Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Bioactive"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Articles
Alkasite restorative material for endodontically treated teeth: a randomized controlled pilot study
Davi Ariel Nobuo Bepu, Renata Siqueira Scatolin, Natalia Saud Junqueira Franco, Luiza Pejon Sanchez, Aline Evangelista Souza-Gabriel, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona
Restor Dent Endod 2024;49(3):e24.   Published online June 11, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e24
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite restorative material in molars that had undergone root canal treatment.

Materials and Methods

The research was registered in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials. The randomized clinical trial involved 33 patients, each with at least 1 mandibular molar requiring restoration after receiving endodontic treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) or the alkasite restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent). Upon completion of the restorations, 3 calibrated professionals utilized the United States Public Health Service criteria to assess various factors, including retention, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, restoration color, marginal pigmentation, and anatomical form. Evaluations were conducted at intervals of 7 days, 6 months, and 17 months. Additionally, the assessment encompassed the presence of radiolucent lines adjacent to the restoration, material deficiencies or excess, contact points, and caries recurrence. The data underwent analysis using the Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05).

Results

After 17 months, the results revealed that the alkasite restorative material exhibited greater wear of anatomical shape compared to the bulk-fill resin composite (p = 0.0189). Furthermore, the alkasite restorative material significantly differed from the natural tooth color in most cases (p = 0.0000). However, no other criteria displayed significant differences between the materials or over time (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The alkasite restorative material (Cention N) emerges as a viable option for restoring endodontically treated teeth, displaying clinically acceptable alterations after a 17-month evaluation period.

Trial Registration

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) Identifier: RBR-97kx5jv

  • 97 View
  • 6 Download
Close layer
The effect of using nanoparticles in bioactive glass on its antimicrobial properties
Maram Farouk Obeid, Kareim Moustafa El-Batouty, Mohammed Aslam
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(4):e58.   Published online October 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e58
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study addresses the effect of using nanoparticles (np) on the antimicrobial properties of bioactive glass (BAG) when used in intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms.

Materials and Methods

E. faecalis biofilms, grown inside 90 root canals for 21 days, were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the antimicrobial regimen followed (n = 20; BAG-np, BAG, calcium hydroxide [CaOH], and saline). After 1 week, residual live bacteria were quantified in terms of colony-forming units (CFU), while dead bacteria were assessed with a confocal laser scanning microscope.

Results

Although there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean CFU value among all groups, the nano-group performed the best. The highest percentage of dead bacteria was detected in the BAG-np group, with a significant difference from the BAG group.

Conclusions

The reduction of particle size and use of a nano-form of BAG improved the antimicrobial properties of the intracanal treatment of E. faecalis biofilms

  • 23 View
  • 2 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
Close layer
Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of the NeoMTA Plus endodontic bioceramic-based sealer
Roberto Alameda Hoshino, Mateus Machado Delfino, Guilherme Ferreira da Silva, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Mário Tanomaru-Filho, Estela Sasso-Cerri, Paulo Sérgio Cerri
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(1):e4.   Published online December 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e4
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the biocompatibility and bioactive potential of NeoMTA Plus mixed as a root canal sealer in comparison with MTA Fillapex.

Materials and Methods

Polyethylene tubes filled with NeoMTA Plus (n = 20), MTA Fillapex (n = 20), or nothing (control group, CG; n = 20) were inserted into the connective tissue in the dorsal subcutaneous layer of rats. After 7, 15, 30 and 60 days, the specimens were processed for paraffin embedding. The capsule thickness, collagen content, and number of inflammatory cells (ICs) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) immunolabeled cells were measured. von Kossa-positive structures were evaluated and unstained sections were analyzed under polarized light. Two-way analysis of variance was performed, followed by the post hoc Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).

Results

At 7 days, the capsules around NeoMTA Plus and MTA Fillapex had more ICs and IL-6-immunostained cells than the CG. However, at 60 days, there was no significant difference in the IC number between NeoMTA Plus and the CG (p = 0.1137) or the MTA Fillapex group (p = 0.4062), although a greater number of IL-6-immunostained cells was observed in the MTA Fillapex group (p = 0.0353). From 7 to 60 days, the capsule thickness of the NeoMTA Plus and MTA Fillapex specimens significantly decreased, concomitantly with an increase in the collagen content. The capsules around root canal sealers showed positivity to the von Kossa stain and birefringent structures.

Conclusions

The NeoMTA Plus root canal sealer is biocompatible and exhibits bioactive potential.

  • 35 View
  • 1 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
Close layer
Dentin moisture conditions strongly influence its interactions with bioactive root canal sealers
Esin Ozlek, Hüseyin Gündüz, Elif Akkol, Prasanna Neelakantan
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(2):e24.   Published online March 24, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e24
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

It is known that bioactive materials interact with the dentin to undergo biomineralization. The exact role of moisture in this interaction is unknown. Here, we investigate the effects of dentin moisture conditions on the dislocation resistance of two bioactive root canal sealers (MTA Fillapex [Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas] and GuttaFlow BioSeal [Colténe/Whaledent AG]) at 3 weeks and 3 months after obturation.

Materials and Methods

Mandibular premolars (n = 120) were prepared and randomly divided into 3 groups based on the dentin condition: group 1, dry dentin; group 2, moist dentin; group 3, wet dentin. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for root canal filling: MTA Fillapex and GuttaFlow BioSeal. Dislocation resistance was evaluated by measuring the push-out bond strength at 3 weeks and 3 months. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.

Results

Moist dentin resulted in higher bond strength values for both materials at both time points. This was significantly higher than wet and dry dentin for both the sealers at the 3 months (p < 0.05), while at 3 weeks it was significant only for GuttaFlow Bioseal. The different moisture conditions demonstrated similar trends in their effects on the dislocation resistance of the 2 root canal sealers.

Conclusions

The dentin moisture conditions had a significant impact on its interaction with the bioactive materials tested. Maintaining moist dentin, but not dry or wet dentin, may be advantageous before the filling root canals with bioactive sealers.

  • 24 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Effect of three nanobiomaterials on microhardness of bleached enamel
Maryam Khoroushi, Farinaz Shirban, Sara Kaveh, Samaneh Doustfateme
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(3):196-201.   Published online July 14, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.196
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of incorporating three different nanobiomaterials into bleaching material on microhardness of bleached enamel.

Materials and Methods

The crowns of 24 extracted sound human molars were sectioned. Sixty enamel specimens (2 × 3 × 4 mm) were selected and divided into five groups (n = 12): Group 1 received no bleaching procedure (control); Group 2 underwent bleaching with a 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) gel; Groups 3, 4, and 5 were bleached with a 40% HP gel modified by incorporation of bioactive glass (BAG), amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) and hydroxyapatite (HA), respectively. The enamel microhardness was evaluated. The differences in Knoop microhardness data of each group were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey tests.

Results

Significant differences were observed between the study groups. The enamel microhardness changes in Groups 1, 3, 4, and 5 were significantly lower than that of Group 2 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that incorporation of each one of the three tested biomaterials as remineralizing agents might be effective in decreasing enamel microhardness changes subsequent to in-office bleaching.

  • 21 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP