Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Precipitate from a combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 37(3); 2012 > Article
Reader's Forum Precipitate from a combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
Jin-Woo Kim
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2012;37(3):185-186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.3.185
Published online: August 29, 2012

Gangneung-Wonju National University, Korea.

©Copyights 2012. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 19 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
Recently I heard that Chlorhexidine can form a precipitate when used in combination with NaOCl during intra-canal irrigation. What's the adverse effect of this precipitate and how can I reduce the chance of precipitation?
From Dr. Yoon-Woo Park (Chuncheon Ye-dental clinic)
During the cleaning and shaping of the root canal, various irrigants have been used to reduce the residual debris, necrotic tissue, and bacteria, as well as to remove smear layer.1-3 Though sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the most common irrigant used in root canal treatment, chlorhexidine (CHX) has been suggested as either an alternative or an adjunct root canal irrigant because of its antimicrobial qualities and substantivity.4-7
A combination of NaOCl and CHX for root canal irrigation has been advocated to enhance their antimicrobial properties.8 Zehender proposed an irrigation regimen as the following: 2.5% NaOCl during instrumentation, and a final flush of the canals is performed in the sequence of 17% EDTA, 2.5% NaOCl, and 2% CHX.
However, the presence of NaOCl in the canals during irrigation with CHX produces an orange-brown precipitate known as parachloroaniline (PCA) (Figure 1).3,10-12 The precipitate occludes the dentinal tubules and may compromise the seal of the obturated root canal.12 Leaching of PCA from the insoluble precipitate is of concern because it has been shown to be cytotoxic in rats and possibly carcinogenic in humans (International Agency for Research on Cancer group 2B).13,14
To solve this problem, we have to try to prevent or minimize precipitation by preventing or minimizing the chance for the two irrigants to come in contact with each other. Basrani et al.11 recommended washing away the remaining NaOCl with alcohol or EDTA, before using CHX. Choi et al.15 compared different canal irrigation methods to prevent precipitation. There were no significant differences in percentage of remaining debris and patent tubules among all experimental groups at all levels.
It seems prudent to make an effort to prevent precipitation when using an irrigation regimen combining CHX and NaOCl.
Jin-Woo Kim (Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 1. Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981;89:321-328. ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:142-149. ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, Fillery E, Sodhi RN. Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. J Endod 2010;36:312-314. ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JC, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002;13:113-117. ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Siqueira JF Jr, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de Uzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998;24:414-416. ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod 1999;25:167-171. ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:768-772. ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1998;24:472-476. ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-398. ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Vivacqua-Gomes N, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Influence of irrigants on the coronal microleakage of laterally condensed gutta-percha root fillings. Int Endod J 2002;35:791-795. ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 2007;33:966-969. PubMed
  • 12. Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 2008;34:181-185. ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Chhabra RS, Huff JE, Haseman JK, Elwell MR, Peters AC. Carcinogenicity of p-chloroanaline in rats and mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1991;29:119-124. PubMed
  • 14. Barbin LE, Saquy PC, Guedes DF, Sousa-Neto MD, Estrela C, Pécora JD. Determination of para-chloroaniline and reactive oxygen species in chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine associated with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2008;34:1508-1514. ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Choi MS, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. The comparison of different canal irrigation methods to prevent reaction precipitate between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:80-87.Article
Figure 1
A representative photograph of brown precipitate formation after consequent use of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in experimental conditions.
rde-37-185-g001.jpg

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Precipitate from a combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
        Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(3):185-186.   Published online August 29, 2012
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      Precipitate from a combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
      Image
      Figure 1 A representative photograph of brown precipitate formation after consequent use of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in experimental conditions.
      Precipitate from a combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine

      Restor Dent Endod : Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
      Close layer
      TOP