-
Correlation between different methodologies used to evaluate the marginal adaptation of proximal dentin gingival margins elevated using a glass hybrid
-
Hoda S. Ismail, Brian R. Morrow, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
-
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(4):e36. Published online September 3, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e36
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the marginal quality of glass hybrid (GH) material used to elevate dentin gingival margins, and to analyze the consistency of the results obtained by 3 in vitro methods. Materials and MethodsTen teeth received compound class II cavities with subgingival margins. The dentin gingival margins were elevated with GH, followed by resin composite. The GH/gingival dentin interfaces were examined through digital microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using resin replicas, and according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. After initial evaluations, all teeth were subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles, followed by repeating the same marginal evaluations and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis for the interfacial zone of 2 specimens. Marginal quality was expressed as the percentage of continuous margin at ×200 for microscopic techniques and as the frequency of each score for FDI ranking. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Pearson and Spearmen correlation coefficients. ResultsNone of the testing techniques proved the significance of the aging factor. Moderate and strong significant correlations were found between the testing techniques. The EDS results suggested the presence of an ion-exchange layer along the GH/gingival dentin interface of aged specimens. ConclusionsThe marginal quality of the GH/dentin gingival interface defied aging by thermocycling. The replica SEM and FDI ranking results had stronger correlations with each other than either showed with the digital microscopy results.
-
20
View
-
1
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength
-
Hoda S. Ismail, Ashraf I. Ali, Rabab El. Mehesen, Jelena Juloski, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Salah H. Mahmoud
-
Restor Dent Endod 2022;47(2):e15. Published online March 4, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e15
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
This review aimed to characterize the effect of direct restorative material types and adhesive protocols on marginal adaptation and the bond strength of the interface between the material and the proximal dentin/cementum. An electronic search of 3 databases (the National Library of Medicine [MEDLINE/PubMed], Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Studies were included if they evaluated marginal adaptation or bond strength tests for proximal restorations under the cementoenamel junction. Only 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies presented a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of the materials used and the methodologies and evaluation criteria of each test; therefore, only a descriptive analysis could be conducted. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following predetermined criteria. To summarize the results of the included studies, the type of restorative material affected the test results, whereas the use of different adhesive protocols had an insignificant effect on the results. It could be concluded that various categories of resin-based composites could be a suitable choice for clinicians to elevate proximal dentin/cementum margins, rather than the open sandwich technique with resin-modified glass ionomers. Despite challenges in bonding to proximal dentin/cementum margins, different adhesive protocols provided comparable outcomes.
-
39
View
-
2
Download
-
8
Web of Science
|