Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Microleakage of various composite resin systems
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 28(2); 2003 > Article
Original Article Microleakage of various composite resin systems
In-Soo Kim, Kyung-San Min, Dong-Hoon Shin
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2003;28(2):127-133.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.127
Published online: March 31, 2003

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Korea.

Corresponding author (donyshin@dankook.ac.kr)

Copyright © 2003 Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

  • 16 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • The object of this study was to compare the microleakage between various composite resin systems of multistep, one-bottle, and self-etching systems using electrical conductivity.
    After making class V cavities (4×3×1.5 mm around CEJ), they were bulk filled with three kinds of resins of A3. Teeth were storaged in a saline solution for one day, after then, they were finished and polished using Sof-Lex system. Another stress of thermocycling was made for 500 times from 5° to 55℃ with each dwelling time of 10 seconds. Electrical conductivity (microamphere, µA) was checked four times: before and after cavity preparation, after filling, after thermocycling.
    One-way ANOVA and 95% Scheffe Post Hoc test was used for checking any statistical difference among groups. Another 95% Paired Samples T-test was also used for estimating any significant difference within group after cavity filling or thermocycling.
    The results were as follows:
    1. Every specimen showed various range of microleakage after filling.

      There was, however, no difference between composite resin systems.
    2. All composite resin systems showed marked increase in microleakage with a thermocycling (p<0.05), there was, however, no difference between composite resin systems.

    3. Although there was no significant difference between groups (p=0.078), one-bottle and self-etching systems seemed to be unstable than multistep system.

    Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that much more consideration should be needed when using thermally unstable one-bottle and self-etching systems that have multi-advantages from simplified step. More studies will be needed to solve these kinds of problems.
  • 1. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res. 1965;44(5):895-902.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 2. Wieczkowski G, Joynt RB, Davis EL, Yu XY, Cleary K. Leakage patterns associated with glassionomer-based resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1992;17(1):21-25.PubMed
  • 3. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The current status of composite materials and adhesive systems. 6: Techniques for indirect placement. Restorative Dent. 1991;7(1):21-23.PubMed
  • 4. Dumsha T, Biron G. Inhibition of marginal leakage with a dentin bonding agent. J Dent Res. 1984;63(10):1255-1257.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 5. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972;84: 1349-1357.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Stark MM. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. a comparative study in vitro. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 228-231.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Douglas WH, Chen CJ, Craig RG. Neutron activation analysis of microleakage around a hydrophobic composite restorative. J Dent Res. 1980;59(9):1507-1510.PubMed
  • 8. Nelsen RJ, Woldott RB, Paffenbarger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1952;44: 288.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Martinez CR, Greener EH. Utilization of electrical conductivity as an alternative method of assessing marginal leakage of pit and fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3(1):69-74.PubMed
  • 10. Marshall GW Jr. Dentin: Microstructure and characterization. Quintessence Int. 1993;24: 606-617.PubMed
  • 11. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34: 849-853.PubMed
  • 12. Croll TP, Helpin ML. Use of self-etching adhesive system and compomer for splinting traumatized incisors. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(1):53-56.PubMed
  • 13. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001;29(1):55-61.PubMed
  • 14. Kemp-scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990;69: 1240-1243.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 15. Nakano Y. A new electrical testing method on marginal leakage of composite resin restorations. Jap J Conserv Dent. 1985;28: 1183-1198.
  • 16. Verdonschot EH, Rondel P, Huysmans MC. Validity of eletrical conductance measurements in evaluating the marginal integrity of sealant restorations. Caries Res. 1995;29: 100-106.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent. 1998;10(6):296-304.PubMed
  • 18. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82: 209-213.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Ebisu S. A new electrical method for detecting marginal leakage of in vitro resin restorations. J Dent. 2000;28: 241-247.PubMed
  • 20. Besnault C, Attal JP. Influence of aa simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent. 2002;30: 1-6.PubMed
  • 21. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent. 2001;14(3):132-136.PubMed
  • 22. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1999;12: 291-294.PubMed
  • 23. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH, Puckett AD. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent. 1995;20(6):230-235.PubMed
  • 24. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent. 2001;29: 123-130.ArticlePubMed
Fig. 1
Diagram of electrical conductivity test
jkacd-28-127-g001.jpg
Fig. 2
Changing pattern of microleakage(electric conductivity)
jkacd-28-127-g002.jpg
Table 1
Materials and surface treatments
jkacd-28-127-i001.jpg
Table 2
Microleakage before and after cavity preparation Mean (S.D.); µA
jkacd-28-127-i002.jpg
Table 3
Microleakage after composite filling Mean (S.D.); µA
jkacd-28-127-i003.jpg
Table 4
Microleakage after thermocycling Mean (S.D.); µA

*:p < 0.05 **:p < 0.01

jkacd-28-127-i004.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Microleakage of various composite resin systems
        J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003;28(2):127-133.   Published online March 31, 2003
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      Microleakage of various composite resin systems
      Image Image
      Fig. 1 Diagram of electrical conductivity test
      Fig. 2 Changing pattern of microleakage(electric conductivity)
      Microleakage of various composite resin systems

      Materials and surface treatments

      Microleakage before and after cavity preparation Mean (S.D.); µA

      Microleakage after composite filling Mean (S.D.); µA

      Microleakage after thermocycling Mean (S.D.); µA

      *:p < 0.05 **:p < 0.01

      Table 1 Materials and surface treatments

      Table 2 Microleakage before and after cavity preparation Mean (S.D.); µA

      Table 3 Microleakage after composite filling Mean (S.D.); µA

      Table 4 Microleakage after thermocycling Mean (S.D.); µA

      *:p < 0.05 **:p < 0.01


      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      Close layer
      TOP