Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

Ömer Uysal

1 Article

Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results: Safa Tuncer, Mustafa Demirci, Evren Öztaş, Neslihan Tekçe, Ömer Uysal; Restor Dent Endod 2017;42(4):253-263. Published online August 21, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.4.253

Objectives

The aim of the study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of occlusal carious restorations using nanofill and microhybrid composites, in combination with 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesives, in patients who were going to commence orthodontic treatment.

Materials and Methods

A total of 118 restorations for occlusal caries were conducted prior to orthodontic treatment. Occlusal restorations were performed both with Filtek Supreme XT (3M ESPE) and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) before beginning orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic bands. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-year recalls.

Results

None of the microhybrid (Filtek Z250) and nanofill (Filtek Supreme XT) composite restorations was clinically unacceptable with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear or loss of anatomical form, recurrent caries, marginal adaptation, or surface texture. A 100% success rate was recorded for both composite materials. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the clinical evaluation criteria between Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme XT restorations for each evaluation period.

Conclusions

The composite restorations showed promising clinical results relating to color matching, marginal discoloration, wear or loss of anatomical form, recurrent caries, marginal adaptation, and surface texture at the end of the 5-year evaluation period.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications
Philippe Francois, Mathieu Izart, Timothy Fasham, Yasmine Smail, Marie Jannot, Stéphane Le Goff, Fleur Beres, Max Troizier-Cheyne, Sara Bergman, Christian Moussally, Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Elisabeth Dursun, Romain Ceinos, Elisa Caussin, Jean-Pierre Attal
Polymers.2025; 17(5): 564. CrossRef
The Application of Nanomaterials for the Rescue of a Single Compromised Tooth with a Multidisciplinary Approach: Case Report and Scoping Review
Riccardo Aiuto, Federico Alcide Villani, Erica Lipani, Aysenur Kara, Daniele Garcovich, Mario Dioguardi, Elisabetta Carli, Dino Re
The Open Dentistry Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Sucrose Concentration on Streptococcus mutans Adhesion to Dental Material Surfaces
Anamarija Zore, Franc Rojko, Nives Matijaković Mlinarić, Jona Veber, Aleksander Učakar, Roman Štukelj, Andreja Pondelak, Andrijana Sever Škapin, Klemen Bohinc
Coatings.2024; 14(2): 165. CrossRef
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Of Various Core Build – up Materials In Maxillary Anterior Teeth - An In-Vitro Study
Pavithra Prabakaran, Laxmi Priya C H, Annapoorna B S
Journal of Indian Dental Association.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A three-year randomized clinical trial evaluating direct posterior composite restorations placed with three self-etch adhesives
Joseph Sabbagh, Layal El Masri, Jean Claude Fahd, Paul Nahas
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry.2021; 8(1): 92. CrossRef
Enhanced mechanical properties are possible with urethane dimethacrylate-based experimental restorative dental composite
Aftab Ahmed Khan, Abdulaziz Abdullah AlKhureif, Badreldin A Mohamed, Leonel S J Bautista
Materials Research Express.2020; 7(10): 105307. CrossRef

189 View
0 Download
6 Crossref

Author index