Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Mehmet Adıguzel 3 Articles
Effects of the endodontic access cavity on apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using different single-file systems
Pelin Tüfenkçi, Koray Yılmaz, Mehmet Adigüzel
Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(3):e33.   Published online June 4, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e33
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of traditional and contracted endodontic cavity (TEC and CEC) preparation with the use of Reciproc Blue (RPC B) and One Curve (OC) single-file systems on the amount of apical debris extrusion in mandibular first molar root canals.

Materials and Methods

Eighty extracted mandibular first molar teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 20) according to the endodontic access cavity shape and the single file system used for root canal preparation (reciprocating motion with the RCP B and rotary motion with the OC): TEC-RPC B, TEC-OC, CEC-RPC B, and CEC-OC. The apically extruded debris during preparation was collected in Eppendorf tubes. The amount of extruded debris was quantified by subtracting the weight of the empty tubes from the weight of the Eppendorf tubes containing the debris. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The CEC-RPC B group showed more apical debris extrusion than the TEC-OC and CEC-OC groups (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of apical debris extrusion among the TEC-OC, CEC-OC, and TEC-RPC B groups.

Conclusions

RPC B caused more apical debris extrusion in the CEC groups than did the OC single-file system. Therefore, it is suggested that the RPC B file should be used carefully in teeth with a CEC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative Evaluation of Periapical Expulsion Using Manual, Rotary, and Reciprocating Instrumentation With EndoVac Irrigation: An In Vitro Study
    Sachin Metkari, Sanpreet S Sachdev, Pravin Patil, Manoj Ramugade, Kishor D Sapkale, Kulvinder S Banga, Dinesh Rao
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R‐Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
    Taher Al Omari, Layla Hassouneh, Khawlah Albashaireh, Alaa Dkmak, Rami Albanna, Ali Al-Mohammed, Ahmed Jamleh, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
    International Journal of Dentistry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of apically extruded debris from root canal filling removal of the mesiobuccal canal of maxillary molars using XP shaper and protaper with two different irrigation
    Sanaz Mirsattari, Maryam Zare Jahromi, Masoud Khabiri
    Dental Research Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Minimum Invasive Access Cavity Design on the Quality of Instrumentation of Root Canals of Maxillary Molars Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An in Vitro Study
    Fahad H Baabdullah, Samia M Elsherief , Rayan A Hawsawi, Hetaf S Redwan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Bacterial Load and Post-Endodontic Pain after One-Visit Root Canal Treatment Using Two Types of Endodontic Access Openings: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Ahmed M. Al-Ani, Ahmed H. Ali, Garrit Koller
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(4): 88.     CrossRef
  • The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system
    Taher M. N. Al Omari, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Rami Haitham Issa Albanna, Abedelmalek Tabnjh, Flavia Papale, Eugenio Pedullà
    Odontology.2023; 111(4): 910.     CrossRef
  • The effects of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods on smear and debris removal in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavities
    Hüseyin Gündüz, Esin Özlek
    Lasers in Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of access cavity design, sodium hypochlorite formulation and XP‐endo Shaper usage on apical debris extrusion – A laboratory investigation
    Jerry Jose, Aishuwariya Thamilselvan, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Giampiero Rossi–Fedele
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2023; 49(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Apically extruded debris, canal transportation, and shaping ability of nickel-titanium instruments on contracted endodontic cavities in molar teeth
    Qinqin Zhang, Jingyi Gu, Jiadi Shen, Ming Ma, Ying Lv, Xin Wei
    Journal of Oral Science.2023; 65(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on instrumentation efficacy—A systematic review
    Manan Shroff, Karkala Venkappa Kishan, Nimisha Shah, Purnima Saklecha
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2023; 49(1): 202.     CrossRef
  • Present status and future directions – Minimal endodontic access cavities
    Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Gustavo De‐Deus, Erick Miranda Souza, Felipe Gonçalves Belladonna, Daniele Moreira Cavalcante, Marco Simões‐Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Versiani
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(S3): 531.     CrossRef
  • Effect of guided conservative endodontic access and different file kinematics on debris extrusion in mesial root of the mandibular molars: An in vitro study
    Sathish Sundar, Aswathi Varghese, KrithikaJ Datta, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2022; 25(5): 547.     CrossRef
  • A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study apical extrusion of debris and irrigants
    Jale Tanalp
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(S1): 153.     CrossRef
  • Current strategies for conservative endodontic access cavity preparation techniques—systematic review, meta-analysis, and decision-making protocol
    Benoit Ballester, Thomas Giraud, Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed, Mohamed Shady Nabhan, Frédéric Bukiet, Maud Guivarc’h
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2021; 25(11): 6027.     CrossRef
  • Extrusion of debris with and without intentional foraminal enlargement – A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Ricardo Machado, Gislayne Vigarani, Tainara Macoppi, Ajinkya Pawar, Stella Maria Glaci Reinke, Ana Cristina Kovalik Gonçalves
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2021; 47(3): 741.     CrossRef
  • Apical debris extrusion of single-file systems in curved canals
    Ecehan Hazar, Olcay Özdemir, Mustafa Murat Koçak, Baran Can Sağlam, Sibel Koçak
    Endodontology.2021; 33(3): 128.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris in Root Canals prepared by Single-file Reciprocating and Single File Rotary Instrumentation Systems
    Sonal Sinha, Konark Singh, Anju Singh, Swati Priya, Avanindra Kumar, Sahil Kawle
    Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.2021; 13(Suppl 2): S1398.     CrossRef
  • THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT PECKING DEPTH ON AMOUNT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS DURING ROOT CANAL PREPARATION
    Fatih ÇAKICI, Busra UYSAL, Elif Bahar CAKİCİ, Adem GUNAYDIN
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; : 1.     CrossRef
  • 307 View
  • 7 Download
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of postoperative pain intensity after using reciprocating and continuous rotary glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial
Mehmet Adıgüzel, Koray Yılmaz, Pelin Tüfenkçi
Restor Dent Endod 2019;44(1):e9.   Published online February 12, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e9
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain intensity after root canal treatment with One G (OG) vs. R-Pilot (RP) files used for glide path preparation.

Materials and Methods

Ninety-three single-canaled mandibular premolar teeth with asymptomatic non-vital pulp were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n = 31): OG, RP, or without glide path (WGP). After creating the glide path, the root canals were prepared using sequential Mtwo rotary files to size 30/0.05. One endodontic specialist carried out single-visit endodontic treatment. The patients were asked to rate the severity of postoperative pain on a visual analogue scale at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the visit. They were also asked to record their intake of prescribed analgesics taken. The data were analyzed using the χ2, Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

In all 3 groups, postoperative pain decreased significantly at each time interval (p < 0.05). At 24 hours, the OG group had less postoperative pain than the WGP group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the RP group and the others. No statistically significant difference was found among the WGP, OG, and RP groups in postoperative pain intensity at 48 or 72 hours or in analgesic tablet intake at the 3 assessed time intervals.

Conclusions

The OG group had less postoperative pain than the WGP group in the first 24 hours. The OG and RP systems were similar regarding postoperative pain intensity and analgesic intake.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative pain in patients following endodontic treatment by XP-endo Shaper files: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henal Nilesh Dedhia, Vibha R. Hegde, Maitri B. Bhayani, Sanitra R. Hegde
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.2024; 27(11): 1168.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Pain Following Single Visit Root Canal Treatment With Reciproc Blue And Hyflex EDM Instrumentation; A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
    Nimet Gençoğlu, Anıl Özgün Karatekin, Mustafa Gündoğar
    Meandros Medical And Dental Journal.2024; 25(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • Glide Path in Endodontics: A Literature Review of Current Knowledge
    Vlad Mircea Lup, Giulia Malvicini, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Gabriela Ciavoi
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(8): 257.     CrossRef
  • Post-Operative Pain in Reciprocating Versus Rotary Kinematics Post-Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review
    Youssef Algarni
    Archives of Pharmacy Practice.2024; 15(2): 53.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Different Single-file Glide Path Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Zeliha Danaci, Kübra Yeşildal Yeter
    Journal of Endodontics.2024; 50(2): 120.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of postoperative pain after using single continuous, single reciprocating, and full sequence continuous rotary file system: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Umesh Kumar, Pragnesh Parmar, Ruchi Vashisht, Namita Tandon, Charan Kamal Kaur
    Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2023; 23(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Impact of kinematics on the efficiency and safety of an engine-driven file for glide path preparation in MB2 canals of maxillary molars
    Larissa B. B. Araújo, Pedro H. S. Calefi, Murilo P. Alcalde, Giulio Gavini, Rodrigo R. Vivan, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2022; 27(3): 1153.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Pulpectomy using Different File Systems in Primary Teeth
    Lakshimi Lakshmanan, Sujatha Somasundaram, Ganesh Jeevanandan, EMG Subramanian
    Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.2021; 12(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of type of kinematics on glide path procedures and torsional fatigue resistance after preparation of moderately curved canals
    Murilo Priori Alcalde, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Pedro Henrique Souza Calefi, Victor de Moraes Cruz, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
    Brazilian Oral Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of glide path kinematics during endodontic treatment on the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
    Thaís Christina Cunha, Felipe de Souza Matos, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Ítalo de Macedo Bernardino, Camilla Christian Gomes Moura
    BMC Oral Health.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 254 View
  • 5 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of the ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments to reach the full working length with or without glide path preparation
Mehmet Adıguzel, Pelin Tufenkci
Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(4):e41.   Published online November 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e41
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The purpose of the present study was to compare the mean preparation times and frequency with which Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments reached the full working length in mandibular molars, with or without glide path preparation.

Materials and Methods

Previously untreated mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals with completely formed apices were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 50) depending on the usage of Reciproc (RC; VDW), Reciproc Blue (RC Blue; VDW), C-Pilot (CP; VDW), and R-Pilot (RP; VDW) files: RC, RC Blue, RC + C-Pilot (RC-CP), RC-Blue + C-Pilot (RC Blue-CP), RC+R-Pilot (RC-RP), and RC Blue + R-Pilot (RC Blue-RP). A glide path was prepared using the hand-operated C-Pilot or the machine-operated R-Pilot instruments, respectively. The χ2 test, analysis of variance, and the Tukey post hoc test were used for statistical comparisons.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed in the distribution of the frequency of reaching the full working length in the RC (94%), RC Blue (88%), RC-CP (94%), RC Blue-CP (90%), RC-RP (96%), and RC Blue-RP (92%) groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Preparation of a glide path did not have a significant effect on reaching the full working length using these systems.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of the Brushing Motions on the Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of the Reciproc Blue Instrument: In vitro Study
    Juliana Borsoi Chicon, Vanessa Maria Fernandes Pavão, Maíra Henrique Gonçalves Cunha, Marcos Frozoni
    Journal of Endodontics.2024; 50(9): 1340.     CrossRef
  • Glide Path in Endodontics: A Literature Review of Current Knowledge
    Vlad Mircea Lup, Giulia Malvicini, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Gabriela Ciavoi
    Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(8): 257.     CrossRef
  • Nickel-titanium files in endodontics: Development, improvement and modifications of nickel-titanium alloy
    Slavoljub Zivkovic, Milica Jovanovic-Medojevic, Jelena Neskovic, Marijana Popovic-Bajic
    Vojnosanitetski pregled.2023; 80(3): 262.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain in single sitting root canal treatment after using two reciprocating systems and two continuous rotary systems: An in vivo study
    VijayKumar Vijayran, Ambica Khetarpal, Asit Vats, Monika Ahlawat, Neha Singhal, Harshita
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2023; 26(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Effect of mode of rotation on apical extrusion of debris with four different single‐file endodontic instrumentation systems: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Muhammad Zubair Ahmad, Durre Sadaf, Marcy McCall MacBain, Khalid A. Merdad
    Australian Endodontic Journal.2022; 48(1): 202.     CrossRef
  • Impact of kinematics on the efficiency and safety of an engine-driven file for glide path preparation in MB2 canals of maxillary molars
    Larissa B. B. Araújo, Pedro H. S. Calefi, Murilo P. Alcalde, Giulio Gavini, Rodrigo R. Vivan, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte
    Clinical Oral Investigations.2022; 27(3): 1153.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of type of kinematics on glide path procedures and torsional fatigue resistance after preparation of moderately curved canals
    Murilo Priori Alcalde, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Pedro Henrique Souza Calefi, Victor de Moraes Cruz, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
    Brazilian Oral Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of Negotiation, Glide Path, and Preflaring Procedures on Root Canal Shaping—Terminology, Basic Concepts, and a Systematic Review
    Gianluca Plotino, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu, Frederic Bukiet, Nicola M. Grande, Sajesh K. Veettil, Gustavo De-Deus, Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed
    Journal of Endodontics.2020; 46(6): 707.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of postoperative pain intensity following the use of three different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial
    Mehmet Adiguzel, Pelin Tufenkci, ismail Ilker Pamukcu
    Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects.2019; 13(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • 252 View
  • 3 Download
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP