-
Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments
-
Júlia Niero Zanatta Streck, Sabrina Arcaro, Renan Antônio Ceretta, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida, Patrícia Maria Poli Kopper, Anarela Vassen Bernardi
-
Restor Dent Endod 2023;48(3):e22. Published online June 8, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2023.48.e22
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
- Objectives
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and MethodsUsing a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. ResultsBased on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. ConclusionsBoth the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.
-
A novel antimicrobial-containing nanocellulose scaffold for regenerative endodontics
-
Victoria Kichler, Lucas Soares Teixeira, Maick Meneguzzo Prado, Guilherme Colla, Daniela Peressoni Vieira Schuldt, Beatriz Serrato Coelho, Luismar Marques Porto, Josiane de Almeida
-
Restor Dent Endod 2021;46(2):e20. Published online March 16, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e20
-
-
Abstract
PDF PubReader ePub
- Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) membranes incorporated with antimicrobial agents regarding cytotoxicity in fibroblasts of the periodontal ligament (PDLF), antimicrobial activity, and inhibition of multispecies biofilm formation. Materials and MethodsThe tested BNC membranes were BNC + 1% clindamycin (BNC/CLI); BNC + 0.12% chlorhexidine (BNC/CHX); BNC + nitric oxide (BNC/NO); and conventional BNC (BNC; control). After PDLF culture, the BNC membranes were positioned in the wells and maintained for 24 hours. Cell viability was then evaluated using the MTS calorimetric test. Antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Streptococcus sanguinis (S. sanguinis) was evaluated using the agar diffusion test. To assess the antibiofilm activity, BNC membranes were exposed for 24 hours to the mixed culture. After sonicating the BNC membranes to remove the remaining biofilm and plating the suspension on agar, the number of colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was determined. Data were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn tests (α = 5%). ResultsPDLF metabolic activity after contact with BNC/CHX, BNC/CLI, and BNC/NO was 35%, 61% and 97%, respectively, compared to BNC. BNC/NO showed biocompatibility similar to that of BNC (p = 0.78). BNC/CLI showed the largest inhibition halos, and was superior to the other BNC membranes against S. sanguinis (p < 0.05). The experimental BNC membranes inhibited biofilm formation, with about a 3-fold log CFU reduction compared to BNC (p < 0.05). ConclusionsBNC/NO showed excellent biocompatibility and inhibited multispecies biofilm formation, similarly to BNC/CLI and BNC/CHX.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Topic: Perspectives on Success and Failure of Endodontic Treatments
Ilma Robo, Manola Kelmendi, Eva Habazaj, Kleves Elezi, Rialda Xhizdari, Nevila Alliu SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Prospective and applications of bacterial nanocellulose in dentistry
Yasmin Alimardani, Esmaeel Mirzakhani, Fereshteh Ansari, Hadi Pourjafar, Nadia Sadeghi Cellulose.2024; 31(13): 7819. CrossRef - Bacterial nanocelluloses as sustainable biomaterials for advanced wound healing and dressings
Atefeh Zarepour, Bahar Gok, Yasemin Budama-Kilinc, Arezoo Khosravi, Siavash Iravani, Ali Zarrabi Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2024; 12(48): 12489. CrossRef - Sulfated endospermic nanocellulose crystals prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1
Enrique Javier Carvajal-Barriga, Wendy Fitzgerald, Emilios K. Dimitriadis, Leonid Margolis, R. Douglas Fields Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - A Novel Approach for the Fabrication of 3D-Printed Dental Membrane Scaffolds including Antimicrobial Pomegranate Extract
Hatice Karabulut, Songul Ulag, Basak Dalbayrak, Elif Arisan, Turgut Taskin, Mehmet Guncu, Burak Aksu, Alireza Valanezhad, Oguzhan Gunduz Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(3): 737. CrossRef - Current advances of nanocellulose application in biomedical field
M.Y. Leong, Y.L. Kong, M.Y. Harun, C.Y. Looi, W.F. Wong Carbohydrate Research.2023; 532: 108899. CrossRef - Bacterial cellulose as a potential biopolymer in biomedical applications: a state-of-the-art review
Prachi Shrivastav, Sheersha Pramanik, Gayatri Vaidya, Mohamed A. Abdelgawad, Mohammed M. Ghoneim, Ajeet Singh, Bassam M. Abualsoud, Larissa Souza Amaral, Mohammed A. S. Abourehab Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2022; 10(17): 3199. CrossRef - Nanocelluloses as new generation materials: natural resources, structure-related properties, engineering nanostructures, and technical challenges
Ahmed Barhoum, Vibhore K. Rastogi, Bhupender K. Mahur, Amit Rastogi, Fatehy M. Abdel-Haleem, Pieter Samyn Materials Today Chemistry.2022; 26: 101247. CrossRef - The current natural/chemical materials and innovative technologies in periodontal diseases therapy and regeneration: A narrative review
Peyman Esmaeili Fard Barzegar, Reza Ranjbar, Mohsen Yazdanian, Elahe Tahmasebi, Mostafa Alam, Kamyar Abbasi, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Keyvan Esmaeili Fard Barzegar Materials Today Communications.2022; 32: 104099. CrossRef
-
272
View
-
9
Download
-
11
Web of Science
-
9
Crossref
|