-
The effect of resin thickness on polymerization characteristics of silorane-based composite resin
-
Sung-Ae Son, Hyoung-Mee Roh, Bock Hur, Yong-Hoon Kwon, Jeong-Kil Park
-
Restor Dent Endod 2014;39(4):310-318. Published online September 5, 2014
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.310
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF PubReader ePub
- Objectives
This study examined the influence of the resin thickness on the polymerization of silorane- and methacrylate-based composites. Materials and MethodsOne silorane-based (Filtek P90, 3M ESPE) and two methacrylate-based (Filtek Z250 and Z350, 3M ESPE) composite resins were used. The number of photons were detected using a photodiode detector at the different thicknesses (thickness, 1, 2 and 3 mm) specimens. The microhardness of the top and bottom surfaces was measured (n = 15) using a Vickers hardness with 200 gf load and 15 sec dwell time conditions. The degree of conversion (DC) of the specimens was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Scratched powder of each top and bottom surface of the specimen dissolved in ethanol for transmission FTIR spectroscopy. The refractive index was measured using a Abbe-type refractometer. To measure the polymerization shrinkage, a linometer was used. The results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at p < 0.05 level. ResultsThe silorane-based resin composite showed the lowest filler content and light attenuation among the specimens. P90 showed the highest values in the DC and the lowest microhardness at all depth. In the polymerization shrinkage, P90 showed a significantly lower shrinkage than the rest two resin products (p < 0.05). P90 showed a significantly lower refractive index than the remaining two resin products (p < 0.05). ConclusionsDC, microhardness, polymerization rate and refractive index linearly decreased as specimen thickness linearly increased. P90 showed much less polymerization shrinkage compared to other specimens. P90, even though achieved the highest DC, showed the lowest microhardness and refractive index.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - A Year-Long Comparison of Dentin Bond Strength Using the Co-Curing Technique and Conventional Adhesive Application
Josipa Vukelja Bosnić, Eva Klarić, Ivan Sever, Zrinka Tarle
Journal of Composites Science.2025; 9(3): 131. CrossRef - The influence of inorganic fillers on the light transmission through resin-matrix composites during the light-curing procedure: an integrative review
Rita Fidalgo-Pereira, Daniela Carpio, Orlanda Torres, Oscar Carvalho, Filipe Silva, Bruno Henriques, Mutlu Özcan, Júlio C. M. Souza
Clinical Oral Investigations.2022; 26(9): 5575. CrossRef - Conversion, Polymerization Shrinkage, Heat Generation, and Depth of Cure of Novel Dental Composites
Saad Liaqat, Humaira Jabeen
Pakistan BioMedical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of Polymerization on the Color of Resin Composites
B Korkut, G Dokumacigil, N Murat, PY Atali, B Tarcin, GB Gocmen
Operative Dentistry.2022; 47(5): 514. CrossRef - Shrinkage Stress and Temperature Variation in Resin Composites Cured via Different Photoactivation Methods: Insights for Standardisation of the Photopolymerisation
Guilherme dos Santos Sousa, Gabriel Felipe Guimarães, Edilmar Marcelino, José Eduardo Petit Rodokas, Arilson José de Oliveira Júnior, Ivana Cesarino, Alcides Lopes Leão, Carla dos Santos Riccardi, Mohammad Arjmand, Rafael Plana Simões
Polymers.2021; 13(13): 2065. CrossRef - Effect of the incorporation of silica blow spun nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles (SiO2/Ag) on the mechanical, physicochemical, and biological properties of a low-viscosity bulk-fill composite resin
Soraya Salmanzadeh Ardestani, Roberta Ferreti Bonan, Mariaugusta Ferreira Mota, Rosiane Maria da Costa Farias, Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Panmella Pereira Maciel, Flávia Maria de Moraes Ramos-Perez, André Ulisses Dantas Batis
Dental Materials.2021; 37(10): 1615. CrossRef - Light-Curing Units, Photoinitiators System, and Monomers on Physico-Mechanical Properties of Experimental Composite Resins
Gustavo Furlan da Silva Prezotto, Weverteon Soares de Lima, Rafael Pino Vitti, Ariel Farias da Silva, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, William Cunha Brandt
