Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Manoel Valcácio Guedes-Neto 1 Article
Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements?
Maria Fernanda Costa Cabral, Roberto Luiz de Menezes Martinho, Manoel Valcácio Guedes-Neto, Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo, Danielson Guedes Pontes, Flávia Cohen-Carneiro
Restor Dent Endod 2015;40(3):209-215.   Published online May 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.209
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) and resin-modified GICs.

Materials and Methods

The cements were grouped as follows: G1 (Vidrion R, SS White), G2 (Vitro Fil, DFL), G3 (Vitro Molar, DFL), G4 (Bioglass R, Biodinâmica), and G5 (Ketac Fil, 3M ESPE), as conventional GICs, and G6 (Vitremer, 3M ESPE), G7 (Vitro Fil LC, DFL), and G8 (Resiglass, Biodinâmica) as resin-modified GICs. Six specimens (8.60 mm in diameter; 1.65 mm in thickness) of each material were prepared using a stainless steel mold. The specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution (pH 4.3) for 6 hr and a remineralizing solution (pH 7.0) for 18 hr a day. The fluoride ions were measured for 15 days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test with 5% significance were applied.

Results

The highest amounts of fluoride release were found during the first 24 hr for all cements, decreasing abruptly on day 2, and reaching gradually decreasing levels on day 7. Based on these results, the decreasing scale of fluoride release was as follows: G2 > G3 > G8 = G4 = G7 > G6 = G1 > G5 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

There were wide variations among the materials in terms of the cumulative amount of fluoride ion released, and the amount of fluoride release could not be attributed to the category of cement, that is, conventional GICs or resin-modified GICs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ion release of the glass ionomer restoration with silver diamine fluoride dentin pretreatment
    Kelsey Xingyun Ge, Ryan Quock, Feng Yan, Walter Yu-Hang Lam, Chun-Hung Chu, Ollie Yiru Yu
    Journal of Dentistry.2024; 148: 105247.     CrossRef
  • Dual function of anti-biofilm and modulating biofilm equilibrium of orthodontic cement containing quaternary ammonium salt
    Wenqi YU, Chaochao REN, Ning ZHANG, Li CAO, Michael D. WEIR, Kai YANG, Hockin H. K. XU, Yuxing BAI
    Dental Materials Journal.2023; 42(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Fluoride exchange by glass-ionomer dental cements and its clinical effects: a review
    John W. Nicholson, Sharanbir K. Sidhu, Beata Czarnecka
    Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Protective Surface Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
    Nantawan Krajangta, Chayanee Dulsamphan, Tongjai Chotitanmapong
    Dentistry Journal.2022; 10(12): 233.     CrossRef
  • Reinforcing an immature tooth model using three different restorative materials
    Pooja Misar, Hemalatha Hiremath, Chhaya Harinkhere, ShailendraS Sonawane, Vinay Sharma, KuldeepSingh Rana
    Dental Research Journal.2022; 19(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements—An in vitro study
    Yasemin Dziuk, Sachin Chhatwani, Stephan C. Möhlhenrich, Sabrina Tulka, Ella A. Naumova, Gholamreza Danesh, Richard Johannes Wierichs
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247716.     CrossRef
  • Phosphate Ion Release and Alkalizing Potential of Three Bioactive Dental Materials in Comparison with Composite Resin
    Shahin Kasraei, Sahebeh Haghi, Sara Valizadeh, Narges Panahandeh, Sogol Nejadkarimi, Shinn Jyh Ding
    International Journal of Dentistry.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • The effect of the polishing procedure and surface sealant application on the fluoride release of different restorative materials
    Muhittin Ugurlu, Hikmet Orhan
    Journal of Conservative Dentistry.2021; 24(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical and antimicrobial property of different surface treated glass ionomer cements under desiccated condition
    Hemalatha Hiremath, Chhaya Harinkhere, Pooja Misar, Kshitij Sabley, Trupti Bajpai
    Dental Research Journal.2021; 18(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • Dental Restorative Materials for Elderly Populations
    Yuyao Huang, Bingqing Song, Xuedong Zhou, Hui Chen, Haohao Wang, Lei Cheng
    Polymers.2021; 13(5): 828.     CrossRef
  • Monomer conversion, dimensional stability, biaxial flexural strength, and fluoride release of resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers
    Piyaphong PANPISUT, Arnit TONELUCK
    Dental Materials Journal.2020; 39(4): 608.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing fluoride release in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) materials: A review
    P.Divya Kumari, Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Avidyuti Chowdhury, Edward Lynch, Chitta R. Chowdhury
    Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.2019; 9(4): 315.     CrossRef
  • Incorporation of chlorhexidine and nano-sized sodium trimetaphosphate into a glass-ionomer cement: Effect on mechanical and microbiological properties and inhibition of enamel demineralization
    Márjully Eduardo Rodrigues da Silva, Marcelle Danelon, José Antonio Santos Souza, Dinah Fressato Silva, Jesse Augusto Pereira, Denise Pedrini, Emerson Rodrigues de Camargo, Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem, Cristiane Duque
    Journal of Dentistry.2019; 84: 81.     CrossRef
  • 216 View
  • 3 Download
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP