The nanoleakage patterns of different dentin adhesive systems

Tae-Yeon Lee; Byeong-Hoon Cho; Ho-Hyun Son

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.169

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 28(2); 2003 > Article

Original Article The nanoleakage patterns of different dentin adhesive systems: Tae-Yeon Lee, Byeong-Hoon Cho, Ho-Hyun Son; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2003;28(2):169-177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.169
Published online: March 31, 2003

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.

Corresponding author (hhson@snu.ac.kr)

21 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

I. Introduction
II. Materials and Methods
III. Results
IV. Discussion
V. Conclusions
REFERENCES

I. Introduction

Previous studies have focused on marginal gaps as the major pathway of microleakage. But Sano et al.1) described the occurrence of microleakage in the absence of gaps and the subsurface porosity of demineralized dentin. Yu and Davis2) described microleakage within or beneath smear layers and resin-bonded dentin using silver nitrate and SEM/EDS techniques. These results indicate that investigators should examine microleakage pathways at high magnification rather than simply relying on macroscopic dye penetration.

Dentin adhesive systems with their micromechanical adhesion to dentin has greatly reduced microleakage3). However, the ideal sealing that the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is rarely achieved, leaving some porous regions within the exposed collagen network4). These porosities can be penetrated by solution such as silver nitrate, even in gap-free bonding between denin and restorative composite resin, and this has been termed nanoleakage5). The nanoleakage tests can provide much useful information on the sealing ability of dentin adhesive systems and the quality of the hybrid layer6).

The pore size of nanoleakage is so small that penetration of bacteria into the compound zone can be excluded, but not of metabolic products like acids4). It should also be considered that marginal gap formation may be caused by the degradation of the adhesive bonding components whereas nanoleakage cannot be seen as an indicator for this loss of attachment.

Poor adhesion to tooth structure and the polymerization contraction of restorative materials are the main causes of microleakage, which can be greater if there is a mismatch in coefficients of thermal expansion of teeth and restorative material. Many leakage tests have used thermal stress to stimulate the clinical situation7). This phenomenon may cause the breakdown of the bond and the subsequent failure of restoration. The effects of thermal stress have often shown increased microleakage8), but in the case of nanoleakage, there is not sufficient information.

Dentin adhesive systems are currently available as three-step, two-step, and single-step systems, depending on how the three cardinal steps of etching, priming, and bonding to tooth substrates are accomplished or simplified9). Two-step systems are sub-divided into single-bottle self-etching primers that require an additional bonding step. The recently introduced single-step, self-etching adhesives further combined these three bonding procedures into a single-step application.

Self-etching adhesive systems are attractive in that prior removal of the smear layer and smear plugs is not required. This reduces the potential for post-operative sensitivity and bonding problems associated with movement of dentinal fluid through patent dentinal tubules. The technique-sensitivity associated with bonding to optimally wet collagen matrix is also eliminated10). Since they do not require a separated acid-etching step, they are less likely to result in a discrepancy between the depth of demineralization and the depth of resin infiltration11) because both processes occur simultaneously.

The purpose of this study was: (1) to compare nanoleakage patterns of total etching system and self-etching adhesives and (2) to investigate the change of the nanoleakage patterns after thermocycling.

II. Materials and Methods

Thirty freshly extracted human molars stored in 0.5% chloramine-T solution were used. Occlusal, buccal and lingual enamel was removed using a model trimmer under running water. The flat occlusal dentin surfaces were examined under a microscope to insure that no enamel remnants remained. The dentin surfaces were wet ground with 500-grit silicon carbide paper (Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluf, IL, USA) for 60 sec.

Three dentin adhesive systems were used in this study (Table 1). Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP) was used as total etching adhesive system. Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Prompt L-pop (LP) were used as self-etching adhesives. Each 10 dentin surfaces were treated with one of the dentin adhesive systems following each manufacturer's instruction (Table 2). 2mm thick of Z-250 hybrid resin composite (3M Dental Products Inc., St. Paul, USA) was light-cured for 40 sec using XL 3000 curing light (3M) on the treated surface. After storage in tap water at 37℃ for 24 hr, the margins were finished and polished with Sof-lex disks (3M). The specimens were checked using a microscope to ensure that no flash was left along the exposed dentin surfaces.

Five teeth of each dentin adhesive group were thermocycled at 5-55℃ water for 30,000 cycles. Dwell time was 1 min and transfer time was 15 sec for each cycle. Root apices of all teeth were sealed with Z-250 composite (3M), and the entire tooth surface except for the bonded interface and 1mm of the tooth surface adjacent to the interface, was coated with two layers of nail varnish. The teeth were placed in 50% (w/v) silver nitrate solution in total darkness for 24 hr, rinsed in running water for 5 min, and immersed in photo-developing solution under fluorescent light for 8 hr in order to reduce the silver ions to metallic silver. After removal from the developing solution, the teeth were placed in running water for 5 min. The teeth were embedded in translucent resin (Epofix; Struers, Denmark), and sectioned buccoligually across the bonded surface, making a total of 20 specimens for each dentin adhesive system.

All the sectioned surfaces were polished with increasingly fine diamond pastes (6, 3, 1µm; Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluf, IL, USA). The specimens were cleaned ultra-sonically, air dried, mounted on aluminum stubs and placed in a desiccator for 24 hr, and coated with thin gold. 10 specimens for each group were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM840A Jeol, Japan) in backscattering electron mode. The silver particles were confirmed with energy dispersive X-ray system (EDS; Oxford, England).

III. Results

All specimens in the six groups showed nanoleakage at the adhesive/dentin interface. Seven specimens (2 in MP, 2 in SE, 3 in LP thermocycled groups) were excluded from the analysis because of definite marginal microleakage as visible gaps between dentin and composite (Fig. 2[a]). The silver particles were confirmed with EDS (Fig. 2[b]). The conical shape of global silver penetration pattern was shown in Fig. 1[a]. And the gap free margins are illustrated in Fig. 1[b]. Typical leakage patterns at the adhesive/dentin interfaces for each dentin adhesive system are illustrated in Fig. 2[a]-[d] under the SEM observation.

Scotchbond Multi-Purpose produced a very distinct hybrid layer which was approximately 15-20µm thick. Distinct resin tags were also observed in Fig. 3[a]. Accumulation of silver particles were noted at the base of the hybrid layer. And in some parts, loosely distributed patches of silver deposite appeared in the hybrid layer. Silver was also deposited around the resin tags. Peri and lateral tubules were filled with silver.

The leakage patterns for Clearfil SE Bond was illustrated in Fig. 3[b]. The hybrid layer was approximately 2-3µm thick. The resin tags were not clear. Silver particles were deposited along the lower half of the hybrid layer by thin line. At top of the hybrid layer, amorphous silver particles were also identified beneath the layer of composite resin.

Prompt L-Pop produced a thin hybrid layer of approximately 2-3µm (Fig. 3[c] and [d]). This system showed few resin tags. Silver deposited along the base of the hybrid layer, with isolated deposits located throughout its whole thickness in many specimens. In another specimens, distinct bands of silver deposits could be detected within the hybrid layer, but silver deposition was not distinct in the base of the hybrid layer.

There were no changes in leakage patterns in thermocycled groups. But the silver distribution in the base of and within the hybrid layer was somewhat more intense (Fig. 4[a]-[d]).

IV. Discussion

In general, all dentin adhesive systems used in this study showed nanoleakage within the hybrid layer and adhesive resin to some extent. This may be a consequence of incomplete penetration of the adhesive resin into the demineralized dentin, leaving the collagen not enveloped by resin, or this may result from polymerization shrinkage12). The nanoleakage pathway may be located within the adhesive resin, within the hybrid layer and within partially- or fully-demineralized dentin13). Porosity in the hybrid layer not infiltrated by adhesive resin is the most important pathway for nanoleakage and influences the durability of the bond, since solutions can penetrate into these nanometer-sized spaces and hydrolyze the exposed collagen and adhesive resin12). The spaces are too small to allow bacterial immigration. However, bacterial products, e.g. acids, might use nanoleakage as penetration pathways through the hybrid layer and dentinal tubules. And the unprotected protein at the dentin adhesive interface may be accessible to bacterial proteolytic enzyme33).

The silver crystals have a minimum diameter of 3 to 5 nm; after longer treatment these small crystals fuse to form large aggregates of 15 to 50 nm diameter14). Collagen can be stained strongly with silver15). The resin of current dentin adhesive systems has been reported not to permeate uniformly within the spaces around the collagen fibrils, leaving them exposed. It may be speculated that when the specimens were immersed in the silver nitrate solutions, the silver penetrated the spaces existing within the hybrid layer by seeping around and precipitating onto the exposed collagen fibrils16).

In the dye penetration studies reported in the literatures, the thermocycling regimens varied in temperature number of cycles and dwell time. Temperature extremes have varied among researchers with a mean low temperature of 6.6℃ and mean high temperature of 55.5℃17). The time of immersion of specimens in hot or cold fluids has varied from a few seconds to several minutes. Harper et al.18) pointed out that a patient would not tolerate direct contact of vital tooth with extremely hot or cold substances for extended periods of time, so dwell time longer than 15 sec would seem to be inappropriate. According to the study of Miyazaky et al.19), the bond strength of dentin adhesive systems decreased after 30,000 cycles, especially in the self etching systems. Thus, temperature of 5-55℃, dwell time of 15 sec and 30,000 cycling numbers were selected in this study.

During the thermal cycling test, the hot water may accelerate hydrolysis of the resin composite as well as the bonding agent and extract poorly polymerized resin oligomers20). The results of this study showed that thermocycling did not affect nanoleakage greatly for dentin adhesive systems used. The results are in agreement with those of previous microleakage studies21,22). Harper et al.18) showed that the rate of temperature change beneath resin restorations was relatively low after taking cold or hot fluids, indicating that the linear coefficient of thermal expansion would not greatly influence the dimensional change of the material and therefore not affect microleakage. Stryom et al.23) suggested that the bonding of the adhesive to tooth structure is micro-mechanical in nature and would not be adversely affected by temperature cycling. High bond strength and the formation of a hybrid layer at the adhesive/dentin interface resulted in gap-free restorations16). Although porosities are still present within the hybrid layer and may permit molecular leakage, it is not believed that thermal stresses imposed on the restorations would be great enough to enlarge the porosities or create gaps at the interface and subsequently increase the dye penetration24). The nanoleakage phenomenon is related to the process of bonding and is not caused by a later fatigue of the hybrid layer25).

The bonding agents used in this study achieved almost totally gap-free margins at the dentin-restoration interfaces. This may be attributed to several factors. The stress generated by polymerization contraction of resin composites has been reported to be about 13-17 MPa and shear bond strength of approximately 21 MPa is believed to be necessary to prevent marginal contraction gaps26). All three adhesive systems in this study are capable of achieving higher bond strengths, which theoretically resist the polymerization contraction stresses. Feilzer et al.27) found that the resulting stress inside a restoration was proportional to the ratio of its bonded to non-bonded surfaces. The flat occlusal composite restorations in this study have almost as much free surface area as bonded surface area, and hence have a C-factor of less than 1. Feilzer et al.27) stated that restorations with C<1 are the only restorations likely to survive polymerization contraction stresses. All these factors may explain the gap-free margins observed in this study, even though bulk placement technique was employed. The composite thickness was less than 2mm, which is the recommended initial thickness for the incremental technique. Using silver nitrate staining, the artificial gaps created upon high vacuum dehydration during specimen preparation can be easily differentiated from true gaps by the absence of silver staining along the gap border with the backscattered electron mode28). The conical shape of the penetration-induced structure can be explained by the diffusion behavior (Fick's first law) of the silver nitrate solution during the exposure time of 24 hr25).

Scotchbond Multi-Purpose demonstrated more intense accumulation of silver in the base of hybrid layer than Clearfil SE bond and Prompt L-Pop. This may mean that Scotchbond Multi-Purpose has much more porosity in the base of hybrid layer than other systems. Silver ions are easily reduced to metallic silver by organic material, especially in the presence of collagen fibers. Intense silver accumulation along the base of hybrid layer may have resulted from that silver ions had filled collagen-rich and resin-poor spaces at the bottom half of deminerailzed dentin29). Silver deposition in the hybrid layer may represent incomplete removal of water. Using air stream to dry applied primer may not effectively remove residual water from a HEMA/water primer30). Remaining water interrupts the formation of adequate polymer network, leaving silver penetrable porosity.

Clearfil SE Bond simultaneously etches and primes the dentin, allowing the adhesive resin to fully penetrate the demineralized dentin. So theoretically silver deposition may not occur at the base of hybrid layer. However, in this study, this system could not ensure complete penetration of adhesive resin into the inter-fibrilar collagen spaces, otherwise, silver would not appear within the hybrid layer.

Prompt L-Pop demonstrated minimal deposition of silver in the base of hybrid layer and the distributed silver particles in the whole hybrid layer. This nanoleakage patterns cannot be attributed to incomplete resin infiltration. These micro-voids more likely represent areas in which water was incompletely removed from the resin-dentin interfaces. The presence of residual water within the adhesive may lead to domains of incomplete polymerization of the adhesive or sequestrations of more hydrophilic oligomers in these particular regions9). All self-etch systems contain water to ionize the acidic monomers for effective demineralization of dentinal hard tissues9). Whereas water is comparatively easy to remove with the use of acetone-based adhesives, because its azeotrope contains more water and it has a higher vapor pressure, it is difficult to remove the last traces of water from ethanol-based adhesives, due to the increased capacity of ethanol to form hydrogen bonds with water9).

The deeper the demineralized dentin and thicker the hybrid layer, the greater is the potential for nanoleakage of silver ions within the partially- or fully-demineralized dentin and the hybrid layer, or within partially polymerized adhesive resin31). The critical index of the quality of a hybrid layer may be how much silver it takes up per unit volume or per unit depth. Self-etching systems that do not etch as deeply as total etch systems may have as much or more silver uptake per unit volume of hybrid layer than more aggressive etching systems31).

Although the mechanisms leading to the nanoleakage phenomenon are not completely explored, it seems to be evident from our study that nanolealage is mainly due to a discrepancy between the depth of etching and the depth of resin penetration in the cases of total etching systems like Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Also, it should be considered that non-polymerized primer monomers and residual water additionally might affect porosities in the hybrid layer region which form nanoleakage as well32) in the cases of self-etching systems like Clearfil SE Bond and Prompt L-Pop. It is too early to judge the clinical relevance of nanoleakage. But the influences in marginal discoloration, recurrent caries, post-operative symptoms and the longevity of the composite restoration cannot be excluded. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of this phenomenon and, if necessary, to develop adhesive systems minimizing nanoleakage in order to optimize dentin bonding.

V. Conclusions

Different nanoleakage patterns were observed with the different adhesive systems.
- -In the group of MP, accumulation of silver particles were noted at the base of the hybrid layer. And in some parts, loosely distributed patches of silver particles appeared in the hybrid layer. Silver was also deposited around the resin tags, the peri and lateral tubules.
- -In the group of SE, silver particles were deposited along the lower half of the hybrid layer by thin line. At top of the hybrid layer, amorphous silver particles were also identified beneath the layer of composite resin.
- -In the group of LP, silver deposited along the base of the hybrid layer, with isolated deposits located throughout its whole thickness in many specimens. In another specimens, distinct bands of silver deposits could be detected within the hybrid layer, but silver deposition was not distinct in the base of hybrid layer.
The dentin adhesive systems used in this study did not achieve perfect sealing at the composite/dentin interface.
There were no changes in nanoleakage patterns in thermocycled groups. But the silver distribution in the base of and within the hybrid layer was somewhat more intense.

REFERENCES

1. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994;19: 59-64.PubMed
2. Yu XY, Davis EL. Orientation and progression of microleakage in restoration with smear layer-mediated dental bonding agent. Quintessence Int. 1992;23: 551-555.PubMed
3. Retief DH. Do adhesive prevent micro-leakage? Int Dent J. 1994;44: 19-26.PubMed
4. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8: 306-335.Article PubMed PDF
5. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage:leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20(1):18-25.PubMed
6. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2000;16(1):48-56.PubMed
7. Trowbridge HO. Model systems for determining biologic effects of micro-leakage. Oper Dent. 1987;12: 164-172.PubMed
8. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of micro-leakage around dental restorations: a reviw. Oper Dent. 1997;22: 173-185.PubMed
9. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama . Tow modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002;81(7):472-476.Article PubMed PDF
10. Perdigão J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater. 1999;15: 282-295.PubMed
11. Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP. Interfacial chemintry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 1458-1463.Article PubMed PDF
12. Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Burrow MF, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20(4):160-167.PubMed
13. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78: 906-911.Article PubMed PDF
14. Hayet MA. Silver in Positive Staining for electron microscopy. 1975;New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 124-146.
15. Eick JD, Miller RG, Robinson SJ, Bowles CQ. Quantitative analysis of the dentin adhesive interface by Auger spectroscopy. J Dent Res. 1996;75: 1027-1033.PubMed
16. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(1):57-65.PubMed
17. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Controlling dentin penetration in computer micro-leakage tracer mapping. J Dent. 1997;25: 129-136.PubMed
18. Harper RH, Schnell RJ, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. In vivo measurements of thermal diffusion through restorations of various materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43: 180-185.Article PubMed
19. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2000;25: 75-80.PubMed
20. Bastioli C, Romano G, Migliaresi C. Water sorption and mechanical properties of dental composites. Biomaterials. 1990;11: 219-223.Article PubMed
21. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in micro-leakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater. 1995;11: 47-51.Article PubMed
22. Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M, Pashley DH. Permeability and microleakage of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 1994;22: 49-56.PubMed
23. Strydom C, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. Laboratory evaluation of the Gluma 3-step bonding system. Am J Dent. 1995;8: 93-98.PubMed
24. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):189-196.Article PubMed
25. Dorfer CE, Staehle HJ, Wurst MW, Duschner H, Pioch T. The nanoleakage phenomenon:influence of different dentin bonding agents, thermocycling and etching time. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108(4):346-351.Article PubMed PDF
26. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent. 1994;7: 44-46.PubMed
27. Feilzer AJ, de-Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66: 1636-1639.PubMed
28. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res. 1995;74: 1168-1178.Article PubMed PDF
29. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agent. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(9):618-631.PubMed
30. Paul SJ, Welter DA, Ghazi M, Pashley D. Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 1999;24(3):181-188.PubMed
31. Pereira PN, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strengths and nanoleakage:evaluation of a new assessment method. Am J Dent. 2001;14(2):100-104.PubMed
32. Griffiths BM, Watson TF. Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1: 119-131.PubMed
33. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Duschner H, Garcia-Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface:a review. Am J Dent. 2001;14(4):252-258.PubMed

Fig. 1

[a] Backscattering SEM images of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose specimens demonstrate the conical shape of global silver penetration pattern at low magnification (100×). [b] Note the gap free margin at high magnification (1000×). C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 2

[a] Backscattering SEM image (2000×) of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose specimen shows the visible gaps (white arrow). [b] Backscattering SEM image of Clearfil SE

Bond : EDS proves the white line is silver. A;adhesive, C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 3

The nanoleakage patterns : [a] Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, [b] Clearfil SE Bond, [c] and [d] Prompt L-Pop. [a] shows silver accumulation at the base of hybrid layer. In [b], thin line of silver was noted in the base of hybrid layer. And distinct bands of silver deposits were observed within the hybrid layer in [c] and [d]. C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 4

The nanoleakage patterns of thermocycled groups : [a] Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, [b] Clearfil SE Bond, [c] and [d] Prompt L-Pop. Note that there were no differences in nanoleakage patterns between Fig.3[a]-[d] and Fig.4[a]-[d] except more intense silver penetration in Fig.4[a]-[d]. C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Table 1

Materials, manufacturers and compositions

Table 2

Bonding procedures according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The nanoleakage patterns of different dentin adhesive systems

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003;28(2):169-177. Published online March 31, 2003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.169

XML Download

Figure

The nanoleakage patterns of different dentin adhesive systems

Fig. 1 [a] Backscattering SEM images of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose specimens demonstrate the conical shape of global silver penetration pattern at low magnification (100×). [b] Note the gap free margin at high magnification (1000×). C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 2 [a] Backscattering SEM image (2000×) of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose specimen shows the visible gaps (white arrow). [b] Backscattering SEM image of Clearfil SE Bond : EDS proves the white line is silver. A;adhesive, C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 3 The nanoleakage patterns : [a] Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, [b] Clearfil SE Bond, [c] and [d] Prompt L-Pop. [a] shows silver accumulation at the base of hybrid layer. In [b], thin line of silver was noted in the base of hybrid layer. And distinct bands of silver deposits were observed within the hybrid layer in [c] and [d]. C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 4 The nanoleakage patterns of thermocycled groups : [a] Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, [b] Clearfil SE Bond, [c] and [d] Prompt L-Pop. Note that there were no differences in nanoleakage patterns between Fig.3[a]-[d] and Fig.4[a]-[d] except more intense silver penetration in Fig.4[a]-[d]. C;composite resin, D;demineralized dentin

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

The nanoleakage patterns of different dentin adhesive systems

Table 1

Materials, manufacturers and compositions

Table 2

Bonding procedures according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Table 1 Materials, manufacturers and compositions

Table 2 Bonding procedures according to the manufacturer's instructions.