-
Polymerization shrinkage, hygroscopic expansion and microleakage of resin-based temporary filling materials
-
Nak Yeon Cho, In-Bog Lee
-
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2008;33(2):115-124. Published online March 31, 2008
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.2.115
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
The purpose of this study was to measure the polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of resin-based temporary filling materials and to evaluate microleakage at the interface between the materials and cavity wall.
Five resin-based temporary filing materials were investigated: Fermit (Vivadent), Quicks (Dentkist), Provifil (Promedica), Spacer (Vericom), Clip (Voco). Caviton (GC) was also included for comparison. Polymerization shrinkage of five resin-based temporary filling materials was measured using the bonded disc method. For the measurement of hygroscopic expansion, the discs of six cured temporary filling materials were immersed in saline and a LVDT displacement sensor was used to measure the expansion for 7 days. For estimating of microleakage, Class I cavities were prepared on 120 extracted human molars and randomly assigned to 6 groups of 20 each. The cavities in each group were filled with six temporary filling materials. All specimens were submitted to 1000 thermo-cycles, with temperature varying from 5℃/55℃. Microleakage was determined using a dye penetration test.
The results were as follows:
Fermit had significantly less polymerization shrinkage than the other resin-based temporary filling materials. Fermit (0.22 %) < Spacer (0.38 %) < Quicks (0.64 %), Provifil (0.67 %), Clip (0.67 %)
Resin-based temporary filling materials showed 0.43 - 1.1 % expansion in 7 days.
Fermit showed the greatest leakage, while Quicks exhibited the least leakage.
There are no correlation between polymerization shrinkage or hygroscopic expansion and microleakage of resin-based temporary filling materials.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Comparison of color stability, gloss, mechanical and physical properties according to dental temporary filling materials type
Ji-Won Choi, You-Young Shin, Song-Yi Yang Korean Journal of Dental Materials.2022; 49(3): 97. CrossRef - Comparative analysis of strain according to two wavelengths of light source and constant temperature bath deposition in ultraviolet-curing resin for dental three-dimensional printing
Dong-Yeon Kim, Gwang-Young Lee, Hoo-Won Kang, Cheon-Seung Yang Journal of Korean Acedemy of Dental Technology.2020; 42(3): 208. CrossRef - Effect of cavity disinfectants on antibacterial activity and microtensile bond strength in class I cavity
Bo-Ram KIM, Man-Hwan OH, Dong-Hoon SHIN Dental Materials Journal.2017; 36(3): 368. CrossRef - Shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to resin-coated dentin
Jee-Youn Hong, Cheol-Woo Park, Jeong-Uk Heo, Min-Ki Bang, Jae-Jun Ryu The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics.2013; 51(1): 27. CrossRef - Coronal microleakage of four temporary restorative materials in Class II-type endodontic access preparations
Sang-Mi Yun, Lorena Karanxha, Hee-Jin Kim, Sung-Ho Jung, Su-Jung Park, Kyung-San Min Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics.2012; 37(1): 29. CrossRef - Microtensile bond strength of resin inlay bonded to dentin treated with various temporary filling materials
Tae-Woo Kim, Bin-Na Lee, Young-Jung Choi, So-Young Yang, Hoon-Sang Chang, Yun-Chan Hwang, In-Nam Hwang, Won-Mann Oh Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2011; 36(5): 419. CrossRef - The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay
Tae-Gun Kim, Kwang-Won Lee, Mi-Kyung Yu Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.2008; 33(6): 553. CrossRef
-
152
View
-
1
Download
-
7
Crossref
|