Matéria (Rio de Janeiro).2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Influence of Different Cordless Light-emitting-diode Units and Battery Levels on Chemical, Mechanical, and Physical Properties of Composite Resin
IO Cardoso, AC Machado, DNR Teixeira, FC Basílio, A Marletta, PV Soares
Operative Dentistry.2020; 45(4): 377. CrossRef - Shrinkage in composites: An enigma
Dhakshinamoorthy Malarvizhi, Arumugam Karthick, NewBegin Selvakumar Gold Pearlin Mary, Alagarsamy Venkatesh
Journal of International Oral Health.2019; 11(5): 244. CrossRef - Development and status of resin composite as dental restorative materials
Xinxuan Zhou, Xiaoyu Huang, Mingyun Li, Xian Peng, Suping Wang, Xuedong Zhou, Lei Cheng
Journal of Applied Polymer Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of the Time of Salivary Contamination during Light Curing on Degree of Conversion and Microhardness of a Restorative Composite Resin
Rasoul Sahebalam, Alireza Boruziniat, Fahimeh Mohammadzadeh, Abdolrasoul Rangrazi
Biomimetics.2018; 3(3): 23. CrossRef - LIGHT POLYMERIZATION OF PHOTO-CURED COMPOSITE MATERIALS: MODERN APPROACHES AND APPLICATION PECULIARITIES
O. A. Udod, V. H. Tsentilo, O. M. Adamenko
Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine.2018; 2(4): 72. CrossRef - Resistencia a la compresión del ionómero de vidrio y de la resina compuesta. Estudio in vitro
Sara Blanco Lerech, Sebastián Frías Tarón, Arnulfo Tarón Dunoyer, José María Bustillo Arrieta, Antonio Díaz Caballero
Revista Odontológica Mexicana.2017; 21(2): 109. CrossRef - Compressive strength of glass ionomer and composite resin. In vitro study
Sara Blanco Lerech, Sebastián Frías Tarón, Arnulfo Tarón Dunoyer, José María Bustillo Arrieta, Antonio Díaz Caballero
Revista Odontológica Mexicana.2017; 21(2): e107. CrossRef - Influência de três modos de fotopolimerização sobre a microdureza de três resinas compostas
Andréa Cristina Schneider, Márcio José Mendonça, Roberta Bento Rodrigues, Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro Busato, Veridiana Camilotti
Polímeros.2016; 26(spe): 37. CrossRef - Vickers microhardness comparison of 4 composite resins with different types of filler.
Rene García-Contreras, Rogelio Scougall-Vilchis, Laura Acosta-Torres, Concepción Arenas-Arrocena, Rigoberto García-Garduño, Javier de la Fuente-Hernández
Journal Oral Of Research.2015; 4(5): 313. CrossRef
-
277
View
-
1
Download
-
16
Crossref
-
The effect of different flute design and torque-controlled motor on the shaping ability of simulated resin root canals
-
Hyoung-Mee Roh, Bock Huh, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Jeong-Kil Park
-
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2005;30(6):486-492. Published online November 30, 2005
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.486
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of the two different Ni-Ti file systems and the two different engine systems in simulated canals.
A total of four groups of each 10 were tested. Each group was instrumented with HeroShaper®and Endo-Mate2® (Group HE), HeroShaper® and Tecnika® (Group HT), ProFile® and Endo-Mate2® (Group PE), and ProFile® and Tecnika® (Group PT).
Canal preparation time was recorded. The images of pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed. The amounts of increased width and centering ratio were measured and calculated at apical 1, 3 and 5 mm levels.
These data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test
The results of this study were as follows;
1. Canal preparation time of HT group was the shortest (p < 0.05).
2. The amount of increased canal width in HE group was significantly larger than PT group at apical 1 mm level (p < 0.05). At apical 3 mm level, PT group was significantly smaller than other groups (p < 0.05). At apical 5 mm level, PE group was significantly larger than PT group (p < 0.05).
3. The amount of centering ratio in HE group was significantly larger than other groups (p < 0.05). At apical 5 mm level, HT group was significantly larger than PE group and PT group (p < 0.05).
Under the condition of this study, torque-controlled endodontic motor is safer than no torque controlled motor, especially when the active file is used.
|
KACD
