Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Frank C. Setzer 1 Article
Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics
Dephne Jack Xin Leong, Frank C. Setzer, Martin Trope, Bekir Karabucak
Restor Dent Endod 2016;41(2):98-105.   Published online March 28, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.98
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for potential use in revascularization or pulp regeneration was evaluated.

Materials and Methods

One resilient lyophilized collagen scaffold (COLL), releasing metronidazole and clindamycin, was compared to an experimental injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid scaffold (PLGA), releasing clindamycin. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) were seeded at densities of 1.0 × 104, 2.5 × 104, and 5.0 × 104. The cells were investigated by light microscopy (cell morphology), MTT assay (cell proliferation) and a cytokine (IL-8) ELISA test (biocompatibility).

Results

Under microscope, the morphology of cells coincubated for 7 days with the scaffolds appeared healthy with COLL. Cells in contact with PLGA showed signs of degeneration and apoptosis. MTT assay showed that at 5.0 × 104 hDPSCs, COLL demonstrated significantly higher cell proliferation rates than cells in media only (control, p < 0.01) or cells co-incubated with PLGA (p < 0.01). In ELISA test, no significant differences were observed between cells with media only and COLL at 1, 3, and 6 days. Cells incubated with PLGA expressed significantly higher IL-8 than the control at all time points (p < 0.01) and compared to COLL after 1 and 3 days (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The COLL showed superior biocompatibility and thus may be suitable for endodontic regeneration purposes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Advances in scaffolds used forpulp–dentinecomplex tissue engineering: A narrative review
    Parisa Noohi, Mohammad J. Abdekhodaie, Mohammad H. Nekoofar, Kerstin M. Galler, Paul M. H. Dummer
    International Endodontic Journal.2022; 55(12): 1277.     CrossRef
  • In vitro performance of a nanobiocomposite scaffold containing boron-modified bioactive glass nanoparticles for dentin regeneration
    Reza Moonesi Rad, Engin Pazarçeviren, Elif Ece Akgün, Zafer Evis, Dilek Keskin, Sıla Şahin, Ayşen Tezcaner
    Journal of Biomaterials Applications.2019; 33(6): 834.     CrossRef
  • Biological effects of silk fibroin 3D scaffolds on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs)
    M. Collado-González, M. P. Pecci-Lloret, D. García-Bernal, S. Aznar-Cervantes, R. E. Oñate-Sánchez, J. M. Moraleda, J. L. Cenis, F. J. Rodríguez-Lozano
    Odontology.2018; 106(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Pulp Regeneration Concepts for Nonvital Teeth: From Tissue Engineering to Clinical Approaches
    Valérie Orti, Pierre-Yves Collart-Dutilleul, Sofía Piglionico, Orsolya Pall, Frédéric Cuisinier, Ivan Panayotov
    Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews.2018; 24(6): 419.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of Human Dental Pulp Cells on a Potential Injectable Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Microsphere Scaffold
    Huiru Zou, Guanhua Wang, Fang Song, Xudong Shi
    Journal of Endodontics.2017; 43(5): 745.     CrossRef
  • Biocompatibility of hydrogel-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
    Sheva Naahidi, Mousa Jafari, Megan Logan, Yujie Wang, Yongfang Yuan, Hojae Bae, Brian Dixon, P. Chen
    Biotechnology Advances.2017; 35(5): 530.     CrossRef
  • 196 View
  • 2 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Close layer
TOP