-
Retention of BioAggregate and MTA as coronal plugs after intracanal medication for regenerative endodontic procedures: an ex vivo study
-
Suzan Abdul Wanees Amin, Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat
-
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(3):e18. Published online April 26, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e18
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
- Objectives
This study compared the retention of BioAggregate (BA; Innovative BioCeramix) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA; Angelus) as coronal plugs after applying different intracanal medications (ICMs) used in regenerative endodontics. Materials and MethodsOne-hundred human maxillary central incisors were used. The canals were enlarged to a diameter of 1.7 mm. Specimens were divided into 5 groups (n = 20) according to the ICM used: calcium hydroxide (CH), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), triple-antibiotic paste (TAP), double-antibiotic paste (DAP), and no ICM (control; CON). After 3 weeks of application, ICMs were removed and BA or MTA were placed as the plug material (n = 10). The push-out bond strength and the mode of failure were assessed. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance, the Tukey's test, and the χ2 test; p values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. ResultsThe type of ICM and the type of plug material significantly affected bond strength (p < 0.01). Regardless of the type of ICM, BA showed a lower bond strength than MTA (p < 0.05). For MTA, CH showed a higher bond strength than CON, TAP and DAP; CHX showed a higher bond strength than DAP (p < 0.01). For BA, CH showed a higher bond strength than DAP (p < 0.05). The mode of failure was predominantly cohesive for BA (p < 0.05). ConclusionsMTA may show better retention than BA. The mode of bond failure with BA can be predominantly cohesive. BA retention may be less affected by ICM type than MTA retention.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three intracanal medicaments – chlorhexidine gel, triple antibiotic paste, and calcium hydroxide paste on the push-out bond strength of MTA Plus, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture
Gouthami Datta, Ramya Raghu, Ashish Shetty, Gautham P Manjunath, Dishant Patel, Subhashini Rajasekhara Endodontology.2023; 35(1): 60. CrossRef - Effects of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament on push‐out bond strength of endodontic sealers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Mohammed Nasser Alhajj, Fadhilah Daud, Sadeq Ali Al‐Maweri, Yanti Johari, Zuryati Ab‐Ghani, Mariatti Jaafar, Yoshihito Naito, Widyasri Prananingrum, Zaihan Ariffin Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.2022; 34(8): 1166. CrossRef - A Breakthrough in the Era of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Critical Review
Payal S Chaudhari, Manoj G Chandak, Akshay A Jaiswal, Nikhil P Mankar, Priyanka Paul Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Modern Medicaments for Endodontic Treatment in Children
Н.В. Шаковец, О.С. Романова Стоматология. Эстетика. Инновации.2021; (4): 408. CrossRef - Do intracanal medications used in regenerative endodontics affect the bond strength of powder-to-liquid and ready-to-use cervical sealing materials?
MarinaCarvalho Prado, Kevillin Martiniano, AndreaCardoso Pereira, KarineL Cortellazzi, MarinaA Marciano, Gabriel Abuna, Adriana de-Jesus-Soares Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(5): 464. CrossRef - In vivo Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Calcium Silicate-Based Bioceramics in Endodontics
Wencheng Song, Wei Sun, Lili Chen, Zhenglin Yuan Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of Hydrogel-Based Antibiotic Intracanal Medicaments on Push-Out Bond Strength
Rayan B. Yaghmoor, Jeffrey A. Platt, Kenneth J. Spolnik, Tien Min Gabriel Chu, Ghaeth H. Yassen European Journal of Dentistry.2020; 14(04): 575. CrossRef - Regenerative Endodontic Procedures, Disinfectants and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Adam S. Kharchi, Nara Tagiyeva-Milne, Shalini Kanagasingam Primary Dental Journal.2020; 9(4): 65. CrossRef
-
218
View
-
3
Download
-
8
Crossref
|