; (E) Adper Prompt (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany, 6th generation bonding system) without retention grooves; (F) Adper Prompt with retention grooves. All cavities were filled with a hybrid composite resin, Denfil (Vericom Co., Anyang, Gyeonggido, Korea) by one operator. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month recall, according to the modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) criteria. Additionally, clinical photographs were taken and epoxy resin replicas were made for SEM evaluation. At 6-month recall, there were some differences in the number of alpha ratings among the experimental groups. But, despite the differences in the number of alpha ratings, there was no significant difference among the 3 adhesive systems (p > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between the groups with or without mechanical retention (p > 0.05). Follow-ups for longer periods than 6 months are needed to verify the clinical performance of different bonding systems and retention grooves.

  • 22 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
A clinical evaluation of a bleaching strip containing 2.9% hydrogen peroxide
Eun-Sook Park, So-Rae Seong, Seong-Tae Hong, Ji-Eun Kim, So-Young Lee, Soo-Youn Hwang, Shin-Jae Lee, Bo-Hyoung Jin, Ho-Hyun Son, Byeong-Hoon Cho
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31(4):269-281.   Published online July 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.269
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of an experimental bleaching strip (Medison dental whitening strip, Samsung medical Co., Anyang, Korea) containing 2.9% hydrogen peroxide. Twenty-three volunteers used the bleaching strips for one and a half hour daily for 2 weeks. As control group, the same strips in which hydrogen peroxide was not included were used by 24 volunteers with the same protocol. The shade change (ΔE*, color difference) of twelve anterior teeth was measured using Shade Vision (X-Rite Inc., S.W. Grandville, MI, USA), Chroma Meter (Minolta Co., Ltd. Osaka, Japan) and Vitapan classical shade guide (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). The shade change of overall teeth in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group (p < 0.05) and was easily perceivable. The change resulted from the increase of lightness (CIE L* value) and the decrease of redness (CIE a* value) and yellowness (CIE b* value). The shade change of individual tooth was greatest in canine, and smallest in central incisor. The safety of the bleaching strip was also confirmed.

  • 15 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP