Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Zahra Ghasri 1 Article
Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM-fabricated polymer-ceramics to different adhesive resin cements
Leyla Sadighpour, Farideh Geramipanah, Zahra Ghasri, Mehrnoosh Neshatian
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(4):e40.   Published online September 3, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e40
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of polymer-ceramic and indirect composite resin with 3 classes of resin cements.

Materials and Methods

Two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated polymer-ceramics (Enamic [ENA; Vita] and Lava Ultimate [LAV; 3M ESPE]) and a laboratory indirect composite resin (Gradia [GRA; GC Corp.]) were equally divided into 6 groups (n = 18) with 3 classes of resin cements: Variolink N (VAR; Vivadent), RelyX U200 (RXU; 3M ESPE), and Panavia F2 (PAN; Kuraray). The μTBS values were compared between groups by 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tamhane test (α = 0.05).

Results

Restorative materials and resin cements significantly influenced µTBS (p < 0.05). In the GRA group, the highest μTBS was found with RXU (27.40 ± 5.39 N) and the lowest with VAR (13.54 ± 6.04 N) (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in the ENA group. In the LAV group, the highest μTBS was observed with VAR (27.45 ± 5.84 N) and the lowest with PAN (10.67 ± 4.37 N) (p < 0.05). PAN had comparable results to those of ENA and GRA, whereas the μTBS values were significantly lower with LAV (p = 0.001). The highest bond strength of RXU was found with GRA (27.40 ± 5.39 N, p = 0.001). PAN showed the lowest µTBS with LAV (10.67 ± 4.37 N; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

When applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, the µTBS of polymer-ceramic CAD/CAM materials and indirect composites is influenced by the luting cements.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of hydrofluoric acid and self-etch ceramic primers on the flexural strength and fatigue resistance of glass ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
    Paulo Matias Moreira, Gabriela Luiza Moreira Carvalho, Rodrigo de Castro Albuquerque, Carolina Bosso André
    Japanese Dental Science Review.2024; 60: 198.     CrossRef
  • Light transmittance through resin-matrix composite onlays adhered to resin-matrix cements or flowable composites
    Rita Fidalgo-Pereira, Susana O. Catarino, Óscar Carvalho, Nélio Veiga, Orlanda Torres, Annabel Braem, Júlio C.M. Souza
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2024; 151: 106353.     CrossRef
  • Effect of thermocycling on the mechanical properties of permanent composite-based CAD-CAM restorative materials produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques
    Tuğba Temizci, Hatice Nalan Bozoğulları
    BMC Oral Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of different surface treatments on resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics bonding to dentin: in vitro study
    Hanan Fathy, Hamdi H. Hamama, Noha El-Wassefy, Salah H. Mahmoud
    BMC Oral Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Digital image analysis of fluorescence of ceramic veneers with different ceramic materials and resin cements
    Jiao ZHANG, Qing YU
    Dental Materials Journal.2022; 41(6): 868.     CrossRef
  • Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations: Effects of Conditionings of the Intaglio Surface and the Resin Cements
    F Dalla-Nora, LF Guilardi, CP Zucuni, LF Valandro, MP Rippe
    Operative Dentistry.2021; 46(3): 316.     CrossRef
  • 201 View
  • 2 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP