A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea

Dong-Ho Shin; Se-Eun Park; In-Seok Yang; Juhea Chang; In-Bog Lee; Byeong-Hoon Cho; Ho-Hyun Son

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.087

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Restor Dent Endod > Volume 34(2); 2009 > Article

Original Article A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea: Dong-Ho Shin, Se-Eun Park, In-Seok Yang, Juhea Chang, In-Bog Lee, Byeong-Hoon Cho, Ho-Hyun Son; Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2009;34(2):87-94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.087
Published online: March 31, 2009

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Ho-Hyun Son. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 28-2 Yeongun-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul, Korea 110-749. Tel: 82-2-2072-2652, Fax: 82-2-2072-3859, hhson@snu.ac.kr

• Received: October 17, 2008 • Revised: October 31, 2008 • Accepted: December 10, 2008

18 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the current materials, methods and difficulties according to the year of licence and educational background of Korean dentists in Class II direct composite resin restorations.

Total 17 questions were included in the questionnaire. Questions were broadly divided into two parts; first, operator's information, and second, the materials and methods used in Class II posterior composite restoration. The questionnaire was sent to dentists enrolled in Korean Dental Association via e-mail. Total 12,193 e-mails were distributed to dentists, 2,612 e-mails were opened, and 840 mails (32.2%) were received from respondents. The data was statically analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS(v. 12.0.1, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

Male dentists among respondents was 79%. 60.3% of the respondents acquired their licences recently (1998-2007), and 77% practiced in private offices. 83.4% have acquired their knowledge through school lectures, conferences and seminars.

For the Class II restorations, gold inlays were preferred by 65.7% of respondents, while direct composite resin restorations were used by 12.1% amalgam users were only 4.4% of respondents.

For the restorative technique, 74.4% of respondents didn't use rubber dam as needed. For the matrix, mylar strip (53.4%), metal matrix (33.8%) and Palodent system (6.5%) were used. 99.6% of respondents restored the Class II cavity by incremental layering.

Obtaining of the tight interproximal contact was considered as the most difficult procedure (57.2%) followed by field isolation (21%).

Among various bonding systems, 22.6% of respondents preferred SE Bond and 20.2% used Single Bond. Z-250 was used most frequently among a variety of composite resins.
Keywords: Korean dentist; E-mail survey; Class II cavity restoration; Composite resin; Adhesive dentistry

REFERENCES

1. Wahl MJ. A resin alternative for posterior teeth: questions and answers on dental amalgam. Dent Update. 2003;30(5):256-262.Article PubMed
2. Manhart J, Garcia-Godov F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46(2):303-339.Article PubMed
3. Melchart D, Vogt S, Kohler W. Treatment of health complaints attributed to amalgam. J Dent Res. 2008;87(4):349-353.PubMed
4. Burke FJT, McHugh S, Hall AC, Randall RC, Widstrom E, Forss H. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J. 2003;194(11):613-618.Article PubMed PDF
5. Burke FJT, McHugh S, Randall RC, Meyers IA, Pitt J, Hall AC. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002. Aust Dent J. 2004;49(4):185-191.Article PubMed
6. Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: an unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(1):15-18. 21-24. 26.PubMed
7. Ortengren U. On composite resin materials. Degradation, erosion and possible adverse effects in dentists. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2000;(141):1-61.
8. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(10):1387-1398.Article PubMed
9. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, Inai N, Yamada T, Tagami J. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent Mater J. 1998;17: 51-58.Article PubMed
10. Rabe P, Holmen A, Sjogren P. Attitudes, awareness and perceptions on evidence based dentistry and scientific publications among dental professionals in the country of Holland, Sweden. Swed Dent J. 2007;31: 113-120.PubMed
11. Haj-ali RN, Walker MP, Petrie CS. Utilization of Evidence-based informational resources for clinical decisions related to posterior composite restorations. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(11):1251-1256.PubMed
12. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NHF. Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137: 619-625.Article PubMed
13. Mccomb D. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(6):405-406.PubMed
14. Peutzfeldt A, Vigild M. A survey of the use of dentin-bonding systems in Denmark. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 211-216.Article PubMed
15. Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Espelid I, Tveit AB. French dentists' restorative treatment decisions. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(2):125-131.PubMed
16. Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations. Int Dent J. 2003;53(6):455-463.Article PubMed
17. Wilson NHF, Christensen GJ, Cheung SW, Burke FJT, Brunton PA. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching. Br Dent J. 2004;197(12):753-756.Article PubMed PDF
18. Idriss S, Abduljabbar T, Habib C, Omar R. Factors associated with microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007;32(1):60-66.Article PubMed PDF
19. Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8(2):113-120.PubMed
20. Haj-ali R, Walker MP, Williams K. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Gen Dent. 2005;8: 369-375.
21. Forss H, Widstrom E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(2):57-62.Article PubMed
22. Raskin A, Setcos JC, Vreven J. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4: 148-152.Article PubMed PDF
23. Fusayama T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. J Esthet Dent. 1992;4: 105-109.PubMed
24. Park JG, Lim BS, Lee IB. Cuspal deflection in class v cavities restored with composite resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008;33(2):83-89.Article
25. Koo BJ, Shin DH. The effect of c-factor and volume on microleakage of composite resin restorations with enamel margins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31(6):452-459.Article
26. Cho YG, Kim MH, Lee MG. Effect of resin sealants on the reduction of microleakage in composite restorations. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2006;31(4):282-289.Article
27. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16: 265-273.PubMed
28. Munck JD, Landuyt KV, Peumans M, Meerbeek BV. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue : Methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118-132.Article PubMed PDF
29. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, Munck JD, Meerbeek BV. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives : A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21: 864-881.Article PubMed
30. Munck JD, Meerbeek BV. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2005;30: 39-49.PubMed
31. Shirai K, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005;21: 110-124.PubMed
32. Yoshida Y, Meerbeek BV. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83: 454-458.Article PubMed PDF

Figure 1

Type of dental clinic in respondents

Figure 2

Gender distribution of respondents

Figure 3

Use of dentin adhesive system in Korea

Figure 4

Use of composite resin in Korea

Table 1

Number and rate(%) of respondence

Table 2

Sources of knowledge acquisition for composite resin restoration

Table 3

Material preference in Class II cavity restoration

Table 4

Methods of Class II direct resin restoration

Table 5

Difficulties in Class II direct resin restoration

Table 6

Type of dentin adhesive system

SBMP : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M Dental, St Paul, USA), All Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., IL, USA)

Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), Single Bond (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

SE Bond (Kuraray Co., Osaka, Japan), Z-100, Z250, Z-300 (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

Gradia (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Tetra Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)

Tables & Figures

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009;34(2):87-94. Published online March 31, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.087

XML Download

Figure

A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea

Figure 1 Type of dental clinic in respondents

Figure 2 Gender distribution of respondents

Figure 3 Use of dentin adhesive system in Korea

Figure 4 Use of composite resin in Korea

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea

Table 1

Number and rate(%) of respondence

Table 2

Sources of knowledge acquisition for composite resin restoration

Table 3

Material preference in Class II cavity restoration

Table 4

Methods of Class II direct resin restoration

Table 5

Difficulties in Class II direct resin restoration

Table 6

Type of dentin adhesive system

SBMP : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M Dental, St Paul, USA), All Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., IL, USA)

Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), Single Bond (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

SE Bond (Kuraray Co., Osaka, Japan), Z-100, Z250, Z-300 (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

Gradia (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Tetra Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)

Table 1 Number and rate(%) of respondence

Table 2 Sources of knowledge acquisition for composite resin restoration

Table 3 Material preference in Class II cavity restoration

Table 4 Methods of Class II direct resin restoration

Table 5 Difficulties in Class II direct resin restoration

Table 6 Type of dentin adhesive system

SBMP : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M Dental, St Paul, USA), All Bond 2 (Bisco Inc., IL, USA)

Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), Single Bond (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

SE Bond (Kuraray Co., Osaka, Japan), Z-100, Z250, Z-300 (3M Dental, St Paul, USA)

Gradia (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Tetra Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein)